All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	David Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com>,
	Phuong Nguyen <phuong_nguyen@sigmadesigns.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:40:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fffedd4-6292-b662-a588-a68fe7380af6@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <310db9dd-7db6-2106-2e53-f0083b2d3758@free.fr>

On 23/03/2017 18:03, Mason wrote:

> The host bridge actually supports 256 MSIs.
> 
> IIUC, what you suggested on IRC is that I support 256 in the driver,
> and only read the status for *enabled* MSIs.
> 
> Pseudo-code:
> 
> for every 32-bit blob in the enabled bitmap
>   if the value is non-zero
>     lookup the corresponding status reg
> 
> Problem is that a BITMAP is unsigned long (as you point out below).
> So I'm not sure how to iterate 32-bits at a time over the BITMAP.

Something along these lines:

	DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled, 256);

	unsigned int pos = 0;

	while ((pos = find_next_bit(enabled, 256, pos)) < 256) {
		int offset = (pos / 32) * 4;
		u32 status = readl_relaxed(status + offset);
		/* Handle each pos set in status */
		pos = round_up(pos, 32);
	}

You mentioned a bug in my code (due to the platform endianness)
when passing the result of readl_relaxed to the bitops routine...
How is one supposed to iterate over status?

I'm not yet seeing this endianness issue, since (status & BIT(i))
provides the status of MSI_i, irrespective of endianness.

Although I see that arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h declares
BE and LE variants... I'm confused.

Regards.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: slash.tmp@free.fr (Mason)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:40:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fffedd4-6292-b662-a588-a68fe7380af6@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <310db9dd-7db6-2106-2e53-f0083b2d3758@free.fr>

On 23/03/2017 18:03, Mason wrote:

> The host bridge actually supports 256 MSIs.
> 
> IIUC, what you suggested on IRC is that I support 256 in the driver,
> and only read the status for *enabled* MSIs.
> 
> Pseudo-code:
> 
> for every 32-bit blob in the enabled bitmap
>   if the value is non-zero
>     lookup the corresponding status reg
> 
> Problem is that a BITMAP is unsigned long (as you point out below).
> So I'm not sure how to iterate 32-bits at a time over the BITMAP.

Something along these lines:

	DECLARE_BITMAP(enabled, 256);

	unsigned int pos = 0;

	while ((pos = find_next_bit(enabled, 256, pos)) < 256) {
		int offset = (pos / 32) * 4;
		u32 status = readl_relaxed(status + offset);
		/* Handle each pos set in status */
		pos = round_up(pos, 32);
	}

You mentioned a bug in my code (due to the platform endianness)
when passing the result of readl_relaxed to the bitops routine...
How is one supposed to iterate over status?

I'm not yet seeing this endianness issue, since (status & BIT(i))
provides the status of MSI_i, irrespective of endianness.

Although I see that arch/arm/include/asm/bitops.h declares
BE and LE variants... I'm confused.

Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-23 23:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 13:05 [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason
2017-03-23 13:05 ` Mason
2017-03-23 14:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-23 14:22   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-23 17:03   ` Mason
2017-03-23 17:03     ` Mason
2017-03-23 23:40     ` Mason [this message]
2017-03-23 23:40       ` Mason
2017-03-24 18:22       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-24 18:22         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 14:35         ` Mason
2017-03-27 14:35           ` Mason
2017-03-27 14:35           ` Mason
2017-03-27 14:46           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-27 14:46             ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-27 15:18             ` Mason
2017-03-27 15:18               ` Mason
2017-03-27 15:18               ` Mason
2017-03-24 18:47     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-24 18:47       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 15:53       ` Mason
2017-03-27 15:53         ` Mason
2017-03-27 17:09         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 17:09           ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 19:44           ` Mason
2017-03-27 19:44             ` Mason
2017-03-27 21:07             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 21:07               ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 21:07               ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 22:04               ` Mason
2017-03-27 22:04                 ` Mason
2017-03-28  8:21                 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-28  8:21                   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 15:13           ` Mason
2017-04-11 15:13             ` Mason
2017-04-11 15:49             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 15:49               ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 16:26               ` Mason
2017-04-11 16:26                 ` Mason
2017-04-11 16:43                 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 16:43                   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 17:52                   ` Mason
2017-04-11 17:52                     ` Mason
2017-04-12  8:08                     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-12  8:08                       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-12  9:50                       ` Mason
2017-04-12  9:50                         ` Mason
2017-04-12  9:59                         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-12  9:59                           ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-19 11:19                           ` Mason
2017-04-19 11:19                             ` Mason
2017-04-20  8:20                             ` Mason
2017-04-20  8:20                               ` Mason
2017-04-20  9:43                               ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-20  9:43                                 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-29 11:39 ` Mason
2017-03-29 11:39   ` Mason
2017-03-30 11:09 ` Mason
2017-03-30 11:09   ` Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fffedd4-6292-b662-a588-a68fe7380af6@free.fr \
    --to=slash.tmp@free.fr \
    --cc=david.laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=phuong_nguyen@sigmadesigns.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.