From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@gmail.com>,
"Torvalds, Linus" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:42:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b4ae2b4-f8c5-fc00-ff6b-41d76cdc0e56@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUV6usk0KOsK=xQSVp0TQmrsx_ELkc3tWjCBFFnUjAO_Vw@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/15/23 13:04, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Exactly, Debian Popularity Contest was what I was looking for yesterday.
>
> Thanks Matthew.
>
> [1] says in Inst (204701):
>
> Name || Number || %
> ==================================
> binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu || 101548 || 49.61%
> binutils-ia64-linux-gnu || 11 || 0.01%
>
> HELP: Inst. is the number of people who installed this package (sum of
> the four categories below)
>
> There may be more popular packages than binutils.
> ( binutils might tell something about development happening or not. )
>
> Anyway, I am not a popcon expert and never participated in Debian's
> Popularity Contest.
And that's the point, it's opt-in!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Torvalds, Linus" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:42:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b4ae2b4-f8c5-fc00-ff6b-41d76cdc0e56@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUV6usk0KOsK=xQSVp0TQmrsx_ELkc3tWjCBFFnUjAO_Vw@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/15/23 13:04, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Exactly, Debian Popularity Contest was what I was looking for yesterday.
>
> Thanks Matthew.
>
> [1] says in Inst (204701):
>
> Name || Number || %
> ==================================
> binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu || 101548 || 49.61%
> binutils-ia64-linux-gnu || 11 || 0.01%
>
> HELP: Inst. is the number of people who installed this package (sum of
> the four categories below)
>
> There may be more popular packages than binutils.
> ( binutils might tell something about development happening or not. )
>
> Anyway, I am not a popcon expert and never participated in Debian's
> Popularity Contest.
And that's the point, it's opt-in!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Torvalds, Linus" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jan Glauber <jan.glauber@gmail.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax)
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 10:42:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b4ae2b4-f8c5-fc00-ff6b-41d76cdc0e56@physik.fu-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUV6usk0KOsK=xQSVp0TQmrsx_ELkc3tWjCBFFnUjAO_Vw@mail.gmail.com>
On 1/15/23 13:04, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Exactly, Debian Popularity Contest was what I was looking for yesterday.
>
> Thanks Matthew.
>
> [1] says in Inst (204701):
>
> Name || Number || %
> ==================================
> binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu || 101548 || 49.61%
> binutils-ia64-linux-gnu || 11 || 0.01%
>
> HELP: Inst. is the number of people who installed this package (sum of
> the four categories below)
>
> There may be more popular packages than binutils.
> ( binutils might tell something about development happening or not. )
>
> Anyway, I am not a popcon expert and never participated in Debian's
> Popularity Contest.
And that's the point, it's opt-in!
Adrian
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer
`. `' Physicist
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 9:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 108+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 23:36 lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 0:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 0:30 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 0:30 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 0:30 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 0:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 7:55 ` ia64 removal (was: Re: lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax) Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 7:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 7:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 16:17 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 16:17 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 16:17 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 20:49 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 20:49 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 20:49 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 21:03 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 21:03 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 21:03 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 21:04 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 21:04 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 21:04 ` Jessica Clarke
2023-01-13 21:05 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-13 21:05 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-13 21:05 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-13 23:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 23:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 23:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-14 11:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-14 11:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-14 11:24 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-14 11:28 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-14 11:28 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-14 11:28 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-15 0:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-15 0:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-15 0:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-15 12:04 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-15 12:04 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-15 12:04 ` Sedat Dilek
2023-01-16 9:42 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz [this message]
2023-01-16 9:42 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:42 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:41 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:41 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:41 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 13:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 13:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 13:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 9:40 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:40 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:40 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:37 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:32 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:32 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 9:32 ` John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
2023-01-16 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-16 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-16 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-13 1:12 ` lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 1:12 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 1:12 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 4:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 9:46 ` Will Deacon
2023-01-13 9:46 ` Will Deacon
2023-01-13 9:46 ` Will Deacon
2023-01-13 3:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 3:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 3:20 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 4:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 4:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 4:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 5:36 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 5:36 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 5:36 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-16 14:08 ` Memory transaction instructions David Howells
2023-01-16 14:08 ` David Howells
2023-01-16 15:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 15:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 15:09 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-16 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-16 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-16 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-18 9:05 ` David Howells
2023-01-18 9:05 ` David Howells
2023-01-18 9:05 ` David Howells
2023-01-19 1:41 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-19 1:41 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-19 1:41 ` Nicholas Piggin
2023-01-13 10:23 ` lockref scalability on x86-64 vs cpu_relax Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-13 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-13 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-13 18:44 ` [PATCH] lockref: stop doing cpu_relax in the cmpxchg loop Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 18:44 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 18:44 ` Mateusz Guzik
2023-01-13 21:47 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 21:47 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 21:47 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-13 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-01-13 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b4ae2b4-f8c5-fc00-ff6b-41d76cdc0e56@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--to=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jan.glauber@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.