All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
	Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:30:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a976370-caef-1beb-d172-bcb0b17e9b78@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159319828304.16351.6990340111766605842.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>



Le 26/06/2020 à 21:04, Hari Bathini a écrit :
> Some archs can have special memory regions, within the given memory
> range, which can't be used for the buffer in a kexec segment. As
> kexec_add_buffer() function is being called from generic code as well,
> add weak arch_kexec_add_buffer definition for archs to override & take
> care of special regions before trying to locate a memory hole.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/kexec.h |    5 +++++
>   kernel/kexec_file.c   |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 1776eb2..1237682 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations(struct purgatory_info *pi,
>   					const Elf_Shdr *relsec,
>   					const Elf_Shdr *symtab);
>   
> +extern int arch_kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
> +

extern keywork is useless here, please remove (checkpatch also complains 
about it usually).

> +/* arch_kexec_add_buffer calls this when it is ready */
> +extern int __kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
> +

same

>   extern int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>   int kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>   
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index bb05fd5..a0b4f7f 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -669,10 +669,6 @@ int kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>    */
>   int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   {
> -
> -	struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
> -	int ret;
> -
>   	/* Currently adding segment this way is allowed only in file mode */
>   	if (!kbuf->image->file_mode)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -696,6 +692,25 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   	kbuf->memsz = ALIGN(kbuf->memsz, PAGE_SIZE);
>   	kbuf->buf_align = max(kbuf->buf_align, PAGE_SIZE);
>   
> +	return arch_kexec_add_buffer(kbuf);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __kexec_add_buffer - arch_kexec_add_buffer would call this function after
> + *                      updating kbuf, to place a buffer in a kexec segment.
> + * @kbuf:               Buffer contents and memory parameters.
> + *
> + * This function assumes that kexec_mutex is held.
> + * On successful return, @kbuf->mem will have the physical address of
> + * the buffer in memory.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +int __kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
> +{
> +	struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	/* Walk the RAM ranges and allocate a suitable range for the buffer */
>   	ret = kexec_locate_mem_hole(kbuf);
>   	if (ret)
> @@ -711,6 +726,20 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * arch_kexec_add_buffer - Some archs have memory regions within the given
> + *                         range that can't be used to place a kexec segment.
> + *                         Such archs can override this function to take care
> + *                         of them before trying to locate the memory hole.
> + * @kbuf:                  Buffer contents and memory parameters.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +int __weak arch_kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
> +{
> +	return __kexec_add_buffer(kbuf);
> +}
> +
>   /* Calculate and store the digest of segments */
>   static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image)
>   {
> 

Christophe

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
	Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:30:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a976370-caef-1beb-d172-bcb0b17e9b78@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159319828304.16351.6990340111766605842.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>



Le 26/06/2020 à 21:04, Hari Bathini a écrit :
> Some archs can have special memory regions, within the given memory
> range, which can't be used for the buffer in a kexec segment. As
> kexec_add_buffer() function is being called from generic code as well,
> add weak arch_kexec_add_buffer definition for archs to override & take
> care of special regions before trying to locate a memory hole.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/kexec.h |    5 +++++
>   kernel/kexec_file.c   |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 1776eb2..1237682 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations(struct purgatory_info *pi,
>   					const Elf_Shdr *relsec,
>   					const Elf_Shdr *symtab);
>   
> +extern int arch_kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
> +

extern keywork is useless here, please remove (checkpatch also complains 
about it usually).

> +/* arch_kexec_add_buffer calls this when it is ready */
> +extern int __kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
> +

same

>   extern int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>   int kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>   
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index bb05fd5..a0b4f7f 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -669,10 +669,6 @@ int kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>    */
>   int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   {
> -
> -	struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
> -	int ret;
> -
>   	/* Currently adding segment this way is allowed only in file mode */
>   	if (!kbuf->image->file_mode)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -696,6 +692,25 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   	kbuf->memsz = ALIGN(kbuf->memsz, PAGE_SIZE);
>   	kbuf->buf_align = max(kbuf->buf_align, PAGE_SIZE);
>   
> +	return arch_kexec_add_buffer(kbuf);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __kexec_add_buffer - arch_kexec_add_buffer would call this function after
> + *                      updating kbuf, to place a buffer in a kexec segment.
> + * @kbuf:               Buffer contents and memory parameters.
> + *
> + * This function assumes that kexec_mutex is held.
> + * On successful return, @kbuf->mem will have the physical address of
> + * the buffer in memory.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +int __kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
> +{
> +	struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	/* Walk the RAM ranges and allocate a suitable range for the buffer */
>   	ret = kexec_locate_mem_hole(kbuf);
>   	if (ret)
> @@ -711,6 +726,20 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * arch_kexec_add_buffer - Some archs have memory regions within the given
> + *                         range that can't be used to place a kexec segment.
> + *                         Such archs can override this function to take care
> + *                         of them before trying to locate the memory hole.
> + * @kbuf:                  Buffer contents and memory parameters.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +int __weak arch_kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
> +{
> +	return __kexec_add_buffer(kbuf);
> +}
> +
>   /* Calculate and store the digest of segments */
>   static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image)
>   {
> 

Christophe

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pingfan Liu <piliu@redhat.com>,
	Kexec-ml <kexec@lists.infradead.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Mahesh J Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.ibm.com>,
	Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org>,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole
Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2020 08:30:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a976370-caef-1beb-d172-bcb0b17e9b78@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <159319828304.16351.6990340111766605842.stgit@hbathini.in.ibm.com>



Le 26/06/2020 à 21:04, Hari Bathini a écrit :
> Some archs can have special memory regions, within the given memory
> range, which can't be used for the buffer in a kexec segment. As
> kexec_add_buffer() function is being called from generic code as well,
> add weak arch_kexec_add_buffer definition for archs to override & take
> care of special regions before trying to locate a memory hole.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/kexec.h |    5 +++++
>   kernel/kexec_file.c   |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h
> index 1776eb2..1237682 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kexec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h
> @@ -195,6 +195,11 @@ int __weak arch_kexec_apply_relocations(struct purgatory_info *pi,
>   					const Elf_Shdr *relsec,
>   					const Elf_Shdr *symtab);
>   
> +extern int arch_kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
> +

extern keywork is useless here, please remove (checkpatch also complains 
about it usually).

> +/* arch_kexec_add_buffer calls this when it is ready */
> +extern int __kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
> +

same

>   extern int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>   int kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf);
>   
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index bb05fd5..a0b4f7f 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -669,10 +669,6 @@ int kexec_locate_mem_hole(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>    */
>   int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   {
> -
> -	struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
> -	int ret;
> -
>   	/* Currently adding segment this way is allowed only in file mode */
>   	if (!kbuf->image->file_mode)
>   		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -696,6 +692,25 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   	kbuf->memsz = ALIGN(kbuf->memsz, PAGE_SIZE);
>   	kbuf->buf_align = max(kbuf->buf_align, PAGE_SIZE);
>   
> +	return arch_kexec_add_buffer(kbuf);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * __kexec_add_buffer - arch_kexec_add_buffer would call this function after
> + *                      updating kbuf, to place a buffer in a kexec segment.
> + * @kbuf:               Buffer contents and memory parameters.
> + *
> + * This function assumes that kexec_mutex is held.
> + * On successful return, @kbuf->mem will have the physical address of
> + * the buffer in memory.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +int __kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
> +{
> +	struct kexec_segment *ksegment;
> +	int ret;
> +
>   	/* Walk the RAM ranges and allocate a suitable range for the buffer */
>   	ret = kexec_locate_mem_hole(kbuf);
>   	if (ret)
> @@ -711,6 +726,20 @@ int kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +/**
> + * arch_kexec_add_buffer - Some archs have memory regions within the given
> + *                         range that can't be used to place a kexec segment.
> + *                         Such archs can override this function to take care
> + *                         of them before trying to locate the memory hole.
> + * @kbuf:                  Buffer contents and memory parameters.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success, negative errno on error.
> + */
> +int __weak arch_kexec_add_buffer(struct kexec_buf *kbuf)
> +{
> +	return __kexec_add_buffer(kbuf);
> +}
> +
>   /* Calculate and store the digest of segments */
>   static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image)
>   {
> 

Christophe

_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-27  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 105+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-26 19:04 [PATCH 00/11] ppc64: enable kdump support for kexec_file_load syscall Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04 ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04 ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04 ` [PATCH 01/11] kexec_file: allow archs to handle special regions while locating memory hole Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-27  6:30   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-06-27  6:30     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-27  6:30     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-28  2:28   ` piliu
2020-06-28  2:28     ` piliu
2020-06-28  2:28     ` piliu
2020-06-29  6:00     ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29  6:00       ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29  6:00       ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29 11:39   ` Petr Tesarik
2020-06-29 11:39     ` Petr Tesarik
2020-06-29 11:39     ` Petr Tesarik
2020-06-29 11:56     ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29 11:56       ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29 11:56       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-01  7:46       ` Dave Young
2020-07-01  7:46         ` Dave Young
2020-07-01  7:46         ` Dave Young
2020-07-01 18:31         ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-01 18:31           ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-01 18:31           ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-02 11:47           ` Dave Young
2020-07-02 11:47             ` Dave Young
2020-07-02 11:47             ` Dave Young
2020-06-26 19:04 ` [PATCH 02/11] powerpc/kexec_file: mark PPC64 specific code Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:04   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-27  6:42   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-27  6:42     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-27  6:42     ` Christophe Leroy
2020-06-29  6:23     ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29  6:23       ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29  6:23       ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/11] powerpc/kexec_file: add helper functions for getting memory ranges Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/11] ppc64/kexec_file: avoid stomping memory used by special regions Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-27 10:45   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 10:45     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 10:45     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-28  2:14   ` piliu
2020-06-28  2:14     ` piliu
2020-06-28  2:14     ` piliu
2020-06-29  5:55     ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29  5:55       ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-29  5:55       ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-30  3:30       ` piliu
2020-06-30  3:30         ` piliu
2020-06-30  3:30         ` piliu
2020-06-30  6:10         ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-30  6:10           ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-30  6:10           ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-30  8:13           ` piliu
2020-06-30  8:13             ` piliu
2020-06-30  8:13             ` piliu
2020-07-01  7:40   ` Dave Young
2020-07-01  7:40     ` Dave Young
2020-07-01  7:40     ` Dave Young
2020-07-01 12:53     ` piliu
2020-07-01 12:53       ` piliu
2020-07-01 12:53       ` piliu
2020-07-02 11:59       ` Dave Young
2020-07-02 11:59         ` Dave Young
2020-07-02 11:59         ` Dave Young
2020-07-01 18:18     ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-01 18:18       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-01 18:18       ` Hari Bathini
2020-07-02 11:54       ` Dave Young
2020-07-02 11:54         ` Dave Young
2020-07-02 11:54         ` Dave Young
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/11] powerpc/drmem: make lmb walk a bit more flexible Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/11] ppc64/kexec_file: restrict memory usage of kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/11] ppc64/kexec_file: add support to relocate purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-27 11:52   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 11:52     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 11:52     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/11] ppc64/kexec_file: setup the stack for purgatory Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/11] ppc64/kexec_file: setup backup region for kdump kernel Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:05   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-27 13:02   ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 13:02     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-27 13:02     ` kernel test robot
2020-06-26 19:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] ppc64/kexec_file: prepare elfcore header for crashing kernel Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:06   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:06   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] ppc64/kexec_file: add appropriate regions for memory reserve map Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:06   ` Hari Bathini
2020-06-26 19:06   ` Hari Bathini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a976370-caef-1beb-d172-bcb0b17e9b78@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=piliu@redhat.com \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.