Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/19] migration: add a parser to accept FT migration incoming mode.

[Yoshiaki Tamura <tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>]

2011/1/29 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>:
> On 01/28/2011 04:05 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
>>
>> Having a scheme like "kemari:tcp:host:port" looks quite
>> challenging to me.  We can of course add some quick hacks for it,
>> but adding a nice layered architecture should be more
>> appropriate.  Similar to protocols and formats in block layer?
>> At the same time, I want to avoid anything over engineered.
>
> I was simply thinking of
>
>   if (strstart (uri, "kemari:", &p)) {
>       ft_mode = FT_INIT;
>       uri = p;
>   }
>
> :)

That's the hack I was imaging :)

Maybe this is just an issue of preference, but I'm not sure
adding "kemari:" to be intuitive.  If there were similar
extensions having the same problem, I would have agreed quickly.
I originally didn't have this idea, but simply adding -kemari
separate from -incoming isn't enough?

Thanks,

Yoshi

> I think the same could be done for outgoing migration instead of -k
> actually.
>
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>