From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
coreteam@netfilter.org,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>,
dccp@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Subject: Re: SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 15:52:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ay6+UTLMr4K_RTTubjzpGZXe2n7T8Q=kC=Q1baHshkHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180801134628.ueyzwg2gszrvk2hc@breakpoint.cc>
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>> If that scenario is possible that a fix would be to make
>
> Looks possible.
>
>> __nf_conntrack_find_get ever return NULL iff it got NULL from
>> ____nf_conntrack_find (not if any of the checks has failed).
>
> I don't see why we need to restart on nf_ct_is_dying(), but other
> than that this seems ok.
Because it can be a wrong entry dying. When we check dying, we don't
yet know if we are looking at the right entry or not. If we
successfully acquire a reference, then recheck nf_ct_key_equal and
_then_ check dying, then we don't need to restart on dying. But with
the current check order, we need to restart on dying too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
coreteam@netfilter.org,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>,
dccp@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedeskt
Subject: Re: SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 15:52:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ay6+UTLMr4K_RTTubjzpGZXe2n7T8Q=kC=Q1baHshkHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180801134628.ueyzwg2gszrvk2hc@breakpoint.cc>
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>> If that scenario is possible that a fix would be to make
>
> Looks possible.
>
>> __nf_conntrack_find_get ever return NULL iff it got NULL from
>> ____nf_conntrack_find (not if any of the checks has failed).
>
> I don't see why we need to restart on nf_ct_is_dying(), but other
> than that this seems ok.
Because it can be a wrong entry dying. When we check dying, we don't
yet know if we are looking at the right entry or not. If we
successfully acquire a reference, then recheck nf_ct_key_equal and
_then_ check dying, then we don't need to restart on dying. But with
the current check order, we need to restart on dying too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
coreteam@netfilter.org,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>,
dccp@vger.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedeskt>
Subject: Re: SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation)
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 15:52:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ay6+UTLMr4K_RTTubjzpGZXe2n7T8Q=kC=Q1baHshkHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180801134628.ueyzwg2gszrvk2hc@breakpoint.cc>
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>> If that scenario is possible that a fix would be to make
>
> Looks possible.
>
>> __nf_conntrack_find_get ever return NULL iff it got NULL from
>> ____nf_conntrack_find (not if any of the checks has failed).
>
> I don't see why we need to restart on nf_ct_is_dying(), but other
> than that this seems ok.
Because it can be a wrong entry dying. When we check dying, we don't
yet know if we are looking at the right entry or not. If we
successfully acquire a reference, then recheck nf_ct_key_equal and
_then_ check dying, then we don't need to restart on dying. But with
the current check order, we need to restart on dying too.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
To: dccp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 13:52:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ay6+UTLMr4K_RTTubjzpGZXe2n7T8Q=kC=Q1baHshkHQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3b48104-3efb-1896-0d46-792419f49a75@virtuozzo.com>
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 3:46 PM, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> wrote:
> Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> wrote:
>> If that scenario is possible that a fix would be to make
>
> Looks possible.
>
>> __nf_conntrack_find_get ever return NULL iff it got NULL from
>> ____nf_conntrack_find (not if any of the checks has failed).
>
> I don't see why we need to restart on nf_ct_is_dying(), but other
> than that this seems ok.
Because it can be a wrong entry dying. When we check dying, we don't
yet know if we are looking at the right entry or not. If we
successfully acquire a reference, then recheck nf_ct_key_equal and
_then_ check dying, then we don't need to restart on dying. But with
the current check order, we need to restart on dying too.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-01 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 123+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-31 17:01 SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Andrey Ryabinin
2018-07-31 17:01 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementatio Andrey Ryabinin
2018-07-31 17:01 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Andrey Ryabinin
2018-07-31 17:09 ` Florian Westphal
2018-07-31 17:09 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Florian Westphal
2018-07-31 17:09 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Florian Westphal
2018-07-31 17:09 ` Florian Westphal
2018-07-31 17:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:32 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:32 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:36 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-31 17:36 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Christopher Lameter
2018-07-31 17:36 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Christopher Lameter
2018-07-31 17:36 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-07-31 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:41 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:41 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:51 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-31 17:51 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-31 17:51 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-31 17:51 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-07-31 18:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 18:16 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 18:16 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 18:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-07-31 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 17:49 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 17:49 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 17:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 18:51 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 18:51 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-31 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-08-01 8:46 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 8:46 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 8:46 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 8:46 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 9:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 9:10 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 9:10 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 9:10 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:35 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 10:35 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 10:35 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 10:35 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 10:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:41 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:41 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:41 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 11:40 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 11:40 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 11:40 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 11:40 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 12:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 12:38 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 12:38 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 12:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 13:46 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 13:46 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 13:46 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 13:46 ` Florian Westphal
2018-08-01 13:52 ` Dmitry Vyukov [this message]
2018-08-01 13:52 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 13:52 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 13:52 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-06 20:20 ` Jan Kara
2018-08-06 20:20 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Jan Kara
2018-08-06 20:20 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Jan Kara
2018-08-06 20:20 ` Jan Kara
2018-08-01 9:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2018-08-01 9:03 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Andrey Ryabinin
2018-08-01 9:03 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Andrey Ryabinin
2018-08-01 9:03 ` Andrey Ryabinin
2018-08-01 10:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 10:23 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 10:23 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 10:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 10:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:34 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:34 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 10:34 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 11:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 11:28 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 11:28 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 11:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 11:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 11:35 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 11:35 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 11:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 15:15 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 15:15 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 15:15 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 15:15 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 15:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 15:37 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 15:37 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 15:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 15:51 ` Misuse of constructors Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-01 15:51 ` Matthew Wilcox
2018-08-01 15:53 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 15:53 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 15:53 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 15:53 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 16:22 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 16:22 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 16:22 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 16:22 ` Christopher Lameter
2018-08-01 16:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 16:25 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 16:25 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 16:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 16:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 16:47 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 16:47 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 16:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2018-08-01 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 17:18 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implement Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 17:18 ` SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation) Eric Dumazet
2018-08-01 17:18 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CACT4Y+ay6+UTLMr4K_RTTubjzpGZXe2n7T8Q=kC=Q1baHshkHQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.