Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] arm64: Fix pending single-step debugging issues

[Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>]

Hi Will,

On Fri, 8 Jul 2022 at 22:01, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 03:14:16PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 11:05 PM Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch-set reworks pending fixes from Wei's series [1] to make
> > > single-step debugging via kgdb/kdb on arm64 work as expected. There was
> > > a prior discussion on ML [2] regarding if we should keep the interrupts
> > > enabled during single-stepping. So patch #1 follows suggestion from Will
> > > [3] to not disable interrupts during single stepping but rather skip
> > > single stepping within interrupt handler.
> > >
> > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200509214159.19680-1-liwei391@huawei.com/
> > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAD=FV=Voyfq3Qz0T3RY+aYWYJ0utdH=P_AweB=13rcV8GDBeyQ@mail.gmail.com/
> > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200626095551.GA9312@willie-the-truck/
> > >
> > > Changes in v3:
> > > - Reword commit descriptions as per Daniel's suggestions.
> > >
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Replace patch #1 to rather follow Will's suggestion.
> > >
> > > Sumit Garg (2):
> > >   arm64: entry: Skip single stepping into interrupt handlers
> > >   arm64: kgdb: Set PSTATE.SS to 1 to re-enable single-step
> > >
> > >  arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |  1 +
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      |  5 +++++
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c        | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> > >  arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c                |  2 ++
> > >  4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Sorry it took so long for me to respond. I kept dreaming that I'd find
> > the time to really dig deep into this to understand it fully and I'm
> > finally giving up on it. I'm going to hope that Will and/or Catalin
> > knows this area of the code well and can give it a good review. If not
> > then I'll strive harder to make the time...
>
> So the good news is that I spent a couple of days on this last week.
>

Thanks for spending time to review this.

> The bad news is that I'm nowhere done and about to disappear on holiday
> for a week!
>
> But anyway, I might be able to give this a review when I'm back. Failing
> that, I wonder if enough of us have a little bit of time each that we
> could hack on an agreed design together which covers the debug exception
> behaviour beyond kgdb?

Sure I will be happy to contribute to improving overall debug
exception behaviour. I look forward to any further
comments/suggestions.

-Sumit

>
> Will