* 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-05-04 76 26 22
2010-04-20 64 35 34
2010-04-07 48 35 33
2010-03-21 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15858
Subject : [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-25 21:14 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <v2k6278d2221004251414kbbcc41baw78b86120d81dce7d@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127223008621881&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790
Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions
Submitter : Florian Mickler <fmickler@gmx.de>
Date : 2010-04-15 18:21 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788
Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (41 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (34 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (39 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (34 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (41 days old)
Message-ID : <<201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (50 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (44 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601
Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de
Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (51 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15893
Subject : Alps: No edge-scrolling since 2.6.34-rc5
Submitter : Felix Zweig <f.zweig@yahoo.de>
Date : 2010-05-01 16:23 (4 days old)
Handled-By : Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26218
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768
Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage
Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (23 days old)
Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49989/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (56 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-05-04 76 26 22
2010-04-20 64 35 34
2010-04-07 48 35 33
2010-03-21 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15858
Subject : [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-25 21:14 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <v2k6278d2221004251414kbbcc41baw78b86120d81dce7d@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127223008621881&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790
Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions
Submitter : Florian Mickler <fmickler@gmx.de>
Date : 2010-04-15 18:21 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788
Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (41 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (34 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (39 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (34 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (41 days old)
Message-ID : <<201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (50 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (44 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601
Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de
Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (51 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15893
Subject : Alps: No edge-scrolling since 2.6.34-rc5
Submitter : Felix Zweig <f.zweig@yahoo.de>
Date : 2010-05-01 16:23 (4 days old)
Handled-By : Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26218
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768
Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage
Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (23 days old)
Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49989/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (56 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.33,
for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.33, please let us
know either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know
if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply
to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling
the issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2010-05-04 76 26 22
2010-04-20 64 35 34
2010-04-07 48 35 33
2010-03-21 15 13 10
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15858
Subject : [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-25 21:14 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <v2k6278d2221004251414kbbcc41baw78b86120d81dce7d@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127223008621881&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790
Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions
Submitter : Florian Mickler <fmickler@gmx.de>
Date : 2010-04-15 18:21 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788
Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (20 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (41 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (34 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (39 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (34 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (41 days old)
Message-ID : <<201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (50 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (44 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601
Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de
Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (51 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15893
Subject : Alps: No edge-scrolling since 2.6.34-rc5
Submitter : Felix Zweig <f.zweig@yahoo.de>
Date : 2010-05-01 16:23 (4 days old)
Handled-By : Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26218
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768
Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage
Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (23 days old)
Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49989/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (56 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions from 2.6.33,
unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15310
Please let the tracking team know if there are any Bugzilla entries that
should be added to the list in there.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Casteyde,
Jesse Barnes, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (56 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
@ 2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Casteyde,
Jesse Barnes, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505
Subject : No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-10 06:59 (56 days old)
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505#c11
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Christian Kujau
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15601] [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, michael-dev@fami-braun.de
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15601
Subject : [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto
Submitter : michael-dev@fami-braun.de
Date : 2010-03-15 13:39 (51 days old)
Message-ID : <4B9E38AF.70309@fami-braun.de>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126866044724539&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15659] [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Maciej Rutecki
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15659
Subject : [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 20:04 (41 days old)
Message-ID : <<201003252104.24965.maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126954749618319&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15611] Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rupjyoti Sarmah
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah@amcc.com>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (50 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D@SDCEXCHANGE01.ad.amcc.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15610] fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ozgur Yuksel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (44 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15611] Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Rupjyoti Sarmah
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15611
Subject : Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel
Submitter : Rupjyoti Sarmah <rsarmah-6mNVq6Owofk@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-16 15:45 (50 days old)
Message-ID : <AC311A8E81420D4EBC1F26E6479848FE065B7D3D-oUPhqDSr77q+n3Z1v9ZxkQKt9jNwmMCsAL8bYrjMMd8@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126875435718396&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15610] fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Ozgur Yuksel
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15610
Subject : fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic
Submitter : Ozgur Yuksel <ozgur.yuksel-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-22 15:59 (44 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15671] intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Norbert Preining
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15671
Subject : intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung)
Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Date : 2010-03-27 16:11 (39 days old)
Message-ID : <20100327161104.GA12043@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126970883105262&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15669
Subject : INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check()
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-08 1:26 (58 days old)
Message-ID : <c4e36d111003250348q678eb2e6w4f3e8133e7fd6e58@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126801163107713&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15673] 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Thomas Meyer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15673
Subject : 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"?
Submitter : Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Date : 2010-03-28 11:31 (38 days old)
Message-ID : <1269775909.5301.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126977593326800&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci@ceibo.fiec.espol.edu.ec>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (34 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Villacis Lasso
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15664
Subject : Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled
Submitter : Alex Villacis Lasso <avillaci-x0m+Mc+nT7uljOmnV8AmnkElSqmLX1BE@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-01 01:09 (34 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-06 13:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Sergey Senozhatsky
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (41 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-24 18:59 ` Pavel Machek
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (34 days old)
Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (41 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel-c8rhgrCDLIED0+JXs3kMbRL4W9x8LtSr@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15768] Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Monakhov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768
Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage
Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (23 days old)
Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49989/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Hartley Sweeten, Randy Dunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-24 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Marcel Holtmann, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
Subject : bluetooth oops
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (52 days old)
Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Hartley Sweeten, Randy Dunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15768] Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dmitry Monakhov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15768
Subject : Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage
Submitter : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-12 11:24 (23 days old)
Handled-By : Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/49989/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15790] Meta-Bug: Regressions
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790
Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions
Submitter : Florian Mickler <fmickler@gmx.de>
Date : 2010-04-15 18:21 (20 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15788] external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, François Valenduc
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788
Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (20 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15790] Meta-Bug: Regressions
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Florian Mickler
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15790
Subject : Meta-Bug: Regressions
Submitter : Florian Mickler <fmickler-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-15 18:21 (20 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15788] external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, François Valenduc
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15788
Subject : external usb sound card doesn't work after resume
Submitter : François Valenduc <francois.valenduc@tvcablenet.be>
Date : 2010-04-15 10:16 (20 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15858] [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem...
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Daniel J Blueman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15858
Subject : [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem...
Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-25 21:14 (10 days old)
Message-ID : <v2k6278d2221004251414kbbcc41baw78b86120d81dce7d@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127223008621881&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15805] reiserfs locking
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alexander Beregalov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15805
Subject : reiserfs locking
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-15 21:02 (20 days old)
Message-ID : <t2ka4423d671004151402n7b2dc425mdc9c6bb9640d63fb@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127136535323933&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15862] 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427@schottelius.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261@ikn.schottelius.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf@mail.gmail.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15880] Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Elsayed
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Miles Lane
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15863
Subject : 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage.
Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 0:51 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <h2ya44ae5cd1004261751waa5cb65ei3d139cbcfa2cc5cf-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127232949104878&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15862] 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15862
Subject : 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-linux-20100427-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-04-27 7:49 (8 days old)
Message-ID : <20100427074934.GB3261-9ll+q7fL1vOwdVNcq5OhcUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127235784004839&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15893] Alps: No edge-scrolling since 2.6.34-rc5
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Dan Carpenter, Felix Zweig
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15893
Subject : Alps: No edge-scrolling since 2.6.34-rc5
Submitter : Felix Zweig <f.zweig@yahoo.de>
Date : 2010-05-01 16:23 (4 days old)
Handled-By : Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Patch : https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=26218
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 22:10 ` Randy Dunlap
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-05-04 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
> Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
> Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
Let's drop this one as not reproducible.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
@ 2010-05-04 22:10 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-05-04 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
> Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
> Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
Let's drop this one as not reproducible.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* RE: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 22:15 ` H Hartley Sweeten
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2010-05-04 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, David Woodhouse
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 1042 bytes --]
On Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
This patch is not yet in Linus' tree, it is in linux-next. David?
Regards,
Hartleyÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* RE: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
@ 2010-05-04 22:15 ` H Hartley Sweeten
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: H Hartley Sweeten @ 2010-05-04 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, David Woodhouse
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap
On Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
This patch is not yet in Linus' tree, it is in linux-next. David?
Regards,
Hartley
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-04 22:18 ` Randy Dunlap
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-05-04 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Hartley Sweeten
On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
Yes, leave it as open until the patch is merged, please.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
@ 2010-05-04 22:18 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2010-05-04 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Hartley Sweeten
On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
Yes, leave it as open until the patch is merged, please.
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
@ 2010-05-04 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
> > Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
> > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503@oracle.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
>
>
> Let's drop this one as not reproducible.
Done.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
@ 2010-05-04 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15625
> > Subject : BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null)
> > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-18 22:22 (48 days old)
> > Message-ID : <4BA2A7A9.4080503-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126895098217351&w=2
>
>
> Let's drop this one as not reproducible.
Done.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* RE: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
@ 2010-05-04 22:22 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2010-05-04 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H Hartley Sweeten
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:15 -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> > Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> > Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
>
> This patch is not yet in Linus' tree, it is in linux-next. David?
Is it a regression? People have been configuring their kernel stupidly
and then acting surprised when it didn't work for _ages_... what's new?
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* RE: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
@ 2010-05-04 22:22 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2010-05-04 22:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: H Hartley Sweeten
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap
On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 17:15 -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 04, 2010 2:21 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> > Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> > Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
>
> This patch is not yet in Linus' tree, it is in linux-next. David?
Is it a regression? People have been configuring their kernel stupidly
and then acting surprised when it didn't work for _ages_... what's new?
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
@ 2010-05-04 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Hartley Sweeten
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> > Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> > Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
>
> Yes, leave it as open until the patch is merged, please.
Sure (that's the default policy).
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
@ 2010-05-04 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-04 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Randy Dunlap
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Hartley Sweeten
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 05/04/10 14:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15729
> > Subject : BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod
> > Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-04-02 20:40 (33 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100402134058.c4682716.randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127024096210230&w=2
> > Handled-By : Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten-3FF4nKcrg1dE2c76skzGb0EOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/90497/
>
> Yes, leave it as open until the patch is merged, please.
Sure (that's the default policy).
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-05 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-05-05 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
> Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
> Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
> Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
This looks like it wasn't a regression, but some other compile/install
issue. See
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127274294422719&w=2
where he reports that his self-compiled 2.6.33 doesn't boot either.
There's some confusion about .config, but it might well be an install
problem too (in fact, that sounds more likely - the original bug-report
seems to reboot before the kernel has really even booted - it apparently
hasn't done the graphics mode switch by the early bootloader)
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
@ 2010-05-05 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-05-05 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Maciej Rutecki, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development, Linux ACPI,
Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List, Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
> Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
> Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
> Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663-eS7Uydv5nfjZ+VzJOa5vwg@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
This looks like it wasn't a regression, but some other compile/install
issue. See
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127274294422719&w=2
where he reports that his self-compiled 2.6.33 doesn't boot either.
There's some confusion about .config, but it might well be an install
problem too (in fact, that sounds more likely - the original bug-report
seems to reboot before the kernel has really even booted - it apparently
hasn't done the graphics mode switch by the early bootloader)
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2010-05-05 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-05-05 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: DRI, Linux SCSI List, Network Development, Linux Wireless List,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux ACPI, Andrew Morton,
Kernel Testers List, Linux PM List, Maciej Rutecki
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15880
> Subject : Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def
> Submitter : Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-04-29 2:28 (6 days old)
> Message-ID : <loom.20100429T041908-663@post.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127250825306178&w=2
This looks like it wasn't a regression, but some other compile/install
issue. See
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127274294422719&w=2
where he reports that his self-compiled 2.6.33 doesn't boot either.
There's some confusion about .config, but it might well be an install
problem too (in fact, that sounds more likely - the original bug-report
seems to reboot before the kernel has really even booted - it apparently
hasn't done the graphics mode switch by the early bootloader)
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media
Hi
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
[ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
[ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
[ 8.818833] Call Trace:
[ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
[ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann @ 2010-05-05 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Hi
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
[ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
[ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
[ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
[ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
[ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
[ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
[ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
[ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
[ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
[ 8.818833] Call Trace:
[ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
[ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
[ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
[ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
[ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
[ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
[ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
[ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
[ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
[ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
[ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
[ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
[ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
[ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
[ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
[ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
[ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
[ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
[ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
[ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
[ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
[ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
[ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
[ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Regards
Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493@bogon.housecafe.de>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
>
> [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
> [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
> [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
> [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
> [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
> [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
> [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
> [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
> [ 8.818833] Call Trace:
> [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
> [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
> [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
> [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
> [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
> [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
> [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
> [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
> [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
> [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
> [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
> [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
> [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
> [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
> [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
> [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
> [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
> [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
> [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
> [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
> [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
> [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
> [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
@ 2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 0:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Christian Kujau, linux-media-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15589
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316
> > Submitter : Christian Kujau <lists-AanptEQQ3TL9uQeqpI+JUg@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-13 23:53 (53 days old)
> > Message-ID : <alpine.DEB.2.01.1003131544340.5493-uKsf7x9sgtqQ/Pez2Lbyp4QuADTiUCJX@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126852442903680&w=2
>
> Still valid for b2c2_flexcop_pci in 2.6.34-rc6-git2:
>
> [ 8.736930] Linux video capture interface: v2.00
> [ 8.809720] b2c2-flexcop: B2C2 FlexcopII/II(b)/III digital TV receiver chip loaded successfully
> [ 8.818680] flexcop-pci: will use the HW PID filter.
> [ 8.818685] flexcop-pci: card revision 2
> [ 8.818694] b2c2_flexcop_pci 0000:06:01.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
> [ 8.818794] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 8.818799] WARNING: at /tmp/buildd/linux-sidux-2.6-2.6.34~rc6-git2/debian/build/source_amd64_none/fs/proc/generic.c:317 __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0()
> [ 8.818801] Hardware name: EP45-DS3
> [ 8.818802] name 'Technisat/B2C2 FlexCop II/IIb/III Digital TV PCI Driver'
> [ 8.818804] Modules linked in: b2c2_flexcop_pci(+) cx88xx b2c2_flexcop rfkill v4l2_common ir_common videodev drm snd_pcm snd_seq rtc_cmos snd_timer rtc_core snd_seq_device rtc_lib v4l1_compat tveeprom v4l2_compat_ioctl32 ir_core dvb_core snd videobuf_dma_sg cx24123 cx24113 videobuf_core s5h1420 tpm_tis led_class btcx_risc tpm i2c_i801 i2c_algo_bit tpm_bios i2c_core evdev intel_agp soundcore snd_page_alloc button processor ext4 mbcache jbd2 crc16 dm_mod sg sr_mod cdrom sd_mod usbhid hid uhci_hcd ahci firewire_ohci libata firewire_core crc_itu_t ehci_hcd r8169 mii scsi_mod thermal usbcore nls_base [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan]
> [ 8.818832] Pid: 1064, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-sidux-amd64 #1
> [ 8.818833] Call Trace:
> [ 8.818837] [<ffffffff8104ba83>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x73/0xb0
> [ 8.818839] [<ffffffff8104bb20>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x40/0x50
> [ 8.818842] [<ffffffff8114f545>] ? __xlate_proc_name+0xb5/0xd0
> [ 8.818844] [<ffffffff8114fb2e>] ? __proc_create+0x7e/0x150
> [ 8.818846] [<ffffffff811504e7>] ? proc_mkdir_mode+0x27/0x60
> [ 8.818849] [<ffffffff8109fb55>] ? register_handler_proc+0x115/0x130
> [ 8.818852] [<ffffffff8109d4c1>] ? __setup_irq+0x1d1/0x330
> [ 8.818855] [<ffffffffa03bc160>] ? flexcop_pci_isr+0x0/0x190 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818858] [<ffffffff8109d735>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x115/0x1b0
> [ 8.818860] [<ffffffffa03bc495>] ? flexcop_pci_probe+0x1a5/0x330 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818864] [<ffffffff811ceef2>] ? local_pci_probe+0x12/0x20
> [ 8.818867] [<ffffffff811d02ca>] ? pci_device_probe+0x10a/0x130
> [ 8.818870] [<ffffffff8125cdda>] ? driver_sysfs_add+0x5a/0x80
> [ 8.818872] [<ffffffff8125cf03>] ? driver_probe_device+0x93/0x190
> [ 8.818874] [<ffffffff8125d093>] ? __driver_attach+0x93/0xa0
> [ 8.818876] [<ffffffff8125d000>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0xa0
> [ 8.818878] [<ffffffff8125c638>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x58/0x80
> [ 8.818880] [<ffffffff8125be70>] ? bus_add_driver+0xb0/0x250
> [ 8.818882] [<ffffffff8125d38a>] ? driver_register+0x6a/0x130
> [ 8.818884] [<ffffffff811d056c>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x4c/0xc0
> [ 8.818887] [<ffffffffa03bf000>] ? flexcop_pci_module_init+0x0/0x20 [b2c2_flexcop_pci]
> [ 8.818890] [<ffffffff81002044>] ? do_one_initcall+0x34/0x1a0
> [ 8.818893] [<ffffffff8107d15f>] ? sys_init_module+0xdf/0x260
> [ 8.818896] [<ffffffff81009f42>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
> [ 8.818897] ---[ end trace 46b5c98323696f39 ]---
> [ 8.822389] DVB: registering new adapter (FlexCop Digital TV device)
> [ 8.823874] b2c2-flexcop: MAC address = 00:d0:d7:0c:83:d6
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
(?)
@ 2010-05-05 8:13 ` Daniel Mack
2010-05-05 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2010-05-05 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Pavel Machek, Jarkko Nikula, Takashi Iwai
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:21:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
> Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
According to alsa-devel, this is fixed by 0f17014b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
@ 2010-05-05 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Mack
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Pavel Machek, Jarkko Nikula, Takashi Iwai
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:21:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
> > Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457@elf.ucw.cz>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
>
> According to alsa-devel, this is fixed by 0f17014b.
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
@ 2010-05-05 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-05 20:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Mack
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Pavel Machek, Jarkko Nikula, Takashi Iwai
On Wednesday 05 May 2010, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:21:14PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15590
> > Subject : 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound
> > Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-14 7:58 (52 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20100314075831.GA13457-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126855353122623&w=2
>
> According to alsa-devel, this is fixed by 0f17014b.
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-06 13:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-05-06 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Sergey Senozhatsky
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3474 bytes --]
Hello,
On (05/04/10 23:21), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
> Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
>
>
.34-rc6-git5
kernel: [ 1176.647885] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
kernel: [ 1210.999903] ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel: [ 1210.999914] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
kernel: [ 1210.999918] Hardware name: F3JC
kernel: [ 1210.999921] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
kernel: [ 1210.999924] Modules linked in: pktgen ppp_async crc_ccitt ipv6 ppp_generic slhc asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hwdep sdhci_pci sdhci snd_hda_codec_si3054 mmc_core led_class snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm rng_core snd_timer snd_page_alloc psmouse snd evdev soundcore sg r8169 serio_raw mii i2c_i801 usbhid hid uhci_hcd sr_mod ehci_hcd cdrom usbcore sd_mod ata_piix
kernel: [ 1210.999983] Pid: 3819, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-dbg-git5 #109
kernel: [ 1210.999987] Call Trace:
kernel: [ 1210.999994] [<c102e1c6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
kernel: [ 1210.999999] [<c12690a5>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
kernel: [ 1211.000005] [<c102e211>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
kernel: [ 1211.000010] [<c12690a5>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
kernel: [ 1211.000017] [<c1040039>] ? __kfifo_from_user_generic+0x18/0x5c
kernel: [ 1211.000024] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
kernel: [ 1211.000029] [<c1036b50>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x203
kernel: [ 1211.000034] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
kernel: [ 1211.000039] [<c1268fe4>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
kernel: [ 1211.000046] [<c1032a86>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
kernel: [ 1211.000051] [<c1032b39>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
kernel: [ 1211.000059] [<f80a3488>] ? pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000064] [<c1032d1c>] _local_bh_enable_ip+0x8b/0xb3
kernel: [ 1211.000070] [<c1032d4c>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x8/0xa
kernel: [ 1211.000076] [<c12c4858>] _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x2f/0x32
kernel: [ 1211.000082] [<f80a3488>] pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000088] [<c1044654>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x121/0x131
kernel: [ 1211.000098] [<fd1e75e9>] ? rtl8169_start_xmit+0x0/0x2f9 [r8169]
kernel: [ 1211.000104] [<c1044691>] ? cpu_clock+0x2d/0x4e
kernel: [ 1211.000111] [<c104d20f>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x21
kernel: [ 1211.000116] [<c104d2d8>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xb5/0xba
kernel: [ 1211.000122] [<f80a3793>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0xd9/0x5e8 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000129] [<f80a382a>] pktgen_thread_worker+0x170/0x5e8 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000135] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 1211.000141] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 1211.000147] [<f80a36ba>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x5e8 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000152] [<c103f782>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
kernel: [ 1211.000158] [<c103f718>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
kernel: [ 1211.000163] [<c1002dc2>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
kernel: [ 1211.000167] ---[ end trace adf7c4da01cca262 ]---
kernel: [ 1211.013760] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-05-06 13:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2010-05-06 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Sergey Senozhatsky
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3529 bytes --]
Hello,
On (05/04/10 23:21), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
> Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
>
>
.34-rc6-git5
kernel: [ 1176.647885] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
kernel: [ 1210.999903] ------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel: [ 1210.999914] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
kernel: [ 1210.999918] Hardware name: F3JC
kernel: [ 1210.999921] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
kernel: [ 1210.999924] Modules linked in: pktgen ppp_async crc_ccitt ipv6 ppp_generic slhc asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hwdep sdhci_pci sdhci snd_hda_codec_si3054 mmc_core led_class snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec
snd_pcm rng_core snd_timer snd_page_alloc psmouse snd evdev soundcore sg r8169 serio_raw mii i2c_i801 usbhid hid uhci_hcd sr_mod ehci_hcd cdrom usbcore sd_mod ata_piix
kernel: [ 1210.999983] Pid: 3819, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-dbg-git5 #109
kernel: [ 1210.999987] Call Trace:
kernel: [ 1210.999994] [<c102e1c6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
kernel: [ 1210.999999] [<c12690a5>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
kernel: [ 1211.000005] [<c102e211>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
kernel: [ 1211.000010] [<c12690a5>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
kernel: [ 1211.000017] [<c1040039>] ? __kfifo_from_user_generic+0x18/0x5c
kernel: [ 1211.000024] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
kernel: [ 1211.000029] [<c1036b50>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x203
kernel: [ 1211.000034] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
kernel: [ 1211.000039] [<c1268fe4>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
kernel: [ 1211.000046] [<c1032a86>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
kernel: [ 1211.000051] [<c1032b39>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
kernel: [ 1211.000059] [<f80a3488>] ? pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000064] [<c1032d1c>] _local_bh_enable_ip+0x8b/0xb3
kernel: [ 1211.000070] [<c1032d4c>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x8/0xa
kernel: [ 1211.000076] [<c12c4858>] _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x2f/0x32
kernel: [ 1211.000082] [<f80a3488>] pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000088] [<c1044654>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x121/0x131
kernel: [ 1211.000098] [<fd1e75e9>] ? rtl8169_start_xmit+0x0/0x2f9 [r8169]
kernel: [ 1211.000104] [<c1044691>] ? cpu_clock+0x2d/0x4e
kernel: [ 1211.000111] [<c104d20f>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x21
kernel: [ 1211.000116] [<c104d2d8>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xb5/0xba
kernel: [ 1211.000122] [<f80a3793>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0xd9/0x5e8 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000129] [<f80a382a>] pktgen_thread_worker+0x170/0x5e8 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000135] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 1211.000141] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
kernel: [ 1211.000147] [<f80a36ba>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x5e8 [pktgen]
kernel: [ 1211.000152] [<c103f782>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
kernel: [ 1211.000158] [<c103f718>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
kernel: [ 1211.000163] [<c1002dc2>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
kernel: [ 1211.000167] ---[ end trace adf7c4da01cca262 ]---
kernel: [ 1211.013760] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
Sergey
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 316 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
2010-05-06 13:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
@ 2010-05-06 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-06 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Thursday 06 May 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (05/04/10 23:21), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
> > Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294@swordfish.minsk.epam.com>>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
> >
> >
>
> .34-rc6-git5
>
> kernel: [ 1176.647885] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
> kernel: [ 1210.999903] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel: [ 1210.999914] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
> kernel: [ 1210.999918] Hardware name: F3JC
> kernel: [ 1210.999921] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
> kernel: [ 1210.999924] Modules linked in: pktgen ppp_async crc_ccitt ipv6 ppp_generic slhc asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hwdep sdhci_pci sdhci snd_hda_codec_si3054 mmc_core led_class snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec
> snd_pcm rng_core snd_timer snd_page_alloc psmouse snd evdev soundcore sg r8169 serio_raw mii i2c_i801 usbhid hid uhci_hcd sr_mod ehci_hcd cdrom usbcore sd_mod ata_piix
> kernel: [ 1210.999983] Pid: 3819, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-dbg-git5 #109
> kernel: [ 1210.999987] Call Trace:
> kernel: [ 1210.999994] [<c102e1c6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
> kernel: [ 1210.999999] [<c12690a5>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> kernel: [ 1211.000005] [<c102e211>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> kernel: [ 1211.000010] [<c12690a5>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> kernel: [ 1211.000017] [<c1040039>] ? __kfifo_from_user_generic+0x18/0x5c
> kernel: [ 1211.000024] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
> kernel: [ 1211.000029] [<c1036b50>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x203
> kernel: [ 1211.000034] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
> kernel: [ 1211.000039] [<c1268fe4>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
> kernel: [ 1211.000046] [<c1032a86>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
> kernel: [ 1211.000051] [<c1032b39>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
> kernel: [ 1211.000059] [<f80a3488>] ? pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000064] [<c1032d1c>] _local_bh_enable_ip+0x8b/0xb3
> kernel: [ 1211.000070] [<c1032d4c>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x8/0xa
> kernel: [ 1211.000076] [<c12c4858>] _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x2f/0x32
> kernel: [ 1211.000082] [<f80a3488>] pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000088] [<c1044654>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x121/0x131
> kernel: [ 1211.000098] [<fd1e75e9>] ? rtl8169_start_xmit+0x0/0x2f9 [r8169]
> kernel: [ 1211.000104] [<c1044691>] ? cpu_clock+0x2d/0x4e
> kernel: [ 1211.000111] [<c104d20f>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x21
> kernel: [ 1211.000116] [<c104d2d8>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xb5/0xba
> kernel: [ 1211.000122] [<f80a3793>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0xd9/0x5e8 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000129] [<f80a382a>] pktgen_thread_worker+0x170/0x5e8 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000135] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 1211.000141] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 1211.000147] [<f80a36ba>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x5e8 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000152] [<c103f782>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
> kernel: [ 1211.000158] [<c103f718>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
> kernel: [ 1211.000163] [<c1002dc2>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
> kernel: [ 1211.000167] ---[ end trace adf7c4da01cca262 ]---
> kernel: [ 1211.013760] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
@ 2010-05-06 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-06 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergey Senozhatsky
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
On Thursday 06 May 2010, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (05/04/10 23:21), Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15704
> > Subject : [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c
> > Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2010-03-31 10:21 (35 days old)
> > Message-ID : <<20100331102142.GA3294-dY8u8AhHFaWtd10JCjopabkcH5ONE+aC@public.gmane.org>>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127003090406108&w=2
> >
> >
>
> .34-rc6-git5
>
> kernel: [ 1176.647885] pktgen 2.72: Packet Generator for packet performance testing.
> kernel: [ 1210.999903] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel: [ 1210.999914] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:256 dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129()
> kernel: [ 1210.999918] Hardware name: F3JC
> kernel: [ 1210.999921] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0 (r8169): transmit queue 0 timed out
> kernel: [ 1210.999924] Modules linked in: pktgen ppp_async crc_ccitt ipv6 ppp_generic slhc asus_laptop sparse_keymap snd_hwdep sdhci_pci sdhci snd_hda_codec_si3054 mmc_core led_class snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec
> snd_pcm rng_core snd_timer snd_page_alloc psmouse snd evdev soundcore sg r8169 serio_raw mii i2c_i801 usbhid hid uhci_hcd sr_mod ehci_hcd cdrom usbcore sd_mod ata_piix
> kernel: [ 1210.999983] Pid: 3819, comm: kpktgend_0 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc6-dbg-git5 #109
> kernel: [ 1210.999987] Call Trace:
> kernel: [ 1210.999994] [<c102e1c6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7c
> kernel: [ 1210.999999] [<c12690a5>] ? dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> kernel: [ 1211.000005] [<c102e211>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x24/0x27
> kernel: [ 1211.000010] [<c12690a5>] dev_watchdog+0xc1/0x129
> kernel: [ 1211.000017] [<c1040039>] ? __kfifo_from_user_generic+0x18/0x5c
> kernel: [ 1211.000024] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
> kernel: [ 1211.000029] [<c1036b50>] run_timer_softirq+0x18f/0x203
> kernel: [ 1211.000034] [<c1036af7>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x136/0x203
> kernel: [ 1211.000039] [<c1268fe4>] ? dev_watchdog+0x0/0x129
> kernel: [ 1211.000046] [<c1032a86>] __do_softirq+0x88/0x10c
> kernel: [ 1211.000051] [<c1032b39>] do_softirq+0x2f/0x47
> kernel: [ 1211.000059] [<f80a3488>] ? pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000064] [<c1032d1c>] _local_bh_enable_ip+0x8b/0xb3
> kernel: [ 1211.000070] [<c1032d4c>] local_bh_enable_ip+0x8/0xa
> kernel: [ 1211.000076] [<c12c4858>] _raw_spin_unlock_bh+0x2f/0x32
> kernel: [ 1211.000082] [<f80a3488>] pktgen_xmit+0xd3e/0xe0b [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000088] [<c1044654>] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x121/0x131
> kernel: [ 1211.000098] [<fd1e75e9>] ? rtl8169_start_xmit+0x0/0x2f9 [r8169]
> kernel: [ 1211.000104] [<c1044691>] ? cpu_clock+0x2d/0x4e
> kernel: [ 1211.000111] [<c104d20f>] ? put_lock_stats+0xd/0x21
> kernel: [ 1211.000116] [<c104d2d8>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xb5/0xba
> kernel: [ 1211.000122] [<f80a3793>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0xd9/0x5e8 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000129] [<f80a382a>] pktgen_thread_worker+0x170/0x5e8 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000135] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 1211.000141] [<c103fa5e>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> kernel: [ 1211.000147] [<f80a36ba>] ? pktgen_thread_worker+0x0/0x5e8 [pktgen]
> kernel: [ 1211.000152] [<c103f782>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
> kernel: [ 1211.000158] [<c103f718>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
> kernel: [ 1211.000163] [<c1002dc2>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
> kernel: [ 1211.000167] ---[ end trace adf7c4da01cca262 ]---
> kernel: [ 1211.013760] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-24 18:59 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-05-24 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
Hi!
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
This one disappeared sometime during rc series. Maybe it was config
dependend. Anyway it now works for me.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
> Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (34 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329@ucw.cz>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
@ 2010-05-24 18:59 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-05-24 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki
Hi!
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
This one disappeared sometime during rc series. Maybe it was config
dependend. Anyway it now works for me.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15712
> Subject : [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-04-01 6:06 (34 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100401060624.GA1329-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=127010200817402&w=2
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-24 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-05-24 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Marcel Holtmann
Hi!
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
This one happened really often in the early -rcS, now I have not seen
it for a while. Maybe it is fixed.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
> Subject : bluetooth oops
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (52 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059@elf.ucw.cz>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
> Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops
@ 2010-05-24 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2010-05-24 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Marcel Holtmann
Hi!
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
This one happened really often in the early -rcS, now I have not seen
it for a while. Maybe it is fixed.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15717
> Subject : bluetooth oops
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel-+ZI9xUNit7I@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-14 20:14 (52 days old)
> Message-ID : <20100314201434.GE22059-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126859771528426&w=4
> Handled-By : Marcel Holtmann <marcel-kz+m5ild9QBg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-06-13 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-15 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2010-06-15 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, Pekka Enberg
This has been addressed by moving the per node information into a
different cacheline.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
> Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
> Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
> Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
> Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-06-15 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2010-06-15 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, Pekka Enberg
This has been addressed by moving the per node information into a
different cacheline.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
> Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
> Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
> Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel-c8rhgrCDLIED0+JXs3kMbRL4W9x8LtSr@public.gmane.org>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
> Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
> Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-06-13 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-13 17:08 ` Pekka Enberg
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-06-13 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
> Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
> Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
> Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
> Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
> Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Fixed by:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=73367bd8eef4f4eb311005886aaa916013073265
in 2.6.35-rc1 and the commit is tagged for stable.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-06-13 17:08 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-06-13 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
> Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
> Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old)
> First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
> Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel-c8rhgrCDLIED0+JXs3kMbXiarf2KHLdh@public.gmane.orgcom>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
> Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
> Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CiyQsjOdHcOuAw@public.gmane.orgfi>
Fixed by:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=73367bd8eef4f4eb311005886aaa916013073265
in 2.6.35-rc1 and the commit is tagged for stable.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-06-13 14:45 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-06-13 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-06-13 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-06-13 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (81 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel-c8rhgrCDLIED0+JXs3kMbRL4W9x8LtSr@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-05-09 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-05-09 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (46 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-04-26 10:09 ` Pekka Enberg
(?)
(?)
@ 2010-04-27 1:41 ` Zhang, Yanmin
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yanmin @ 2010-04-27 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Tejun Heo, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen
On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 13:09 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
> <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >>>> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
> >>> Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
> >>> hyper-threading machine.
>
> On 04/26/2010 09:22 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >> OK, so does anyone know why hyper-threading would change things for
> >> the per-CPU allocator?
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> > My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
> > neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
> > to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
> > longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
> > per-cpu.
>
> Yanmin, do we see a lot of remote frees for your hackbench run? IIRC,
> it's the "deactivate_remote_frees" stat when CONFIG_SLAB_STATS is
> enabled.
After runing the testing with 2.6.34-rc5:
#slabinfo -AD
Name Objects Alloc Free %Fast Fallb O
skbuff_head_cache 2518 800011810 800009770 95 19 0 1
kmalloc-512 1101 800009118 800008441 95 19 0 2
anon_vma_chain 2500 195878 194477 98 13 0 0
vm_area_struct 2487 160755 158908 97 20 0 1
anon_vma 2645 88626 87637 99 12 0 0
[ymzhang@lkp-ne01 ~]$ cat /sys/kernel/slab/skbuff_head_cache/deactivate_remote_frees
1 C13=1
[ymzhang@lkp-ne01 ~]$ cat /sys/kernel/slab/kmalloc-512/deactivate_remote_frees
3 C8=2 C15=1
After running testing against 2.6.33 kernel:
#slabinfo -AD
Name Objects Alloc Free %Fast Fallb O
kmalloc-1024 961 800011628 800011167 93 1 0 3
skbuff_head_cache 2518 800012055 800010015 93 1 0 1
vm_area_struct 2892 162196 159987 97 19 0 1
names_cache 128 47139 47141 99 97 0 3
kmalloc-64 3612 40180 37287 99 89 0 0
Acpi-State 816 36301 36301 99 98 0 0
I remember with 2.6.34-rc1, the fast alloc/free are close to the one of 2.6.33.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-04-26 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka J Enberg
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen, npiggin, rientjes
Hello, Pekka.
On 04/26/2010 04:17 PM, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Even if the cacheline is dirtied like in the struct kmem_cache_cpu case?
If my hypothesis is the case, I don't think dirtying or not would
matter. It's about two cpus sharing a cache line which usually is a
bad idea but in this case happens to be a good idea because the two
cpus sit on the same cache.
> If that's the case, don't we want the per-CPU allocator to support back
> to back allocation for cores that are in the same package?
I think it's probably gonna be an over-engineering effort. W/ percpu
allocator the rest of the cacheline would likely be occupied by
another percpu item for the cpu, so it's not really wasted. It's just
used differently. It would be good if we have a way to better pack
small hot ones (for the same cpu) into the same cachelines but I don't
think it would be wise to interleave stuff from different cpus. It's
not like there's only single way to save a cacheline after all.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-04-26 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka J Enberg
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w, npiggin-l3A5Bk7waGM,
rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA
Hello, Pekka.
On 04/26/2010 04:17 PM, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> Even if the cacheline is dirtied like in the struct kmem_cache_cpu case?
If my hypothesis is the case, I don't think dirtying or not would
matter. It's about two cpus sharing a cache line which usually is a
bad idea but in this case happens to be a good idea because the two
cpus sit on the same cache.
> If that's the case, don't we want the per-CPU allocator to support back
> to back allocation for cores that are in the same package?
I think it's probably gonna be an over-engineering effort. W/ percpu
allocator the rest of the cacheline would likely be occupied by
another percpu item for the cpu, so it's not really wasted. It's just
used differently. It would be good if we have a way to better pack
small hot ones (for the same cpu) into the same cachelines but I don't
think it would be wise to interleave stuff from different cpus. It's
not like there's only single way to save a cacheline after all.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-04-26 10:53 ` Tejun Heo
(?)
@ 2010-04-26 14:17 ` Pekka J Enberg
2010-04-26 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka J Enberg @ 2010-04-26 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen, npiggin, rientjes
On 04/26/2010 12:09 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
>>> neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
>>> to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
>>> longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
>>> per-cpu.
>>
>> Yanmin, do we see a lot of remote frees for your hackbench run? IIRC,
>> it's the "deactivate_remote_frees" stat when CONFIG_SLAB_STATS is
>> enabled.
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010, Tejun Heo wrote:
> I'm not familiar with the details or scales here so please take
> whatever I say with a grain of salt. For hyperthreading configuration
> I think operations don't have to be remote to be affected. If the
> data for cpu0 and cpu1 were on the same cache line, and cpu0 and cpu1
> are occupying the same physical core thus sharing all the resources it
> would benefit from the sharing whether any operation was remote or not
> as it saves the physical processor one cache line.
Even if the cacheline is dirtied like in the struct kmem_cache_cpu case?
If that's the case, don't we want the per-CPU allocator to support
back to back allocation for cores that are in the same package?
Btw, I focused on remote frees initially before I understood what you
actually meant and scetched the following untested patch to take advantage
of the fact that struct kmem_cache_cpu doesn't fill a whole cache line. It
tries amortize remote free costs by "queuing" objects. It would be
interesting to see if it helps here (or in the other SLUB regressions like
netperf and the famous Intel one).
Pekka
diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
index 0249d41..b554a67 100644
--- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
+++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
@@ -34,10 +34,14 @@ enum stat_item {
ORDER_FALLBACK, /* Number of times fallback was necessary */
NR_SLUB_STAT_ITEMS };
+#define SLUB_MAX_NR_REMOTES 5
+
struct kmem_cache_cpu {
void **freelist; /* Pointer to first free per cpu object */
struct page *page; /* The slab from which we are allocating */
int node; /* The node of the page (or -1 for debug) */
+ int nr_remotes; /* Number of remotely free'd objects */
+ void *remotelist[SLUB_MAX_NR_REMOTES]; /* List of remotely free'd objects */
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_STATS
unsigned stat[NR_SLUB_STAT_ITEMS];
#endif
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 7d6c8b1..e8e5523 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1480,6 +1480,24 @@ static void deactivate_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
unfreeze_slab(s, page, tail);
}
+static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, void *x, unsigned long addr);
+
+static void flush_remotelist(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < c->nr_remotes; i++) {
+ struct page *page;
+ void *x;
+
+ x = c->remotelist[i];
+ page = virt_to_head_page(x);
+
+ __slab_free(s, page, x, _RET_IP_);
+ }
+ c->nr_remotes = 0;
+}
+
static inline void flush_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_cpu *c)
{
stat(s, CPUSLAB_FLUSH);
@@ -1496,7 +1514,12 @@ static inline void __flush_cpu_slab(struct kmem_cache *s, int cpu)
{
struct kmem_cache_cpu *c = per_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab, cpu);
- if (likely(c && c->page))
+ if (unlikely(!c))
+ return;
+
+ flush_remotelist(s, c);
+
+ if (likely(c->page))
flush_slab(s, c);
}
@@ -1709,6 +1732,8 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc(struct kmem_cache *s,
local_irq_save(flags);
c = __this_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
+ if (unlikely(c->nr_remotes == SLUB_MAX_NR_REMOTES))
+ flush_remotelist(s, c);
object = c->freelist;
if (unlikely(!object || !node_match(c, node)))
@@ -1865,8 +1890,12 @@ static __always_inline void slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
set_freepointer(s, object, c->freelist);
c->freelist = object;
stat(s, FREE_FASTPATH);
- } else
- __slab_free(s, page, x, addr);
+ } else {
+ if (unlikely(c->nr_remotes == SLUB_MAX_NR_REMOTES))
+ flush_remotelist(s, c);
+
+ c->remotelist[c->nr_remotes++] = x;
+ }
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 10:53 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-04-26 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen
On 04/26/2010 12:09 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
>> neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
>> to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
>> longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
>> per-cpu.
>
> Yanmin, do we see a lot of remote frees for your hackbench run? IIRC,
> it's the "deactivate_remote_frees" stat when CONFIG_SLAB_STATS is
> enabled.
I'm not familiar with the details or scales here so please take
whatever I say with a grain of salt. For hyperthreading configuration
I think operations don't have to be remote to be affected. If the
data for cpu0 and cpu1 were on the same cache line, and cpu0 and cpu1
are occupying the same physical core thus sharing all the resources it
would benefit from the sharing whether any operation was remote or not
as it saves the physical processor one cache line.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 10:53 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-04-26 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
On 04/26/2010 12:09 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
>> neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
>> to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
>> longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
>> per-cpu.
>
> Yanmin, do we see a lot of remote frees for your hackbench run? IIRC,
> it's the "deactivate_remote_frees" stat when CONFIG_SLAB_STATS is
> enabled.
I'm not familiar with the details or scales here so please take
whatever I say with a grain of salt. For hyperthreading configuration
I think operations don't have to be remote to be affected. If the
data for cpu0 and cpu1 were on the same cache line, and cpu0 and cpu1
are occupying the same physical core thus sharing all the resources it
would benefit from the sharing whether any operation was remote or not
as it saves the physical processor one cache line.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 10:09 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-04-26 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
<yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
>>> Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
>>> hyper-threading machine.
On 04/26/2010 09:22 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> OK, so does anyone know why hyper-threading would change things for
>> the per-CPU allocator?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:
> My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
> neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
> to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
> longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
> per-cpu.
Yanmin, do we see a lot of remote frees for your hackbench run? IIRC,
it's the "deactivate_remote_frees" stat when CONFIG_SLAB_STATS is
enabled.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 10:09 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-04-26 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
<yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>>> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
>>> Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
>>> hyper-threading machine.
On 04/26/2010 09:22 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>> OK, so does anyone know why hyper-threading would change things for
>> the per-CPU allocator?
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
> neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
> to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
> longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
> per-cpu.
Yanmin, do we see a lot of remote frees for your hackbench run? IIRC,
it's the "deactivate_remote_frees" stat when CONFIG_SLAB_STATS is
enabled.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 10:02 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-04-26 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen
Hello,
On 04/26/2010 09:22 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
> <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
>> Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
>> hyper-threading machine.
>
> OK, so does anyone know why hyper-threading would change things for
> the per-CPU allocator?
My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
per-cpu.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 10:02 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2010-04-26 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Zhang, Yanmin, Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, tim.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
Hello,
On 04/26/2010 09:22 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
> <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
>> Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
>> hyper-threading machine.
>
> OK, so does anyone know why hyper-threading would change things for
> the per-CPU allocator?
My wild speculation is that previously the cpu_slub structures of two
neighboring threads ended up on the same cacheline by accident thanks
to the back to back allocation. W/ the percpu allocator, this no
longer would happen as the allocator groups percpu data together
per-cpu.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 7:22 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-04-26 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Yanmin
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, tj, tim.c.chen
Hi Yanmin,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
<yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
> Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
> hyper-threading machine.
OK, so does anyone know why hyper-threading would change things for
the per-CPU allocator?
>> Yanmin, does something like this help on your machines?
> A quick testing doesn't show any help.
So it's unlikely to be false sharing, I suppose.
> I did a new testing. After the machine boots, I hot remove 8 hyper-threading cpu
> which means last 8 are just cores. The regression between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34-rc becomes
> small.
>
> My opinion is we needn't revert the patch, but still keep an eye on it when testing other
> new RC kernel releases. One reason is volanoMark and netperf have no such regression.
> Is it ok?
We need to get this fixed. In my experience, it's pretty common that
slab regressions pop up only in one or few benchmarks. The problem is
likely to pop up in some real-world workload where it's even more
difficult to track down because basic CPU profiles don't pin-point the
problem.
Do we have some Intel CPU expert hanging around here that could
enlighten me of the effects of hyper-threading on CPU caching? I also
wonder why it's showing up with the new per-CPU allocator and not with
the homebrewn one we had in SLUB previously.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 7:22 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-04-26 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Zhang, Yanmin
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi,
tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, tim.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
Hi Yanmin,
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Zhang, Yanmin
<yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
> Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
> hyper-threading machine.
OK, so does anyone know why hyper-threading would change things for
the per-CPU allocator?
>> Yanmin, does something like this help on your machines?
> A quick testing doesn't show any help.
So it's unlikely to be false sharing, I suppose.
> I did a new testing. After the machine boots, I hot remove 8 hyper-threading cpu
> which means last 8 are just cores. The regression between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34-rc becomes
> small.
>
> My opinion is we needn't revert the patch, but still keep an eye on it when testing other
> new RC kernel releases. One reason is volanoMark and netperf have no such regression.
> Is it ok?
We need to get this fixed. In my experience, it's pretty common that
slab regressions pop up only in one or few benchmarks. The problem is
likely to pop up in some real-world workload where it's even more
difficult to track down because basic CPU profiles don't pin-point the
problem.
Do we have some Intel CPU expert hanging around here that could
enlighten me of the effects of hyper-threading on CPU caching? I also
wonder why it's showing up with the new per-CPU allocator and not with
the homebrewn one we had in SLUB previously.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 6:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yanmin @ 2010-04-26 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka J Enberg
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, tj, tim.c.chen
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:18 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >>> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> >>> tracking team
> >>> know (either way).
> >>
> >> I have not been able to reproduce it so far.
> >
> > So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now but
> > I still can't see what's wrong with it...
I also don't know why. The original patch looks good.
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
hyper-threading machine.
>
> Yanmin, does something like this help on your machines?
A quick testing doesn't show any help.
I did a new testing. After the machine boots, I hot remove 8 hyper-threading cpu
which means last 8 are just cores. The regression between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34-rc becomes
small.
My opinion is we needn't revert the patch, but still keep an eye on it when testing other
new RC kernel releases. One reason is volanoMark and netperf have no such regression.
Is it ok?
Yanmin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-26 6:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Zhang, Yanmin @ 2010-04-26 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka J Enberg
Cc: Christoph Lameter, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi,
tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A, tim.c.chen-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:18 +0300, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >>> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> >>> tracking team
> >>> know (either way).
> >>
> >> I have not been able to reproduce it so far.
> >
> > So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now but
> > I still can't see what's wrong with it...
I also don't know why. The original patch looks good.
>
> I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
Mostly, the regression exists on Nehalem machines. I suspect it's related to
hyper-threading machine.
>
> Yanmin, does something like this help on your machines?
A quick testing doesn't show any help.
I did a new testing. After the machine boots, I hot remove 8 hyper-threading cpu
which means last 8 are just cores. The regression between 2.6.33 and 2.6.34-rc becomes
small.
My opinion is we needn't revert the patch, but still keep an eye on it when testing other
new RC kernel releases. One reason is volanoMark and netperf have no such regression.
Is it ok?
Yanmin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-04-22 17:26 ` Pekka Enberg
(?)
@ 2010-04-23 19:18 ` Pekka J Enberg
2010-04-26 6:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka J Enberg @ 2010-04-23 19:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, yanmin_zhang, tj
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
>>> tracking team
>>> know (either way).
>>
>> I have not been able to reproduce it so far.
>
> So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now but
> I still can't see what's wrong with it...
I haven't been able to reproduce this either on my Core 2 machine.
Yanmin, does something like this help on your machines? I'm thinking false
sharing with some other per-CPU data structure that happens to be put in
same percpu slot as struct kmem_cache_cpu...
Pekka
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 7d6c8b1..d8159d6 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2066,7 +2066,7 @@ init_kmem_cache_node(struct kmem_cache_node *n, struct kmem_cache *s)
#endif
}
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kmem_cache_cpu, kmalloc_percpu[KMALLOC_CACHES]);
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU_ALIGNED(struct kmem_cache_cpu, kmalloc_percpu[KMALLOC_CACHES]);
static inline int alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags)
{
@@ -2077,7 +2077,7 @@ static inline int alloc_kmem_cache_cpus(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags)
*/
s->cpu_slab = kmalloc_percpu + (s - kmalloc_caches);
else
- s->cpu_slab = alloc_percpu(struct kmem_cache_cpu);
+ s->cpu_slab = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct kmem_cache_cpu), cache_line_size());
if (!s->cpu_slab)
return 0;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-22 17:26 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-04-22 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, yanmin_zhang, tj
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>> know (either way).
>
> I have not been able to reproduce it so far.
So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now
but I still can't see what's wrong with it...
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-22 17:26 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-04-22 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi,
yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA, tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
>> know (either way).
>
> I have not been able to reproduce it so far.
So what are our options? We can revert the SLUB conversion patch for now
but I still can't see what's wrong with it...
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-04-20 3:19 ` [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-22 15:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-22 17:26 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2010-04-22 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki,
Alex Shi, Pekka Enberg
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
I have not been able to reproduce it so far.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-04-20 3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-20 3:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-22 15:45 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-20 3:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (26 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
2010-04-07 21:08 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel@alexs-hp.sh.intel.com>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
* [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
@ 2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 100+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-04-07 21:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Maciej Rutecki, Alex Shi, Christoph Lameter,
Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.33. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15713
Subject : hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e
Submitter : Alex Shi <alex.shi-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2010-03-25 8:40 (14 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/9dfc6e68bfe6ee452efb1a4e9ca26a9007f2b864
Message-ID : <1269506457.4513.141.camel-c8rhgrCDLIED0+JXs3kMbRL4W9x8LtSr@public.gmane.org>
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126950632920682&w=4
Handled-By : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 100+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-15 14:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-04 20:49 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 20:49 ` [Bug #15505] No more b43 wireless interface since 2.6.34-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15659] [Regresion] [2.6.34-rc1] [drm:i915_hangcheck_elapsed] *ERROR* Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15601] [BUG] SLOB breaks Crypto Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15610] fsck leads to swapper - BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference & panic Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15625] BUG: 2.6.34-rc1, RIP is (null) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 22:10 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-05-04 22:10 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-05-04 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 22:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15589] 2.6.34-rc1: Badness at fs/proc/generic.c:316 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-05-05 0:18 ` Stefan Lippers-Hollmann
2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15590] 2.6.34-rc1: regression: ^Z no longer stops sound Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 8:13 ` Daniel Mack
2010-05-05 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 20:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15611] Failure with the 2.6.34-rc1 kernel Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15669] INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15673] 2.6.34-rc2: "ima_dec_counts: open/free imbalance"? Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15671] intel graphic card hanging (Hangcheck timer elapsed... GPU hung) Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15664] Graphics hang and kernel backtrace when starting Azureus with Compiz enabled Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15704] [r8169] WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-06 13:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-05-06 13:31 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2010-05-06 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-06 19:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15712] [regression] 2.6.34-rc1 to -rc3 on zaurus: no longer boots Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-24 18:59 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-24 18:59 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15729] BUG: physmap modprobe & rmmod Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 22:15 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2010-05-04 22:15 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2010-05-04 22:22 ` David Woodhouse
2010-05-04 22:22 ` David Woodhouse
2010-05-04 22:18 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-05-04 22:18 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-05-04 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 22:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15717] bluetooth oops Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-24 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-24 19:00 ` Pavel Machek
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15768] Incorrectly calculated free blocks result in ENOSPC from writepage Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15790] Meta-Bug: Regressions Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15788] external usb sound card doesn't work after resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15805] reiserfs locking Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15858] [2.6.34-rc5] bad page state copying to/from HFS+ filesystem Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15863] 2.6.34-rc5-git7 (plus all patches) -- another suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15880] Very bad regression from 2.6.33 as of 1600f9def Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15862] 2.6.34-rc4/5: iwlagn unusable until reload Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-04 21:21 ` [Bug #15893] Alps: No edge-scrolling since 2.6.34-rc5 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-05 0:00 ` 2.6.34-rc6-git2: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Linus Torvalds
2010-05-05 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-05-05 0:00 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-06-13 14:45 2.6.35-rc3: Reported regressions 2.6.33 -> 2.6.34 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 14:48 ` [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 14:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-06-13 17:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-06-13 17:08 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-06-15 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-06-15 14:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-05-09 21:13 2.6.34-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-05-09 21:17 ` [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20 3:15 2.6.34-rc5: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-20 3:19 ` [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-22 15:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2010-04-22 17:26 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-22 17:26 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-23 19:18 ` Pekka J Enberg
2010-04-26 6:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-26 6:59 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-26 7:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-26 7:22 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-26 10:02 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-26 10:02 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-26 10:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-26 10:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-04-26 10:53 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-26 10:53 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-26 14:17 ` Pekka J Enberg
2010-04-26 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-26 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
2010-04-27 1:41 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-04-07 21:08 2.6.34-rc3-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07 21:13 ` [Bug #15713] hackbench regression due to commit 9dfc6e68bfe6e Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-07 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.