From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:07:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYGYPhPZQmgeLA-K-RQKZMLy1qHY6P7LS6SKsFC=d=MHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161024194917.g5oezqc4uacsyt24@lukather>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from
> your tree, is there a reason for that?
No can you point it out?
> Also, in order to preserve bisectability, could you create an
> immutable branch for those sunxi patches so that I can merge the DT
> bits?
It's too late because they are already in the devel branch
and mixed up with merged of *other* immutable stuff.
However I think it is plain wrong to try to keep any bisectability
between the kernel at large and arch/*/boot/dts/*, because
the DTS stuff is supposed to at some point be maintained outside
of the kernel and for all OSes, they simply shouldn't be sync:ed.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 14:07:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYGYPhPZQmgeLA-K-RQKZMLy1qHY6P7LS6SKsFC=d=MHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161024194917.g5oezqc4uacsyt24@lukather>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> However, it looks like the first patch from this serie is missing from
> your tree, is there a reason for that?
No can you point it out?
> Also, in order to preserve bisectability, could you create an
> immutable branch for those sunxi patches so that I can merge the DT
> bits?
It's too late because they are already in the devel branch
and mixed up with merged of *other* immutable stuff.
However I think it is plain wrong to try to keep any bisectability
between the kernel at large and arch/*/boot/dts/*, because
the DTS stuff is supposed to at some point be maintained outside
of the kernel and for all OSes, they simply shouldn't be sync:ed.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-25 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-20 13:49 [PATCH v3 0/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Generic bindings rework Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-29 9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-29 9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-29 9:08 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Support generic binding Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-24 0:02 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-24 0:02 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-24 0:02 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] dt-bindings: pinctrl: Deprecate sunxi pinctrl bindings Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-24 0:03 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-24 0:03 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-24 0:03 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <CACRpkdb7zs7Nhs3i1o=WUt787vJCuePre3Tj3wLu++qwpO0atQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-24 19:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-24 19:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-24 19:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-25 12:07 ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2016-10-25 12:07 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-25 12:07 ` Linus Walleij
2016-10-25 13:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-25 13:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-25 13:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner,drive property Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner,pull property Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 15:38 ` Jean-Francois Moine
2016-10-20 15:38 ` Jean-Francois Moine
[not found] ` <20161020173848.be9cf97854f8933b3ce90d55-GANU6spQydw@public.gmane.org>
2016-10-21 10:40 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-10-21 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner, pull property Maxime Ripard
2016-10-21 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: sunxi: Remove useless allwinner,pull property Maxime Ripard
2016-10-20 13:49 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: sunxi: Convert pinctrl nodes to generic bindings Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACRpkdYGYPhPZQmgeLA-K-RQKZMLy1qHY6P7LS6SKsFC=d=MHg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.