All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
	linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:39:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c7de46d-9869-aa5e-2bb9-5dbc2eda395e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

The testing show that perf_ftrace_function_call() are using
smp_processor_id() with preemption enabled, all the checking
on CPU could be wrong after preemption, PATCH 1/2 will fix
that.

Besides, as Peter point out, the testing of recursion within
the section between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()/_unlock()
pair also need the preemption disabled as the documentation
explained, PATCH 2/2 will make sure on that.

Michael Wang (2):
  ftrace: disable preemption on the testing of recursion
  ftrace: prevent preemption in perf_ftrace_function_call()

 arch/csky/kernel/probes/ftrace.c     |  2 --
 arch/parisc/kernel/ftrace.c          |  2 --
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |  2 --
 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/ftrace.c    |  2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c     |  2 --
 include/linux/trace_recursion.h      | 10 +++++++++-
 kernel/livepatch/patch.c             |  6 ------
 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c      | 17 +++++++++++++----
 kernel/trace/trace_functions.c       |  5 -----
 9 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
	Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>,
	linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:39:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8c7de46d-9869-aa5e-2bb9-5dbc2eda395e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)

The testing show that perf_ftrace_function_call() are using
smp_processor_id() with preemption enabled, all the checking
on CPU could be wrong after preemption, PATCH 1/2 will fix
that.

Besides, as Peter point out, the testing of recursion within
the section between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock()/_unlock()
pair also need the preemption disabled as the documentation
explained, PATCH 2/2 will make sure on that.

Michael Wang (2):
  ftrace: disable preemption on the testing of recursion
  ftrace: prevent preemption in perf_ftrace_function_call()

 arch/csky/kernel/probes/ftrace.c     |  2 --
 arch/parisc/kernel/ftrace.c          |  2 --
 arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes-ftrace.c |  2 --
 arch/riscv/kernel/probes/ftrace.c    |  2 --
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c     |  2 --
 include/linux/trace_recursion.h      | 10 +++++++++-
 kernel/livepatch/patch.c             |  6 ------
 kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c      | 17 +++++++++++++----
 kernel/trace/trace_functions.c       |  5 -----
 9 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-12  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-12  5:39 王贇 [this message]
2021-10-12  5:39 ` 王贇
2021-10-12  5:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] ftrace: disable preemption on the testing of recursion 王贇
2021-10-12  5:40   ` 王贇
2021-10-12 12:17   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-12 12:17     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-12 12:17     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  1:46     ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:46       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:46       ` 王贇
2021-10-12 12:24   ` Miroslav Benes
2021-10-12 12:24     ` Miroslav Benes
2021-10-12 12:24     ` Miroslav Benes
2021-10-12 12:29     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-12 12:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-12 12:29       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  1:52       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:52         ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:52         ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:50     ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:50       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:50       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:27       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  2:27         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  2:27         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  2:36         ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:36           ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:36           ` 王贇
2021-10-12 12:43   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-12 12:43     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-12 12:43     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  2:04     ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:04       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:04       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:30       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  2:30         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  2:30         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  2:38         ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:38           ` 王贇
2021-10-13  2:38           ` 王贇
2021-10-12  5:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: prevent preemption in perf_ftrace_function_call() 王贇
2021-10-12  5:40   ` 王贇
2021-10-12 11:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-12 11:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-12 11:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-13  1:45     ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:45       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  1:45       ` 王贇
2021-10-12  5:41 ` [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing 王贇
2021-10-12  5:41   ` 王贇
2021-10-13  3:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling 王贇
2021-10-13  3:16   ` 王贇
2021-10-13  3:17   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ftrace: disable preemption between ftrace_test_recursion_trylock/unlock() 王贇
2021-10-13  3:17     ` 王贇
2021-10-13  3:18   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ftrace: do CPU checking after preemption disabled 王贇
2021-10-13  3:18     ` 王贇
2021-10-13  3:26   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  3:26     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  3:26     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-10-13  3:33     ` 王贇
2021-10-13  3:33       ` 王贇
2021-10-13  3:33       ` 王贇
2021-10-26 23:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing Palmer Dabbelt
2021-10-26 23:48   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-10-26 23:48   ` Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8c7de46d-9869-aa5e-2bb9-5dbc2eda395e@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=guoren@kernel.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-csky@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/2] ftrace: make sure preemption disabled on recursion testing' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.