* PAN performance @ 2010-08-20 3:57 Han [not found] ` <AANLkTi=8KS=_z05WgXJLf1Kc0WJqzrWX104eZmQaqJ+B@mail.gmail.com> [not found] ` <AANLkTikch9E6mw-YErX7-85yivWVAh2E2iRS3eBc1hp5@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Han @ 2010-08-20 3:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-bluetooth Hi, I have been using bluetooth PAN to run some personal programs. One thing I noticed is that PAN seems to be very slow (i.e. not up to 3Mbps for BT 2.0). I have bluetooth 2.0 adapters on my laptops and I do SSH over PAN. Whenever I run a GUI application (on sshd server), i see the GUI response is very slow. It is not video or anything so I don't think it needs up to 3Mbps. Is this slowness over PAN expected? Thanks. Han ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <AANLkTi=8KS=_z05WgXJLf1Kc0WJqzrWX104eZmQaqJ+B@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <AANLkTik5Q0CpUu=wpz_X8An1h6ShTku19xUff3O39Bkx@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: PAN performance [not found] ` <AANLkTik5Q0CpUu=wpz_X8An1h6ShTku19xUff3O39Bkx@mail.gmail.com> @ 2010-08-20 16:50 ` Han 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Han @ 2010-08-20 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arun Kumar, linux-bluetooth Hi Arun, I was able to transfer pictures and file over BT in fair good speed. I yet to test the actual bps though. I will check out the configurations... thanks Han On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Arun Kumar <arunkat@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Han, > > just curious--are you able to get good performance[upto 3 Mbps] with non-pan > bluez profiles? as BT speeds depend on HCI transports too used below viz. > UARTS. They may not be configured optimally for BR/EDR high speeds... > > -- > Best Regards, > Arun Kumar Singh > > >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Han <keepsimple@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> I have been using bluetooth PAN to run some personal programs. One >>> thing I noticed is that PAN seems to be very slow (i.e. not up to >>> 3Mbps for BT 2.0). I have bluetooth 2.0 adapters on my laptops and I >>> do SSH over PAN. Whenever I run a GUI application (on sshd server), i >>> see the GUI response is very slow. It is not video or anything so I >>> don't think it needs up to 3Mbps. Is this slowness over PAN expected? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> Han >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe >>> linux-bluetooth" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> >> >> >> >> > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <AANLkTikch9E6mw-YErX7-85yivWVAh2E2iRS3eBc1hp5@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: PAN performance [not found] ` <AANLkTikch9E6mw-YErX7-85yivWVAh2E2iRS3eBc1hp5@mail.gmail.com> @ 2010-08-20 16:52 ` Han 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Han @ 2010-08-20 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: steven bluez; +Cc: linux-bluetooth On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 11:59 PM, steven bluez <steven.bluez@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Han, > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Han <keepsimple@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> I have been using bluetooth PAN to run some personal programs. One >> thing I noticed is that PAN seems to be very slow (i.e. not up to >> 3Mbps for BT 2.0). I have bluetooth 2.0 adapters on my laptops and I >> do SSH over PAN. Whenever I run a GUI application (on sshd server), i >> see the GUI response is very slow. It is not video or anything so I >> don't think it needs up to 3Mbps. Is this slowness over PAN expected? >> >> Thanks. >> Han >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bluetooth" >> in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > I think is depending upon the vendor you have. I had a chip which had no > issues like yours and the 3mbps doesnt come into the scenario you expect > instead you get 1-2mbps in bluetooth. If it's bidi direction it might > vary...My experience of pan would be around 1.5mpbs MAX I noticed the difference between chips as well. But i saw the issue even with one of mine better BT doggles ;-). Btw, I tried to use "ssh -C -X" options and now the latency is much better. > > Regards, > Steven > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-20 16:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2010-08-20 3:57 PAN performance Han [not found] ` <AANLkTi=8KS=_z05WgXJLf1Kc0WJqzrWX104eZmQaqJ+B@mail.gmail.com> [not found] ` <AANLkTik5Q0CpUu=wpz_X8An1h6ShTku19xUff3O39Bkx@mail.gmail.com> 2010-08-20 16:50 ` Han [not found] ` <AANLkTikch9E6mw-YErX7-85yivWVAh2E2iRS3eBc1hp5@mail.gmail.com> 2010-08-20 16:52 ` Han
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.