hammer 0.94.10

hammer 0.94.10

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Abhishek:

A number of bugfixes have been backported to hammer - see the emails 
with the same subject line sent to the leads today.

Do you think it's time to publish a hammer point release?

Cheers,
Nathan

Re: hammer 0.94.10

[Abhishek L]

Nathan Cutler writes:

> Hi Abhishek:
>
> A number of bugfixes have been backported to hammer - see the emails
> with the same subject line sent to the leads today.
>
> Do you think it's time to publish a hammer point release?

Yes, let's do it.

Re: hammer 0.94.10

[Josh Durgin]

On 01/20/2017 03:10 PM, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Josh:
>
> A number of bugfixes have been merged into hammer after passing a rados
> suite - see [1] for a list.
>
> Do you think it's OK for QE to start their own round of testing?

Looks ready to me!

Josh

Re: hammer 0.94.10

[John Spray]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:02 PM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz> wrote:
> Hi John:
>
> Three cephfs-related bugfixes were backported to hammer. For the first two,
> see [1]. These have passed an fs suite and have been merged. A third fix -
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18602 - is still pending but should be merged
> very soon.
>
> Do you think it's OK for QE to start their own round of testing?

Yep!

John

>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> [1]
> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/cephfs/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=status_id&op%5Bstatus_id%5D=*&f%5B%5D=fixed_version_id&op%5Bfixed_version_id%5D=%3D&v%5Bfixed_version_id%5D%5B%5D=525&f%5B%5D=&c%5B%5D=project&c%5B%5D=tracker&c%5B%5D=status&c%5B%5D=priority&c%5B%5D=subject&c%5B%5D=assigned_to&c%5B%5D=updated_on&c%5B%5D=category&c%5B%5D=fixed_version&c%5B%5D=cf_3&group_by=&t%5B%5D=

Re: hammer 0.94.10

[Jason Dillaman]

On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 5:51 PM, Nathan Cutler <ncutler@suse.cz> wrote:
> Should we wait for that last issue or is hammer ready for QE to start their
> own round of testing?

RBD is good-to-go for QE -- no need to wait for that issue to get backported.

-- 
Jason

hammer 0.94.10

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Josh:

A number of bugfixes have been merged into hammer after passing a rados 
suite - see [1] for a list.

Do you think it's OK for QE to start their own round of testing?

Cheers,
Nathan

[1] 
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=status_id&op%5Bstatus_id%5D=*&f%5B%5D=fixed_version_id&op%5Bfixed_version_id%5D=%3D&v%5Bfixed_version_id%5D%5B%5D=525&f%5B%5D=subproject_id&op%5Bsubproject_id%5D=%21*&f%5B%5D=&c%5B%5D=project&c%5B%5D=tracker&c%5B%5D=status&c%5B%5D=priority&c%5B%5D=subject&c%5B%5D=assigned_to&c%5B%5D=updated_on&c%5B%5D=category&c%5B%5D=fixed_version&c%5B%5D=cf_3&group_by=&t%5B%5D=

hammer 0.94.10

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi John:

Three cephfs-related bugfixes were backported to hammer. For the first 
two, see [1]. These have passed an fs suite and have been merged. A 
third fix - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18602 - is still pending but 
should be merged very soon.

Do you think it's OK for QE to start their own round of testing?

Cheers,
Nathan

[1] 
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/cephfs/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=status_id&op%5Bstatus_id%5D=*&f%5B%5D=fixed_version_id&op%5Bfixed_version_id%5D=%3D&v%5Bfixed_version_id%5D%5B%5D=525&f%5B%5D=&c%5B%5D=project&c%5B%5D=tracker&c%5B%5D=status&c%5B%5D=priority&c%5B%5D=subject&c%5B%5D=assigned_to&c%5B%5D=updated_on&c%5B%5D=category&c%5B%5D=fixed_version&c%5B%5D=cf_3&group_by=&t%5B%5D=

hammer 0.94.10

[Nathan Cutler]

Hi Jason:

Several bugfixes have been backported to hammer and passed an rbd suite 
- see [1] for a detailed list.

There is one pending issue - http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/18436 - that 
you earmarked for backport to hammer a couple days ago.

Should we wait for that last issue or is hammer ready for QE to start 
their own round of testing?

Cheers,
Nathan

[1] 
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/rbd/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f%5B%5D=status_id&op%5Bstatus_id%5D=*&f%5B%5D=fixed_version_id&op%5Bfixed_version_id%5D=%3D&v%5Bfixed_version_id%5D%5B%5D=525&f%5B%5D=&c%5B%5D=project&c%5B%5D=tracker&c%5B%5D=status&c%5B%5D=priority&c%5B%5D=subject&c%5B%5D=assigned_to&c%5B%5D=updated_on&c%5B%5D=category&c%5B%5D=fixed_version&c%5B%5D=cf_3&group_by=&t%5B%5D=