[U-Boot] [EXT] Re: [PATCH 1/3 v3] armv8: ls1028a: Add NXP LS1028A SoC support

[Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>]

Hi Andy,

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 2:45 PM Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Bin,
>
> Thanks for your review. Please see my comments below.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > Sent: 2019年5月17日 14:32
> > To: Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>
> > Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>;
> > Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>; Sudhanshu Gupta
> > <sudhanshu.gupta@nxp.com>; U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>;
> > Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>; Bhaskar Upadhaya
> > <bhaskar.upadhaya@nxp.com>
> > Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v3] armv8: ls1028a: Add NXP
> > LS1028A SoC support
> >
> > Caution: EXT Email
> >
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 11:23 AM Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Bin,
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: 2019年5月16日 20:10
> > > > To: Andy Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>; Simon Glass
> > <sjg@chromium.org>;
> > > > Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
> > > > Cc: Prabhakar Kushwaha <prabhakar.kushwaha@nxp.com>; Sudhanshu
> > Gupta
> > > > <sudhanshu.gupta@nxp.com>; U-Boot Mailing List
> > > > <u-boot@lists.denx.de>; Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@nxp.com>; Bhaskar
> > > > Upadhaya <bhaskar.upadhaya@nxp.com>
> > > > Subject: [EXT] Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v3] armv8: ls1028a: Add NXP
> > > > LS1028A SoC support
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:50 PM Yuantian Tang <andy.tang@nxp.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ls1028a Soc is based on Layerscape Chassis Generation 3.2
> > > > > architecture with features:
> > > > >  2 ARM v8 Cortex-A72 cores, CCI400, SEC, DDR3L/4, LCD, GPU, TSN
> > > > > ENETC, 2 USB 3.0, 2 eSDHC, 2 FlexCAN, 2 SPI, SATA, 8 I2C
> > > > > controllers,
> > > > >  6 LPUARTs, GPIO, SAI, qDMA, eDMA, GIC, TMU etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sudhanshu Gupta <sudhanshu.gupta@nxp.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rai Harninder <harninder.rai@nxp.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat <rajesh.bhagat@nxp.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Upadhaya <Bhaskar.Upadhaya@nxp.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <andy.tang@nxp.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v3:
> > > > >         -- fix some issues
> > > > >  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Kconfig          |  39 ++-
> > > > >  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/Makefile         |   4 +
> > > > >  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c            |   3 +
> > > > >  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/doc/README.soc   |  51 ++++
> > > > >  arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ls1028a_serdes.c |  73 ++++++
> > > > >  arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi                      | 280
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/config.h  |  61 +++++
> > > > >  .../include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/immap_lsch3.h  |   9 +
> > > > >  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/soc.h     |   1 +
> > > > >  .../asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/stream_id_lsch3.h      |   2 +-
> > > > >  10 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)  create mode
> > > > > 100644 arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/ls1028a_serdes.c
> > > > >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I really would like to see complete DM driver support on this new
> > platform.
> > > > Please consider converting appropriate codes to driver model. If
> > > > there is no proper uclass model, please propose one and discuss it
> > > > on the list. I see the existing NXP PowerPC support is stuck in such
> > > > a situation that lots of codes are still non-DM and we are getting
> > > > close to the DM deadline. I don't want to see such happens again in the
> > NXP ARM support.
> > > Could you please be more specific which part of code is non-DM based?
> > > I checked it and didn't find where is non-DM.
> > > Thanks for your review.
> >
> > For example, the "config ARCH_LS1028A" selects the following I2C
> > components:
> >
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C1
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C2
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C3
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C4
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C5
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C6
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C7
> > +       select SYS_I2C_MXC_I2C8
> >
> > These I2C# macros look to me this is not DM based. For DM such stuff is
> > determined from the DT automatically.
> Agree. Our I2C IP owner is working on it and will change all I2C driver to DM based.

Great.

>
> >
> > For ls1028a_serdes.c, we probably need create serdes uclass driver for it.
> We don't have serdes dts node in both uboot and kernel. So I think we can leave it as it is.

I see. Then let's keep it as it is.

>
> >
> > For arch/arm/cpu/armv8/fsl-layerscape/cpu.c, can we create a CPU driver for
> > it? I see lots of CONFIG_XXX_BASE and CONFIG_XXX_SIZE in this file that
> > come from arch/arm/include/asm/arch-fsl-layerscape/cpu.h? Can't we get
> > such in DT?
> Agree. But this affects all our platforms and need big efforts. Many components are involved in it.
> We will convert it step by step.
>

Sounds you already have a plan, which is good!

Regards,
Bin