From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:24:59 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <AANLkTinTt3uodt83VV89wi9RkATF1WTqFdauYaBz7exE@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikiZRHKRrosXgY5TEYODN_D_JLJ0XXWSb9g1zPQ@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Note it also contains a couple of fluff fallout patches from the recent >> drm-fixes rebase. (I thought it would be wise to include any core drm >> changes in our testing before sending the request...) > > F*%^ me, why does drm always have to be so messy? please just reject Chris's pull, I've asked he don't send you pulls directly, and he seems to have missed the memo in this case, if he'd sent this to me I'd have pushed back. the reason the tree got rebased is that i did a pull from Ben and I screwed up, I didn't check his history and he'd based his tree on a branch for -next not for you, and some commits in there were also strangely renumbered, so I pushed back when I noticed (which was after I pushed out drm-fixes). I should have noticed before I pushed it out but I didn't mea-culpa. I'll talk to Chris about where he bases his trees, generally I ask they based their trees on your tree or the last thing I sent you, unless we have some conflicting reasons which after -rc1 should never be the case. > And yeah, it's ugly. And if that patch introduces a regression (which > is entirely possible, it's not like it's small and trivial and > obviously correct) it will just make bisection harder, and add > confusion. And it's totally pointless. It only adds pain. And it > makes the history harder to read. > > Why did the Intel drm tree merge a patch that had _nothing_ > what-so-ever to do with Intel DRM? WHY? > > And why did the drm tree rebase a tree that had obviously been public > and pulled from? WHY? Why did you make it public before it was ready? > And/or why was it so ugly that it needed to rebase it? Why do these > things keep happening? I can't remember the last time we had a crazy rebase situation in the drm, so its been a relatively while. I would have thought pushing a tree with reverts would have made for uglier history than you just refusing Chris's tree, and letting me deal with it in time. > > What's wrong with the whole drm crowd? Even if it isn't rebasing, why > is drivers/gpu/drm always so very visible in the later -rc trees? > > I'm asking "why", but what I really want you guys to do is to ask > _yourself_ why. And ask "Why is that? What am I doing wrong that this > keeps happening?" > > Really. Spend some time pondering. What the hell just happened, and > why did it happen, and how can you guys stop doing it? > > Chris: stop pulling in random crap in your tree. Do _your_ development > in your tree. Nothing else. > > And Dave, I have no idea why those two commits were rebased. They seem > identical in the tree that Chris had pulled. They have the same base > commit. What was the point? Yeah I screwed up there, after I screwed up Ben's pull I nuked everything and rebuilt, I should have just gone back before Ben's commit and left those two commits intact. As for why drm ends up with a lot of churn after rc1? radeon 90,000 LOC (417 devices in pci table - not to mention variants in set of encoder/connectors BIOS tables per card) nouveau 45,148 LOC (can't tell how many devices). intel 41,651 LOC (32 pciids, but also variants in connectors is massive) these are just the drivers, I don't think a 1000 line modified set of changes across 200,000 lines of code is major, especially as its not in the core DRM, I'm guessing that wireless is probably the only other driver base in the same region of LOC per driver. Like maybe we need more testing for code pre -rc1 but I think we just end up with the same problem as when people tell you to merge less, it just gets stacked up for the next window. People test stuff on the hardware they have, its not really until it hits your tree or even distros that we find it doesn't work on some other variant of the hardware. We've had bugs in laptops with identical names and chipsets, but slightly different panels, also people plug a wide range of monitors into graphics cards, you'd think again these would be standard but a small change in the EDID parser may break some monitor or HDMI tv that has a 5c rom in it with 90% garbage. Generally merging stuff in -rc1 means we have to fix it after that point, testing the fixes don't regress anything is just as much pain as testing the code in the first place. Though I've been asking myself the same question lately why we have so much change, it was one of the reasons I asked Chris to starting sending things via me so I could get more visibility into what is changing after rc1, for radeon I've been asking Alex about each fix as it goes past and I'm generally happy they fix problems people are actually seeing, and Chris seems to be showing a lot more constraint than Eric used to. nouveau I'm not as pushed to constrain but I do generally pushed back on Ben to rework stuff where it a big change doesn't make sense. I also wonder if its partly psychological on your part, if I sent a number of smaller pull requests rather than queuing up things would you notice the line count less? If Chris sends things direct to you instead of me merging them and sending do you see a combined drm line count or do you just notice on a pull by pull basis etc. Like I know the goal here is to create the perfect kernel for hardware Linus owns, but I'd like to be able to fix bugs urgently on hardware users have that aren't so privileged, think of it as some sort of outreach program. Dave.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org> Subject: Re: [git pull] drm fixes Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 06:24:59 +1000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <AANLkTinTt3uodt83VV89wi9RkATF1WTqFdauYaBz7exE@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikiZRHKRrosXgY5TEYODN_D_JLJ0XXWSb9g1zPQ@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote: >> >> Note it also contains a couple of fluff fallout patches from the recent >> drm-fixes rebase. (I thought it would be wise to include any core drm >> changes in our testing before sending the request...) > > F*%^ me, why does drm always have to be so messy? please just reject Chris's pull, I've asked he don't send you pulls directly, and he seems to have missed the memo in this case, if he'd sent this to me I'd have pushed back. the reason the tree got rebased is that i did a pull from Ben and I screwed up, I didn't check his history and he'd based his tree on a branch for -next not for you, and some commits in there were also strangely renumbered, so I pushed back when I noticed (which was after I pushed out drm-fixes). I should have noticed before I pushed it out but I didn't mea-culpa. I'll talk to Chris about where he bases his trees, generally I ask they based their trees on your tree or the last thing I sent you, unless we have some conflicting reasons which after -rc1 should never be the case. > And yeah, it's ugly. And if that patch introduces a regression (which > is entirely possible, it's not like it's small and trivial and > obviously correct) it will just make bisection harder, and add > confusion. And it's totally pointless. It only adds pain. And it > makes the history harder to read. > > Why did the Intel drm tree merge a patch that had _nothing_ > what-so-ever to do with Intel DRM? WHY? > > And why did the drm tree rebase a tree that had obviously been public > and pulled from? WHY? Why did you make it public before it was ready? > And/or why was it so ugly that it needed to rebase it? Why do these > things keep happening? I can't remember the last time we had a crazy rebase situation in the drm, so its been a relatively while. I would have thought pushing a tree with reverts would have made for uglier history than you just refusing Chris's tree, and letting me deal with it in time. > > What's wrong with the whole drm crowd? Even if it isn't rebasing, why > is drivers/gpu/drm always so very visible in the later -rc trees? > > I'm asking "why", but what I really want you guys to do is to ask > _yourself_ why. And ask "Why is that? What am I doing wrong that this > keeps happening?" > > Really. Spend some time pondering. What the hell just happened, and > why did it happen, and how can you guys stop doing it? > > Chris: stop pulling in random crap in your tree. Do _your_ development > in your tree. Nothing else. > > And Dave, I have no idea why those two commits were rebased. They seem > identical in the tree that Chris had pulled. They have the same base > commit. What was the point? Yeah I screwed up there, after I screwed up Ben's pull I nuked everything and rebuilt, I should have just gone back before Ben's commit and left those two commits intact. As for why drm ends up with a lot of churn after rc1? radeon 90,000 LOC (417 devices in pci table - not to mention variants in set of encoder/connectors BIOS tables per card) nouveau 45,148 LOC (can't tell how many devices). intel 41,651 LOC (32 pciids, but also variants in connectors is massive) these are just the drivers, I don't think a 1000 line modified set of changes across 200,000 lines of code is major, especially as its not in the core DRM, I'm guessing that wireless is probably the only other driver base in the same region of LOC per driver. Like maybe we need more testing for code pre -rc1 but I think we just end up with the same problem as when people tell you to merge less, it just gets stacked up for the next window. People test stuff on the hardware they have, its not really until it hits your tree or even distros that we find it doesn't work on some other variant of the hardware. We've had bugs in laptops with identical names and chipsets, but slightly different panels, also people plug a wide range of monitors into graphics cards, you'd think again these would be standard but a small change in the EDID parser may break some monitor or HDMI tv that has a 5c rom in it with 90% garbage. Generally merging stuff in -rc1 means we have to fix it after that point, testing the fixes don't regress anything is just as much pain as testing the code in the first place. Though I've been asking myself the same question lately why we have so much change, it was one of the reasons I asked Chris to starting sending things via me so I could get more visibility into what is changing after rc1, for radeon I've been asking Alex about each fix as it goes past and I'm generally happy they fix problems people are actually seeing, and Chris seems to be showing a lot more constraint than Eric used to. nouveau I'm not as pushed to constrain but I do generally pushed back on Ben to rework stuff where it a big change doesn't make sense. I also wonder if its partly psychological on your part, if I sent a number of smaller pull requests rather than queuing up things would you notice the line count less? If Chris sends things direct to you instead of me merging them and sending do you see a combined drm line count or do you just notice on a pull by pull basis etc. Like I know the goal here is to create the perfect kernel for hardware Linus owns, but I'd like to be able to fix bugs urgently on hardware users have that aren't so privileged, think of it as some sort of outreach program. Dave.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 20:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 671+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2010-11-19 1:21 [git pull] drm fixes Dave Airlie 2010-11-19 1:21 ` Dave Airlie 2010-11-19 10:02 ` Chris Wilson 2010-11-19 10:02 ` Chris Wilson 2010-11-19 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-11-19 19:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-11-19 20:24 ` Dave Airlie [this message] 2010-11-19 20:24 ` Dave Airlie 2010-11-19 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2017-09-29 7:22 Dave Airlie 2016-08-18 2:58 Dave Airlie 2016-08-18 2:58 ` Dave Airlie 2016-08-18 19:58 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-08-18 19:58 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-08-09 5:24 Dave Airlie 2016-08-09 5:24 ` Dave Airlie 2016-07-19 7:09 Dave Airlie 2016-07-19 7:09 ` Dave Airlie 2016-07-15 4:34 Dave Airlie 2016-07-15 4:34 ` Dave Airlie 2016-07-08 5:04 Dave Airlie 2016-07-08 5:04 ` Dave Airlie 2016-06-24 3:03 Dave Airlie 2016-06-24 3:03 ` Dave Airlie 2016-05-27 6:56 Dave Airlie 2016-05-27 6:56 ` Dave Airlie 2016-05-13 6:21 Dave Airlie 2016-05-13 6:21 ` Dave Airlie 2016-05-06 4:25 Dave Airlie 2016-05-06 4:25 ` Dave Airlie 2016-04-29 5:48 Dave Airlie 2016-04-29 5:48 ` Dave Airlie 2016-04-22 0:57 Dave Airlie 2016-04-22 0:57 ` Dave Airlie 2016-04-22 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds 2016-04-22 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds 2016-04-22 17:23 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-04-22 17:23 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-04-22 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds 2016-04-22 17:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-04-22 17:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-04-15 4:34 Dave Airlie 2016-04-15 4:34 ` Dave Airlie 2016-04-07 5:57 Dave Airlie 2016-04-07 5:57 ` Dave Airlie 2016-04-01 4:08 Dave Airlie 2016-04-01 4:08 ` Dave Airlie 2016-03-25 6:11 Dave Airlie 2016-03-25 6:11 ` Dave Airlie 2016-03-10 2:53 Dave Airlie 2016-03-10 2:53 ` Dave Airlie 2016-03-10 12:55 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-03-10 12:55 ` Daniel Vetter 2016-03-04 22:05 Dave Airlie 2016-03-04 22:05 ` Dave Airlie 2016-02-26 2:20 Dave Airlie 2016-02-26 2:20 ` Dave Airlie 2016-02-26 3:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2016-02-26 3:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2016-02-26 3:29 ` Dave Airlie 2016-02-26 3:29 ` Dave Airlie 2016-02-19 22:53 Dave Airlie 2016-02-19 22:53 ` Dave Airlie 2016-02-17 5:43 Dave Airlie 2016-02-17 5:43 ` Dave Airlie 2016-02-06 0:50 Dave Airlie 2016-02-06 0:50 ` Dave Airlie 2016-01-29 0:39 Dave Airlie 2016-01-29 0:39 ` Dave Airlie 2016-01-07 20:39 Dave Airlie 2016-01-07 20:39 ` Dave Airlie 2015-12-23 4:27 Dave Airlie 2015-12-23 4:27 ` Dave Airlie 2015-12-17 1:18 Dave Airlie 2015-12-17 1:18 ` Dave Airlie 2015-12-11 6:47 Dave Airlie 2015-12-11 6:47 ` Dave Airlie 2015-12-05 21:15 Dave Airlie 2015-12-05 21:15 ` Dave Airlie 2015-11-20 4:07 Dave Airlie 2015-11-20 4:07 ` Dave Airlie 2015-11-27 19:05 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-11-27 19:36 ` Dave Airlie 2015-11-30 7:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-11-30 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-11-13 0:10 Dave Airlie 2015-11-13 0:10 ` Dave Airlie 2015-11-11 2:43 Dave Airlie 2015-11-11 2:43 ` Dave Airlie 2015-10-30 5:06 Dave Airlie 2015-10-30 5:06 ` Dave Airlie 2015-10-26 5:58 Dave Airlie 2015-10-26 5:58 ` Dave Airlie 2015-10-22 5:56 Dave Airlie 2015-10-22 5:56 ` Dave Airlie 2015-10-16 4:02 Dave Airlie 2015-10-16 4:02 ` Dave Airlie 2015-10-13 1:04 Dave Airlie 2015-10-13 1:04 ` Dave Airlie 2015-10-03 5:40 Dave Airlie 2015-10-03 5:40 ` Dave Airlie 2015-09-24 21:04 Dave Airlie 2015-09-24 21:04 ` Dave Airlie 2015-09-11 10:28 Dave Airlie 2015-09-11 10:28 ` Dave Airlie 2015-08-21 9:54 Dave Airlie 2015-08-21 9:54 ` Dave Airlie 2015-08-18 0:43 Dave Airlie 2015-08-18 0:43 ` Dave Airlie 2015-08-14 4:33 Dave Airlie 2015-08-14 4:33 ` Dave Airlie 2015-07-31 3:30 Dave Airlie 2015-07-31 3:30 ` Dave Airlie 2015-07-24 5:35 Dave Airlie 2015-07-17 8:22 Dave Airlie 2015-07-17 8:22 ` Dave Airlie 2015-07-10 6:41 Dave Airlie 2015-07-10 6:41 ` Dave Airlie 2015-06-20 0:28 Dave Airlie 2015-06-20 0:28 ` Dave Airlie 2015-06-12 0:20 Dave Airlie 2015-06-12 0:20 ` Dave Airlie 2015-06-05 2:38 Dave Airlie 2015-06-05 2:38 ` Dave Airlie 2015-05-29 10:36 Dave Airlie 2015-05-29 10:36 ` Dave Airlie 2015-05-22 3:39 Dave Airlie 2015-05-22 3:39 ` Dave Airlie 2015-05-22 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-05-22 21:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-05-22 23:20 ` Dave Airlie 2015-05-23 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-05-15 5:38 Dave Airlie 2015-05-15 5:38 ` Dave Airlie 2015-05-10 20:28 Dave Airlie 2015-05-10 20:28 ` Dave Airlie 2015-05-03 23:00 Dave Airlie 2015-05-03 23:00 ` Dave Airlie 2015-04-08 21:02 Dave Airlie 2015-04-08 21:02 ` Dave Airlie 2015-04-03 0:17 Dave Airlie 2015-04-03 0:17 ` Dave Airlie 2015-03-20 21:49 Dave Airlie 2015-03-20 21:49 ` Dave Airlie 2015-03-21 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-23 15:33 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-23 15:33 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-23 18:34 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-23 18:34 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-24 7:32 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-24 13:15 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-24 13:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2015-03-24 13:57 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-24 14:22 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-24 14:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2015-03-24 14:46 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-24 16:10 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-24 16:48 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-24 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter 2015-03-24 16:54 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-25 3:49 ` Xi Ruoyao 2015-03-25 8:54 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-25 13:11 ` [Intel-gfx] " Josh Boyer 2015-03-25 14:00 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-25 14:56 ` Xi Ruoyao 2015-03-25 15:12 ` Xi Ruoyao 2015-03-25 15:37 ` [Intel-gfx] " Josh Boyer 2015-03-25 15:50 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-25 15:53 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-25 16:42 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-25 17:17 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-25 17:37 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-25 19:40 ` Josh Boyer 2015-03-25 23:32 ` Xi Ruoyao 2015-03-26 8:41 ` Xi Ruoyao 2015-03-24 1:41 ` Dave Jones 2015-03-25 8:56 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-25 8:56 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-25 14:34 ` Dave Jones 2015-03-25 14:34 ` Dave Jones 2015-03-14 21:50 Dave Airlie 2015-03-14 21:50 ` Dave Airlie 2015-03-06 21:52 Dave Airlie 2015-03-06 21:52 ` Dave Airlie 2015-03-13 11:36 ` Paul Bolle 2015-03-16 9:46 ` Paul Bolle 2015-03-16 9:46 ` Paul Bolle 2015-03-16 9:51 ` Thierry Reding 2015-03-16 9:51 ` Thierry Reding 2015-03-16 10:08 ` Paul Bolle 2015-03-16 10:08 ` Paul Bolle 2015-02-27 4:42 Dave Airlie 2015-02-27 4:42 ` Dave Airlie 2015-03-01 5:40 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 5:40 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 6:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 6:08 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 7:27 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 7:27 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-01 21:00 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-02 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-02 9:04 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-02 9:04 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-03-02 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-02 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-03-02 9:44 ` Paul Bolle 2015-03-02 9:44 ` Paul Bolle 2015-03-02 10:26 ` Jani Nikula 2015-03-02 10:26 ` Jani Nikula 2015-03-02 10:33 ` Daniel Vetter 2015-02-05 4:03 Dave Airlie 2015-02-05 4:03 ` Dave Airlie 2015-01-27 2:06 Dave Airlie 2015-01-27 2:06 ` Dave Airlie 2015-01-27 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-01-27 18:04 ` Linus Torvalds 2015-01-27 21:15 ` Dave Airlie 2015-01-21 0:01 Dave Airlie 2015-01-21 0:01 ` Dave Airlie 2015-01-08 22:57 Dave Airlie 2015-01-08 22:57 ` Dave Airlie 2014-12-24 3:18 Dave Airlie 2014-12-24 3:18 ` Dave Airlie 2014-11-30 20:31 Dave Airlie 2014-11-30 20:31 ` Dave Airlie 2014-11-21 20:28 Dave Airlie 2014-11-21 20:28 ` Dave Airlie 2014-11-14 23:24 Dave Airlie 2014-11-14 23:24 ` Dave Airlie 2014-11-02 19:41 Dave Airlie 2014-11-02 19:41 ` Dave Airlie 2014-10-22 1:15 Dave Airlie 2014-10-22 1:15 ` Dave Airlie 2014-09-24 21:09 Dave Airlie 2014-09-24 21:09 ` Dave Airlie 2014-09-20 7:46 Dave Airlie 2014-09-20 7:46 ` Dave Airlie 2014-09-12 4:25 Dave Airlie 2014-09-12 4:25 ` Dave Airlie 2014-09-04 9:34 Dave Airlie 2014-08-28 2:32 Dave Airlie 2014-08-28 2:32 ` Dave Airlie 2014-07-18 4:23 Dave Airlie 2014-07-18 4:23 ` Dave Airlie 2014-07-05 22:13 Dave Airlie 2014-07-05 22:13 ` Dave Airlie 2014-07-06 2:24 ` Ed Tomlinson 2014-07-06 8:49 ` Dave Airlie 2014-07-06 8:49 ` Dave Airlie 2014-07-07 13:34 ` Daniel Vetter 2014-06-27 6:50 Dave Airlie 2014-06-27 6:50 ` Dave Airlie 2014-06-19 1:03 Dave Airlie 2014-06-19 1:03 ` Dave Airlie 2014-06-04 3:34 Dave Airlie 2014-06-04 3:34 ` Dave Airlie 2014-05-06 23:10 Dave Airlie 2014-05-06 23:10 ` Dave Airlie 2014-04-30 0:00 Dave Airlie 2014-04-30 0:00 ` Dave Airlie 2014-04-22 22:03 Dave Airlie 2014-04-22 22:03 ` Dave Airlie 2014-04-19 7:19 Dave Airlie 2014-04-19 7:19 ` Dave Airlie 2014-04-19 19:03 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2014-04-20 1:21 ` Alex Deucher 2014-04-20 1:21 ` Alex Deucher 2014-04-20 6:24 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2014-04-20 6:24 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2014-04-20 8:27 ` Christian König 2014-04-20 9:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2014-04-20 9:56 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2014-04-20 10:04 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2014-04-20 15:23 ` Christian König 2014-04-20 15:28 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2014-04-21 14:25 ` Ed Tomlinson 2014-04-21 19:08 ` Ed Tomlinson 2014-04-21 21:26 ` Ed Tomlinson 2014-04-22 15:46 ` Ed Tomlinson 2014-04-22 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds 2014-04-22 15:59 ` Linus Torvalds 2014-04-22 21:54 ` Dave Airlie 2014-04-23 21:36 ` Woody Suwalski 2014-04-24 8:17 ` Christian König 2014-04-25 22:12 ` Woody Suwalski 2014-04-23 22:04 ` Ed Tomlinson 2014-04-24 8:21 ` Christian König 2014-03-28 2:46 Dave Airlie 2014-03-28 2:46 ` Dave Airlie 2014-03-28 8:48 ` Daniel Vetter 2014-03-21 5:29 Dave Airlie 2014-03-21 5:29 ` Dave Airlie 2014-03-14 3:57 Dave Airlie 2014-03-14 3:57 ` Dave Airlie 2014-03-07 0:38 Dave Airlie 2014-03-02 23:11 Dave Airlie 2014-03-02 23:11 ` Dave Airlie 2014-02-18 23:16 Dave Airlie 2014-02-18 23:16 ` Dave Airlie 2014-02-12 6:28 Dave Airlie 2014-02-12 6:28 ` Dave Airlie 2014-02-06 5:23 Dave Airlie 2014-02-06 5:23 ` Dave Airlie 2014-01-08 8:13 Dave Airlie 2014-01-08 8:13 ` Dave Airlie 2013-12-23 2:13 Dave Airlie 2013-12-23 2:13 ` Dave Airlie 2013-12-18 0:33 Dave Airlie 2013-12-18 0:33 ` Dave Airlie 2013-12-18 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-12-18 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-12-18 0:52 ` Dave Airlie 2013-12-18 0:52 ` Dave Airlie 2013-12-09 8:33 Dave Airlie 2013-12-09 8:33 ` Dave Airlie 2013-11-22 6:08 Dave Airlie 2013-10-22 7:01 Dave Airlie 2013-10-11 5:28 Dave Airlie 2013-10-11 17:54 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-09-29 3:02 Dave Airlie 2013-09-22 22:38 Dave Airlie 2013-08-29 23:08 Dave Airlie 2013-08-30 23:18 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-08-31 0:00 ` Dave Airlie 2013-08-31 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-09-01 20:10 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-09-02 6:54 ` Daniel Vetter 2013-09-02 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-08-23 10:39 Dave Airlie 2013-08-19 4:21 Dave Airlie 2013-08-09 4:53 Dave Airlie 2013-07-31 0:25 Dave Airlie 2013-07-23 4:40 Dave Airlie 2013-07-18 21:00 Dave Airlie 2013-06-12 7:38 Dave Airlie 2013-06-06 5:14 Dave Airlie 2013-06-06 5:22 ` Linus Torvalds 2013-06-06 5:25 ` Dave Airlie 2013-05-31 2:59 Dave Airlie 2013-05-28 7:07 Dave Airlie 2013-05-17 1:52 Dave Airlie 2013-05-13 2:22 Dave Airlie 2013-04-14 8:48 Dave Airlie 2013-04-14 8:48 ` Dave Airlie 2013-04-02 20:58 Dave Airlie 2013-04-02 20:58 ` Dave Airlie 2013-03-21 3:13 Dave Airlie 2013-03-07 22:38 Dave Airlie 2013-01-30 0:43 Dave Airlie 2013-01-30 0:43 ` Dave Airlie 2013-01-21 3:49 Dave Airlie 2013-01-14 2:16 Dave Airlie 2013-01-08 23:33 Dave Airlie 2012-12-30 4:23 Dave Airlie 2012-12-30 10:09 ` Lucas Stach 2012-12-30 12:10 ` Dave Airlie 2012-12-30 12:10 ` Dave Airlie 2012-11-29 10:07 Dave Airlie 2012-11-22 4:34 Dave Airlie 2012-11-22 4:50 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-11-22 10:57 ` Dave Airlie 2012-11-22 10:57 ` Dave Airlie 2012-11-28 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-11-16 5:02 Dave Airlie 2012-11-03 11:35 Dave Airlie 2012-10-23 0:19 Dave Airlie 2012-10-16 6:44 Dave Airlie 2012-09-27 8:03 Dave Airlie 2012-09-27 8:03 ` Dave Airlie 2012-09-14 10:24 Dave Airlie 2012-09-10 5:35 Dave Airlie 2012-09-10 5:35 ` Dave Airlie 2012-08-30 5:29 Dave Airlie 2012-08-13 23:34 Dave Airlie 2012-08-13 23:34 ` Dave Airlie 2012-07-03 10:49 Dave Airlie 2012-06-28 12:23 Dave Airlie 2012-06-26 13:56 Dave Airlie 2012-06-27 5:30 ` Henrik Rydberg 2012-06-23 8:43 Dave Airlie 2012-06-12 15:35 Dave Airlie 2012-06-01 16:10 Dave Airlie 2012-06-01 16:10 ` Dave Airlie 2012-05-30 10:12 Dave Airlie 2012-05-07 10:33 Dave Airlie 2012-05-07 10:33 ` Dave Airlie 2012-05-04 14:26 Dave Airlie 2012-05-04 14:26 ` Dave Airlie 2012-04-27 8:44 Dave Airlie 2012-04-19 19:02 Dave Airlie 2012-04-12 17:43 Dave Airlie 2012-04-03 10:26 Dave Airlie 2012-04-03 10:26 ` Dave Airlie 2012-03-27 13:08 Dave Airlie 2012-03-28 12:55 ` Dave Airlie 2012-03-01 9:31 Dave Airlie 2012-02-22 19:56 Dave Airlie 2012-02-23 20:19 ` Torsten Kaiser 2012-02-27 16:09 ` Jesse Barnes 2012-02-27 16:33 ` Eugeni Dodonov 2012-02-27 16:45 ` Jesse Barnes 2012-02-16 9:39 Dave Airlie 2012-02-16 9:39 ` Dave Airlie 2012-02-10 15:51 Dave Airlie 2012-01-30 10:03 Dave Airlie 2012-01-25 19:05 Dave Airlie 2012-01-25 19:05 ` Dave Airlie 2012-01-25 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds 2012-01-26 6:21 ` Jerome Glisse 2012-01-26 6:21 ` Jerome Glisse 2012-01-26 7:07 ` Dave Airlie 2012-01-26 7:07 ` Dave Airlie 2011-12-14 17:27 Dave Airlie 2011-12-14 17:27 ` Dave Airlie 2011-12-14 17:39 ` Dave Airlie 2011-12-06 16:21 Dave Airlie 2011-12-06 16:27 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-12-06 16:36 ` Dave Airlie 2011-12-06 16:44 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-12-07 8:12 ` Dave Airlie 2011-12-07 8:12 ` Dave Airlie 2011-12-02 11:07 Dave Airlie 2011-11-23 9:56 Dave Airlie 2011-11-11 14:59 Dave Airlie 2011-11-07 13:27 Dave Airlie 2011-11-07 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-11-07 18:30 ` Dave Airlie 2011-10-19 8:54 Dave Airlie 2011-10-08 7:20 Dave Airlie 2011-10-08 7:20 ` Dave Airlie 2011-10-04 16:34 Dave Airlie 2011-10-04 16:58 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-10-04 16:58 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-10-04 17:04 ` Alex Deucher 2011-09-23 13:09 Dave Airlie 2011-09-19 9:10 Dave Airlie 2011-09-12 19:55 Dave Airlie 2011-09-12 19:55 ` Dave Airlie 2011-08-30 10:02 Dave Airlie 2011-08-23 12:29 Dave Airlie 2011-08-05 9:22 [git pull " Dave Airlie 2011-08-05 9:22 ` Dave Airlie 2011-08-05 9:45 ` Pekka Enberg 2011-08-05 9:48 ` Dave Airlie 2011-08-05 9:48 ` Dave Airlie 2011-08-05 9:51 ` Pekka Enberg 2011-08-05 10:04 ` Dave Airlie 2011-08-05 10:07 ` Pekka Enberg 2011-08-05 17:50 ` Keith Packard 2011-07-13 6:51 [git pull] " Dave Airlie 2011-07-08 7:19 Dave Airlie 2011-06-14 3:18 Dave Airlie 2011-06-07 4:36 Dave Airlie 2011-05-11 4:08 Dave Airlie 2011-05-09 4:40 Dave Airlie 2011-05-04 0:25 Dave Airlie 2011-04-28 4:25 Dave Airlie 2011-04-28 4:25 ` Dave Airlie 2011-04-30 13:56 ` Johannes Engel 2011-04-13 0:43 Dave Airlie 2011-04-13 0:43 ` Dave Airlie 2011-04-05 0:38 Dave Airlie 2011-04-05 1:02 ` Keith Packard 2011-04-05 1:09 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-04-05 1:47 ` Keith Packard 2011-04-05 1:47 ` Keith Packard 2011-04-05 1:02 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-23 4:18 Dave Airlie 2011-03-23 7:23 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-23 8:16 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-23 8:16 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-23 8:22 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-23 8:22 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-23 9:06 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-23 9:35 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-23 9:35 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-23 11:40 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-23 11:40 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-23 11:45 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-24 11:06 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-24 11:17 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-24 11:31 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-24 11:31 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-24 14:37 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-03-24 15:49 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-24 15:49 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-24 19:11 ` Corbin Simpson 2011-03-24 19:11 ` Corbin Simpson 2011-03-24 20:05 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-24 20:22 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-24 23:48 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-03-25 0:07 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-25 0:07 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-25 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-03-25 0:29 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-03-25 0:55 ` Jerome Glisse 2011-03-25 10:25 ` Ben Skeggs 2011-03-25 10:25 ` Ben Skeggs 2011-03-25 14:01 ` Jerome Glisse 2011-03-25 17:34 ` Jesse Barnes 2011-03-25 18:09 ` Jerome Glisse 2011-03-25 7:21 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-25 7:43 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-25 7:43 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-25 7:51 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-25 8:00 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-25 8:00 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-25 14:52 ` Ilija Hadzic 2011-03-25 15:25 ` Michel Dänzer 2011-03-25 15:44 ` Peter Stuge 2011-03-26 6:34 ` Xavier Bestel 2011-03-26 6:34 ` Xavier Bestel 2011-03-25 15:29 ` Jerome Glisse 2011-03-25 12:51 ` Kevin Winchester 2011-03-25 14:04 ` Jerome Glisse 2011-03-25 17:46 ` Jesse Barnes 2011-03-25 17:46 ` Jesse Barnes 2011-03-13 0:16 Dave Airlie 2011-03-13 0:16 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-13 0:19 ` Dave Airlie 2011-03-03 3:12 Dave Airlie 2011-02-28 21:14 Dave Airlie 2011-02-23 23:17 Dave Airlie 2011-02-23 23:58 ` Linus Torvalds 2011-02-24 0:13 ` Chris Wilson 2011-02-24 8:27 ` Alex Riesen 2011-02-24 9:18 ` Indan Zupancic 2011-02-24 19:04 ` Alex Riesen 2011-02-24 19:25 ` Alex Riesen 2011-02-24 23:29 ` Indan Zupancic 2011-02-25 10:18 ` Alex Riesen 2011-02-25 11:07 ` Indan Zupancic 2011-02-25 11:35 ` Alex Riesen 2011-02-27 10:57 ` Alex Riesen 2011-02-27 9:46 ` Pavel Machek 2011-02-17 22:50 Dave Airlie 2011-02-18 10:10 ` Anca Emanuel 2011-02-18 10:10 ` Anca Emanuel 2011-02-18 22:14 ` Rafał Miłecki 2011-02-18 22:14 ` Rafał Miłecki 2011-02-15 23:03 Dave Airlie 2011-01-28 1:38 Dave Airlie 2011-01-17 4:16 Dave Airlie 2011-01-17 4:16 ` Dave Airlie 2011-01-18 12:51 ` Anca Emanuel 2010-12-21 23:43 Dave Airlie 2010-12-22 3:19 ` Stephen Clark 2010-12-22 3:54 ` Dave Airlie 2010-12-22 16:24 ` Takashi Iwai 2010-12-22 16:59 ` Chris Wilson 2010-12-22 17:07 ` Takashi Iwai 2010-12-23 3:54 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-12-23 3:54 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-12-23 5:53 ` Peter Stuge 2010-12-23 5:53 ` Peter Stuge 2010-12-23 6:03 ` Dave Airlie 2010-12-23 9:32 ` Alex Riesen 2010-12-23 17:48 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-12-23 16:51 ` Jesse Barnes 2010-12-09 8:07 Dave Airlie 2010-12-08 5:48 Dave Airlie 2010-12-01 3:39 Dave Airlie 2010-12-01 3:39 ` Dave Airlie 2010-11-11 0:24 Dave Airlie 2010-11-12 16:24 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-11-12 17:21 ` Chris Wilson 2010-11-12 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-11-12 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-10-28 3:33 Dave Airlie 2010-10-28 3:33 ` Dave Airlie 2010-10-12 20:51 Dave Airlie 2010-10-07 0:41 Dave Airlie 2010-10-07 8:45 ` Dave Airlie 2010-10-01 5:27 Dave Airlie 2010-10-01 9:07 ` Dave Airlie 2010-10-01 9:07 ` Dave Airlie 2010-10-01 11:18 ` Dave Airlie 2010-09-15 1:44 Dave Airlie 2010-09-15 1:44 ` Dave Airlie 2010-09-06 22:21 Dave Airlie 2010-08-27 3:36 Dave Airlie 2010-08-23 3:33 Dave Airlie 2010-08-23 3:33 ` Dave Airlie 2010-07-30 0:08 Dave Airlie 2010-07-21 0:41 Dave Airlie 2010-07-21 0:41 ` Dave Airlie 2010-07-07 3:23 Dave Airlie 2010-07-07 4:24 ` Dave Airlie 2010-07-07 4:24 ` Dave Airlie 2010-06-09 2:00 Dave Airlie 2010-06-09 3:16 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 3:09 Dave Airlie 2010-06-07 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 18:26 ` Al Viro 2010-06-07 18:53 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 19:08 ` Al Viro 2010-06-07 19:32 ` David Woodhouse 2010-06-07 19:40 ` Al Viro 2010-06-07 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 21:33 ` Al Viro 2010-06-07 21:38 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 21:39 ` David Woodhouse 2010-06-08 0:30 ` Al Viro 2010-06-07 20:26 ` Dave Airlie 2010-06-07 20:41 ` Dave Airlie 2010-06-07 21:03 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-06-07 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-05-26 3:02 Dave Airlie 2010-05-26 3:02 ` Dave Airlie 2010-05-07 5:33 Dave Airlie 2010-05-07 5:33 Dave Airlie 2010-04-27 6:16 Dave Airlie 2010-04-27 6:16 ` Dave Airlie 2010-04-19 4:28 Dave Airlie 2010-04-19 4:28 Dave Airlie 2010-04-19 8:57 ` Dave Airlie 2010-04-19 8:57 ` Dave Airlie 2010-04-09 5:00 Dave Airlie 2010-03-30 4:34 Dave Airlie 2010-03-30 4:34 Dave Airlie 2010-03-30 6:43 ` Michel Dänzer 2010-03-30 6:43 ` Michel Dänzer 2010-03-30 6:49 ` Dave Airlie 2010-03-30 6:49 ` Dave Airlie 2010-03-30 7:07 ` Dave Airlie 2010-03-30 7:07 ` Dave Airlie 2010-03-30 14:24 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-03-30 14:24 ` Linus Torvalds 2010-03-30 15:43 ` Jerome Glisse 2010-03-30 15:43 ` Jerome Glisse 2010-04-01 5:36 ` Rafał Miłecki 2010-04-01 7:43 ` Dave Airlie 2010-04-01 7:43 ` Dave Airlie 2010-04-01 7:45 ` Rafał Miłecki 2010-04-01 7:45 ` Rafał Miłecki 2010-04-01 5:36 ` Rafał Miłecki 2010-03-25 3:35 Dave Airlie 2010-03-25 6:52 ` Pekka Enberg 2010-03-25 7:44 ` Dave Airlie 2010-03-25 7:44 ` Dave Airlie 2010-03-25 6:52 ` Pekka Enberg 2010-03-25 9:24 ` Michel Dänzer 2010-03-25 3:35 Dave Airlie 2010-02-18 5:21 Dave Airlie 2010-02-18 5:21 Dave Airlie 2010-02-15 5:09 Dave Airlie 2010-02-15 5:35 ` Dave Airlie 2010-02-15 5:35 ` Dave Airlie 2010-02-15 5:09 Dave Airlie 2010-02-05 4:15 Dave Airlie 2010-02-05 4:15 Dave Airlie 2010-02-05 7:11 ` Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-05 7:11 ` Rafał Miłecki 2010-02-01 2:20 Dave Airlie 2010-02-01 2:53 ` Dave Airlie 2010-02-01 2:53 ` Dave Airlie 2010-02-01 2:20 Dave Airlie 2010-01-13 6:25 Dave Airlie 2010-01-13 6:25 Dave Airlie 2010-01-07 4:17 Dave Airlie 2010-01-07 4:17 Dave Airlie 2009-11-24 3:10 Dave Airlie 2009-08-21 0:57 Dave Airlie 2009-08-21 9:33 ` Dave Airlie 2009-06-04 3:39 Dave Airlie 2009-06-05 5:42 ` Markus Trippelsdorf 2009-06-05 5:59 ` Dave Airlie 2009-06-05 7:53 ` Timo Jyrinki 2009-06-05 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds 2009-06-05 21:41 ` Dave Airlie 2009-05-20 23:30 Jesse Barnes 2009-05-05 23:20 Dave Airlie 2009-03-02 23:57 Dave Airlie 2009-01-16 8:49 Dave Airlie
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=AANLkTinTt3uodt83VV89wi9RkATF1WTqFdauYaBz7exE@mail.gmail.com \ --to=airlied@gmail.com \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.