[PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi]

This is the seventh version of the TC-BPF series.

It adds a simple API that uses netlink to attach the tc filter and its bpf
classifier program. Currently, a user needs to shell out to the tc command line
to be able to create filters and attach SCHED_CLS programs as classifiers. With
the help of this API, it will be possible to use libbpf for doing all parts of
bpf program setup and attach.

Changelog contains details of patchset evolution.

In an effort to keep discussion focused, this series doesn't have the high level
TC-BPF API. It was clear that there is a need for a bpf_link API in the kernel,
hence that will be submitted as a separate patchset based on this.

The individual commit messages contain more details, and also a brief summary of
the API.

Changelog:
----------
v6 -> v7
v6: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210504005023.1240974-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * Address all comments from Daniel
   * Rename BPF_NL_* to NL_*
   * Make bpf_tc_query only support targeted query
   * Adjust inconsistencies in the commit message
   * Drop RTM_GETTFILTER NLM_F_DUMP support
   * Other misc cleanups (also remove bpf_tc_query selftest for dump mode)

v5 -> v6
v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210428162553.719588-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * Address all comments from Andrii.
 * Reorganize selftest to make logical separation between each test's set up
   and clean up more clear to the reader. Also add a common way to test
   different combination of opts.
 * Cleanup the commit message a bit.
 * Fix instances of ret < 0 && ret == -ENOENT pattern everywhere.
 * Use C89 declaration syntax.
 * Drop PRIu32.
 * Move flags to bpf_tc_opts and bpf_tc_hook.
 * Other misc comments.

v4 -> v5
v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210423150600.498490-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * Added bpf_tc_hook to represent the attach location of a filter.
 * Removed the bpf_tc_ctx context object, refactored code to not assume shared
   open socket across operations on the same ctx.
 * Add a helper libbpf_nl_send_recv that wraps socket creation, sending and
   receiving the netlink message.
 * Extended netlink code to cut short message processing using BPF_NL_DONE. This
   is used in a few places to return early to the user and discard remaining
   data.
 * selftests rewrite and expansion, considering API is looking more solid now.
 * Documented the API assumptions and behaviour in the commit that adds it,
   along with a few basic usage examples.
 * Dropped documentation from libbpf.h.
 * Relax some restrictions on bpf_tc_query to make it more useful (e.g. to
   detect if any filters exist).
 * Incorporate other minor suggestions from previous review (Andrii and Daniel).

v3 -> v4
v3: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210420193740.124285-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * Added a concept of bpf_tc_ctx context structure representing the attach point.
   The qdisc setup and delete is tied to this object's lifetime if it succeeds
   in creating the clsact qdisc when the attach point is BPF_TC_INGRESS or
   BPF_TC_EGRESS. Qdisc is only deleted when there are no filters attached to
   it.
 * Refactored all API functions to take ctx.
 * Removed bpf_tc_info, bpf_tc_attach_id, instead reused bpf_tc_opts for filling
   in attributes in various API functions (including query).
 * Explicitly documented the expectation of each function regarding the opts
   fields set. Added some small notes for the defaults chosen by the API.
 * Rename bpf_tc_get_info to bpf_tc_query
 * Keep the netlink socket open in the context structure to save on open/close
   cycles for each operation.
 * Miscellaneous adjustments due to keeping the socket open.
 * Rewrote the tests, and also added tests for testing all preconditions of the
   TC-BPF API.
 * We now use bpf skeleton in examples and tests.

v2 -> v3
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210419121811.117400-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * bpf_tc_cls_* -> bpf_tc_* rename
 * bpf_tc_attach_id now only consists of handle and priority, the two variables
   that user may or may not set.
 * bpf_tc_replace has been dropped, instead a replace bool is introduced in
   bpf_tc_opts for the same purpose.
 * bpf_tc_get_info now takes attach_id for filling in filter details during
   lookup instead of requiring user to do so. This also allows us to remove the
   fd parameter, as no matching is needed as long as we have all attributes
   necessary to identify a specific filter.
 * A little bit of code simplification taking into account the change above.
 * priority and protocol are now __u16 members in user facing API structs to
   reflect actual size.
 * Patch updating pkt_cls.h header has been removed, as it is unused now.
 * protocol and chain_index options have been dropped in bpf_tc_opts,
   protocol is always set to ETH_P_ALL, while chain_index is set as 0 by
   default in the kernel. This also means removal of chain_index from
   bpf_tc_attach_id, as it is unconditionally always 0.
 * bpf_tc_cls_change has been dropped
 * selftest now uses ASSERT_* macros

v1-> v2
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210325120020.236504-1-memxor@gmail.com

 * netlink helpers have been renamed to object_action style.
 * attach_id now only contains attributes that are not explicitly set. Only
   the bare minimum info is kept in it.
 * protocol is now an optional and always set to ETH_P_ALL.
 * direct-action mode is always set.
 * skip_sw and skip_hw options have also been removed.
 * bpf_tc_cls_info struct now also returns the bpf program tag and id, as
   available in the netlink response. This came up as a requirement during
   discussion with people wanting to use this functionality.
 * support for attaching SCHED_ACT programs has been dropped, as it isn't
   useful without any support for binding loaded actions to a classifier.
 * the distinction between dev and block API has been dropped, there is now
   a single set of functions and user has to pass the special ifindex value
   to indicate operation on a shared filter block on their own.
 * The high level API returning a bpf_link is gone. This was already non-
   functional for pinning and typical ownership semantics. Instead, a separate
   patchset will be sent adding a bpf_link API for attaching SCHED_CLS progs to
   the kernel, and its corresponding libbpf API.
 * The clsact qdisc is now setup automatically in a best-effort fashion whenever
   user passes in the clsact ingress or egress parent id. This is done with
   exclusive mode, such that if an ingress or clsact qdisc is already set up,
   we skip the setup and move on with filter creation.
 * Other minor changes that came up during the course of discussion and rework.

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (3):
  libbpf: add netlink helpers
  libbpf: add low level TC-BPF API
  libbpf: add selftests for TC-BPF API

 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |  43 ++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   5 +
 tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c                       | 554 ++++++++++++++++--
 tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h                        |  48 ++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c | 395 +++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c |  12 +
 6 files changed, 993 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c

-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] libbpf: add netlink helpers

[Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi]

This change introduces a few helpers to wrap open coded attribute
preparation in netlink.c. It also adds a libbpf_nl_send_recv that is useful
to wrap send + recv handling in a generic way. Subsequent patch will
also use this function for sending and receiving a netlink response.
The libbpf_nl_get_link helper has been removed instead, moving socket
creation into the newly named libbpf_nl_send_recv.

Every nested attribute's closure must happen using the helper
nlattr_end_nested, which sets its length properly. NLA_F_NESTED is
enforced using nlattr_begin_nested helper. Other simple attributes
can be added directly.

The maxsz parameter corresponds to the size of the request structure
which is being filled in, so for instance with req being:

struct {
	struct nlmsghdr nh;
	struct tcmsg t;
	char buf[4096];
} req;

Then, maxsz should be sizeof(req).

This change also converts the open coded attribute preparation with the
helpers. Note that the only failure the internal call to nlattr_add
could result in the nested helper would be -EMSGSIZE, hence that is what
we return to our caller.

The libbpf_nl_send_recv call takes care of opening the socket, sending the
netlink message, receiving the response, potentially invoking callbacks,
and return errors if any, and then finally close the socket. This allows
users to avoid identical socket setup code in different places. The only
user of libbpf_nl_get_link has been converted to make use of it.

__bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_replace has also been refactored to use it.

Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h  |  48 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
index d2cb28e9ef52..e78d03a76110 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
@@ -131,72 +131,54 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq,
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static int libbpf_nl_send_recv(struct nlmsghdr *nh, __dump_nlmsg_t parse_msg,
+			       libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t parse_attr, void *cookie);
+
 static int __bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_replace(int ifindex, int fd, int old_fd,
 					 __u32 flags)
 {
-	int sock, seq = 0, ret;
-	struct nlattr *nla, *nla_xdp;
+	struct nlattr *nla;
+	int ret;
 	struct {
 		struct nlmsghdr  nh;
 		struct ifinfomsg ifinfo;
 		char             attrbuf[64];
 	} req;
-	__u32 nl_pid = 0;
-
-	sock = libbpf_netlink_open(&nl_pid);
-	if (sock < 0)
-		return sock;
 
 	memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
 	req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct ifinfomsg));
 	req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK;
 	req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_SETLINK;
-	req.nh.nlmsg_pid = 0;
-	req.nh.nlmsg_seq = ++seq;
 	req.ifinfo.ifi_family = AF_UNSPEC;
 	req.ifinfo.ifi_index = ifindex;
 
 	/* started nested attribute for XDP */
-	nla = (struct nlattr *)(((char *)&req)
-				+ NLMSG_ALIGN(req.nh.nlmsg_len));
-	nla->nla_type = NLA_F_NESTED | IFLA_XDP;
-	nla->nla_len = NLA_HDRLEN;
+	nla = nlattr_begin_nested(&req.nh, sizeof(req), IFLA_XDP);
+	if (!nla)
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
 
 	/* add XDP fd */
-	nla_xdp = (struct nlattr *)((char *)nla + nla->nla_len);
-	nla_xdp->nla_type = IFLA_XDP_FD;
-	nla_xdp->nla_len = NLA_HDRLEN + sizeof(int);
-	memcpy((char *)nla_xdp + NLA_HDRLEN, &fd, sizeof(fd));
-	nla->nla_len += nla_xdp->nla_len;
+	ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), IFLA_XDP_FD, &fd, sizeof(fd));
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
 
 	/* if user passed in any flags, add those too */
 	if (flags) {
-		nla_xdp = (struct nlattr *)((char *)nla + nla->nla_len);
-		nla_xdp->nla_type = IFLA_XDP_FLAGS;
-		nla_xdp->nla_len = NLA_HDRLEN + sizeof(flags);
-		memcpy((char *)nla_xdp + NLA_HDRLEN, &flags, sizeof(flags));
-		nla->nla_len += nla_xdp->nla_len;
+		ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), IFLA_XDP_FLAGS, &flags, sizeof(flags));
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	if (flags & XDP_FLAGS_REPLACE) {
-		nla_xdp = (struct nlattr *)((char *)nla + nla->nla_len);
-		nla_xdp->nla_type = IFLA_XDP_EXPECTED_FD;
-		nla_xdp->nla_len = NLA_HDRLEN + sizeof(old_fd);
-		memcpy((char *)nla_xdp + NLA_HDRLEN, &old_fd, sizeof(old_fd));
-		nla->nla_len += nla_xdp->nla_len;
+		ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), IFLA_XDP_EXPECTED_FD, &old_fd,
+				 sizeof(old_fd));
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
-	req.nh.nlmsg_len += NLA_ALIGN(nla->nla_len);
+	nlattr_end_nested(&req.nh, nla);
 
-	if (send(sock, &req, req.nh.nlmsg_len, 0) < 0) {
-		ret = -errno;
-		goto cleanup;
-	}
-	ret = bpf_netlink_recv(sock, nl_pid, seq, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-
-cleanup:
-	close(sock);
-	return ret;
+	return libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL);
 }
 
 int bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_opts(int ifindex, int fd, __u32 flags,
@@ -282,16 +264,22 @@ static int get_xdp_info(void *cookie, void *msg, struct nlattr **tb)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int libbpf_nl_get_link(int sock, unsigned int nl_pid,
-			      libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t dump_link_nlmsg, void *cookie);
 
 int bpf_get_link_xdp_info(int ifindex, struct xdp_link_info *info,
 			  size_t info_size, __u32 flags)
 {
 	struct xdp_id_md xdp_id = {};
-	int sock, ret;
-	__u32 nl_pid = 0;
 	__u32 mask;
+	int ret;
+	struct {
+		struct nlmsghdr nlh;
+		struct ifinfomsg ifm;
+	} req = {
+		.nlh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct ifinfomsg)),
+		.nlh.nlmsg_type = RTM_GETLINK,
+		.nlh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_DUMP | NLM_F_REQUEST,
+		.ifm.ifi_family = AF_PACKET,
+	};
 
 	if (flags & ~XDP_FLAGS_MASK || !info_size)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -302,14 +290,10 @@ int bpf_get_link_xdp_info(int ifindex, struct xdp_link_info *info,
 	if (flags && flags & mask)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	sock = libbpf_netlink_open(&nl_pid);
-	if (sock < 0)
-		return sock;
-
 	xdp_id.ifindex = ifindex;
 	xdp_id.flags = flags;
 
-	ret = libbpf_nl_get_link(sock, nl_pid, get_xdp_info, &xdp_id);
+	ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nlh, __dump_link_nlmsg, get_xdp_info, &xdp_id);
 	if (!ret) {
 		size_t sz = min(info_size, sizeof(xdp_id.info));
 
@@ -317,7 +301,6 @@ int bpf_get_link_xdp_info(int ifindex, struct xdp_link_info *info,
 		memset((void *) info + sz, 0, info_size - sz);
 	}
 
-	close(sock);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -349,24 +332,29 @@ int bpf_get_link_xdp_id(int ifindex, __u32 *prog_id, __u32 flags)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-int libbpf_nl_get_link(int sock, unsigned int nl_pid,
-		       libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t dump_link_nlmsg, void *cookie)
+static int libbpf_nl_send_recv(struct nlmsghdr *nh, __dump_nlmsg_t parse_msg,
+			       libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t parse_attr, void *cookie)
 {
-	struct {
-		struct nlmsghdr nlh;
-		struct ifinfomsg ifm;
-	} req = {
-		.nlh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct ifinfomsg)),
-		.nlh.nlmsg_type = RTM_GETLINK,
-		.nlh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_DUMP | NLM_F_REQUEST,
-		.ifm.ifi_family = AF_PACKET,
-	};
-	int seq = time(NULL);
+	__u32 nl_pid = 0;
+	int sock, ret;
 
-	req.nlh.nlmsg_seq = seq;
-	if (send(sock, &req, req.nlh.nlmsg_len, 0) < 0)
-		return -errno;
+	if (!nh)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	sock = libbpf_netlink_open(&nl_pid);
+	if (sock < 0)
+		return sock;
 
-	return bpf_netlink_recv(sock, nl_pid, seq, __dump_link_nlmsg,
-				dump_link_nlmsg, cookie);
+	nh->nlmsg_pid = 0;
+	nh->nlmsg_seq = time(NULL);
+	if (send(sock, nh, nh->nlmsg_len, 0) < 0) {
+		ret = -errno;
+		goto end;
+	}
+
+	ret = bpf_netlink_recv(sock, nl_pid, nh->nlmsg_seq, parse_msg, parse_attr, cookie);
+
+end:
+	close(sock);
+	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h b/tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h
index 6cc3ac91690f..3c780ab6d022 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h
@@ -10,7 +10,10 @@
 #define __LIBBPF_NLATTR_H
 
 #include <stdint.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <errno.h>
 #include <linux/netlink.h>
+
 /* avoid multiple definition of netlink features */
 #define __LINUX_NETLINK_H
 
@@ -103,4 +106,49 @@ int libbpf_nla_parse_nested(struct nlattr *tb[], int maxtype,
 
 int libbpf_nla_dump_errormsg(struct nlmsghdr *nlh);
 
+static inline struct nlattr *nla_data(struct nlattr *nla)
+{
+	return (struct nlattr *)((char *)nla + NLA_HDRLEN);
+}
+
+static inline struct nlattr *nh_tail(struct nlmsghdr *nh)
+{
+	return (struct nlattr *)((char *)nh + NLMSG_ALIGN(nh->nlmsg_len));
+}
+
+static inline int nlattr_add(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t maxsz, int type,
+			     const void *data, int len)
+{
+	struct nlattr *nla;
+
+	if (NLMSG_ALIGN(nh->nlmsg_len) + NLA_ALIGN(NLA_HDRLEN + len) > maxsz)
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+	if (!!data != !!len)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	nla = nh_tail(nh);
+	nla->nla_type = type;
+	nla->nla_len = NLA_HDRLEN + len;
+	if (data)
+		memcpy(nla_data(nla), data, len);
+	nh->nlmsg_len = NLMSG_ALIGN(nh->nlmsg_len) + NLA_ALIGN(nla->nla_len);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static inline struct nlattr *nlattr_begin_nested(struct nlmsghdr *nh,
+						 size_t maxsz, int type)
+{
+	struct nlattr *tail;
+
+	tail = nh_tail(nh);
+	if (nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, type | NLA_F_NESTED, NULL, 0))
+		return NULL;
+	return tail;
+}
+
+static inline void nlattr_end_nested(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct nlattr *tail)
+{
+	tail->nla_len = (char *)nh_tail(nh) - (char *)tail;
+}
+
 #endif /* __LIBBPF_NLATTR_H */
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH bpf-next v7 2/3] libbpf: add low level TC-BPF API

[Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi]

This adds functions that wrap the netlink API used for adding,
manipulating, and removing traffic control filters.

An API summary:

A bpf_tc_hook represents a location where a TC-BPF filter can be
attached. This means that creating a hook leads to creation of the
backing qdisc, while destruction either removes all filters attached to
a hook, or destroys qdisc if requested explicitly (as discussed below).

The TC-BPF API functions operate on this bpf_tc_hook to attach, replace,
query, and detach tc filters.

All functions return 0 on success, and a negative error code on failure.

bpf_tc_hook_create - Create a hook
Parameters:
	@hook - Cannot be NULL, ifindex > 0, attach_point must be set to
		proper enum constant. Note that parent must be unset when
		attach_point is one of BPF_TC_INGRESS or BPF_TC_EGRESS. Note
		that as an exception BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS is also a
		valid value for attach_point.

		Returns -EOPNOTSUPP when hook has attach_point as BPF_TC_CUSTOM.

bpf_tc_hook_destroy - Destroy the hook
Parameters:
        @hook - Cannot be NULL. The behaviour depends on value of
		attach_point.

		If BPF_TC_INGRESS, all filters attached to the ingress
		hook will be detached.
		If BPF_TC_EGRESS, all filters attached to the egress hook
		will be detached.
		If BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGRESS, the clsact qdisc will be
		deleted, also detaching all filters.

		As before, parent must be unset for these attach_points,
		and set for BPF_TC_CUSTOM.

		It is advised that if the qdisc is operated on by many programs,
		then the program at least check that there are no other existing
		filters before deleting the clsact qdisc. An example is shown
		below:

		DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, .ifindex = if_nametoindex("lo"),
				    .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
		/* set opts as NULL, as we're not really interested in
		 * getting any info for a particular filter, but just
	 	 * detecting its presence.
		 */
		r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, NULL);
		if (r == -ENOENT) {
			/* no filters */
			hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS|BPF_TC_EGREESS;
			return bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
		} else {
			/* failed or r == 0, the latter means filters do exist */
			return r;
		}

		Note that there is a small race between checking for no
		filters and deleting the qdisc. This is currently unavoidable.

		Returns -EOPNOTSUPP when hook has attach_point as BPF_TC_CUSTOM.

bpf_tc_attach - Attach a filter to a hook
Parameters:
	@hook - Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook the filter will be
		attached to. Requirements for ifindex and attach_point are
		same as described in bpf_tc_hook_create, but BPF_TC_CUSTOM
		is also supported.  In that case, parent must be set to the
		handle where the filter will be attached (using BPF_TC_PARENT).

		E.g. To set parent to 1:16 like in tc command line,
		     the equivalent would be BPF_TC_PARENT(1, 16).

	@opts - Cannot be NULL.

		The following opts are optional:
			handle - The handle of the filter
			priority - The priority of the filter
				   Must be >= 0 and <= UINT16_MAX
		Note that when left unset, they will be auto-allocated
		by the kernel.
		The following opts must be set:
			prog_fd - The fd of the loaded SCHED_CLS prog
		The following opts must be unset:
			prog_id - The ID of the BPF prog
		The following opts are optional:
			flags - Currently only BPF_TC_F_REPLACE is
				allowed. It allows replacing an existing
				filter instead of failing with -EEXIST.

		The following opts will be filled by bpf_tc_attach on a
		successful attach operation if they are unset:
			handle - The handle of the attached filter
			priority - The priority of the attached filter
			prog_id - The ID of the attached SCHED_CLS prog

		This way, the user can know what the auto allocated
		values for optional opts like handle and priority are
		for the newly attached filter, if they were unset.

		Note that some other attributes are set to some default
		values listed below (this holds for all bpf_tc_* APIs):
			protocol - ETH_P_ALL
			mode - direct action
			chain index - 0
			class ID - 0 (this can be set by writing to the
			skb->tc_classid field from the BPF program)

bpf_tc_detach
Parameters:
	@hook: Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook the filter will be
		detached from. Requirements are same as described above
		in bpf_tc_attach.

	@opts:	Cannot be NULL.

		The following opts must be set:
			handle
			priority
		The following opts must be unset:
			prog_fd
			prog_id
			flags

bpf_tc_query
Parameters:
	@hook: Cannot be NULL. Represents the hook where the filter
	       lookup will be performed. Requirements are same as described
	       above in bpf_tc_attach.

	@opts: Cannot be NULL.

	       The following opts must be set:
			handle
			priority
	       The following opts must be unset:
			prog_fd
			prog_id
			flags

	       The following fields will be filled by bpf_tc_query on a
	       successful lookup:
			prog_id

Some usage examples (using bpf skeleton infrastructure):

BPF program (test_tc_bpf.c):

	#include <linux/bpf.h>
	#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>

	SEC("classifier")
	int cls(struct __sk_buff *skb)
	{
		return 0;
	}

Userspace loader:

	struct test_tc_bpf *skel = NULL;
	int fd, r;

	skel = test_tc_bpf__open_and_load();
	if (!skel)
		return -ENOMEM;

	fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.cls);

	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, hook, .ifindex =
			    if_nametoindex("lo"), .attach_point =
			    BPF_TC_INGRESS);
	/* Create clsact qdisc */
	r = bpf_tc_hook_create(&hook);
	if (r < 0)
		goto end;

	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts, .prog_fd = fd);
	r = bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &opts);
	if (r < 0)
		goto end;
	/* Print the auto allocated handle and priority */
	printf("Handle=%u", opts.handle);
	printf("Priority=%u", opts.priority);

	opts.prog_fd = opts.prog_id = 0;
	bpf_tc_detach(&hook, &opts);
end:
	test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel);

This is equivalent to doing the following using tc command line:
  # tc qdisc add dev lo clsact
  # tc filter add dev lo ingress bpf obj foo.o sec classifier da
  # tc filter del dev lo ingress handle <h> prio <p> bpf

... where the handle and priority can be found using:
  # tc filter show dev lo ingress

Another example replacing a filter (extending prior example):

	/* We can also choose both (or one), let's try replacing an
	 * existing filter.
	 */
	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, replace_opts, .handle =
			    opts.handle, .priority = opts.priority,
			    .prog_fd = fd);
	r = bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &replace_opts);
	if (r == -EEXIST) {
		/* Expected, now use BPF_TC_F_REPLACE to replace it */
		replace_opts.flags = BPF_TC_F_REPLACE;
		return bpf_tc_attach(&hook, &replace_opts);
	} else if (r < 0) {
		return r;
	}
	/* There must be no existing filter with these
	 * attributes, so cleanup and return an error.
	 */
	replace_opts.prog_fd = replace_opts.prog_id = 0;
	bpf_tc_detach(&hook, &replace_opts);
	return -1;

To obtain info of a particular filter:

	/* Find info for filter with handle 1 and priority 50 */
	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, info_opts, .handle = 1,
			    .priority = 50);
	r = bpf_tc_query(&hook, &info_opts);
	if (r == -ENOENT)
		printf("Filter not found");
	else if (r < 0)
		return r;
	printf("Prog ID: %u", info_opts.prog_id);
	return 0;

Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h   |  43 ++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map |   5 +
 tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c  | 440 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 487 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 3f3a24763459..0f28172db18d 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -783,6 +783,49 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__add_file(struct bpf_linker *linker,
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_linker__finalize(struct bpf_linker *linker);
 LIBBPF_API void bpf_linker__free(struct bpf_linker *linker);
 
+enum bpf_tc_attach_point {
+	BPF_TC_INGRESS = 1 << 0,
+	BPF_TC_EGRESS  = 1 << 1,
+	BPF_TC_CUSTOM  = 1 << 2,
+};
+
+#define BPF_TC_PARENT(a, b) ((((a) << 16) & 0xFFFF0000U) | ((b) & 0x0000FFFFU))
+
+enum bpf_tc_flags {
+	BPF_TC_F_REPLACE = 1 << 0,
+};
+
+struct bpf_tc_hook {
+	size_t sz;
+	int ifindex;
+	enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point;
+	__u32 parent;
+	size_t :0;
+};
+
+#define bpf_tc_hook__last_field parent
+
+struct bpf_tc_opts {
+	size_t sz;
+	int prog_fd;
+	__u32 flags;
+	__u32 prog_id;
+	__u32 handle;
+	__u32 priority;
+	size_t :0;
+};
+
+#define bpf_tc_opts__last_field priority
+
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
+			     struct bpf_tc_opts *opts);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
+			     const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_tc_query(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook,
+			    struct bpf_tc_opts *opts);
+
 #ifdef __cplusplus
 } /* extern "C" */
 #endif
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index b9b29baf1df8..6c96729050dc 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -361,4 +361,9 @@ LIBBPF_0.4.0 {
 		bpf_linker__new;
 		bpf_map__inner_map;
 		bpf_object__set_kversion;
+		bpf_tc_attach;
+		bpf_tc_detach;
+		bpf_tc_hook_create;
+		bpf_tc_hook_destroy;
+		bpf_tc_query;
 } LIBBPF_0.3.0;
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
index e78d03a76110..2716f9457e15 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c
@@ -4,7 +4,10 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <memory.h>
 #include <unistd.h>
+#include <arpa/inet.h>
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/if_ether.h>
+#include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
 #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
 #include <sys/socket.h>
 #include <errno.h>
@@ -73,6 +76,12 @@ static int libbpf_netlink_open(__u32 *nl_pid)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+enum {
+	NL_CONT,
+	NL_NEXT,
+	NL_DONE,
+};
+
 static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq,
 			    __dump_nlmsg_t _fn, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn,
 			    void *cookie)
@@ -84,6 +93,7 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq,
 	int len, ret;
 
 	while (multipart) {
+start:
 		multipart = false;
 		len = recv(sock, buf, sizeof(buf), 0);
 		if (len < 0) {
@@ -121,8 +131,18 @@ static int bpf_netlink_recv(int sock, __u32 nl_pid, int seq,
 			}
 			if (_fn) {
 				ret = _fn(nh, fn, cookie);
-				if (ret)
+				if (ret < 0)
+					return ret;
+				switch (ret) {
+				case NL_CONT:
+					break;
+				case NL_NEXT:
+					goto start;
+				case NL_DONE:
+					return 0;
+				default:
 					return ret;
+				}
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -358,3 +378,421 @@ static int libbpf_nl_send_recv(struct nlmsghdr *nh, __dump_nlmsg_t parse_msg,
 	close(sock);
 	return ret;
 }
+
+/* TC-HOOK */
+
+typedef int (*qdisc_config_t)(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t,
+			      size_t maxsz);
+
+static int clsact_config(struct nlmsghdr *nh, struct tcmsg *t, size_t maxsz)
+{
+	t->tcm_parent = TC_H_CLSACT;
+	t->tcm_handle = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, 0);
+
+	return nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_KIND, "clsact", sizeof("clsact"));
+}
+
+static int attach_point_to_config(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, qdisc_config_t *configp)
+{
+	switch (OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) {
+	case BPF_TC_INGRESS:
+	case BPF_TC_EGRESS:
+	case BPF_TC_INGRESS | BPF_TC_EGRESS:
+		if (OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		*configp = &clsact_config;
+		return 0;
+	case BPF_TC_CUSTOM:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+}
+
+static long long tc_get_tcm_parent(enum bpf_tc_attach_point attach_point,
+				       __u32 parent)
+{
+	switch (attach_point) {
+	case BPF_TC_INGRESS:
+		if (parent)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		return TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_INGRESS);
+	case BPF_TC_EGRESS:
+		if (parent)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		return TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_EGRESS);
+	case BPF_TC_CUSTOM:
+		if (!parent)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		return parent;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+}
+
+static int tc_qdisc_modify(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int cmd, int flags)
+{
+	qdisc_config_t config;
+	int ret;
+	struct {
+		struct nlmsghdr nh;
+		struct tcmsg t;
+		char buf[256];
+	} req;
+
+	ret = attach_point_to_config(hook, &config);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | flags;
+	req.nh.nlmsg_type = cmd;
+	req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC;
+	req.t.tcm_ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0);
+
+	ret = config(&req.nh, &req.t, sizeof(req));
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	return libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+static int tc_qdisc_create_excl(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook)
+{
+	return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_NEWQDISC, NLM_F_CREATE);
+}
+
+static int tc_qdisc_delete(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook)
+{
+	return tc_qdisc_modify(hook, RTM_DELQDISC, 0);
+}
+
+int bpf_tc_hook_create(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook)
+{
+	int ifindex;
+
+	if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0);
+
+	if (ifindex <= 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return tc_qdisc_create_excl(hook);
+}
+
+static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts,
+			 bool flush);
+
+int bpf_tc_hook_destroy(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook)
+{
+	if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0) <= 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	switch (OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0)) {
+	case BPF_TC_INGRESS:
+	case BPF_TC_EGRESS:
+		return tc_cls_detach(hook, NULL, true);
+	case BPF_TC_INGRESS | BPF_TC_EGRESS:
+		return tc_qdisc_delete(hook);
+	case BPF_TC_CUSTOM:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+}
+
+struct pass_info {
+	struct bpf_tc_opts *opts;
+	bool processed;
+};
+
+/* TC-BPF */
+
+static int tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(struct nlmsghdr *nh, size_t maxsz, int fd)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	char name[256];
+	int len, ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &info_len);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_FD, &fd, sizeof(fd));
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	len = snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:[%u]", info.name, info.id);
+	if (len < 0)
+		return -errno;
+	if (len >= sizeof(name))
+		return -ENAMETOOLONG;
+
+	return nlattr_add(nh, maxsz, TCA_BPF_NAME, name, len + 1);
+}
+
+
+static int cls_get_info(struct nlmsghdr *nh, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, void *cookie);
+
+int bpf_tc_attach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, struct bpf_tc_opts *opts)
+{
+	__u32 protocol, bpf_flags, handle, priority, parent, prog_id, flags;
+	int ret, ifindex, attach_point, prog_fd;
+	struct pass_info info = {};
+	long long tcm_parent;
+	struct nlattr *nla;
+	struct {
+		struct nlmsghdr nh;
+		struct tcmsg t;
+		char buf[256];
+	} req;
+
+	if (!hook || !opts || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0);
+	parent = OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0);
+	attach_point = OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0);
+
+	handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0);
+	priority = OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0);
+	prog_fd = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0);
+	prog_id = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0);
+	flags = OPTS_GET(opts, flags, 0);
+
+	if (ifindex <= 0 || !prog_fd || prog_id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (priority > UINT16_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	protocol = ETH_P_ALL;
+	flags = (flags & BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) ? NLM_F_REPLACE : NLM_F_EXCL;
+
+	memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK | NLM_F_CREATE | NLM_F_ECHO | flags;
+	req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_NEWTFILTER;
+	req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC;
+	req.t.tcm_handle = handle;
+	req.t.tcm_ifindex = ifindex;
+	req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(priority << 16, htons(protocol));
+
+	tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(attach_point, parent);
+	if (tcm_parent < 0)
+		return tcm_parent;
+	req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent;
+
+	ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf"));
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	nla = nlattr_begin_nested(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_OPTIONS);
+	if (!nla)
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
+
+	ret = tc_cls_add_fd_and_name(&req.nh, sizeof(req), prog_fd);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* direct action mode is always enabled */
+	bpf_flags = TCA_BPF_FLAG_ACT_DIRECT;
+	ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_BPF_FLAGS, &bpf_flags, sizeof(bpf_flags));
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	nlattr_end_nested(&req.nh, nla);
+
+	info.opts = opts;
+
+	ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, &cls_get_info, NULL, &info);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Failed to process unicast response */
+	if (!info.processed)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int tc_cls_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts,
+			 bool flush)
+{
+	__u32 protocol = 0, handle, priority, parent, prog_id, flags;
+	int ret, ifindex, attach_point, prog_fd;
+	long long tcm_parent;
+	struct {
+		struct nlmsghdr nh;
+		struct tcmsg t;
+		char buf[256];
+	} req;
+
+	if (!hook || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0);
+	parent = OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0);
+	attach_point = OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0);
+
+	handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0);
+	priority = OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0);
+	prog_fd = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0);
+	prog_id = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0);
+	flags = OPTS_GET(opts, flags, 0);
+
+	if (ifindex <= 0 || flags || prog_fd || prog_id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (priority > UINT16_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!flush) {
+		if (!handle || !priority)
+			return -EINVAL;
+		protocol = ETH_P_ALL;
+	} else {
+		if (handle || priority)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST | NLM_F_ACK;
+	req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_DELTFILTER;
+	req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC;
+	req.t.tcm_ifindex = ifindex;
+
+	if (!flush) {
+		req.t.tcm_handle = handle;
+		req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(priority << 16, htons(protocol));
+	}
+
+	tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(attach_point, parent);
+	if (tcm_parent < 0)
+		return tcm_parent;
+	req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent;
+
+	if (!flush) {
+		ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf"));
+		if (ret < 0)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+int bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, const struct bpf_tc_opts *opts)
+{
+	if (!opts)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return tc_cls_detach(hook, opts, false);
+}
+
+static int __cls_get_info(void *cookie, void *msg, struct nlattr **tb, bool unicast)
+{
+	struct nlattr *tbb[TCA_BPF_MAX + 1];
+	struct pass_info *info = cookie;
+	struct tcmsg *t = msg;
+
+	if (!info || !info->opts)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (unicast && info->processed)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (!tb[TCA_OPTIONS])
+		return NL_CONT;
+
+	libbpf_nla_parse_nested(tbb, TCA_BPF_MAX, tb[TCA_OPTIONS], NULL);
+
+	if (!tbb[TCA_BPF_ID])
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	OPTS_SET(info->opts, handle, t->tcm_handle);
+	OPTS_SET(info->opts, priority, TC_H_MAJ(t->tcm_info) >> 16);
+	OPTS_SET(info->opts, prog_id, libbpf_nla_getattr_u32(tbb[TCA_BPF_ID]));
+
+	info->processed = true;
+	return unicast ? NL_NEXT : NL_DONE;
+}
+
+static int cls_get_info(struct nlmsghdr *nh, libbpf_dump_nlmsg_t fn, void *cookie)
+{
+	struct tcmsg *t = NLMSG_DATA(nh);
+	struct nlattr *tb[TCA_MAX + 1];
+
+	libbpf_nla_parse(tb, TCA_MAX,
+			 (struct nlattr *)((char *)t + NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(*t))),
+			 NLMSG_PAYLOAD(nh, sizeof(*t)), NULL);
+
+	if (!tb[TCA_KIND])
+		return NL_CONT;
+
+	return __cls_get_info(cookie, t, tb, nh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_ECHO);
+}
+
+/* This is the analogue of `tc filter get`, i.e. RTM_GETTFILTER without NLM_F_DUMP */
+int bpf_tc_query(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, struct bpf_tc_opts *opts)
+{
+	__u32 protocol, handle, priority, parent, prog_id, flags;
+	int ret, ifindex, attach_point, prog_fd;
+	struct pass_info pinfo = {};
+	long long tcm_parent;
+	struct {
+		struct nlmsghdr nh;
+		struct tcmsg t;
+		char buf[256];
+	} req;
+
+	if (!hook || !opts || !OPTS_VALID(hook, bpf_tc_hook) || !OPTS_VALID(opts, bpf_tc_opts))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ifindex = OPTS_GET(hook, ifindex, 0);
+	parent = OPTS_GET(hook, parent, 0);
+	attach_point = OPTS_GET(hook, attach_point, 0);
+
+	handle = OPTS_GET(opts, handle, 0);
+	priority = OPTS_GET(opts, priority, 0);
+	prog_fd = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_fd, 0);
+	prog_id = OPTS_GET(opts, prog_id, 0);
+	flags = OPTS_GET(opts, flags, 0);
+
+	if (ifindex <= 0 || !handle || !priority || flags || prog_fd || prog_id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	if (priority > UINT16_MAX)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	protocol = ETH_P_ALL;
+
+	memset(&req, 0, sizeof(req));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_len = NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(struct tcmsg));
+	req.nh.nlmsg_flags = NLM_F_REQUEST;
+	req.nh.nlmsg_type = RTM_GETTFILTER;
+	req.t.tcm_family = AF_UNSPEC;
+	req.t.tcm_handle = handle;
+	req.t.tcm_ifindex = ifindex;
+	req.t.tcm_info = TC_H_MAKE(priority << 16, htons(protocol));
+
+	tcm_parent = tc_get_tcm_parent(attach_point, parent);
+	if (tcm_parent < 0)
+		return tcm_parent;
+	req.t.tcm_parent = tcm_parent;
+
+	ret = nlattr_add(&req.nh, sizeof(req), TCA_KIND, "bpf", sizeof("bpf"));
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	pinfo.opts = opts;
+
+	ret = libbpf_nl_send_recv(&req.nh, &cls_get_info, NULL, &pinfo);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!pinfo.processed)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	return ret;
+}
-- 
2.31.1

[PATCH bpf-next v7 3/3] libbpf: add selftests for TC-BPF API

[Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi]

This adds some basic tests for the low level bpf_tc_* API.

Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c | 395 ++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c |  12 +
 2 files changed, 407 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4fc2b9984a28
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,395 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <linux/pkt_cls.h>
+
+#include "test_tc_bpf.skel.h"
+
+#define LO_IFINDEX 1
+
+#define TEST_DECLARE_OPTS(__fd)                                                                   \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_h, .handle = 1);                                     \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_p, .priority = 1);                                   \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_f, .prog_fd = __fd);                                 \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_hp, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);                     \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_hf, .handle = 1, .prog_fd = __fd);                   \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_pf, .priority = 1, .prog_fd = __fd);                 \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_hpf, .handle = 1, .priority = 1, .prog_fd = __fd);   \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_hpi, .handle = 1, .priority = 1, .prog_id = 42);     \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_hpr, .handle = 1, .priority = 1,                     \
+			    .flags = BPF_TC_F_REPLACE);                                            \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_hpfi, .handle = 1, .priority = 1, .prog_fd = __fd,   \
+			    .prog_id = 42);                                                        \
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts_prio_max, .handle = 1, .priority = UINT16_MAX + 1);
+
+static int test_tc_bpf_basic(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int fd)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1, .prog_fd = fd);
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fd, &info, &info_len);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd"))
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_attach"))
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(opts.handle, 1, "handle set") ||
+	    !ASSERT_EQ(opts.priority, 1, "priority set") ||
+	    !ASSERT_EQ(opts.prog_id, info.id, "prog_id set"))
+		goto end;
+
+	opts.prog_id = 0;
+	opts.flags = BPF_TC_F_REPLACE;
+	ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_attach replace mode"))
+		goto end;
+
+	opts.flags = opts.prog_fd = opts.prog_id = 0;
+	ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_query"))
+		goto end;
+
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(opts.handle, 1, "handle set") ||
+	    !ASSERT_EQ(opts.priority, 1, "priority set") ||
+	    !ASSERT_EQ(opts.prog_id, info.id, "prog_id set"))
+		goto end;
+
+end:
+	opts.flags = opts.prog_fd = opts.prog_id = 0;
+	ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts);
+	ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_detach");
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int test_tc_bpf_api(struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, int fd)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, attach_opts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1, .prog_fd = fd);
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, inv_hook, .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_opts, opts, .handle = 1, .priority = 1);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(NULL);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_create invalid hook = NULL"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* hook ifindex = 0 */
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_create invalid hook ifindex == 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_destroy invalid hook ifindex == 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_attach(&inv_hook, &attach_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid hook ifindex == 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	attach_opts.prog_id = 0;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_detach(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid hook ifindex == 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_query(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid hook ifindex == 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* hook ifindex < 0 */
+	inv_hook.ifindex = -1;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_create invalid hook ifindex < 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_destroy invalid hook ifindex < 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_attach(&inv_hook, &attach_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid hook ifindex < 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+	attach_opts.prog_id = 0;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_detach(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid hook ifindex < 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_query(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid hook ifindex < 0"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	inv_hook.ifindex = LO_IFINDEX;
+
+	/* hook.attach_point invalid */
+	inv_hook.attach_point = 0xabcd;
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_create invalid hook.attach_point"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_destroy invalid hook.attach_point"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_attach(&inv_hook, &attach_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid hook.attach_point"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_detach(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid hook.attach_point"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_query(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid hook.attach_point"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	inv_hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS;
+
+	/* hook.attach_point valid, but parent invalid */
+	inv_hook.parent = TC_H_MAKE(1UL << 16, 10);
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_create invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_hook_destroy invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_attach(&inv_hook, &attach_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_detach(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_query(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	inv_hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_CUSTOM;
+	inv_hook.parent = 0;
+	/* These return EOPNOTSUPP instead of EINVAL as parent is checked after
+	 * attach_point of the hook.
+	 */
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EOPNOTSUPP, "bpf_tc_hook_create invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&inv_hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EOPNOTSUPP, "bpf_tc_hook_destroy invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_attach(&inv_hook, &attach_opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_detach(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_query(&inv_hook, &opts);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid hook parent"))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	inv_hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS;
+
+	/* detach */
+	{
+		TEST_DECLARE_OPTS(fd);
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(NULL, &opts_hp);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid hook = NULL"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, NULL);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid opts = NULL"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_hpr);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid flags set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_hpf);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid prog_fd set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_hpi);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid prog_id set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_p);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid handle unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_h);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid priority unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_prio_max);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_detach invalid priority > UINT16_MAX"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* query */
+	{
+		TEST_DECLARE_OPTS(fd);
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(NULL, &opts);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid hook = NULL"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, NULL);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid opts = NULL"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts_hpr);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid flags set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts_hpf);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid prog_fd set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts_hpi);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid prog_id set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts_p);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid handle unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts_h);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid priority unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts_prio_max);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query invalid priority > UINT16_MAX"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		/* when chain is not present, kernel returns -EINVAL */
+		ret = bpf_tc_query(hook, &opts_hp);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_query valid handle, priority set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/* attach */
+	{
+		TEST_DECLARE_OPTS(fd);
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(NULL, &opts_hp);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid hook = NULL"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, NULL);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid opts = NULL"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		opts_hp.flags = 42;
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts_hp);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid flags"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, NULL);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid prog_fd unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts_hpi);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid prog_id set"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts_pf);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_attach valid handle unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		opts_pf.prog_fd = opts_pf.prog_id = 0;
+		ASSERT_OK(bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_pf), "bpf_tc_detach");
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts_hf);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_attach valid priority unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		opts_hf.prog_fd = opts_hf.prog_id = 0;
+		ASSERT_OK(bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_hf), "bpf_tc_detach");
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts_prio_max);
+		if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EINVAL, "bpf_tc_attach invalid priority > UINT16_MAX"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+
+		ret = bpf_tc_attach(hook, &opts_f);
+		if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_attach valid both handle and priority unset"))
+			return -EINVAL;
+		opts_f.prog_fd = opts_f.prog_id = 0;
+		ASSERT_OK(bpf_tc_detach(hook, &opts_f), "bpf_tc_detach");
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void test_tc_bpf(void)
+{
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_tc_hook, hook, .ifindex = LO_IFINDEX,
+			    .attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS);
+	struct test_tc_bpf *skel = NULL;
+	bool hook_created = false;
+	int cls_fd, ret;
+
+	skel = test_tc_bpf__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "test_tc_bpf__open_and_load"))
+		return;
+
+	cls_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.cls);
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&hook);
+	if (ret == 0)
+		hook_created = true;
+
+	ret = ret == -EEXIST ? 0 : ret;
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "bpf_tc_hook_create(BPF_TC_INGRESS)"))
+		goto end;
+
+	hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_CUSTOM;
+	hook.parent = TC_H_MAKE(TC_H_CLSACT, TC_H_MIN_INGRESS);
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_create(&hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EOPNOTSUPP, "bpf_tc_hook_create invalid hook.attach_point"))
+		goto end;
+
+	ret = test_tc_bpf_basic(&hook, cls_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_internal ingress"))
+		goto end;
+
+	ret = bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(ret, -EOPNOTSUPP, "bpf_tc_hook_destroy invalid hook.attach_point"))
+		goto end;
+
+	hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS;
+	hook.parent = 0;
+	bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+	ret = test_tc_bpf_basic(&hook, cls_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_internal ingress"))
+		goto end;
+
+	bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+	hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_EGRESS;
+	ret = test_tc_bpf_basic(&hook, cls_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_internal egress"))
+		goto end;
+
+	bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+	ret = test_tc_bpf_api(&hook, cls_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(ret, "test_tc_bpf_api"))
+		goto end;
+
+	bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+
+end:
+	if (hook_created) {
+		hook.attach_point = BPF_TC_INGRESS | BPF_TC_EGRESS;
+		bpf_tc_hook_destroy(&hook);
+	}
+	test_tc_bpf__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..18a3a7ed924a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+/* Dummy prog to test TC-BPF API */
+
+SEC("classifier")
+int cls(struct __sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
--
2.31.1

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[Daniel Borkmann]

On 5/12/21 12:34 PM, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> This is the seventh version of the TC-BPF series.
> 
> It adds a simple API that uses netlink to attach the tc filter and its bpf
> classifier program. Currently, a user needs to shell out to the tc command line
> to be able to create filters and attach SCHED_CLS programs as classifiers. With
> the help of this API, it will be possible to use libbpf for doing all parts of
> bpf program setup and attach.
> 
> Changelog contains details of patchset evolution.
> 
> In an effort to keep discussion focused, this series doesn't have the high level
> TC-BPF API. It was clear that there is a need for a bpf_link API in the kernel,
> hence that will be submitted as a separate patchset based on this.
> 
> The individual commit messages contain more details, and also a brief summary of
> the API.
> 
> Changelog:
> ----------
> v6 -> v7
> v6: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210504005023.1240974-1-memxor@gmail.com
> 
>   * Address all comments from Daniel
>     * Rename BPF_NL_* to NL_*
>     * Make bpf_tc_query only support targeted query
>     * Adjust inconsistencies in the commit message
>     * Drop RTM_GETTFILTER NLM_F_DUMP support
>     * Other misc cleanups (also remove bpf_tc_query selftest for dump mode)

Still had to do a major patch cleanup on the first two before pushing out, but I
think it looks nice now and I do like the simple/straight forward API for tc/BPF.

Anyway, applied, thanks!

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is the seventh version of the TC-BPF series.
>
> It adds a simple API that uses netlink to attach the tc filter and its bpf
> classifier program. Currently, a user needs to shell out to the tc command line
> to be able to create filters and attach SCHED_CLS programs as classifiers. With
> the help of this API, it will be possible to use libbpf for doing all parts of
> bpf program setup and attach.
>
> Changelog contains details of patchset evolution.
>
> In an effort to keep discussion focused, this series doesn't have the high level
> TC-BPF API. It was clear that there is a need for a bpf_link API in the kernel,
> hence that will be submitted as a separate patchset based on this.
>
> The individual commit messages contain more details, and also a brief summary of
> the API.
>
> Changelog:
> ----------

Hey Kartikeya,

There were few issues flagged by Coverity after I synced libbpf to
Github. A bunch of them are netlink.c-related. Could you please take a
look and see if they are false positives or something that we can
actually fix? See links to the issues below. Thanks!

  [0] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901199&mergedDefectId=141815
  [1] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901193&mergedDefectId=322806
  [2] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901197&mergedDefectId=322807
  [3] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901195&mergedDefectId=322808

[...]

>
> Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (3):
>   libbpf: add netlink helpers
>   libbpf: add low level TC-BPF API
>   libbpf: add selftests for TC-BPF API
>
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |  43 ++
>  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   5 +
>  tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c                       | 554 ++++++++++++++++--
>  tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h                        |  48 ++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c | 395 +++++++++++++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c |  12 +
>  6 files changed, 993 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi]

On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:31:56AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is the seventh version of the TC-BPF series.
> >
> > It adds a simple API that uses netlink to attach the tc filter and its bpf
> > classifier program. Currently, a user needs to shell out to the tc command line
> > to be able to create filters and attach SCHED_CLS programs as classifiers. With
> > the help of this API, it will be possible to use libbpf for doing all parts of
> > bpf program setup and attach.
> >
> > Changelog contains details of patchset evolution.
> >
> > In an effort to keep discussion focused, this series doesn't have the high level
> > TC-BPF API. It was clear that there is a need for a bpf_link API in the kernel,
> > hence that will be submitted as a separate patchset based on this.
> >
> > The individual commit messages contain more details, and also a brief summary of
> > the API.
> >
> > Changelog:
> > ----------
>
> Hey Kartikeya,
>
> There were few issues flagged by Coverity after I synced libbpf to
> Github. A bunch of them are netlink.c-related. Could you please take a
> look and see if they are false positives or something that we can
> actually fix? See links to the issues below. Thanks!
>
>   [0] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901199&mergedDefectId=141815
>   [1] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901193&mergedDefectId=322806
>   [2] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901197&mergedDefectId=322807
>   [3] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901195&mergedDefectId=322808
>

Hi Andrii,

These links don't work for me (I get a timeout). Would you know why? Is there
some other link where I can look at them?

> [...]
>
> >
> > Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (3):
> >   libbpf: add netlink helpers
> >   libbpf: add low level TC-BPF API
> >   libbpf: add selftests for TC-BPF API
> >
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |  43 ++
> >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   5 +
> >  tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c                       | 554 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h                        |  48 ++
> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c | 395 +++++++++++++
> >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c |  12 +
> >  6 files changed, 993 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >

--
Kartikeya

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:47 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:31:56AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> > <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This is the seventh version of the TC-BPF series.
> > >
> > > It adds a simple API that uses netlink to attach the tc filter and its bpf
> > > classifier program. Currently, a user needs to shell out to the tc command line
> > > to be able to create filters and attach SCHED_CLS programs as classifiers. With
> > > the help of this API, it will be possible to use libbpf for doing all parts of
> > > bpf program setup and attach.
> > >
> > > Changelog contains details of patchset evolution.
> > >
> > > In an effort to keep discussion focused, this series doesn't have the high level
> > > TC-BPF API. It was clear that there is a need for a bpf_link API in the kernel,
> > > hence that will be submitted as a separate patchset based on this.
> > >
> > > The individual commit messages contain more details, and also a brief summary of
> > > the API.
> > >
> > > Changelog:
> > > ----------
> >
> > Hey Kartikeya,
> >
> > There were few issues flagged by Coverity after I synced libbpf to
> > Github. A bunch of them are netlink.c-related. Could you please take a
> > look and see if they are false positives or something that we can
> > actually fix? See links to the issues below. Thanks!
> >
> >   [0] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901199&mergedDefectId=141815
> >   [1] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901193&mergedDefectId=322806
> >   [2] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901197&mergedDefectId=322807
> >   [3] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901195&mergedDefectId=322808
> >
>
> Hi Andrii,
>
> These links don't work for me (I get a timeout). Would you know why? Is there
> some other link where I can look at them?
>

Sorry, I don't know any other way to share them.
https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903 should show all
libbpf issues. Maybe try creating an account with coverity.com?..

> > [...]
> >
> > >
> > > Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi (3):
> > >   libbpf: add netlink helpers
> > >   libbpf: add low level TC-BPF API
> > >   libbpf: add selftests for TC-BPF API
> > >
> > >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h                        |  43 ++
> > >  tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |   5 +
> > >  tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c                       | 554 ++++++++++++++++--
> > >  tools/lib/bpf/nlattr.h                        |  48 ++
> > >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c | 395 +++++++++++++
> > >  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c |  12 +
> > >  6 files changed, 993 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tc_bpf.c
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_tc_bpf.c
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >
>
> --
> Kartikeya

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi]

On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 02:28:09AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:47 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:31:56AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> > > <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > This is the seventh version of the TC-BPF series.
> > > >
> > > > It adds a simple API that uses netlink to attach the tc filter and its bpf
> > > > classifier program. Currently, a user needs to shell out to the tc command line
> > > > to be able to create filters and attach SCHED_CLS programs as classifiers. With
> > > > the help of this API, it will be possible to use libbpf for doing all parts of
> > > > bpf program setup and attach.
> > > >
> > > > Changelog contains details of patchset evolution.
> > > >
> > > > In an effort to keep discussion focused, this series doesn't have the high level
> > > > TC-BPF API. It was clear that there is a need for a bpf_link API in the kernel,
> > > > hence that will be submitted as a separate patchset based on this.
> > > >
> > > > The individual commit messages contain more details, and also a brief summary of
> > > > the API.
> > > >
> > > > Changelog:
> > > > ----------
> > >
> > > Hey Kartikeya,
> > >
> > > There were few issues flagged by Coverity after I synced libbpf to
> > > Github. A bunch of them are netlink.c-related. Could you please take a
> > > look and see if they are false positives or something that we can
> > > actually fix? See links to the issues below. Thanks!
> > >
> > >   [0] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901199&mergedDefectId=141815
> > >   [1] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901193&mergedDefectId=322806
> > >   [2] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901197&mergedDefectId=322807
> > >   [3] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901195&mergedDefectId=322808
> > >
> >
> > Hi Andrii,
> >
> > These links don't work for me (I get a timeout). Would you know why? Is there
> > some other link where I can look at them?
> >
>
> Sorry, I don't know any other way to share them.
> https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903 should show all
> libbpf issues. Maybe try creating an account with coverity.com?..
>

Thanks, that helped. I now see 401 Unauthorized, so I sent an approval request.

--
Kartikeya

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/3] Add TC-BPF API

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 2:25 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
<memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 02:28:09AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 1:47 PM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> > <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 01:31:56AM IST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 3:35 AM Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
> > > > <memxor@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the seventh version of the TC-BPF series.
> > > > >
> > > > > It adds a simple API that uses netlink to attach the tc filter and its bpf
> > > > > classifier program. Currently, a user needs to shell out to the tc command line
> > > > > to be able to create filters and attach SCHED_CLS programs as classifiers. With
> > > > > the help of this API, it will be possible to use libbpf for doing all parts of
> > > > > bpf program setup and attach.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changelog contains details of patchset evolution.
> > > > >
> > > > > In an effort to keep discussion focused, this series doesn't have the high level
> > > > > TC-BPF API. It was clear that there is a need for a bpf_link API in the kernel,
> > > > > hence that will be submitted as a separate patchset based on this.
> > > > >
> > > > > The individual commit messages contain more details, and also a brief summary of
> > > > > the API.
> > > > >
> > > > > Changelog:
> > > > > ----------
> > > >
> > > > Hey Kartikeya,
> > > >
> > > > There were few issues flagged by Coverity after I synced libbpf to
> > > > Github. A bunch of them are netlink.c-related. Could you please take a
> > > > look and see if they are false positives or something that we can
> > > > actually fix? See links to the issues below. Thanks!
> > > >
> > > >   [0] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901199&mergedDefectId=141815
> > > >   [1] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901193&mergedDefectId=322806
> > > >   [2] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901197&mergedDefectId=322807
> > > >   [3] https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903/fileInstanceId=53874109&defectInstanceId=10901195&mergedDefectId=322808
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Andrii,
> > >
> > > These links don't work for me (I get a timeout). Would you know why? Is there
> > > some other link where I can look at them?
> > >
> >
> > Sorry, I don't know any other way to share them.
> > https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v40547/p11903 should show all
> > libbpf issues. Maybe try creating an account with coverity.com?..
> >
>
> Thanks, that helped. I now see 401 Unauthorized, so I sent an approval request.

Approved.

>
> --
> Kartikeya