From: Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Sebastian Pipping" <webmaster@hartwork.org>,
"SZEDER Gábor" <szeder@ira.uka.de>,
"Matthieu Moy" <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 21:15:21 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikLJXyQH8au5SpfvAMgq3sA1PqKsG16GK0YcCFB@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v1v2reywi.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 8:46 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>> But how many people may be impacted this way? ...
>> Or accept that evolution is painful and go with current plan, which I'm OK too.
>
> So even though you raised a concern on possible pains during the
> migration, you think that the migration plan outlined would be the
> least bad one?
I only see two ways. The 'new command' approach only delays the
transition until a later (user decided) point. There's no guarantee
that I (user) would make a good decision to switch. Plus the outlined
plan looks simpler. Yes, it seems better.
--
Duy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-01 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-07 2:27 [PATCH 1.8.0] add: make "add -u" update full tree without pathspec Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-02-07 5:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-07 6:14 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-07 6:26 ` Miles Bader
2011-02-09 10:58 ` Joshua Juran
2011-02-07 12:09 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-27 10:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-27 11:43 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-02-27 17:04 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 13:35 ` Sverre Rabbelier
2011-02-27 17:01 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 16:52 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-27 19:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-02-28 6:37 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-02-28 6:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 11:22 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-03-01 13:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 14:15 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [this message]
2011-03-01 14:53 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-03-01 18:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 18:51 ` Matthieu Moy
2011-03-01 19:36 ` Jakub Narebski
2011-03-01 20:00 ` Jeff King
2011-03-01 20:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-03-01 20:25 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AANLkTikLJXyQH8au5SpfvAMgq3sA1PqKsG16GK0YcCFB@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=szeder@ira.uka.de \
--cc=webmaster@hartwork.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.