From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jianqun Xu" <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pinctrl: rockchip: add support for rk3568
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 01:17:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAEAJfB3csiXBtAioV768PYMb4Sv8UYvmaVaOXZDhJWEzXPLeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY+A4bsW28yXRGeGVnK_UcR70sMeX3jpABGVJc49A-xcg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus, Jianqun,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 10:41, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:14 AM Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> > RK3568 SoCs have 5 gpio controllers, each gpio has 32 pins. GPIO supports
> > set iomux, pull, drive strength and schmitt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - fix route_type to route_location, compile error fix
> > - remove slewrate option
>
> This v3 applied. Any additional review comments can be fixed in follow-up
> patches.
>
I'm really glad to see RK3568 happening this early :-)
Seems we are missing the dt-bindings for the new compatible string
"rockchip,rk3568-pinctrl". Is there a patch for it somewhere?
Thanks a lot!
Ezequiel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Jianqun Xu" <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>,
"Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] pinctrl: rockchip: add support for rk3568
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 01:17:44 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAEAJfB3csiXBtAioV768PYMb4Sv8UYvmaVaOXZDhJWEzXPLeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdY+A4bsW28yXRGeGVnK_UcR70sMeX3jpABGVJc49A-xcg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus, Jianqun,
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 at 10:41, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:14 AM Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>
> > RK3568 SoCs have 5 gpio controllers, each gpio has 32 pins. GPIO supports
> > set iomux, pull, drive strength and schmitt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu <jay.xu@rock-chips.com>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - fix route_type to route_location, compile error fix
> > - remove slewrate option
>
> This v3 applied. Any additional review comments can be fixed in follow-up
> patches.
>
I'm really glad to see RK3568 happening this early :-)
Seems we are missing the dt-bindings for the new compatible string
"rockchip,rk3568-pinctrl". Is there a patch for it somewhere?
Thanks a lot!
Ezequiel
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-09 4:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-23 7:24 [PATCH] pinctrl: rockchip: add support for rk3568 Jianqun Xu
2021-02-23 7:24 ` Jianqun Xu
2021-02-23 10:08 ` Johan Jonker
2021-02-23 10:08 ` Johan Jonker
2021-02-23 10:11 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-02-23 10:11 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-02-24 11:39 ` [PATCH v2] " Jianqun Xu
2021-02-24 11:39 ` Jianqun Xu
2021-03-04 0:58 ` [PATCH v3] " Jianqun Xu
2021-03-04 0:58 ` Jianqun Xu
2021-03-04 1:33 ` [PATCH v3 RESEND] " Jianqun Xu
2021-03-04 1:33 ` Jianqun Xu
2021-03-05 1:24 ` Kever Yang
2021-03-05 1:24 ` Kever Yang
2021-03-19 8:11 ` [PATCH v3] " Jianqun Xu
2021-03-19 8:11 ` Jianqun Xu
2021-03-19 8:14 ` [PATCH v4] " Jianqun Xu
2021-03-19 8:14 ` Jianqun Xu
2021-03-19 11:28 ` jay.xu
2021-03-19 11:28 ` jay.xu
2021-04-08 13:40 ` Linus Walleij
2021-04-08 13:40 ` Linus Walleij
2021-04-09 4:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2021-04-09 4:17 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2021-04-09 12:37 ` Linus Walleij
2021-04-09 12:37 ` Linus Walleij
2021-04-10 18:30 ` Peter Geis
2021-04-10 18:30 ` Peter Geis
2021-04-10 21:10 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-04-10 21:10 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-04-11 0:40 ` Linus Walleij
2021-04-11 0:40 ` Linus Walleij
2021-04-11 3:40 ` Peter Geis
2021-04-11 3:40 ` Peter Geis
2021-04-11 7:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-04-11 7:55 ` Heiko Stübner
2021-04-14 7:31 ` Linus Walleij
2021-04-14 7:31 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAAEAJfB3csiXBtAioV768PYMb4Sv8UYvmaVaOXZDhJWEzXPLeA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jay.xu@rock-chips.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.