All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yuichi Ito <ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] arm64/irqentry: remove duplicate housekeeping of rcu
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:31:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v92crbtf.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001144406.7719-1-kernelfans@gmail.com>

On Fri, 01 Oct 2021 15:44:03 +0100,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> When an IRQ is taken, some accounting needs to be performed to enter and
> exit IRQ context around the IRQ handler. Historically arch code would
> leave this to the irqchip or core IRQ code, but these days we want this
> to happen in exception entry code, and architectures such as arm64 do
> this.
> 
> Currently handle_domain_irq() performs this entry/exit accounting, and
> if used on an architecture where the entry code also does this, the
> entry/exit accounting will be performed twice per IRQ. This is
> problematic as core RCU code such as rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()
> depends on this happening once per IRQ, and will not detect quescent
> periods correctly, leading to stall warnings.
> 
> As irqchip drivers which use handle_domain_irq() need to work on
> architectures with or without their own entry/exit accounting, this
> patch makes handle_domain_irq() conditionally perform the entry
> accounting depending on a new HAVE_ARCH_IRQENTRY Kconfig symbol that
> architectures can select if they perform this entry accounting
> themselves.
> 
> V3 -> V4:
>   address Signed-off-by in [2/3]
>   improve commit log in [3/3]
> 
> V2 -> V3:
>   Drop other patches and concentrate on the purpose of [3-4/5] of V2.
>   And lift the level, where to add {irq_enter,exit}_rcu(), from the
>   interrupt controler to exception entry  
> 
> History:
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1607912752-12481-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210924132837.45994-1-kernelfans@gmail.com
> V3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210930131708.35328-1-kernelfans@gmail.com
> 
> 
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Yuichi Ito <ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> 
> Mark Rutland (1):
>   arm64: entry: refactor EL1 interrupt entry logic
> 
> Pingfan Liu (2):
>   kernel/irq: make irq_{enter,exit}() in handle_domain_irq() arch
>     optional
>   arm64: entry: avoid double-accounting IRQ RCU entry
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  kernel/irq/Kconfig               |  3 ++
>  kernel/irq/irqdesc.c             |  4 +++
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Given that most of the changes are in the arm64 tree, it'd be good if
the whole series went via the arm64 tree, most probably as a fix.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Yuichi Ito <ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/3] arm64/irqentry: remove duplicate housekeeping of rcu
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 17:31:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v92crbtf.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211001144406.7719-1-kernelfans@gmail.com>

On Fri, 01 Oct 2021 15:44:03 +0100,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> When an IRQ is taken, some accounting needs to be performed to enter and
> exit IRQ context around the IRQ handler. Historically arch code would
> leave this to the irqchip or core IRQ code, but these days we want this
> to happen in exception entry code, and architectures such as arm64 do
> this.
> 
> Currently handle_domain_irq() performs this entry/exit accounting, and
> if used on an architecture where the entry code also does this, the
> entry/exit accounting will be performed twice per IRQ. This is
> problematic as core RCU code such as rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()
> depends on this happening once per IRQ, and will not detect quescent
> periods correctly, leading to stall warnings.
> 
> As irqchip drivers which use handle_domain_irq() need to work on
> architectures with or without their own entry/exit accounting, this
> patch makes handle_domain_irq() conditionally perform the entry
> accounting depending on a new HAVE_ARCH_IRQENTRY Kconfig symbol that
> architectures can select if they perform this entry accounting
> themselves.
> 
> V3 -> V4:
>   address Signed-off-by in [2/3]
>   improve commit log in [3/3]
> 
> V2 -> V3:
>   Drop other patches and concentrate on the purpose of [3-4/5] of V2.
>   And lift the level, where to add {irq_enter,exit}_rcu(), from the
>   interrupt controler to exception entry  
> 
> History:
> V1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1607912752-12481-1-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com
> V2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210924132837.45994-1-kernelfans@gmail.com
> V3: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20210930131708.35328-1-kernelfans@gmail.com
> 
> 
> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>
> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
> Cc: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Yuichi Ito <ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com>
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> 
> Mark Rutland (1):
>   arm64: entry: refactor EL1 interrupt entry logic
> 
> Pingfan Liu (2):
>   kernel/irq: make irq_{enter,exit}() in handle_domain_irq() arch
>     optional
>   arm64: entry: avoid double-accounting IRQ RCU entry
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++---------------
>  kernel/irq/Kconfig               |  3 ++
>  kernel/irq/irqdesc.c             |  4 +++
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

Given that most of the changes are in the arm64 tree, it'd be good if
the whole series went via the arm64 tree, most probably as a fix.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-10-04 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-01 14:44 [PATCHv4 0/3] arm64/irqentry: remove duplicate housekeeping of rcu Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44 ` Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44 ` [PATCHv4 1/3] kernel/irq: make irq_{enter,exit}() in handle_domain_irq() arch optional Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44   ` [PATCHv4 1/3] kernel/irq: make irq_{enter, exit}() " Pingfan Liu
2021-10-04 16:30   ` [PATCHv4 1/3] kernel/irq: make irq_{enter,exit}() " Marc Zyngier
2021-10-04 16:30     ` [PATCHv4 1/3] kernel/irq: make irq_{enter, exit}() " Marc Zyngier
2021-10-01 14:44 ` [PATCHv4 2/3] arm64: entry: refactor EL1 interrupt entry logic Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44   ` Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44 ` [PATCHv4 3/3] arm64: entry: avoid double-accounting IRQ RCU entry Pingfan Liu
2021-10-01 14:44   ` Pingfan Liu
2021-10-04 16:31 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-10-04 16:31   ` [PATCHv4 0/3] arm64/irqentry: remove duplicate housekeeping of rcu Marc Zyngier
2021-10-05 17:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2021-10-05 17:17   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87v92crbtf.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=ito-yuichi@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.