From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"Eliad Peller" <eliad@wizery.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
"Ian Campbell" <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra" <eballetbo@gmail.com>,
"Sekhar Nori" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kevin Hilman" <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Benoît Cousson" <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak@codeaurora.org>,
"Javier Martinez Canillas" <javier@dowhile0.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Luciano Coelho" <luca@coelho.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:00:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87siczg44w.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150316151554.GO5264@atomide.com> (Tony Lindgren's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:15:55 -0700")
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
>> I prefer these going through the omap tree. Like Eliad said,
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti does not get that many changes nowadays so the
>> chances of this patchset conflicting with something is very small.
>
> OK great. In that case no need to rearrange the patches, I can
> apply them into an immutable branch once the pending issues have
> been fixed if Kalle acks them.
>
> To avoid merge conflicts that branch is easiest done against
> v4.0-rc4. Kalle and Arnd, does that work for you guys?
>
> I can also base it on 5b7610f23562 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix wl12xx on
> dm3730-evm with mainline u-boot") that's on top of -rc2 plus few
> other fixes now merged to -rc4 mainline if we need a branch based
> on an earlier tag.
Sorry, it seems I forgot to answer this one:
Either baseline is good for me, I can't think of any problems with
either one. But please do remember that I'm a new maintainer, I might
very well miss something ;)
--
Kalle Valo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
"Eliad Peller" <eliad-Ix1uc/W3ht7QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"Ian Campbell"
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
"Enric Balletbo i Serra"
<eballetbo-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Sekhar Nori" <nsekhar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Kevin Hilman"
<khilman-1D3HCaltpLuhEniVeURVKkEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"Benoît Cousson"
<bcousson-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>,
"Kumar Gala" <galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
"Javier Martinez Canillas"
<javier-0uQlZySMnqxg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"Luciano Coelho" <luca-XPOmlcxoEMv1KXRcyAk9cg@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:00:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87siczg44w.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150316151554.GO5264-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> (Tony Lindgren's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:15:55 -0700")
Tony Lindgren <tony-4v6yS6AI5VpBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> writes:
>> I prefer these going through the omap tree. Like Eliad said,
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti does not get that many changes nowadays so the
>> chances of this patchset conflicting with something is very small.
>
> OK great. In that case no need to rearrange the patches, I can
> apply them into an immutable branch once the pending issues have
> been fixed if Kalle acks them.
>
> To avoid merge conflicts that branch is easiest done against
> v4.0-rc4. Kalle and Arnd, does that work for you guys?
>
> I can also base it on 5b7610f23562 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix wl12xx on
> dm3730-evm with mainline u-boot") that's on top of -rc2 plus few
> other fixes now merged to -rc4 mainline if we need a branch based
> on an earlier tag.
Sorry, it seems I forgot to answer this one:
Either baseline is good for me, I can't think of any problems with
either one. But please do remember that I'm a new maintainer, I might
very well miss something ;)
--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: kvalo@codeaurora.org (Kalle Valo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:00:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87siczg44w.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150316151554.GO5264@atomide.com> (Tony Lindgren's message of "Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:15:55 -0700")
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> writes:
>> I prefer these going through the omap tree. Like Eliad said,
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti does not get that many changes nowadays so the
>> chances of this patchset conflicting with something is very small.
>
> OK great. In that case no need to rearrange the patches, I can
> apply them into an immutable branch once the pending issues have
> been fixed if Kalle acks them.
>
> To avoid merge conflicts that branch is easiest done against
> v4.0-rc4. Kalle and Arnd, does that work for you guys?
>
> I can also base it on 5b7610f23562 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix wl12xx on
> dm3730-evm with mainline u-boot") that's on top of -rc2 plus few
> other fixes now merged to -rc4 mainline if we need a branch based
> on an earlier tag.
Sorry, it seems I forgot to answer this one:
Either baseline is good for me, I can't think of any problems with
either one. But please do remember that I'm a new maintainer, I might
very well miss something ;)
--
Kalle Valo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-12 12:09 [PATCH v6 0/6] wlcore: add device-tree support Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] wlcore: set irq_trigger in board files instead of hiding behind a quirk Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-13 15:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-13 15:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-13 15:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-15 8:43 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 8:43 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-15 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-15 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-16 6:50 ` Kalle Valo
2015-03-16 6:50 ` Kalle Valo
2015-03-16 6:50 ` Kalle Valo
2015-03-16 15:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 15:15 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-20 14:00 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2015-03-20 14:00 ` Kalle Valo
2015-03-20 14:00 ` Kalle Valo
2015-03-20 14:54 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-20 14:54 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-12 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] dt: bindings: add TI's wilink wireless device Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] wlcore: add device-tree support Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] ARM: dts: add wl12xx/wl18xx bindings Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-13 8:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-03-13 8:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-03-13 8:01 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2015-03-13 8:17 ` Enric Balletbo Serra
2015-03-13 8:17 ` Enric Balletbo Serra
2015-03-13 8:17 ` Enric Balletbo Serra
2015-03-16 13:08 ` Pau Pajuel
2015-03-17 7:02 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-17 7:02 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-17 7:02 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-13 15:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-13 15:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-13 15:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-15 8:55 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 8:55 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 8:55 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] wlcore: remove wl12xx_platform_data Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-12 12:09 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-13 15:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-13 15:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-13 15:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-15 8:50 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 8:50 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 8:50 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-15 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-15 12:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-16 15:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 15:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 15:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 18:25 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-03-16 18:25 ` Sebastian Reichel
2015-03-16 18:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 18:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 18:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-17 6:58 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-17 6:58 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-16 20:58 ` Pali Rohár
2015-03-16 20:58 ` Pali Rohár
2015-03-16 20:58 ` Pali Rohár
2015-03-16 21:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 21:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 21:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 21:15 ` Pali Rohár
2015-03-16 21:15 ` Pali Rohár
2015-03-16 21:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 21:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-16 21:25 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-03-13 16:11 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] wlcore: add device-tree support Sébastien Szymanski
2015-03-13 16:11 ` Sébastien Szymanski
2015-03-13 16:11 ` Sébastien Szymanski
2015-03-15 8:58 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 8:58 ` Eliad Peller
2015-03-15 8:58 ` Eliad Peller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87siczg44w.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eballetbo@gmail.com \
--cc=eliad@wizery.com \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca@coelho.fi \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.