From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Microship SAMA5D4 VPU support et al Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:22:05 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACvgo53V8sZ2PA0NTR1=JCqcFGBecqs7=aB4uofApOa-C0GZCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YFxObibxqK23WTMf@piout.net> Greetings all, On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 08:48, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > On 24/03/2021 14:44:14+0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > Now, when we have the tag from Rob, how to coordinate these different > > pieces? Will it go through the media git tree? Will we benefit from a stable > > branch to share or will we just have to wait for the driver to hit Mainline > > before adding the defconfig and DT patches? > > Thanks for the Acked-by Nicolas. > > I think the defconfig and dt patches can go through at91 as soon as we > get Rob's ack. There is no build dependency so it can be taken at any > time. Worst case, we end up with a selected config option that doesn't > exist. > My personal preference is to merge everything in one go. I believe it will be easier from maintainer's point of view, plus odds of conflicts with the AT91 tree are close to zero. Then again, as long as the maintainers are happy - I'm fine either way. Thanks Emil
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@collabora.com>, devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Microship SAMA5D4 VPU support et al Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 14:22:05 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CACvgo53V8sZ2PA0NTR1=JCqcFGBecqs7=aB4uofApOa-C0GZCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YFxObibxqK23WTMf@piout.net> Greetings all, On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 08:48, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> wrote: > > On 24/03/2021 14:44:14+0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > > Now, when we have the tag from Rob, how to coordinate these different > > pieces? Will it go through the media git tree? Will we benefit from a stable > > branch to share or will we just have to wait for the driver to hit Mainline > > before adding the defconfig and DT patches? > > Thanks for the Acked-by Nicolas. > > I think the defconfig and dt patches can go through at91 as soon as we > get Rob's ack. There is no build dependency so it can be taken at any > time. Worst case, we end up with a selected config option that doesn't > exist. > My personal preference is to merge everything in one go. I believe it will be easier from maintainer's point of view, plus odds of conflicts with the AT91 tree are close to zero. Then again, as long as the maintainers are happy - I'm fine either way. Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ Linux-rockchip mailing list Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-25 14:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-11 15:40 [PATCH v2 00/10] Microship SAMA5D4 VPU support et al Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] media: hantro: use G1_REG_INTERRUPT directly for the mpeg2 Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] media: hantro: imx: reuse MB_DIM define Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] media: hantro: imx: remove duplicate dec_base init Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] media: hantro: imx: remove unused include Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] media: hantro: introduce hantro_g1.c for common API Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] media: dt-bindings: Document SAMA5D4 VDEC bindings Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-24 15:17 ` Rob Herring 2021-03-24 15:17 ` Rob Herring 2021-03-25 14:14 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-25 14:14 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-26 14:28 ` Ezequiel Garcia 2021-03-26 14:28 ` Ezequiel Garcia 2021-03-31 17:42 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-31 17:42 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-26 14:33 ` Ezequiel Garcia 2021-03-26 14:33 ` Ezequiel Garcia 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] media: hantro: add initial SAMA5D4 support Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] ARM: dts: sama5d4: enable Hantro G1 VDEC Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] ARM: configs: at91: sama5: update with savedefconfig Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] ARM: configs: at91: sama5: enable the Hantro G1 engine Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-11 15:40 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-16 17:23 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Microship SAMA5D4 VPU support et al Ezequiel Garcia 2021-03-16 17:23 ` Ezequiel Garcia 2021-03-24 12:49 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-24 12:49 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-24 13:44 ` Nicolas Ferre 2021-03-24 13:44 ` Nicolas Ferre 2021-03-25 8:48 ` Alexandre Belloni 2021-03-25 8:48 ` Alexandre Belloni 2021-03-25 14:22 ` Emil Velikov [this message] 2021-03-25 14:22 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-29 9:53 ` Nicolas Ferre 2021-03-29 9:53 ` Nicolas Ferre 2021-03-31 17:36 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-31 17:36 ` Emil Velikov 2021-03-25 15:50 ` Nicolas Ferre 2021-03-25 15:50 ` Nicolas Ferre 2021-03-24 19:58 ` Nicolas Dufresne 2021-03-24 19:58 ` Nicolas Dufresne
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CACvgo53V8sZ2PA0NTR1=JCqcFGBecqs7=aB4uofApOa-C0GZCA@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \ --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=ezequiel@collabora.com \ --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \ --cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \ --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.