[PATCH 4/6] pinctrl: sunxi: add clock support

[linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)]

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Linus Walleij (2013-04-04 04:37:23)
>> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Maxime Ripard
>> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> > Le 03/04/2013 13:59, Linus Walleij a ?crit :
>> >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Maxime Ripard
>> >> <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Linus,
>> >>> Le 27/03/2013 14:14, Linus Walleij a ?crit :
>> >>>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> For the port controller to work, we need to enable the apb0_pio gate.
>> >>>>> This commit adds the ability to enable one clock specified on the device
>> >>>>> tree to the pinctrl driver.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Emilio L?pez <emilio@elopez.com.ar>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I guess you'll want to merge these as one series to some platform-specific
>> >>>> tree, tell me if you want it merged in the pinctrl tree.
>> >>>
>> >>> The easiest would probably be to merge this patch through your patch,
>> >>> with Mike taking the clock driver patches and me taking the dt ones,
>> >>> once we agree on the other patches.
>> >>
>> >> OK then, patch applied to the pinctrl tree, thanks!
>> >
>> > Ouch, the previous patches aren't applied yet by Mike, and we didn't
>> > have some comments from him about these patches, so I can't really say
>> > if the previous patches will get merge by 3.10 or not... So we will
>> > maybe end up with a broken pinctrl stuff.
>>
>> This is usually why we keep patches together and merge whole series
>> into one tree, such as ARM SoC.
>>
>> Well, maybe I'll drop it then ...
>>
>
> I plan on taking in the three clk patches after getting final comments
> from Gregory.  So maybe you do not need to drop the pinctrl patches?

No, I'm keeping it around, no problem.

Thanks Mike,
Linus Walleij