From: Russell Harmon <eatnumber1@gmail.com> To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: mpatocka@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve the dm-integrity documentation. Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 11:25:06 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CA+zrezTegR8jHQA3MNM6WnfFU_RP4=fiCuk6WgwJZsjZ2PYUSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <65b7bc64-4a4b-c056-db65-cd77bcc3d1d9@gmail.com> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:07 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/4/23 03:15, Russell Harmon wrote: > > Thanks for taking a look. Here's the multi-patch series plus the changes > > you suggested. > > > > > > This is v2, right? Next reroll, remember to version your patches > (pass -v to git-format-patch(1)). Will do. > Also, I don't see description (that would be commit message > once applied by jon) in all patches on this series. I hope you > have a time reading Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > so that trivial mistakes like this shouldn't happen again. In > any case, when preparing patch series, always add cover letter > by passing --cover-letter to git-format-patch(1) then edit the > generated template (look for 0000-*-cover-letter.patch). My "thanks for taking a look" email was the cover letter. Interesting that the commit message didn't go through in the body, they're each one line and were moved to the subject line. I'll try again and add a little more description.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Russell Harmon <eatnumber1@gmail.com> To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, mpatocka@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] Improve the dm-integrity documentation. Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2023 11:25:06 -0700 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CA+zrezTegR8jHQA3MNM6WnfFU_RP4=fiCuk6WgwJZsjZ2PYUSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <65b7bc64-4a4b-c056-db65-cd77bcc3d1d9@gmail.com> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:07 AM Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 6/4/23 03:15, Russell Harmon wrote: > > Thanks for taking a look. Here's the multi-patch series plus the changes > > you suggested. > > > > > > This is v2, right? Next reroll, remember to version your patches > (pass -v to git-format-patch(1)). Will do. > Also, I don't see description (that would be commit message > once applied by jon) in all patches on this series. I hope you > have a time reading Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst > so that trivial mistakes like this shouldn't happen again. In > any case, when preparing patch series, always add cover letter > by passing --cover-letter to git-format-patch(1) then edit the > generated template (look for 0000-*-cover-letter.patch). My "thanks for taking a look" email was the cover letter. Interesting that the commit message didn't go through in the body, they're each one line and were moved to the subject line. I'll try again and add a little more description. -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-04 18:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-05-30 0:20 [dm-devel] [PATCH] Improve the dm-integrity documentation Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 10:02 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 12:50 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-03 12:50 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-03 12:45 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-03 12:45 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-03 20:15 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] Fix minor grammatical error in dm-integrity.rst Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] Documents the meaning of "buffer" in dm-integrity Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] Document dm-integrity default values Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] Document an example of how the tunables relate in dm-integrity Russell Harmon 2023-06-03 20:15 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 14:07 ` [PATCH] Improve the dm-integrity documentation Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-04 14:07 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-04 18:25 ` Russell Harmon [this message] 2023-06-04 18:25 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Fix minor grammatical error in dm-integrity.rst Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 3:03 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 3:03 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 5:00 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:00 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] Documents the meaning of "buffer" in dm-integrity Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 3:05 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 3:05 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 3:07 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 3:07 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 5:01 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:01 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] Document dm-integrity default values Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 3:16 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 3:16 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 5:05 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:05 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 13:23 ` Jonathan Corbet 2023-06-05 13:23 ` [dm-devel] " Jonathan Corbet 2023-06-06 2:16 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-06 2:16 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] Document an example of how the tunables relate in dm-integrity Russell Harmon 2023-06-04 19:06 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 3:17 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 3:17 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 5:05 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:05 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve the dm-integrity documentation Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] Documentation: dm-integrity: Fix minor grammatical error Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-06 2:17 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-06 2:17 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] Documentation: dm-integrity: Document the meaning of "buffer" Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-06 2:18 ` Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-06 2:18 ` [dm-devel] " Bagas Sanjaya 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] Documentation: dm-integrity: Document default values Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] Documentation: dm-integrity: Document an example of how the tunables relate Russell Harmon 2023-06-05 5:08 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon 2023-06-17 19:37 ` Russell Harmon 2023-06-17 19:37 ` [dm-devel] " Russell Harmon
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CA+zrezTegR8jHQA3MNM6WnfFU_RP4=fiCuk6WgwJZsjZ2PYUSw@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=eatnumber1@gmail.com \ --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \ --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \ --cc=snitzer@redhat.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.