All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Help required for Debugging JBD
@ 2011-06-21 16:52 Niraj Kulkarni
  2011-06-22  6:43 ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Niraj Kulkarni @ 2011-06-21 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ext4

Hi all,
         I have modified my JBD (no change to Ext3) to support 
Transactional-Flash. For that I require only to collect metadata and 
data blocks and send them simultaneously (no transaction record, revoke 
record etc).
        The problem is, though it works well for small number of 
operations, the kernel completely hangs when I run any benchmark (like 
blogbench or postmark) over them. The bad thing is that there is no 
trace left afterwards, ie logs don't contain any message since the 
operation was started, kernel OOPS are not shown, no faults are shown, 
no panic is shown even though I have enabled panic on hard/soft lockup. 
I have to hard reboot machine each time.
         So essentially, I am totally clueless about the point  at which 
it is crashing or reason behind it. There is a small possibility that 
bug may be in modified MTD layer (which I've written myself), but since 
I have run unmodified Ext3 on that MTD layer without any bug, the chance 
of buggy MTD layer appears very slim.

Any help in greatly appreciated.

Niraj

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Help required for Debugging JBD
  2011-06-21 16:52 Help required for Debugging JBD Niraj Kulkarni
@ 2011-06-22  6:43 ` Amir Goldstein
  2011-06-22 18:27   ` Niraj Kulkarni
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2011-06-22  6:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Niraj Kulkarni; +Cc: linux-ext4

On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Niraj Kulkarni
<kulkarniniraj14@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>        I have modified my JBD (no change to Ext3) to support
> Transactional-Flash. For that I require only to collect metadata and data
> blocks and send them simultaneously (no transaction record, revoke record
> etc).

It's hard to help without knowing what your patches do in more details.
Could you post the patches or give a more detailed description of how they
work?
For example, how do you collect data blocks without them being already
written? or is this not a requirement for your use case?

>       The problem is, though it works well for small number of operations,
> the kernel completely hangs when I run any benchmark (like blogbench or
> postmark) over them. The bad thing is that there is no trace left
> afterwards, ie logs don't contain any message since the operation was
> started, kernel OOPS are not shown, no faults are shown, no panic is shown
> even though I have enabled panic on hard/soft lockup. I have to hard reboot
> machine each time.

Did you try alt+sysrq+w to dump waiting tasks?

>        So essentially, I am totally clueless about the point  at which it is
> crashing or reason behind it. There is a small possibility that bug may be
> in modified MTD layer (which I've written myself), but since I have run
> unmodified Ext3 on that MTD layer without any bug, the chance of buggy MTD
> layer appears very slim.
>
> Any help in greatly appreciated.
>
> Niraj
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Help required for Debugging JBD
  2011-06-22  6:43 ` Amir Goldstein
@ 2011-06-22 18:27   ` Niraj Kulkarni
  2011-06-22 19:29     ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Niraj Kulkarni @ 2011-06-22 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Amir Goldstein; +Cc: linux-ext4

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1047 bytes --]

Hi,
      Thanks for that SysRq tip. Now I am able to get some logs.

 From OOPS message, it showed an assertion failure on
     J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == 
journal->j_committing_transaction);

In my code, I've modified journal_commit_transaction such that it 
collects all buffer_head in a linked list, with their corresponding
buffer numbers in other list.
      I collect all buffers (data + metadata ) and push them all 
simultaneously and pass list of block numbers through a special ioctl call.

The problem that I see in my code is that all buffers are handled in 
same way as all data buffers in original code. ie metadata buffers are
getting unfiled instead of refiling.

I am attaching my patch. Please can you see and check if that indeed is 
problem here?

Also what can be possible solution to it? separation of buffers in 2 
list (data, metadata) and handling them separately?

(Being a kernel noob, my coding does not conform to any standard. So 
please point out any blunders I've committed in my patch)

Thank You
Niraj

[-- Attachment #2: patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 32160 bytes --]

diff -ur ./commit.c /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/commit.c
--- ./commit.c	2011-05-10 03:46:23.000000000 +0530
+++ /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/commit.c	2011-06-22 22:53:39.641366902 +0530
@@ -21,6 +21,17 @@
 #include <linux/pagemap.h>
 #include <linux/bio.h>
 
+#include <linux/mtd/blktrans.h>
+#ifdef TXFLASH
+#include <linux/genhd.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
+#endif
+
+struct BLK_CHAIN{
+	struct list_head list;
+	struct buffer_head *bh;
+};
+static struct BLK_CHAIN blk_chain;
 /*
  * Default IO end handler for temporary BJ_IO buffer_heads.
  */
@@ -152,11 +163,10 @@
 				   int write_op)
 {
 	int i;
 	for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
 		wbuf[i]->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
 		/* We use-up our safety reference in submit_bh() */
-		submit_bh(write_op, wbuf[i]);
+		//submit_bh(write_op, wbuf[i]);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -165,7 +175,12 @@
  */
 static int journal_submit_data_buffers(journal_t *journal,
 				       transaction_t *commit_transaction,
-				       int write_op)
+				       int write_op
+#ifdef TXFLASH
+				       ,struct mtd_flash_txn *mytxn,int *data_cnt
+#endif				       
+				       )
+				       
 {
 	struct journal_head *jh;
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
@@ -173,6 +188,10 @@
 	int bufs = 0;
 	struct buffer_head **wbuf = journal->j_wbuf;
 	int err = 0;
+#ifdef TXFLASH	
+	struct mtd_txn_blk *new_entry=NULL;
+	struct BLK_CHAIN *new_blk_entry=NULL;
+#endif				       	
 
 	/*
 	 * Whenever we unlock the journal and sleep, things can get added
@@ -200,11 +220,24 @@
 		 * blocking lock_buffer().
 		 */
 		if (buffer_dirty(bh)) {
-			if (!trylock_buffer(bh)) {
+#ifdef TXFLASH			
+			{ 
+				BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "needs blocking lock");
+				spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+				/* Write out all data to prevent deadlocks */
+				if(bufs>0)
+					journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs, write_op);
+				if(!new_entry)
+					new_entry=(struct mtd_txn_blk *)kzalloc(sizeof(struct mtd_txn_blk),GFP_KERNEL);
+				if(!new_blk_entry)
+					new_blk_entry=(struct BLK_CHAIN *)kzalloc(sizeof(struct BLK_CHAIN),GFP_KERNEL);
+#else		
+			if (!trylock_buffer(bh)) { 
 				BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "needs blocking lock");
 				spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 				/* Write out all data to prevent deadlocks */
 				journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs, write_op);
+#endif			
 				bufs = 0;
 				lock_buffer(bh);
 				spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
@@ -230,6 +263,21 @@
 		if (locked && test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh)) {
 			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "needs writeout, adding to array");
 			wbuf[bufs++] = bh;
+#ifdef TXFLASH
+			(*data_cnt)++;
+			if(new_entry){
+				new_entry->blk_no=bh->b_blocknr;
+				list_add_tail(&(new_entry->list),&(mytxn->blks));
+				new_entry=NULL;
+				jbd_debug(3, "JBD submit data buffer at insertion point %lX of size %lX\n",bh->b_blocknr,bh->b_size);
+			}
+			if(new_blk_entry)
+			{
+				new_blk_entry->bh=bh;
+				list_add_tail(&(new_blk_entry->list),&(blk_chain.list));
+				new_blk_entry=NULL;
+			}
+#endif			
 			__journal_file_buffer(jh, commit_transaction,
 						BJ_Locked);
 			jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
@@ -265,11 +313,14 @@
 		}
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 	journal_do_submit_data(wbuf, bufs, write_op);
 
 	return err;
 }
 
+
+#ifndef TXFLASH
 /*
  * journal_commit_transaction
  *
@ -952,3 +1006,786 @@
 
 	wake_up(&journal->j_wait_done_commit);
 }
+#else
+/*
+ * Transactional Version
+ */
+void journal_commit_transaction(journal_t *journal)
+{
+	transaction_t *commit_transaction;
+	struct journal_head *jh, *new_jh, *descriptor;
+	struct buffer_head **wbuf = journal->j_wbuf;
+	int bufs;
+	int flags;
+	int err;
+	unsigned int blocknr;
+	ktime_t start_time;
+	u64 commit_time;
+	char *tagp = NULL;
+	journal_header_t *header;
+	journal_block_tag_t *tag = NULL;
+	int space_left = 0;
+	int first_tag = 0;
+	int tag_flag;
+	int i;
+	int write_op = WRITE_SYNC;
+
+	struct mtd_flash_txn *mytxn;
+	struct mtd_txn_blk *pos,*tmp_pos;
+	struct BLK_CHAIN *new_blk_pos,*tmp_blk_pos;
+	int descriptor_counter,data_counter,meta_counter;
+	struct buffer_head *my_desc_buf=NULL;
+	/*
+	 * First job: lock down the current transaction and wait for
+	 * all outstanding updates to complete.
+	 */
+	 
+	descriptor_counter=0;
+	data_counter=0;
+	meta_counter=0;
+#ifdef COMMIT_STATS
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	summarise_journal_usage(journal);
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+#endif
+
+	/* Do we need to erase the effects of a prior journal_flush? */
+	if (journal->j_flags & JFS_FLUSHED) {
+		jbd_debug(3, "super block updated\n");
+		journal_update_superblock(journal, 1);
+	} else {
+		jbd_debug(3, "superblock not updated\n");
+	}
+
+	J_ASSERT(journal->j_running_transaction != NULL);
+	J_ASSERT(journal->j_committing_transaction == NULL);
+
+	commit_transaction = journal->j_running_transaction;
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_state == T_RUNNING);
+
+	jbd_debug(1, "JBD: starting commit of transaction %d\n",
+			commit_transaction->t_tid);
+
+	mytxn=(struct mtd_flash_txn*)kmalloc(sizeof(struct mtd_flash_txn),GFP_KERNEL);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(mytxn->blks));		
+	mytxn->txn_number=commit_transaction->t_tid;
+	mytxn->bh_size=0;
+	
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&(blk_chain.list));		
+	blk_chain.bh=0;
+	
+	
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+	commit_transaction->t_state = T_LOCKED;
+
+	/*
+	 * Use plugged writes here, since we want to submit several before
+	 * we unplug the device. We don't do explicit unplugging in here,
+	 * instead we rely on sync_buffer() doing the unplug for us.
+	 */
+	if (commit_transaction->t_synchronous_commit)
+		write_op = WRITE_SYNC_PLUG;
+	spin_lock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
+	while (commit_transaction->t_updates) {
+		DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+
+		prepare_to_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait,
+					TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		if (commit_transaction->t_updates) {
+			spin_unlock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+			schedule();
+			spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+			spin_lock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
+		}
+		finish_wait(&journal->j_wait_updates, &wait);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&commit_transaction->t_handle_lock);
+
+	J_ASSERT (commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits <=
+			journal->j_max_transaction_buffers);
+
+	/*
+	 * First thing we are allowed to do is to discard any remaining
+	 * BJ_Reserved buffers.  Note, it is _not_ permissible to assume
+	 * that there are no such buffers: if a large filesystem
+	 * operation like a truncate needs to split itself over multiple
+	 * transactions, then it may try to do a journal_restart() while
+	 * there are still BJ_Reserved buffers outstanding.  These must
+	 * be released cleanly from the current transaction.
+	 *
+	 * In this case, the filesystem must still reserve write access
+	 * again before modifying the buffer in the new transaction, but
+	 * we do not require it to remember exactly which old buffers it
+	 * has reserved.  This is consistent with the existing behaviour
+	 * that multiple journal_get_write_access() calls to the same
+	 * buffer are perfectly permissable.
+	 */
+	while (commit_transaction->t_reserved_list) {
+		jh = commit_transaction->t_reserved_list;
+		JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "reserved, unused: refile");
+		/*
+		 * A journal_get_undo_access()+journal_release_buffer() may
+		 * leave undo-committed data.
+		 */
+		if (jh->b_committed_data) {
+			struct buffer_head *bh = jh2bh(jh);
+
+			jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
+			jbd_free(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_size);
+			jh->b_committed_data = NULL;
+			jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+		}
+		journal_refile_buffer(journal, jh);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Now try to drop any written-back buffers from the journal's
+	 * checkpoint lists.  We do this *before* commit because it potentially
+	 * frees some memory
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	__journal_clean_checkpoint_list(journal);
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+
+	jbd_debug (3, "JBD: commit phase 1\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * Switch to a new revoke table.
+	 */
+	journal_switch_revoke_table(journal);
+
+	commit_transaction->t_state = T_FLUSH;
+	journal->j_committing_transaction = commit_transaction;
+	journal->j_running_transaction = NULL;
+	start_time = ktime_get();
+	commit_transaction->t_log_start = journal->j_head;
+	wake_up(&journal->j_wait_transaction_locked);
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+
+
+	
+
+	jbd_debug (3, "JBD: commit phase 2\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * Now start flushing things to disk, in the order they appear
+	 * on the transaction lists.  Data blocks go first.
+	 */
+	err = journal_submit_data_buffers(journal, commit_transaction,
+					  write_op,mytxn,&data_counter);
+
+	/*list_for_each_entry(pos,&mytxn.blks,list)
+	{
+		jbd_debug(3,"in jrnl commit blk no %lX",pos->blk_no);
+			
+	}*/
+	//journal->j_dev->bd_disk->fops->ioctl(journal->j_dev,0777,CYCLIC_COMMIT,(unsigned long )&mytxn);
+	
+#if 0	
+	journal_write_revoke_records(journal, commit_transaction, write_op);
+#endif
+	/*
+	 * Wait for all previously submitted IO to complete.
+	 */
+	 
+
+	jbd_debug (3, "JBD: commit phase 3\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * Way to go: we have now written out all of the data for a
+	 * transaction!  Now comes the tricky part: we need to write out
+	 * metadata.  Loop over the transaction's entire buffer list:
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+	commit_transaction->t_state = T_COMMIT;
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_nr_buffers <=
+		 commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits);
+
+	descriptor = NULL;
+	bufs = 0;
+	pos=NULL;
+	new_blk_pos=NULL;
+	while (commit_transaction->t_buffers) {
+
+		/* Find the next buffer to be journaled... */
+
+		jh = commit_transaction->t_buffers;
+
+		if(!pos)
+			pos=(struct mtd_txn_blk*)kzalloc(sizeof(struct mtd_txn_blk),GFP_KERNEL);
+		if(!new_blk_pos)
+			new_blk_pos=(struct BLK_CHAIN *)kzalloc(sizeof(struct BLK_CHAIN),GFP_KERNEL);
+
+		/* If we're in abort mode, we just un-journal the buffer and
+		   release it. */
+
+		if (is_journal_aborted(journal)) {
+			clear_buffer_jbddirty(jh2bh(jh));
+			JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "journal is aborting: refile");
+			journal_refile_buffer(journal, jh);
+			/* If that was the last one, we need to clean up
+			 * any descriptor buffers which may have been
+			 * already allocated, even if we are now
+			 * aborting. */
+			if (!commit_transaction->t_buffers)
+				goto start_journal_io;
+			continue;
+		}
+
+		/* Make sure we have a descriptor block in which to
+		   record the metadata buffer. */
+			/*Obselete for TXFLASH */
+#if 0
+		if (!descriptor) {
+			struct buffer_head *bh;
+
+			J_ASSERT (bufs == 0);
+
+			jbd_debug(4, "JBD: get descriptor\n");
+
+			descriptor = journal_get_descriptor_buffer(journal);
+			if (!descriptor) {
+				journal_abort(journal, -EIO);
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			bh = jh2bh(descriptor);
+			jbd_debug(4, "JBD: got buffer %llu %llX (%p)\n",
+				(unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr,
+				(unsigned long long)bh->b_blocknr, bh->b_data);
+			header = (journal_header_t *)&bh->b_data[0];
+			header->h_magic     = cpu_to_be32(JFS_MAGIC_NUMBER);
+			header->h_blocktype = cpu_to_be32(JFS_DESCRIPTOR_BLOCK);
+			header->h_sequence  = cpu_to_be32(commit_transaction->t_tid);
+
+			tagp = &bh->b_data[sizeof(journal_header_t)];
+			space_left = bh->b_size - sizeof(journal_header_t);
+			first_tag = 1;
+			set_buffer_jwrite(bh);
+			set_buffer_dirty(bh);
+			wbuf[bufs++] = bh;
+			my_desc_buf=bh;
+			
+			descriptor_counter++;
+			/* Record it so that we can wait for IO
+                           completion later */
+			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "ph3: file as descriptor");
+			journal_file_buffer(descriptor, commit_transaction,
+					BJ_LogCtl);
+		}
+#endif
+		/* Where is the buffer to be written? */
+#if 0
+		err = journal_next_log_block(journal, &blocknr);
+		/* If the block mapping failed, just abandon the buffer
+		   and repeat this loop: we'll fall into the
+		   refile-on-abort condition above. */
+		if (err) {
+			journal_abort(journal, err);
+			continue;
+		}
+#endif
+		/*
+		 * start_this_handle() uses t_outstanding_credits to determine
+		 * the free space in the log, but this counter is changed
+		 * by journal_next_log_block() also.
+		 */
+		commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits--;
+
+		/* Bump b_count to prevent truncate from stumbling over
+                   the shadowed buffer!  @@@ This can go if we ever get
+                   rid of the BJ_IO/BJ_Shadow pairing of buffers. */
+		get_bh(jh2bh(jh));
+
+		/* Make a temporary IO buffer with which to write it out
+                   (this will requeue both the metadata buffer and the
+                   temporary IO buffer). new_bh goes on BJ_IO*/
+
+		set_buffer_jwrite(jh2bh(jh));
+		/*
+		 * akpm: journal_write_metadata_buffer() sets
+		 * new_bh->b_transaction to commit_transaction.
+		 * We need to clean this up before we release new_bh
+		 * (which is of type BJ_IO)
+		 */
+		JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "ph3: write metadata");
+#if 0		
+		flags = journal_write_metadata_buffer(commit_transaction,
+						      jh, &new_jh, blocknr);
+#endif						      
+		journal_file_buffer(jh,commit_transaction,BJ_Locked);
+		set_buffer_jwrite(jh2bh(jh));
+		wbuf[bufs++] = jh2bh(jh);
+		meta_counter++;
+		
+		if(!mytxn->bh_size)
+		{
+				mytxn->bh_size=(jh2bh(jh))->b_size;
+		}
+		
+		if(pos){
+             pos->blk_no=(jh2bh(jh))->b_blocknr;
+             list_add_tail(&(pos->list),&(mytxn->blks));
+             pos=NULL;
+             jbd_debug(3, "JBD submit metadata buffer at insertion point %lX of size %lX\n",(jh2bh(jh))->b_blocknr,(jh2bh(jh))->b_size);
+         }
+         if(new_blk_pos)
+         {
+			 new_blk_pos->bh=(jh2bh(jh));
+			 list_add_tail(&(new_blk_pos->list),&(blk_chain.list));
+			 new_blk_pos=NULL;
+		 }
+
+
+		/* Record the new block's tag in the current descriptor
+                   buffer */
+
+#if 0		
+		tag_flag = 0;
+		if (flags & 1)
+			tag_flag |= JFS_FLAG_ESCAPE;
+		if (!first_tag)
+			tag_flag |= JFS_FLAG_SAME_UUID;
+
+		tag = (journal_block_tag_t *) tagp;
+		tag->t_blocknr = cpu_to_be32(jh2bh(jh)->b_blocknr);
+		tag->t_flags = cpu_to_be32(tag_flag);
+		tagp += sizeof(journal_block_tag_t);
+		space_left -= sizeof(journal_block_tag_t);
+
+		if (first_tag) {
+			memcpy (tagp, journal->j_uuid, 16);
+			tagp += 16;
+			space_left -= 16;
+			first_tag = 0;
+		}
+#endif		
+		/* If there's no more to do, or if the descriptor is full,
+		   let the IO rip! */
+
+		if (bufs == journal->j_wbufsize ||
+		    commit_transaction->t_buffers == NULL 
+#if 0		    
+		    /*||
+		    space_left < sizeof(journal_block_tag_t) + 16*/
+#endif		    
+		    ) {
+
+			jbd_debug(4, "JBD: Submit %d IOs\n", bufs);
+
+			/* Write an end-of-descriptor marker before
+                           submitting the IOs.  "tag" still points to
+                           the last tag we set up. */
+#if 0
+			tag->t_flags |= cpu_to_be32(JFS_FLAG_LAST_TAG);
+#endif			
+			/* nk : Submit descriptor buffer now only since not recorded in blk chain*/
+			
+			
+start_journal_io:
+			for (i = 0; i < bufs; i++) {
+				struct buffer_head *bh = wbuf[i];
+				lock_buffer(bh);
+				clear_buffer_dirty(bh);
+				set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
+				bh->b_end_io = journal_end_buffer_io_sync;
+				jbd_debug(3, "JBD: submitting metadata buffer %lX of size %lX",bh->b_blocknr,bh->b_size);
+#if 0
+				submit_bh(write_op, bh);
+#endif
+			}
+#if 0			
+			submit_bh(write_op, my_desc_buf);
+#endif			
+			cond_resched();
+
+			/* Force a new descriptor to be generated next
+                           time round the loop. */
+			descriptor = NULL;
+			bufs = 0;
+		}
+	}
+	/* nk : Send txn first and then buffer */
+	jbd_debug(1, "JBD: submitting TXFLASH\n");
+	journal->j_dev->bd_disk->fops->ioctl(journal->j_dev,0777,CYCLIC_COMMIT,(unsigned long )mytxn);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(new_blk_pos,tmp_blk_pos,&(blk_chain.list),list)
+	{
+		submit_bh(write_op,new_blk_pos->bh);
+		list_del(&(new_blk_pos->list));
+		kfree(new_blk_pos);
+			
+	}
+	jbd_debug(3, "JBD: submitted %d descriptors %d data and %d metadata totalling %d and 1 commit record\n", descriptor_counter
+				,data_counter,meta_counter,descriptor_counter+data_counter+meta_counter);
+	/* Lo and behold: we have just managed to send a transaction to
+           the log.  Before we can commit it, wait for the IO so far to
+           complete.  Control buffers being written are on the
+           transaction's t_log_list queue, and metadata buffers are on
+           the t_iobuf_list queue.
+
+	   Wait for the buffers in reverse order.  That way we are
+	   less likely to be woken up until all IOs have completed, and
+	   so we incur less scheduling load.
+	*/
+/*****************************************************************************************/
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	while (commit_transaction->t_locked_list) {
+		struct buffer_head *bh;
+
+		jh = commit_transaction->t_locked_list->b_tprev;
+		bh = jh2bh(jh);
+		get_bh(bh);
+		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
+			spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+			wait_on_buffer(bh);
+			spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+		}
+		if (unlikely(!buffer_uptodate(bh))) {
+			if (!trylock_page(bh->b_page)) {
+				spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+				lock_page(bh->b_page);
+				spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+			}
+			if (bh->b_page->mapping)
+				set_bit(AS_EIO, &bh->b_page->mapping->flags);
+
+			unlock_page(bh->b_page);
+			SetPageError(bh->b_page);
+			err = -EIO;
+		}
+		if (!inverted_lock(journal, bh)) {
+			put_bh(bh);
+			spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (buffer_jbd(bh) && bh2jh(bh) == jh &&
+		    jh->b_transaction == commit_transaction &&
+		    jh->b_jlist == BJ_Locked) {
+			__journal_unfile_buffer(jh);
+			jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+			journal_remove_journal_head(bh);
+			put_bh(bh);
+		} else {
+			jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+		}
+		release_data_buffer(bh);
+		cond_resched_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+
+	if (err) {
+		char b[BDEVNAME_SIZE];
+
+		printk(KERN_WARNING
+			"JBD: Detected IO errors while flushing file data "
+			"on %s\n", bdevname(journal->j_fs_dev, b));
+		if (journal->j_flags & JFS_ABORT_ON_SYNCDATA_ERR)
+			journal_abort(journal, err);
+		err = 0;
+	}
+
+	
+
+	/*
+	 * If we found any dirty or locked buffers, then we should have
+	 * looped back up to the write_out_data label.  If there weren't
+	 * any then journal_clean_data_list should have wiped the list
+	 * clean by now, so check that it is in fact empty.
+	 */
+	J_ASSERT (commit_transaction->t_sync_datalist == NULL);
+/**************************************************************************************** */
+	
+
+	jbd_debug(3, "JBD: commit phase 4\n");
+
+	/*
+	 * akpm: these are BJ_IO, and j_list_lock is not needed.
+	 * See __journal_try_to_free_buffer.
+	 */
+#if 0	 
+wait_for_iobuf:
+	while (commit_transaction->t_iobuf_list != NULL) {
+		struct buffer_head *bh;
+
+		jh = commit_transaction->t_iobuf_list->b_tprev;
+		bh = jh2bh(jh);
+		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
+			wait_on_buffer(bh);
+			goto wait_for_iobuf;
+		}
+		if (cond_resched())
+			goto wait_for_iobuf;
+
+		if (unlikely(!buffer_uptodate(bh)))
+			err = -EIO;
+
+		clear_buffer_jwrite(bh);
+
+		JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "ph4: unfile after journal write");
+		journal_unfile_buffer(journal, jh);
+
+		/*
+		 * ->t_iobuf_list should contain only dummy buffer_heads
+		 * which were created by journal_write_metadata_buffer().
+		 */
+		BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "dumping temporary bh");
+		journal_put_journal_head(jh);
+		__brelse(bh);
+		J_ASSERT_BH(bh, atomic_read(&bh->b_count) == 0);
+		free_buffer_head(bh);
+
+		/* We also have to unlock and free the corresponding
+                   shadowed buffer */
+		jh = commit_transaction->t_shadow_list->b_tprev;
+		bh = jh2bh(jh);
+		clear_buffer_jwrite(bh);
+		J_ASSERT_BH(bh, buffer_jbddirty(bh));
+
+		/* The metadata is now released for reuse, but we need
+                   to remember it against this transaction so that when
+                   we finally commit, we can do any checkpointing
+                   required. */
+		JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "file as BJ_Forget");
+		journal_file_buffer(jh, commit_transaction, BJ_Forget);
+		/* Wake up any transactions which were waiting for this
+		   IO to complete */
+		wake_up_bit(&bh->b_state, BH_Unshadow);
+		JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "brelse shadowed buffer");
+		__brelse(bh);
+	}
+#endif	
+
+	J_ASSERT (commit_transaction->t_shadow_list == NULL);
+
+	jbd_debug(3, "JBD: commit phase 5\n");
+
+	/* Here we wait for the revoke record and descriptor record buffers */
+#if 0	
+ wait_for_ctlbuf:
+	while (commit_transaction->t_log_list != NULL) {
+		struct buffer_head *bh;
+
+		jh = commit_transaction->t_log_list->b_tprev;
+		bh = jh2bh(jh);
+		if (buffer_locked(bh)) {
+			wait_on_buffer(bh);
+			goto wait_for_ctlbuf;
+		}
+		if (cond_resched())
+			goto wait_for_ctlbuf;
+
+		if (unlikely(!buffer_uptodate(bh)))
+			err = -EIO;
+
+		BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "ph5: control buffer writeout done: unfile");
+		clear_buffer_jwrite(bh);
+		journal_unfile_buffer(journal, jh);
+		journal_put_journal_head(jh);
+		__brelse(bh);		/* One for getblk */
+		/* AKPM: bforget here */
+	}
+
+	if (err)
+		journal_abort(journal, err);
+#endif
+
+	jbd_debug(3, "JBD: commit phase 6\n");
+
+	/* All metadata is written, now write commit record and do cleanup */
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_state == T_COMMIT);
+	commit_transaction->t_state = T_COMMIT_RECORD;
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+
+#if 0
+	if (journal_write_commit_record(journal, commit_transaction))
+		err = -EIO;
+
+	if (err)
+		journal_abort(journal, err);
+#endif
+	/* End of a transaction!  Finally, we can do checkpoint
+           processing: any buffers committed as a result of this
+           transaction can be removed from any checkpoint list it was on
+           before. */
+
+	jbd_debug(3, "JBD: commit phase 7\n");
+
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_sync_datalist == NULL);
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_buffers == NULL);
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_checkpoint_list == NULL);
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_iobuf_list == NULL);
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_shadow_list == NULL);
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_log_list == NULL);
+
+restart_loop:
+	/*
+	 * As there are other places (journal_unmap_buffer()) adding buffers
+	 * to this list we have to be careful and hold the j_list_lock.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	while (commit_transaction->t_forget) {
+		transaction_t *cp_transaction;
+		struct buffer_head *bh;
+
+		jh = commit_transaction->t_forget;
+		spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+		bh = jh2bh(jh);
+		jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
+		J_ASSERT_JH(jh,	jh->b_transaction == commit_transaction ||
+			jh->b_transaction == journal->j_running_transaction);
+
+		/*
+		 * If there is undo-protected committed data against
+		 * this buffer, then we can remove it now.  If it is a
+		 * buffer needing such protection, the old frozen_data
+		 * field now points to a committed version of the
+		 * buffer, so rotate that field to the new committed
+		 * data.
+		 *
+		 * Otherwise, we can just throw away the frozen data now.
+		 */
+		if (jh->b_committed_data) {
+			jbd_free(jh->b_committed_data, bh->b_size);
+			jh->b_committed_data = NULL;
+			if (jh->b_frozen_data) {
+				jh->b_committed_data = jh->b_frozen_data;
+				jh->b_frozen_data = NULL;
+			}
+		} else if (jh->b_frozen_data) {
+			jbd_free(jh->b_frozen_data, bh->b_size);
+			jh->b_frozen_data = NULL;
+		}
+
+		spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+		cp_transaction = jh->b_cp_transaction;
+		if (cp_transaction) {
+			JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "remove from old cp transaction");
+			__journal_remove_checkpoint(jh);
+		}
+
+		/* Only re-checkpoint the buffer_head if it is marked
+		 * dirty.  If the buffer was added to the BJ_Forget list
+		 * by journal_forget, it may no longer be dirty and
+		 * there's no point in keeping a checkpoint record for
+		 * it. */
+
+		/* A buffer which has been freed while still being
+		 * journaled by a previous transaction may end up still
+		 * being dirty here, but we want to avoid writing back
+		 * that buffer in the future after the "add to orphan"
+		 * operation been committed,  That's not only a performance
+		 * gain, it also stops aliasing problems if the buffer is
+		 * left behind for writeback and gets reallocated for another
+		 * use in a different page. */
+		if (buffer_freed(bh) && !jh->b_next_transaction) {
+			clear_buffer_freed(bh);
+			clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
+		}
+
+		if (buffer_jbddirty(bh)) {
+			JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "add to new checkpointing trans");
+			__journal_insert_checkpoint(jh, commit_transaction);
+			if (is_journal_aborted(journal))
+				clear_buffer_jbddirty(bh);
+			JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "refile for checkpoint writeback");
+			__journal_refile_buffer(jh);
+			jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+		} else {
+			J_ASSERT_BH(bh, !buffer_dirty(bh));
+			/* The buffer on BJ_Forget list and not jbddirty means
+			 * it has been freed by this transaction and hence it
+			 * could not have been reallocated until this
+			 * transaction has committed. *BUT* it could be
+			 * reallocated once we have written all the data to
+			 * disk and before we process the buffer on BJ_Forget
+			 * list. */
+			JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "refile or unfile freed buffer");
+			__journal_refile_buffer(jh);
+			if (!jh->b_transaction) {
+				jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+				 /* needs a brelse */
+				journal_remove_journal_head(bh);
+				release_buffer_page(bh);
+			} else
+				jbd_unlock_bh_state(bh);
+		}
+		cond_resched_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	/*
+	 * This is a bit sleazy.  We use j_list_lock to protect transition
+	 * of a transaction into T_FINISHED state and calling
+	 * __journal_drop_transaction(). Otherwise we could race with
+	 * other checkpointing code processing the transaction...
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+	spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+	/*
+	 * Now recheck if some buffers did not get attached to the transaction
+	 * while the lock was dropped...
+	 */
+	if (commit_transaction->t_forget) {
+		spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+		goto restart_loop;
+	}
+
+	/* Done with this transaction! */
+
+	jbd_debug(3, "JBD: commit phase 8\n");
+
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction->t_state == T_COMMIT_RECORD);
+
+	commit_transaction->t_state = T_FINISHED;
+	J_ASSERT(commit_transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction);
+	journal->j_commit_sequence = commit_transaction->t_tid;
+	journal->j_committing_transaction = NULL;
+	commit_time = ktime_to_ns(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start_time));
+
+	/*
+	 * weight the commit time higher than the average time so we don't
+	 * react too strongly to vast changes in commit time
+	 */
+	if (likely(journal->j_average_commit_time))
+		journal->j_average_commit_time = (commit_time*3 +
+				journal->j_average_commit_time) / 4;
+	else
+		journal->j_average_commit_time = commit_time;
+
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
+
+	if (commit_transaction->t_checkpoint_list == NULL &&
+	    commit_transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list == NULL) {
+		__journal_drop_transaction(journal, commit_transaction);
+	} else {
+		if (journal->j_checkpoint_transactions == NULL) {
+			journal->j_checkpoint_transactions = commit_transaction;
+			commit_transaction->t_cpnext = commit_transaction;
+			commit_transaction->t_cpprev = commit_transaction;
+		} else {
+			commit_transaction->t_cpnext =
+				journal->j_checkpoint_transactions;
+			commit_transaction->t_cpprev =
+				commit_transaction->t_cpnext->t_cpprev;
+			commit_transaction->t_cpnext->t_cpprev =
+				commit_transaction;
+			commit_transaction->t_cpprev->t_cpnext =
+				commit_transaction;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock);
+
+	jbd_debug(1, "JBD: commit %d complete, head %d\n",
+		  journal->j_commit_sequence, journal->j_tail_sequence);
+
+	wake_up(&journal->j_wait_done_commit);
+}
+
+#endif
diff -ur ./journal.c /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/journal.c
--- ./journal.c	2011-05-10 03:46:23.000000000 +0530
+++ /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/journal.c	2011-06-22 14:24:21.551958448 +0530
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/page.h>
+#include <linux/mtd/blktrans.h>
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(journal_start);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(journal_restart);
@@ -329,11 +330,13 @@
 	/*
 	 * Check for escaping
 	 */
+#ifndef	 TXFLASH
 	if (*((__be32 *)(mapped_data + new_offset)) ==
 				cpu_to_be32(JFS_MAGIC_NUMBER)) {
 		need_copy_out = 1;
 		do_escape = 1;
 	}
+#endif	
 	kunmap_atomic(mapped_data, KM_USER0);
 
 	/*
diff -ur ./recovery.c /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/recovery.c
--- ./recovery.c	2011-05-10 03:46:23.000000000 +0530
+++ /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/recovery.c	2011-06-22 14:24:21.571958448 +0530
@@ -22,6 +22,12 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #endif
 
+#include <linux/mtd/blktrans.h>
+#ifdef TXFLASH
+#include <linux/genhd.h>
+#include <linux/blkdev.h>
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Maintain information about the progress of the recovery job, so that
  * the different passes can carry information between them.
@@ -226,7 +232,7 @@
 	journal_superblock_t *	sb;
 
 	struct recovery_info	info;
+#ifndef TXFLASH
 	memset(&info, 0, sizeof(info));
 	sb = journal->j_superblock;
 
@@ -265,6 +271,9 @@
 		err = err2;
 
 	return err;
+#else
+	return journal->j_dev->bd_disk->fops->ioctl(journal->j_dev,0777,RECOVER,0);
+#endif	
 }
 
 /**
diff -ur ./revoke.c /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/revoke.c
--- ./revoke.c	2011-05-10 03:46:23.000000000 +0530
+++ /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/revoke.c	2011-06-22 17:43:20.229114134 +0530
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
 #include <linux/bio.h>
 #endif
 #include <linux/log2.h>
+#include <linux/mtd/blktrans.h>
 
 static struct kmem_cache *revoke_record_cache;
 static struct kmem_cache *revoke_table_cache;
@@ -119,7 +120,11 @@
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 static void write_one_revoke_record(journal_t *, transaction_t *,
 				    struct journal_head **, int *,
-				    struct jbd_revoke_record_s *, int);
+				    struct jbd_revoke_record_s *, int
+				    ,int*
+				    );
 static void flush_descriptor(journal_t *, struct journal_head *, int, int);
 #endif
 
@@ -508,11 +513,12 @@
 	struct jbd_revoke_table_s *revoke;
 	struct list_head *hash_list;
 	int i, offset, count;
+	int meta_cnt;
 	descriptor = NULL;
 	offset = 0;
 	count = 0;
+	meta_cnt=0;
 	/* select revoke table for committing transaction */
 	revoke = journal->j_revoke == journal->j_revoke_table[0] ?
 		journal->j_revoke_table[1] : journal->j_revoke_table[0];
@@ -525,14 +531,25 @@
 				hash_list->next;
 			write_one_revoke_record(journal, transaction,
 						&descriptor, &offset,
-						record, write_op);
+						record, write_op
+						,&meta_cnt
+						);
 			count++;
 			list_del(&record->hash);
 			kmem_cache_free(revoke_record_cache, record);
 		}
 	}
 	if (descriptor)
+	{
+		meta_cnt++;
+		jbd_debug(1, "my_descriptor record count %d\n", meta_cnt);
 		flush_descriptor(journal, descriptor, offset, write_op);
+	}
 	jbd_debug(1, "Wrote %d revoke records\n", count);
 }
 
@@ -546,7 +563,11 @@
 				    struct journal_head **descriptorp,
 				    int *offsetp,
 				    struct jbd_revoke_record_s *record,
-				    int write_op)
+				    int write_op
+					,int *meta_cnt
+				    )
 {
 	struct journal_head *descriptor;
 	int offset;
@@ -565,6 +586,9 @@
 	/* Make sure we have a descriptor with space left for the record */
 	if (descriptor) {
 		if (offset == journal->j_blocksize) {
+			(*meta_cnt)++;
 			flush_descriptor(journal, descriptor, offset, write_op);
 			descriptor = NULL;
 		}
diff -ur ./transaction.c /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/transaction.c
--- ./transaction.c	2011-05-10 03:46:23.000000000 +0530
+++ /home/srimugunthan/niraj/linux_kernel/linux-2.6.38.6/fs/jbd/transaction.c	2011-06-22 14:24:21.501958448 +0530
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 #include <linux/highmem.h>
 #include <linux/hrtimer.h>
+#include <linux/mtd/blktrans.h>
 
 static void __journal_temp_unlink_buffer(struct journal_head *jh);
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: Help required for Debugging JBD
  2011-06-22 18:27   ` Niraj Kulkarni
@ 2011-06-22 19:29     ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2011-06-22 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Niraj Kulkarni; +Cc: linux-ext4

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Niraj Kulkarni
<kulkarniniraj14@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>     Thanks for that SysRq tip. Now I am able to get some logs.
>
> From OOPS message, it showed an assertion failure on
>    J_ASSERT_JH(jh, jh->b_transaction == journal->j_committing_transaction);
>
> In my code, I've modified journal_commit_transaction such that it collects
> all buffer_head in a linked list, with their corresponding
> buffer numbers in other list.
>     I collect all buffers (data + metadata ) and push them all
> simultaneously and pass list of block numbers through a special ioctl call.
>
> The problem that I see in my code is that all buffers are handled in same
> way as all data buffers in original code. ie metadata buffers are
> getting unfiled instead of refiling.

I am not sure what you are saying, but it sounds bad.
data buffers and metadata buffers are handled very differently.

>
> I am attaching my patch. Please can you see and check if that indeed is
> problem here?
>

JBD is one complicated piece of work (to me), so even if I do find time
to review your patch, it's not going to be easy for me.

> Also what can be possible solution to it? separation of buffers in 2 list
> (data, metadata) and handling them separately?
>

Without looking at your patches, I have a lead for you.
Lookup the "Journal guided RAID resync" patches.
They do something similar to what you describe, for a different purpose,
but they also maintain a list of data blocks and yes, they deal with them
separately.
These patches have been already tested, so they used to be in good shape,
but are not uptodate.

Good luck,
Amir.

> (Being a kernel noob, my coding does not conform to any standard. So please
> point out any blunders I've committed in my patch)
>
> Thank You
> Niraj
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-06-22 19:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-06-21 16:52 Help required for Debugging JBD Niraj Kulkarni
2011-06-22  6:43 ` Amir Goldstein
2011-06-22 18:27   ` Niraj Kulkarni
2011-06-22 19:29     ` Amir Goldstein

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.