All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] sctp: not copying duplicate addrs to the assoc's bind address list
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 14:41:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_do3kQSotq7-PbvoCBBSwOBBdZtx=rR+Q2XX3_bhV4_0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160819175007.GB3578@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

> Ah, I see what you're doing.  Ok, this makes some sense, at least on the receive
> side, when you get a cookie unpacked and modify the remote peers address list,
> it makes sense to check for duplicates.  On the local side however, I would,
> instead of checking it when the list gets copied, I'd check it when the master
> list gets updated (in the NETDEV_UP event notifier for the local address list,

I was thinking about to check it in the NETDEV_UP, yes it can make the
master list has no duplicated addresses.  But what if two same addresses
events come, and they come from different NICs (though I can't point  out
the valid use case), then we filter there.

Later, sctp may receive one  NETDEV_DOWN event,sctp will remove that
addr in the master list, but it shouldn't have been removed, as another local
NIC still has that addr.

That's why I have to leave the master alone, just check when they are really
being bind to asoc addr list.

> and the sctp_add_bind_addr function for the endpoint address list).  That way

As to the endpoint address list, sctp has different process for binding
the address 'ANY' from assoc address list (note that this issue only
happened in binding the address 'ANY'). instead of  copying the master
address list to  the endpoint, it only adds address 'ANY' to the EP
address list. Only when starting a connection and create the assoc, it
copy the master address list to ASOC.

So no need to do it in sctp_add_bind_addr for endpoint address list.
Besides, sctp_add_bind_addr  is supposed to be called after checking
the duplicated address(I got it from sctp_do_bind()). :-)

> you can keep that nested for loop out of the send path on the local system.
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: network dev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, davem <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
	daniel@iogearbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] sctp: not copying duplicate addrs to the assoc's bind address list
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 06:41:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADvbK_do3kQSotq7-PbvoCBBSwOBBdZtx=rR+Q2XX3_bhV4_0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160819175007.GB3578@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>

> Ah, I see what you're doing.  Ok, this makes some sense, at least on the receive
> side, when you get a cookie unpacked and modify the remote peers address list,
> it makes sense to check for duplicates.  On the local side however, I would,
> instead of checking it when the list gets copied, I'd check it when the master
> list gets updated (in the NETDEV_UP event notifier for the local address list,

I was thinking about to check it in the NETDEV_UP, yes it can make the
master list has no duplicated addresses.  But what if two same addresses
events come, and they come from different NICs (though I can't point  out
the valid use case), then we filter there.

Later, sctp may receive one  NETDEV_DOWN event,sctp will remove that
addr in the master list, but it shouldn't have been removed, as another local
NIC still has that addr.

That's why I have to leave the master alone, just check when they are really
being bind to asoc addr list.

> and the sctp_add_bind_addr function for the endpoint address list).  That way

As to the endpoint address list, sctp has different process for binding
the address 'ANY' from assoc address list (note that this issue only
happened in binding the address 'ANY'). instead of  copying the master
address list to  the endpoint, it only adds address 'ANY' to the EP
address list. Only when starting a connection and create the assoc, it
copy the master address list to ASOC.

So no need to do it in sctp_add_bind_addr for endpoint address list.
Besides, sctp_add_bind_addr  is supposed to be called after checking
the duplicated address(I got it from sctp_do_bind()). :-)

> you can keep that nested for loop out of the send path on the local system.
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-20  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-19 11:30 [PATCH net 0/2] sctp: not copying duplicate addrs to the assoc's bind address list Xin Long
2016-08-19 11:30 ` Xin Long
2016-08-19 11:30 ` [PATCH net 1/2] sctp: reduce indent level in sctp_copy_local_addr_list Xin Long
2016-08-19 11:30   ` Xin Long
2016-08-19 11:30   ` [PATCH net 2/2] sctp: not copying duplicate addrs to the assoc's bind address list Xin Long
2016-08-19 11:30     ` Xin Long
2016-08-19 13:30     ` Neil Horman
2016-08-19 13:30       ` Neil Horman
2016-08-19 15:16       ` Xin Long
2016-08-19 15:16         ` Xin Long
2016-08-19 17:50     ` Neil Horman
2016-08-19 17:50       ` Neil Horman
2016-08-20  6:41       ` Xin Long [this message]
2016-08-20  6:41         ` Xin Long
2016-08-22 14:25         ` Neil Horman
2016-08-22 14:25           ` Neil Horman
2016-08-24  5:14           ` Xin Long
2016-08-24  5:14             ` Xin Long
2016-08-24 10:38             ` Neil Horman
2016-08-24 10:38               ` Neil Horman
2016-12-17  9:56               ` Xin Long
2016-12-17  9:56                 ` Xin Long
2016-12-19 12:35                 ` Neil Horman
2016-12-19 12:35                   ` Neil Horman
2016-08-24 11:23           ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-08-24 11:23             ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-08-25  4:03             ` Xin Long
2016-08-25  4:03               ` Xin Long
2016-08-25 12:10               ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-08-25 12:10                 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-09-02 13:22               ` David Laight
2016-09-02 13:22                 ` David Laight
2016-09-02 13:46                 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-09-02 13:46                   ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2016-09-02 14:25                   ` David Laight
2016-09-02 14:25                     ` David Laight
2016-09-02 14:44                     ` 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner'
2016-09-02 14:44                       ` 'Marcelo Ricardo Leitner'

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADvbK_do3kQSotq7-PbvoCBBSwOBBdZtx=rR+Q2XX3_bhV4_0w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=lucien.xin@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.