All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 01/23] target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (22 more replies)
  0 siblings, 23 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

This patch set implements FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI for armv8. These
introduce support for a new category of interrupts in the architecture
which we can use to provide NMI like functionality.

There are two modes for using this FEAT_NMI. When PSTATE.ALLINT or
PSTATE.SP & SCTLR_ELx.SCTLR_SPINTMASK is set, any entry to ELx causes all
interrupts including those with superpriority to be masked on entry to ELn
until the mask is explicitly removed by software or hardware. PSTATE.ALLINT
can be managed by software using the new register control ALLINT.ALLINT.
Independent controls are provided for this feature at each EL, usage at EL1
should not disrupt EL2 or EL3.

I have tested it with the following linux patches which try to support
FEAT_NMI in linux kernel:

	https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/Y4sH5qX5bK9xfEBp@lpieralisi/T/#mb4ba4a2c045bf72c10c2202c1dd1b82d3240dc88

In the test, SGI, PPI and SPI interrupts can all be set to have super priority
to be converted to a hardware NMI interrupt. The SGI is tested with kernel
IPI as NMI framework, softlockup, hardlockup and kgdb test cases, and the PPI
interrupt is tested with "perf top" command with hardware NMI enabled, and
the SPI interrupt is tested with a custom test module, in which NMI interrupts
can be received and sent normally.

And the Virtual NMI(VNMI) SGI, PPI and SPI interrupts has also been tested in
nested QEMU Virtual Machine with host "virtualization=true". The SGI VNMI is
tested by accessing GICR_INMIR0 and GICR_ISPENDR0 with devmem command, as well
as hardlockup and kgdb testcases. The PPI VNMI is tested by accessing
GICR_INMIR0 and GICR_ISPENDR0 with devmem command, as well as "perf top"
command with hardware NMI enabled, which works well. The SPI VNMI is tested
with a custom test module, in which SPI VNMI can be sent from the
GIC and received normally.

         +-------------------------------------------------+
         |               Distributor                       |
         +-------------------------------------------------+
             SPI |  NMI                         |  NMI
                \/                            \/
            +--------+                     +-------+
            | Redist |                     | Redist|
            +--------+                     +-------+
            SGI  | NMI                     PPI | NMI
                \/                            \/
          +-------------+             +---------------+
          |CPU Interface|   ...       | CPU Interface |
          +-------------+             +---------------+
               | NMI                         | NMI
              \/                            \/
            +-----+                       +-----+
            |  PE |                       |  PE |
            +-----+                       +-----+

Changes in v10:
- Correct the exception_target_el(env) to 2 in msr_set_allint_el1 helper,
  since it is a hypervisor trap from EL1 to EL2.
- In arm_cpu_exec_interrupt(), if SCTLR_ELx.NMI is 0, NMI -> IRQ,
  VINMI -> VIRQ, VFNMI -> VFIQ.
- Make arm_cpu_update_virq() and arm_cpu_update_vfiq() check that it is not a
  VINMI/VFNMI, so only set 1 bit in interrupt_request, not 2.
- Adjust "hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature" to before "add irq
  non-maskable property".
- superprio -> nmi, gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0, is_nmi -> nmi,
  is_hppi -> hppi, has_superprio -> nmi, superpriority -> non-maskable property.
- Save NMI state in vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
- Exchange the order of nmi and hppi parameters.
- Handle APR and RPR NMI bits, rename ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI to ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI.
- Set ICV_RPR_EL1.NMI according to the ICV_AP1R<n>_EL1.NMI in
  ich_highest_active_virt_prio()
- Update the commit message.

Changes in v9:
- Move nmi_reginfo and related functions inside an existing ifdef
  TARGET_AARCH64 to solve the --target-list=aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu
  compilation problem.
- Check 'isread' when writing to ALLINT.
- Update the GPIOs passed in the arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, and update the comment.
- Definitely not merge VINMI and VFNMI into EXCP_VNMI.
- ARM_CPU_VNMI -> ARM_CPU_VINMI, CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI -> CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI.
- Update VINMI and VFNMI when writing HCR_EL2 or HCRX_EL2.
- Update the commit subject and message, VNMI -> VINMI.
- Handle CPSR_F and ISR_FS according to CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI instead of
  CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ and HCRX_EL2.VFNMI.
- Not check SCTLR_NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64().
- Correct the INTID_NMI logic.
- Declare cpu variable to reuse latter.

Changes in v8:
- Fix the rcu stall after sending a VNMI in qemu VM.
- Fix an unexpected interrupt bug when sending VNMI by running qemu VM.
- Test the VNMI interrupt.
- Update the commit message.
- Add Reviewed-by.

Changes in v7:
- env->cp15.hcrx_el2 -> arm_hcrx_el2_eff().
- Reorder the irqbetter() code for clarity.
- Eliminate the has_superprio local variable for gicv3_get_priority().
- false -> cs->hpplpi.superprio in gicv3_redist_update_noirqset().
- 0x0 -> false in arm_gicv3_common_reset_hold().
- Clear superprio in several places for hppi, hpplpi and hppvlpi.
- Add Reviewed-by.

Changes in v6:
- Fix DISAS_TOO_MANY to DISAS_UPDATE_EXIT for ALLINT MSR (immediate).
- Verify that HCR_EL2.VF is set before checking VFNMI.
- env->cp15.hcr_el2 -> arm_hcr_el2_eff().
- env->cp15.hcrx_el2 -> arm_hcrx_el2_eff().
- Not combine VFNMI with CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI.
- Implement icv_nmiar1_read().
- Put the "extract superprio info" code into gicv3_get_priority().
- Update the comment in irqbetter().
- Reset the cs->hppi.superprio to 0x0.
- Set hppi.superprio to false for LPI.
- Add Reviewed-by.

Changes in v5:
- Remove the comment for ALLINT in cpu.h.
- Merge allint_check() to msr_i_allint to clear the ALLINT MSR (immediate)
  implementation.
- Rename msr_i_allint() to msr_set_allint_el1() to make it clearer.
- Drop the & 1 in trans_MSR_i_ALLINT().
- Add Reviewed-by.

Changes in v4:
- Handle VNMI within the CPU and the GIC.
- Keep PSTATE.ALLINT in env->pstate but not env->allint.
- Fix the ALLINT MSR (immediate) decodetree implementation.
- Accept NMI unconditionally for arm_cpu_has_work() but add comment.
- Improve nmi mask in arm_excp_unmasked().
- Make the GICR_INMIR0 and GICD_INMIR implementation more clearer.
- Improve ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 implementation
- Extract gicv3_get_priority() to avoid priority code repetition.
- Add Reviewed-by.

Changes in v3:
- Remove the FIQ NMI.
- Adjust the patches Sequence.
- Reomve the patch "Set pstate.ALLINT in arm_cpu_reset_hold".
- Check whether support FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 for FEAT_GICv3_NMI.
- With CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI, both CPSR_I and ISR_IS must be set.
- Not include NMI logic when FEAT_NMI or SCTLR_ELx.NMI not enabled.
- Refator nmi mask in arm_excp_unmasked().
- Add VNMI definitions, add HCRX_VINMI and HCRX_VFNMI support in HCRX_EL2.
- Add Reviewed-by and Acked-by.
- Update the commit message.

Changes in v2:
- Break up the patches so that each one does only one thing.
- Remove the command line option and just implement it in "max" cpu.

Jinjie Ruan (23):
  target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI
  target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT
  target/arm: Add support for FEAT_NMI, Non-maskable Interrupt
  target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate)
  target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT
  target/arm: Add support for Non-maskable Interrupt
  target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el()
  target/arm: Handle IS/FS in ISR_EL1 for NMI, VINMI and VFNMI
  target/arm: Handle PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception
  hw/arm/virt: Wire NMI and VINMI irq lines from GIC to CPU
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI
  target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64()
  hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read()
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update()
  hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the VINMI interrupt
  target/arm: Add FEAT_NMI to max
  hw/arm/virt: Add FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature support in virt GIC

 docs/system/arm/emulation.rst      |   1 +
 hw/arm/virt.c                      |  25 +++-
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c                |  67 +++++++--
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         |  54 ++++++++
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c          | 210 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c           |  36 +++++
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c         |  22 +++
 hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h           |  13 ++
 hw/intc/trace-events               |   2 +
 include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h   |   2 +
 include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h |   7 +
 target/arm/cpu-features.h          |   5 +
 target/arm/cpu-qom.h               |   5 +-
 target/arm/cpu.c                   | 146 ++++++++++++++++++--
 target/arm/cpu.h                   |   9 ++
 target/arm/helper.c                | 102 +++++++++++++-
 target/arm/internals.h             |  21 +++
 target/arm/tcg/a64.decode          |   1 +
 target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c             |   1 +
 target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c        |  12 ++
 target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h        |   1 +
 target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c     |  19 +++
 22 files changed, 711 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 01/23] target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 02/23] target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

FEAT_NMI defines another three new bits in HCRX_EL2: TALLINT, HCRX_VINMI and
HCRX_VFNMI. When the feature is enabled, allow these bits to be written in
HCRX_EL2.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v9:
- Declare cpu variable to reuse latter.
v4:
- Update the comment for FEAT_NMI in hcrx_write().
- Update the commit message, s/thress/three/g.
v3:
- Add Reviewed-by.
- Add HCRX_VINMI and HCRX_VFNMI support in HCRX_EL2.
- Upate the commit messsage.
---
 target/arm/cpu-features.h | 5 +++++
 target/arm/helper.c       | 9 ++++++++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu-features.h b/target/arm/cpu-features.h
index e5758d9fbc..b300d0446d 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu-features.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu-features.h
@@ -681,6 +681,11 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_sme(const ARMISARegisters *id)
     return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, SME) != 0;
 }
 
+static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_nmi(const ARMISARegisters *id)
+{
+    return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64pfr1, ID_AA64PFR1, NMI) != 0;
+}
+
 static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_tgran4_lpa2(const ARMISARegisters *id)
 {
     return FIELD_SEX64(id->id_aa64mmfr0, ID_AA64MMFR0, TGRAN4) >= 1;
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 3f3a5b55d4..7d6c6e9878 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6183,13 +6183,20 @@ bool el_is_in_host(CPUARMState *env, int el)
 static void hcrx_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
                        uint64_t value)
 {
+    ARMCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
+
     uint64_t valid_mask = 0;
 
     /* FEAT_MOPS adds MSCEn and MCE2 */
-    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mops, env_archcpu(env))) {
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_mops, cpu)) {
         valid_mask |= HCRX_MSCEN | HCRX_MCE2;
     }
 
+    /* FEAT_NMI adds TALLINT, VINMI and VFNMI */
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) {
+        valid_mask |= HCRX_TALLINT | HCRX_VINMI | HCRX_VFNMI;
+    }
+
     /* Clear RES0 bits.  */
     env->cp15.hcrx_el2 = value & valid_mask;
 }
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 02/23] target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 01/23] target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 03/23] target/arm: Add support for FEAT_NMI, Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

When PSTATE.ALLINT is set, an IRQ or FIQ interrupt that is targeted to
ELx, with or without superpriority is masked.

As Richard suggested, place ALLINT bit in PSTATE in env->pstate.

With the change to pstate_read/write, exception entry
and return are automatically handled.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v5:
- Remove the ALLINT comment, as it is covered by "all other bits".
- Add Reviewed-by.
v4:
- Keep PSTATE.ALLINT in env->pstate but not env->allint.
- Update the commit message.
v3:
- Remove ALLINT dump in aarch64_cpu_dump_state().
- Update the commit message.
---
 target/arm/cpu.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index bc0c84873f..de740d223f 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1430,6 +1430,7 @@ void pmu_init(ARMCPU *cpu);
 #define PSTATE_D (1U << 9)
 #define PSTATE_BTYPE (3U << 10)
 #define PSTATE_SSBS (1U << 12)
+#define PSTATE_ALLINT (1U << 13)
 #define PSTATE_IL (1U << 20)
 #define PSTATE_SS (1U << 21)
 #define PSTATE_PAN (1U << 22)
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 03/23] target/arm: Add support for FEAT_NMI, Non-maskable Interrupt
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 01/23] target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 02/23] target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 04/23] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate) Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Add support for FEAT_NMI. NMI (FEAT_NMI) is an mandatory feature in
ARMv8.8-A and ARM v9.3-A.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v3:
- Add Reviewed-by.
- Adjust to before the MSR patches.
---
 target/arm/internals.h | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index dd3da211a3..516e0584bf 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -1229,6 +1229,9 @@ static inline uint32_t aarch64_pstate_valid_mask(const ARMISARegisters *id)
     if (isar_feature_aa64_mte(id)) {
         valid |= PSTATE_TCO;
     }
+    if (isar_feature_aa64_nmi(id)) {
+        valid |= PSTATE_ALLINT;
+    }
 
     return valid;
 }
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 04/23] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate)
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 03/23] target/arm: Add support for FEAT_NMI, Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 05/23] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Add ALLINT MSR (immediate) to decodetree, in which the CRm is 0b000x. The
EL0 check is necessary to ALLINT, and the EL1 check is necessary when
imm == 1. So implement it inline for EL2/3, or EL1 with imm==0. Avoid the
unconditional write to pc and use raise_exception_ra to unwind.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- Correct the exception_target_el(env) to 2, since it is a hypervisor trap
  from EL1 to EL2.
v7:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v6:
- Fix DISAS_TOO_MANY to DISAS_UPDATE_EXIT and add the comment.
v5:
- Drop the & 1 in trans_MSR_i_ALLINT().
- Simplify and merge msr_i_allint() and allint_check().
- Rename msr_i_allint() to msr_set_allint_el1().
v4:
- Fix the ALLINT MSR (immediate) decodetree implementation.
- Remove arm_is_el2_enabled() check in allint_check().
- Update env->allint to env->pstate.
- Only call allint_check() when imm == 1.
- Simplify the allint_check() to not pass "op" and extract.
- Implement it inline for EL2/3, or EL1 with imm==0.
- Pass (a->imm & 1) * PSTATE_ALLINT (i64) to simplfy the ALLINT set/clear.
v3:
- Remove EL0 check in allint_check().
- Add TALLINT check for EL1 in allint_check().
- Remove unnecessarily arm_rebuild_hflags() in msr_i_allint helper.
---
 target/arm/tcg/a64.decode      |  1 +
 target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c    | 12 ++++++++++++
 target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h    |  1 +
 target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode b/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode
index 8a20dce3c8..0e7656fd15 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/a64.decode
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ MSR_i_DIT       1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 010 11111 @msr_i
 MSR_i_TCO       1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 100 11111 @msr_i
 MSR_i_DAIFSET   1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 110 11111 @msr_i
 MSR_i_DAIFCLEAR 1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 .... 111 11111 @msr_i
+MSR_i_ALLINT    1101 0101 0000 0 001 0100 000 imm:1 000 11111
 MSR_i_SVCR      1101 0101 0000 0 011 0100 0 mask:2 imm:1 011 11111
 
 # MRS, MSR (register), SYS, SYSL. These are all essentially the
diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c
index ebaa7f00df..673e949422 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.c
@@ -66,6 +66,18 @@ void HELPER(msr_i_spsel)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t imm)
     update_spsel(env, imm);
 }
 
+void HELPER(msr_set_allint_el1)(CPUARMState *env)
+{
+    /* ALLINT update to PSTATE. */
+    if (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_TALLINT) {
+        raise_exception_ra(env, EXCP_UDEF,
+                           syn_aa64_sysregtrap(0, 1, 0, 4, 1, 0x1f, 0), 2,
+                           GETPC());
+    }
+
+    env->pstate |= PSTATE_ALLINT;
+}
+
 static void daif_check(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t op,
                        uint32_t imm, uintptr_t ra)
 {
diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h
index 575a5dab7d..0518165399 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/helper-a64.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ DEF_HELPER_FLAGS_1(rbit64, TCG_CALL_NO_RWG_SE, i64, i64)
 DEF_HELPER_2(msr_i_spsel, void, env, i32)
 DEF_HELPER_2(msr_i_daifset, void, env, i32)
 DEF_HELPER_2(msr_i_daifclear, void, env, i32)
+DEF_HELPER_1(msr_set_allint_el1, void, env)
 DEF_HELPER_3(vfp_cmph_a64, i64, f16, f16, ptr)
 DEF_HELPER_3(vfp_cmpeh_a64, i64, f16, f16, ptr)
 DEF_HELPER_3(vfp_cmps_a64, i64, f32, f32, ptr)
diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c b/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c
index 340265beb0..21758b290d 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/translate-a64.c
@@ -2036,6 +2036,25 @@ static bool trans_MSR_i_DAIFCLEAR(DisasContext *s, arg_i *a)
     return true;
 }
 
+static bool trans_MSR_i_ALLINT(DisasContext *s, arg_i *a)
+{
+    if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, s) || s->current_el == 0) {
+        return false;
+    }
+
+    if (a->imm == 0) {
+        clear_pstate_bits(PSTATE_ALLINT);
+    } else if (s->current_el > 1) {
+        set_pstate_bits(PSTATE_ALLINT);
+    } else {
+        gen_helper_msr_set_allint_el1(tcg_env);
+    }
+
+    /* Exit the cpu loop to re-evaluate pending IRQs. */
+    s->base.is_jmp = DISAS_UPDATE_EXIT;
+    return true;
+}
+
 static bool trans_MSR_i_SVCR(DisasContext *s, arg_MSR_i_SVCR *a)
 {
     if (!dc_isar_feature(aa64_sme, s) || a->mask == 0) {
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 05/23] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 04/23] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate) Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 06/23] target/arm: Add support for Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Support ALLINT msr access as follow:
	mrs <xt>, ALLINT	// read allint
	msr ALLINT, <xt>	// write allint with imm

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v9:
- Move nmi_reginfo and related functions inside an existing ifdef
  TARGET_AARCH64 to solve the --target-list=aarch64-softmmu,arm-softmmu
  compilation problem.
- Check 'isread' when writing to ALLINT.
v5:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v4:
- Remove arm_is_el2_enabled() check in allint_check().
- Change to env->pstate instead of env->allint.
v3:
- Remove EL0 check in aa64_allint_access() which alreay checks in .access
  PL1_RW.
- Use arm_hcrx_el2_eff() in aa64_allint_access() instead of env->cp15.hcrx_el2.
- Make ALLINT msr access function controlled by aa64_nmi.
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 7d6c6e9878..a65729af66 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -7497,6 +7497,37 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo rme_mte_reginfo[] = {
       .opc0 = 1, .opc1 = 6, .crn = 7, .crm = 14, .opc2 = 5,
       .access = PL3_W, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
 };
+
+static void aa64_allint_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
+                              uint64_t value)
+{
+    env->pstate = (env->pstate & ~PSTATE_ALLINT) | (value & PSTATE_ALLINT);
+}
+
+static uint64_t aa64_allint_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
+{
+    return env->pstate & PSTATE_ALLINT;
+}
+
+static CPAccessResult aa64_allint_access(CPUARMState *env,
+                                         const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, bool isread)
+{
+    if (!isread && arm_current_el(env) == 1 &&
+        (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_TALLINT)) {
+        return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL2;
+    }
+    return CP_ACCESS_OK;
+}
+
+static const ARMCPRegInfo nmi_reginfo[] = {
+    { .name = "ALLINT", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0, .crn = 4, .crm = 3,
+      .type = ARM_CP_NO_RAW,
+      .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = aa64_allint_access,
+      .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, pstate),
+      .writefn = aa64_allint_write, .readfn = aa64_allint_read,
+      .resetfn = arm_cp_reset_ignore },
+};
 #endif /* TARGET_AARCH64 */
 
 static void define_pmu_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
@@ -9891,6 +9922,10 @@ void register_cp_regs_for_features(ARMCPU *cpu)
     if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nv2, cpu)) {
         define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, nv2_reginfo);
     }
+
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) {
+        define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, nmi_reginfo);
+    }
 #endif
 
     if (cpu_isar_feature(any_predinv, cpu)) {
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 06/23] target/arm: Add support for Non-maskable Interrupt
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 05/23] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 07/23] target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el() Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

This only implements the external delivery method via the GICv3.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- In arm_cpu_exec_interrupt(), if SCTLR_ELx.NMI is 0, NMI -> IRQ,
  VINMI -> VIRQ, VFNMI -> VFIQ.
- Make arm_cpu_update_virq() and arm_cpu_update_vfiq() check that it is not a
  VINMI/VFNMI, so only set 1 bit in interrupt_request, not 2.
v9:
- Update the GPIOs passed in the arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, and update the comment.
- Definitely not merge VINMI and VFNMI into EXCP_VNMI.
- Update VINMI and VFNMI when writing HCR_EL2 or HCRX_EL2.
v8:
- Fix the rcu stall after sending a VNMI in qemu VM.
v7:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v6:
- env->cp15.hcr_el2 -> arm_hcr_el2_eff().
- env->cp15.hcrx_el2 -> arm_hcrx_el2_eff().
- Not include VF && VFNMI in CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI.
v4:
- Accept NMI unconditionally for arm_cpu_has_work() but add comment.
- Change from & to && for EXCP_IRQ or EXCP_FIQ.
- Refator nmi mask in arm_excp_unmasked().
- Also handle VNMI in arm_cpu_exec_interrupt() and arm_cpu_set_irq().
- Rename virtual to Virtual.
v3:
- Not include CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI when FEAT_NMI not enabled
- Add ARM_CPU_VNMI.
- Refator nmi mask in arm_excp_unmasked().
- Test SCTLR_ELx.NMI for ALLINT mask for NMI.
---
 target/arm/cpu-qom.h   |   5 +-
 target/arm/cpu.c       | 146 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 target/arm/cpu.h       |   6 ++
 target/arm/helper.c    |  33 ++++++++--
 target/arm/internals.h |  18 +++++
 5 files changed, 192 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu-qom.h b/target/arm/cpu-qom.h
index 8e032691db..b497667d61 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu-qom.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu-qom.h
@@ -36,11 +36,14 @@ DECLARE_CLASS_CHECKERS(AArch64CPUClass, AARCH64_CPU,
 #define ARM_CPU_TYPE_SUFFIX "-" TYPE_ARM_CPU
 #define ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME(name) (name ARM_CPU_TYPE_SUFFIX)
 
-/* Meanings of the ARMCPU object's four inbound GPIO lines */
+/* Meanings of the ARMCPU object's seven inbound GPIO lines */
 #define ARM_CPU_IRQ 0
 #define ARM_CPU_FIQ 1
 #define ARM_CPU_VIRQ 2
 #define ARM_CPU_VFIQ 3
+#define ARM_CPU_NMI 4
+#define ARM_CPU_VINMI 5
+#define ARM_CPU_VFNMI 6
 
 /* For M profile, some registers are banked secure vs non-secure;
  * these are represented as a 2-element array where the first element
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index ab8d007a86..74eb573aeb 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ void arm_restore_state_to_opc(CPUState *cs,
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_TCG */
 
+/*
+ * With SCTLR_ELx.NMI == 0, IRQ with Superpriority is masked identically with
+ * IRQ without Superpriority. Moreover, if the GIC is configured so that
+ * FEAT_GICv3_NMI is only set if FEAT_NMI is set, then we won't ever see
+ * CPU_INTERRUPT_*NMI anyway. So we might as well accept NMI here
+ * unconditionally.
+ */
 static bool arm_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
 {
     ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs);
@@ -129,6 +136,7 @@ static bool arm_cpu_has_work(CPUState *cs)
     return (cpu->power_state != PSCI_OFF)
         && cs->interrupt_request &
         (CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD
+         | CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI | CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI | CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI
          | CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ | CPU_INTERRUPT_VSERR
          | CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB);
 }
@@ -668,6 +676,7 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx,
     CPUARMState *env = cpu_env(cs);
     bool pstate_unmasked;
     bool unmasked = false;
+    bool allIntMask = false;
 
     /*
      * Don't take exceptions if they target a lower EL.
@@ -678,13 +687,36 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx,
         return false;
     }
 
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, env_archcpu(env)) &&
+        env->cp15.sctlr_el[target_el] & SCTLR_NMI && cur_el == target_el) {
+        allIntMask = env->pstate & PSTATE_ALLINT ||
+                     ((env->cp15.sctlr_el[target_el] & SCTLR_SPINTMASK) &&
+                      (env->pstate & PSTATE_SP));
+    }
+
     switch (excp_idx) {
+    case EXCP_NMI:
+        pstate_unmasked = !allIntMask;
+        break;
+
+    case EXCP_VINMI:
+        if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
+            /* VINMIs are only taken when hypervized.  */
+            return false;
+        }
+        return !allIntMask;
+    case EXCP_VFNMI:
+        if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
+            /* VFNMIs are only taken when hypervized.  */
+            return false;
+        }
+        return !allIntMask;
     case EXCP_FIQ:
-        pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_F);
+        pstate_unmasked = (!(env->daif & PSTATE_F)) && (!allIntMask);
         break;
 
     case EXCP_IRQ:
-        pstate_unmasked = !(env->daif & PSTATE_I);
+        pstate_unmasked = (!(env->daif & PSTATE_I)) && (!allIntMask);
         break;
 
     case EXCP_VFIQ:
@@ -692,13 +724,13 @@ static inline bool arm_excp_unmasked(CPUState *cs, unsigned int excp_idx,
             /* VFIQs are only taken when hypervized.  */
             return false;
         }
-        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_F);
+        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_F) && (!allIntMask);
     case EXCP_VIRQ:
         if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
             /* VIRQs are only taken when hypervized.  */
             return false;
         }
-        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_I);
+        return !(env->daif & PSTATE_I) && (!allIntMask);
     case EXCP_VSERR:
         if (!(hcr_el2 & HCR_AMO) || (hcr_el2 & HCR_TGE)) {
             /* VIRQs are only taken when hypervized.  */
@@ -804,6 +836,48 @@ static bool arm_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
 
     /* The prioritization of interrupts is IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED. */
 
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, env_archcpu(env)) &&
+        (arm_sctlr(env, cur_el) & SCTLR_NMI)) {
+        if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI) {
+            excp_idx = EXCP_NMI;
+            target_el = arm_phys_excp_target_el(cs, excp_idx, cur_el, secure);
+            if (arm_excp_unmasked(cs, excp_idx, target_el,
+                                  cur_el, secure, hcr_el2)) {
+                goto found;
+            }
+        }
+        if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI) {
+            excp_idx = EXCP_VINMI;
+            target_el = 1;
+            if (arm_excp_unmasked(cs, excp_idx, target_el,
+                                  cur_el, secure, hcr_el2)) {
+                goto found;
+            }
+        }
+        if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI) {
+            excp_idx = EXCP_VFNMI;
+            target_el = 1;
+            if (arm_excp_unmasked(cs, excp_idx, target_el,
+                                  cur_el, secure, hcr_el2)) {
+                goto found;
+            }
+        }
+    } else {
+        /*
+         * NMI disabled: interrupts with superpriority are handled
+         * as if they didn't have it
+         */
+        if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI) {
+            interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD;
+        }
+        if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI) {
+            interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ;
+        }
+        if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI) {
+            interrupt_request |= CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ;
+        }
+    }
+
     if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ) {
         excp_idx = EXCP_FIQ;
         target_el = arm_phys_excp_target_el(cs, excp_idx, cur_el, secure);
@@ -867,7 +941,8 @@ void arm_cpu_update_virq(ARMCPU *cpu)
     CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
     CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
 
-    bool new_state = (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_VI) ||
+    bool new_state = ((arm_hcr_el2_eff(env) & HCR_VI) &&
+        !(arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_VINMI)) ||
         (env->irq_line_state & CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ);
 
     if (new_state != ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ) != 0)) {
@@ -888,7 +963,8 @@ void arm_cpu_update_vfiq(ARMCPU *cpu)
     CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
     CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
 
-    bool new_state = (env->cp15.hcr_el2 & HCR_VF) ||
+    bool new_state = ((arm_hcr_el2_eff(env) & HCR_VF) &&
+        !(arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_VFNMI)) ||
         (env->irq_line_state & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ);
 
     if (new_state != ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ) != 0)) {
@@ -900,6 +976,48 @@ void arm_cpu_update_vfiq(ARMCPU *cpu)
     }
 }
 
+void arm_cpu_update_vinmi(ARMCPU *cpu)
+{
+    /*
+     * Update the interrupt level for VINMI, which is the logical OR of
+     * the HCRX_EL2.VINMI bit and the input line level from the GIC.
+     */
+    CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
+    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
+
+    bool new_state = ((arm_hcr_el2_eff(env) & HCR_VI) &&
+                      (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_VINMI)) ||
+        (env->irq_line_state & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI);
+
+    if (new_state != ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI) != 0)) {
+        if (new_state) {
+            cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI);
+        } else {
+            cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI);
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+void arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(ARMCPU *cpu)
+{
+    /*
+     * Update the interrupt level for VFNMI, which is the HCRX_EL2.VFNMI bit.
+     */
+    CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
+    CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
+
+    bool new_state = (arm_hcr_el2_eff(env) & HCR_VF) &&
+                      (arm_hcrx_el2_eff(env) & HCRX_VFNMI);
+
+    if (new_state != ((cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI) != 0)) {
+        if (new_state) {
+            cpu_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI);
+        } else {
+            cpu_reset_interrupt(cs, CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI);
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 void arm_cpu_update_vserr(ARMCPU *cpu)
 {
     /*
@@ -929,7 +1047,9 @@ static void arm_cpu_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
         [ARM_CPU_IRQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD,
         [ARM_CPU_FIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ,
         [ARM_CPU_VIRQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ,
-        [ARM_CPU_VFIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ
+        [ARM_CPU_VFIQ] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ,
+        [ARM_CPU_NMI] = CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI,
+        [ARM_CPU_VINMI] = CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI,
     };
 
     if (!arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2) &&
@@ -955,8 +1075,12 @@ static void arm_cpu_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
     case ARM_CPU_VFIQ:
         arm_cpu_update_vfiq(cpu);
         break;
+    case ARM_CPU_VINMI:
+        arm_cpu_update_vinmi(cpu);
+        break;
     case ARM_CPU_IRQ:
     case ARM_CPU_FIQ:
+    case ARM_CPU_NMI:
         if (level) {
             cpu_interrupt(cs, mask[irq]);
         } else {
@@ -1350,12 +1474,12 @@ static void arm_cpu_initfn(Object *obj)
 #else
     /* Our inbound IRQ and FIQ lines */
     if (kvm_enabled()) {
-        /* VIRQ and VFIQ are unused with KVM but we add them to maintain
-         * the same interface as non-KVM CPUs.
+        /* VIRQ, VFIQ, NMI, VINMI are unused with KVM but we add
+         * them to maintain the same interface as non-KVM CPUs.
          */
-        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, 4);
+        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_kvm_set_irq, 6);
     } else {
-        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_set_irq, 4);
+        qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(cpu), arm_cpu_set_irq, 6);
     }
 
     qdev_init_gpio_out(DEVICE(cpu), cpu->gt_timer_outputs,
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index de740d223f..08a6bc50de 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
 #define EXCP_DIVBYZERO      23   /* v7M DIVBYZERO UsageFault */
 #define EXCP_VSERR          24
 #define EXCP_GPC            25   /* v9 Granule Protection Check Fault */
+#define EXCP_NMI            26
+#define EXCP_VINMI          27
+#define EXCP_VFNMI          28
 /* NB: add new EXCP_ defines to the array in arm_log_exception() too */
 
 #define ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET   1
@@ -80,6 +83,9 @@
 #define CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ  CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_2
 #define CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ  CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_3
 #define CPU_INTERRUPT_VSERR CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_INT_0
+#define CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI   CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_4
+#define CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_EXT_0
+#define CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI CPU_INTERRUPT_TGT_INT_1
 
 /* The usual mapping for an AArch64 system register to its AArch32
  * counterpart is for the 32 bit world to have access to the lower
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index a65729af66..1868235499 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6042,15 +6042,19 @@ static void do_hcr_write(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t value, uint64_t valid_mask)
      * and the state of the input lines from the GIC. (This requires
      * that we have the BQL, which is done by marking the
      * reginfo structs as ARM_CP_IO.)
-     * Note that if a write to HCR pends a VIRQ or VFIQ it is never
-     * possible for it to be taken immediately, because VIRQ and
-     * VFIQ are masked unless running at EL0 or EL1, and HCR
-     * can only be written at EL2.
+     * Note that if a write to HCR pends a VIRQ or VFIQ or VINMI or
+     * VFNMI, it is never possible for it to be taken immediately
+     * because VIRQ, VFIQ, VINMI and VFNMI are masked unless running
+     * at EL0 or EL1, and HCR can only be written at EL2.
      */
     g_assert(bql_locked());
     arm_cpu_update_virq(cpu);
     arm_cpu_update_vfiq(cpu);
     arm_cpu_update_vserr(cpu);
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) {
+        arm_cpu_update_vinmi(cpu);
+        arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(cpu);
+    }
 }
 
 static void hcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
@@ -6199,6 +6203,23 @@ static void hcrx_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
 
     /* Clear RES0 bits.  */
     env->cp15.hcrx_el2 = value & valid_mask;
+
+    /*
+     * Updates to VINMI and VFNMI require us to update the status of
+     * virtual NMI, which are the logical OR of these bits
+     * and the state of the input lines from the GIC. (This requires
+     * that we have the BQL, which is done by marking the
+     * reginfo structs as ARM_CP_IO.)
+     * Note that if a write to HCRX pends a VINMI or VFNMI it is never
+     * possible for it to be taken immediately, because VINMI and
+     * VFNMI are masked unless running at EL0 or EL1, and HCRX
+     * can only be written at EL2.
+     */
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) {
+        g_assert(bql_locked());
+        arm_cpu_update_vinmi(cpu);
+        arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(cpu);
+    }
 }
 
 static CPAccessResult access_hxen(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
@@ -6214,6 +6235,7 @@ static CPAccessResult access_hxen(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
 
 static const ARMCPRegInfo hcrx_el2_reginfo = {
     .name = "HCRX_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_AA64,
+    .type = ARM_CP_IO,
     .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 2,
     .access = PL2_RW, .writefn = hcrx_write, .accessfn = access_hxen,
     .nv2_redirect_offset = 0xa0,
@@ -10796,6 +10818,9 @@ void arm_log_exception(CPUState *cs)
             [EXCP_DIVBYZERO] = "v7M DIVBYZERO UsageFault",
             [EXCP_VSERR] = "Virtual SERR",
             [EXCP_GPC] = "Granule Protection Check",
+            [EXCP_NMI] = "NMI",
+            [EXCP_VINMI] = "Virtual IRQ NMI",
+            [EXCP_VFNMI] = "Virtual FIQ NMI",
         };
 
         if (idx >= 0 && idx < ARRAY_SIZE(excnames)) {
diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
index 516e0584bf..b53f5e8ff2 100644
--- a/target/arm/internals.h
+++ b/target/arm/internals.h
@@ -1109,6 +1109,24 @@ void arm_cpu_update_virq(ARMCPU *cpu);
  */
 void arm_cpu_update_vfiq(ARMCPU *cpu);
 
+/**
+ * arm_cpu_update_vinmi: Update CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI bit in cs->interrupt_request
+ *
+ * Update the CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI bit in cs->interrupt_request, following
+ * a change to either the input VNMI line from the GIC or the HCRX_EL2.VINMI.
+ * Must be called with the BQL held.
+ */
+void arm_cpu_update_vinmi(ARMCPU *cpu);
+
+/**
+ * arm_cpu_update_vfnmi: Update CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI bit in cs->interrupt_request
+ *
+ * Update the CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI bit in cs->interrupt_request, following
+ * a change to the HCRX_EL2.VFNMI.
+ * Must be called with the BQL held.
+ */
+void arm_cpu_update_vfnmi(ARMCPU *cpu);
+
 /**
  * arm_cpu_update_vserr: Update CPU_INTERRUPT_VSERR bit
  *
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 07/23] target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el()
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 06/23] target/arm: Add support for Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 08/23] target/arm: Handle IS/FS in ISR_EL1 for NMI, VINMI and VFNMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt
with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so handle NMI same as IRQ in
arm_phys_excp_target_el().

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v4:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v3:
- Remove nmi_is_irq flag in CPUARMState.
- Handle NMI same as IRQ in arm_phys_excp_target_el().
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 1868235499..077c9a6923 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -10760,6 +10760,7 @@ uint32_t arm_phys_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs, uint32_t excp_idx,
     hcr_el2 = arm_hcr_el2_eff(env);
     switch (excp_idx) {
     case EXCP_IRQ:
+    case EXCP_NMI:
         scr = ((env->cp15.scr_el3 & SCR_IRQ) == SCR_IRQ);
         hcr = hcr_el2 & HCR_IMO;
         break;
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 08/23] target/arm: Handle IS/FS in ISR_EL1 for NMI, VINMI and VFNMI
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 07/23] target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el() Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 09/23] target/arm: Handle PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Add IS and FS bit in ISR_EL1 and handle the read. With CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI or
CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI, both CPSR_I and ISR_IS must be set. With
CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI, both CPSR_F and ISR_FS must be set.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v9:
- CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI -> CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI.
- Handle CPSR_F and ISR_FS according to CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI instead of
  CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ and HCRX_EL2.VFNMI.
- Update the commit message.
v7:
- env->cp15.hcrx_el2 -> arm_hcrx_el2_eff().
- Add Reviewed-by.
v6:
- Verify that HCR_EL2.VF is set before checking VFNMI.
v4;
- Also handle VNMI.
v3:
- CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI do not set FIQ, so remove it.
- With CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI, both CPSR_I and ISR_IS must be set.
---
 target/arm/cpu.h    |  2 ++
 target/arm/helper.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 08a6bc50de..97997dbd08 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1398,6 +1398,8 @@ void pmu_init(ARMCPU *cpu);
 #define CPSR_N (1U << 31)
 #define CPSR_NZCV (CPSR_N | CPSR_Z | CPSR_C | CPSR_V)
 #define CPSR_AIF (CPSR_A | CPSR_I | CPSR_F)
+#define ISR_FS (1U << 9)
+#define ISR_IS (1U << 10)
 
 #define CPSR_IT (CPSR_IT_0_1 | CPSR_IT_2_7)
 #define CACHED_CPSR_BITS (CPSR_T | CPSR_AIF | CPSR_GE | CPSR_IT | CPSR_Q \
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 077c9a6923..b57114d35d 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -2021,16 +2021,29 @@ static uint64_t isr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
         if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VIRQ) {
             ret |= CPSR_I;
         }
+        if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VINMI) {
+            ret |= ISR_IS;
+            ret |= CPSR_I;
+        }
     } else {
         if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) {
             ret |= CPSR_I;
         }
+
+        if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI) {
+            ret |= ISR_IS;
+            ret |= CPSR_I;
+        }
     }
 
     if (hcr_el2 & HCR_FMO) {
         if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFIQ) {
             ret |= CPSR_F;
         }
+        if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_VFNMI) {
+            ret |= ISR_FS;
+            ret |= CPSR_F;
+        }
     } else {
         if (cs->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ) {
             ret |= CPSR_F;
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 09/23] target/arm: Handle PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 08/23] target/arm: Handle IS/FS in ISR_EL1 for NMI, VINMI and VFNMI Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 10/23] hw/arm/virt: Wire NMI and VINMI irq lines from GIC to CPU Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Set or clear PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception to ELx according to the
SCTLR_ELx.SPINTMASK bit.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v9:
- Not check SCTLR_NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64().
v3:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index b57114d35d..967e833ee8 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -11730,6 +11730,14 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs)
         }
     }
 
+    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu)) {
+        if (!(env->cp15.sctlr_el[new_el] & SCTLR_SPINTMASK)) {
+            new_mode |= PSTATE_ALLINT;
+        } else {
+            new_mode &= ~PSTATE_ALLINT;
+        }
+    }
+
     pstate_write(env, PSTATE_DAIF | new_mode);
     env->aarch64 = true;
     aarch64_restore_sp(env, new_el);
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 10/23] hw/arm/virt: Wire NMI and VINMI irq lines from GIC to CPU
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 09/23] target/arm: Handle PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 11/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Wire the new NMI and VINMI interrupt line from the GIC to each CPU.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v9:
- Rename ARM_CPU_VNMI to ARM_CPU_VINMI.
- Update the commit message.
v4:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v3:
- Also add VNMI wire.
---
 hw/arm/virt.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index a9a913aead..ef2e6c2c4d 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -821,7 +821,8 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem)
 
     /* Wire the outputs from each CPU's generic timer and the GICv3
      * maintenance interrupt signal to the appropriate GIC PPI inputs,
-     * and the GIC's IRQ/FIQ/VIRQ/VFIQ interrupt outputs to the CPU's inputs.
+     * and the GIC's IRQ/FIQ/VIRQ/VFIQ/NMI/VINMI interrupt outputs to the
+     * CPU's inputs.
      */
     for (i = 0; i < smp_cpus; i++) {
         DeviceState *cpudev = DEVICE(qemu_get_cpu(i));
@@ -865,6 +866,10 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem)
                            qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_VIRQ));
         sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + 3 * smp_cpus,
                            qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_VFIQ));
+        sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + 4 * smp_cpus,
+                           qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_NMI));
+        sysbus_connect_irq(gicbusdev, i + 5 * smp_cpus,
+                           qdev_get_gpio_in(cpudev, ARM_CPU_VINMI));
     }
 
     fdt_add_gic_node(vms);
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 11/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 10/23] hw/arm/virt: Wire NMI and VINMI irq lines from GIC to CPU Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-28 14:55   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 12/23] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64() Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Augment the GICv3's QOM device interface by adding one
new set of sysbus IRQ line, to signal NMI to each CPU.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v4:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v3:
- Add support for VNMI.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         | 6 ++++++
 include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h   | 2 ++
 include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h | 2 ++
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
index cb55c72681..c52f060026 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
@@ -299,6 +299,12 @@ void gicv3_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICv3State *s, qemu_irq_handler handler,
     for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
         sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->cpu[i].parent_vfiq);
     }
+    for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
+        sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->cpu[i].parent_nmi);
+    }
+    for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
+        sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &s->cpu[i].parent_vnmi);
+    }
 
     memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem_dist, OBJECT(s), ops, s,
                           "gicv3_dist", 0x10000);
diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h
index 7080375008..97fea4102d 100644
--- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h
+++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.h
@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ struct GICState {
     qemu_irq parent_fiq[GIC_NCPU];
     qemu_irq parent_virq[GIC_NCPU];
     qemu_irq parent_vfiq[GIC_NCPU];
+    qemu_irq parent_nmi[GIC_NCPU];
+    qemu_irq parent_vnmi[GIC_NCPU];
     qemu_irq maintenance_irq[GIC_NCPU];
 
     /* GICD_CTLR; for a GIC with the security extensions the NS banked version
diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
index 4e2fb518e7..7324c7d983 100644
--- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
+++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
@@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ struct GICv3CPUState {
     qemu_irq parent_fiq;
     qemu_irq parent_virq;
     qemu_irq parent_vfiq;
+    qemu_irq parent_nmi;
+    qemu_irq parent_vnmi;
 
     /* Redistributor */
     uint32_t level;                  /* Current IRQ level */
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 12/23] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64()
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 11/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 13/23] hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

According to Arm GIC section 4.6.3 Interrupt superpriority, the interrupt
with superpriority is always IRQ, never FIQ, so the NMI exception trap entry
behave like IRQ. And VINMI(vIRQ with Superpriority) can be raised from the
GIC or come from the hcrx_el2.HCRX_VINMI bit, VFNMI(vFIQ with Superpriority)
come from the hcrx_el2.HCRX_VFNMI bit.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v9:
- Update the commit message.
- Handle VINMI and VFNMI.
v7:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v6:
- Not combine VFNMI with CPU_INTERRUPT_VNMI.
v4:
- Also handle VNMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64().
v3:
- Remove the FIQ NMI handle.
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 967e833ee8..eef37b801d 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -11650,10 +11650,13 @@ static void arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64(CPUState *cs)
         break;
     case EXCP_IRQ:
     case EXCP_VIRQ:
+    case EXCP_NMI:
+    case EXCP_VINMI:
         addr += 0x80;
         break;
     case EXCP_FIQ:
     case EXCP_VFIQ:
+    case EXCP_VFNMI:
         addr += 0x100;
         break;
     case EXCP_VSERR:
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 13/23] hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 12/23] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64() Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Added properties to enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature, setup distributor
and redistributor registers to indicate NMI support.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- Adjust to before add irq non-maskable property.
v4:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         | 1 +
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c           | 2 ++
 hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h           | 1 +
 include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h | 1 +
 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
index c52f060026..2d2cea6858 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
@@ -569,6 +569,7 @@ static Property arm_gicv3_common_properties[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", GICv3State, num_irq, 32),
     DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("revision", GICv3State, revision, 3),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has-lpi", GICv3State, lpi_enable, 0),
+    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has-nmi", GICv3State, nmi_support, 0),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has-security-extensions", GICv3State, security_extn, 0),
     /*
      * Compatibility property: force 8 bits of physical priority, even
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
index 35e850685c..22ddc0d666 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ static bool gicd_readl(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset,
          *                      by GICD_TYPER.IDbits)
          * MBIS == 0 (message-based SPIs not supported)
          * SecurityExtn == 1 if security extns supported
+         * NMI = 1 if Non-maskable interrupt property is supported
          * CPUNumber == 0 since for us ARE is always 1
          * ITLinesNumber == (((max SPI IntID + 1) / 32) - 1)
          */
@@ -402,6 +403,7 @@ static bool gicd_readl(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset,
         bool dvis = s->revision >= 4;
 
         *data = (1 << 25) | (1 << 24) | (dvis << 18) | (sec_extn << 10) |
+            (s->nmi_support << GICD_TYPER_NMI_SHIFT) |
             (s->lpi_enable << GICD_TYPER_LPIS_SHIFT) |
             (0xf << 19) | itlinesnumber;
         return true;
diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
index 29d5cdc1b6..8f4ebed2f4 100644
--- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
+++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
 #define GICD_CTLR_E1NWF             (1U << 7)
 #define GICD_CTLR_RWP               (1U << 31)
 
+#define GICD_TYPER_NMI_SHIFT           9
 #define GICD_TYPER_LPIS_SHIFT          17
 
 /* 16 bits EventId */
diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
index 7324c7d983..4358c5319c 100644
--- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
+++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
@@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct GICv3State {
     uint32_t num_irq;
     uint32_t revision;
     bool lpi_enable;
+    bool nmi_support;
     bool security_extn;
     bool force_8bit_prio;
     bool irq_reset_nonsecure;
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 13/23] hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-28 14:54   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 15/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0 Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

A SPI, PPI or SGI interrupt can have non-maskable property. So maintain
non-maskable property in PendingIrq and GICR/GICD. Since add new device
state, it also needs to be migrated, so also save NMI info in
vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- superprio -> nmi, gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0.
- Save NMI state in vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
- Update the commit message.
v3:
- Place this ahead of implement GICR_INMIR.
- Add Acked-by.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h |  4 +++
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
index 2d2cea6858..be76ae0be6 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
@@ -164,6 +164,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicv4 = {
     }
 };
 
+static bool nmi_needed(void *opaque)
+{
+    GICv3CPUState *cs = opaque;
+
+    return cs->gic->nmi_support != 0;
+}
+
+static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu_nmi = {
+    .name = "arm_gicv3_cpu/nmi",
+    .version_id = 1,
+    .minimum_version_id = 1,
+    .needed = nmi_needed,
+    .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
+        VMSTATE_UINT32(gicr_inmir0, GICv3CPUState),
+        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
+    }
+};
+
 static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
     .name = "arm_gicv3_cpu",
     .version_id = 1,
@@ -197,6 +215,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
         &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_sre_el1,
         &vmstate_gicv3_gicv4,
         NULL
+    },
+    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
+        &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_nmi,
+        NULL
     }
 };
 
@@ -238,6 +260,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_migration_shift_bug = {
     }
 };
 
+static bool needed_nmi(void *opaque)
+{
+    GICv3State *cs = opaque;
+
+    return cs->nmi_support != 0;
+}
+
+const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_nmi = {
+    .name = "arm_gicv3/gicd_nmi",
+    .version_id = 1,
+    .minimum_version_id = 1,
+    .needed = needed_nmi,
+    .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
+        VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(nmi, GICv3State, GICV3_BMP_SIZE),
+        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
+    }
+};
+
 static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
     .name = "arm_gicv3",
     .version_id = 1,
@@ -267,6 +307,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
     .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
         &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_migration_shift_bug,
         NULL
+    },
+    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
+        &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_nmi,
+        NULL
     }
 };
 
diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
index 4358c5319c..88533749eb 100644
--- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
+++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
@@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ typedef struct {
     int irq;
     uint8_t prio;
     int grp;
+    bool nmi;
 } PendingIrq;
 
 struct GICv3CPUState {
@@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ struct GICv3CPUState {
     uint32_t gicr_ienabler0;
     uint32_t gicr_ipendr0;
     uint32_t gicr_iactiver0;
+    uint32_t gicr_inmir0;
     uint32_t edge_trigger; /* ICFGR0 and ICFGR1 even bits */
     uint32_t gicr_igrpmodr0;
     uint32_t gicr_nsacr;
@@ -275,6 +277,7 @@ struct GICv3State {
     GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(active);       /* GICD_ISACTIVER */
     GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(level);        /* Current level */
     GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(edge_trigger); /* GICD_ICFGR even bits */
+    GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(nmi);          /* GICD_INMIR */
     uint8_t gicd_ipriority[GICV3_MAXIRQ];
     uint64_t gicd_irouter[GICV3_MAXIRQ];
     /* Cached information: pointer to the cpu i/f for the CPUs specified
@@ -314,6 +317,7 @@ GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(pending)
 GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(active)
 GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(level)
 GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(edge_trigger)
+GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(nmi)
 
 #define TYPE_ARM_GICV3_COMMON "arm-gicv3-common"
 typedef struct ARMGICv3CommonClass ARMGICv3CommonClass;
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 15/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-28 14:56   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 16/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Add GICR_INMIR0 register and support access GICR_INMIR0.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0.
v6:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v4:
- Make the GICR_INMIR0 implementation more clearer.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h   |  1 +
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c
index 8153525849..ed1f9d1e44 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c
@@ -35,6 +35,15 @@ static int gicr_ns_access(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq)
     return extract32(cs->gicr_nsacr, irq * 2, 2);
 }
 
+static void gicr_write_bitmap_reg(GICv3CPUState *cs, MemTxAttrs attrs,
+                                  uint32_t *reg, uint32_t val)
+{
+    /* Helper routine to implement writing to a "set" register */
+    val &= mask_group(cs, attrs);
+    *reg = val;
+    gicv3_redist_update(cs);
+}
+
 static void gicr_write_set_bitmap_reg(GICv3CPUState *cs, MemTxAttrs attrs,
                                       uint32_t *reg, uint32_t val)
 {
@@ -406,6 +415,10 @@ static MemTxResult gicr_readl(GICv3CPUState *cs, hwaddr offset,
         *data = value;
         return MEMTX_OK;
     }
+    case GICR_INMIR0:
+        *data = cs->gic->nmi_support ?
+                gicr_read_bitmap_reg(cs, attrs, cs->gicr_inmir0) : 0;
+        return MEMTX_OK;
     case GICR_ICFGR0:
     case GICR_ICFGR1:
     {
@@ -555,6 +568,12 @@ static MemTxResult gicr_writel(GICv3CPUState *cs, hwaddr offset,
         gicv3_redist_update(cs);
         return MEMTX_OK;
     }
+    case GICR_INMIR0:
+        if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
+            gicr_write_bitmap_reg(cs, attrs, &cs->gicr_inmir0, value);
+        }
+        return MEMTX_OK;
+
     case GICR_ICFGR0:
         /* Register is all RAZ/WI or RAO/WI bits */
         return MEMTX_OK;
diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
index 8f4ebed2f4..21697ecf39 100644
--- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
+++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
@@ -110,6 +110,7 @@
 #define GICR_ICFGR1           (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0C04)
 #define GICR_IGRPMODR0        (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0D00)
 #define GICR_NSACR            (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0E00)
+#define GICR_INMIR0           (GICR_SGI_OFFSET + 0x0F80)
 
 /* VLPI redistributor registers, offsets from VLPI_base */
 #define GICR_VPROPBASER       (GICR_VLPI_OFFSET + 0x70)
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 16/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 15/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0 Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-28 14:57   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Add GICD_INMIR, GICD_INMIRnE register and support access GICD_INMIR0.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- superprio -> nmi.
v4:
- Make the GICD_INMIR implementation more clearer.
- Udpate the commit message.
v3:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
index 22ddc0d666..d8207acb22 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_dist.c
@@ -89,6 +89,29 @@ static int gicd_ns_access(GICv3State *s, int irq)
     return extract32(s->gicd_nsacr[irq / 16], (irq % 16) * 2, 2);
 }
 
+static void gicd_write_bitmap_reg(GICv3State *s, MemTxAttrs attrs,
+                                  uint32_t *bmp, maskfn *maskfn,
+                                  int offset, uint32_t val)
+{
+    /*
+     * Helper routine to implement writing to a "set" register
+     * (GICD_INMIR, etc).
+     * Semantics implemented here:
+     * RAZ/WI for SGIs, PPIs, unimplemented IRQs
+     * Bits corresponding to Group 0 or Secure Group 1 interrupts RAZ/WI.
+     * offset should be the offset in bytes of the register from the start
+     * of its group.
+     */
+    int irq = offset * 8;
+
+    if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL || irq >= s->num_irq) {
+        return;
+    }
+    val &= mask_group_and_nsacr(s, attrs, maskfn, irq);
+    *gic_bmp_ptr32(bmp, irq) = val;
+    gicv3_update(s, irq, 32);
+}
+
 static void gicd_write_set_bitmap_reg(GICv3State *s, MemTxAttrs attrs,
                                       uint32_t *bmp,
                                       maskfn *maskfn,
@@ -545,6 +568,11 @@ static bool gicd_readl(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset,
         /* RAZ/WI since affinity routing is always enabled */
         *data = 0;
         return true;
+    case GICD_INMIR ... GICD_INMIR + 0x7f:
+        *data = (!s->nmi_support) ? 0 :
+                gicd_read_bitmap_reg(s, attrs, s->nmi, NULL,
+                                     offset - GICD_INMIR);
+        return true;
     case GICD_IROUTER ... GICD_IROUTER + 0x1fdf:
     {
         uint64_t r;
@@ -754,6 +782,12 @@ static bool gicd_writel(GICv3State *s, hwaddr offset,
     case GICD_SPENDSGIR ... GICD_SPENDSGIR + 0xf:
         /* RAZ/WI since affinity routing is always enabled */
         return true;
+    case GICD_INMIR ... GICD_INMIR + 0x7f:
+        if (s->nmi_support) {
+            gicd_write_bitmap_reg(s, attrs, s->nmi, NULL,
+                                  offset - GICD_INMIR, value);
+        }
+        return true;
     case GICD_IROUTER ... GICD_IROUTER + 0x1fdf:
     {
         uint64_t r;
diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
index 21697ecf39..8d793243f4 100644
--- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
+++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@
 #define GICD_SGIR            0x0F00
 #define GICD_CPENDSGIR       0x0F10
 #define GICD_SPENDSGIR       0x0F20
+#define GICD_INMIR           0x0F80
+#define GICD_INMIRnE         0x3B00
 #define GICD_IROUTER         0x6000
 #define GICD_IDREGS          0xFFD0
 
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 16/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-28 14:50   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 18/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read() Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Add the NMIAR CPU interface registers which deal with acknowledging NMI.

When introduce NMI interrupt, there are some updates to the semantics for the
register ICC_IAR1_EL1 and ICC_HPPIR1_EL1. For ICC_IAR1_EL1 register, it
should return 1022 if the intid has non-maskable property. And for
ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 register, it should return 1023 if the intid do not have
non-maskable property. Howerever, these are not necessary for ICC_HPPIR1_EL1
register.

And the APR and RPR has NMI bits which should be handled correctly.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- is_nmi -> nmi.
- is_hppi -> hppi.
- Exchange the order of nmi and hppi parameters.
- superprio -> nmi.
- Handle APR and RPR NMI bits.
- Update the commit message, super priority -> non-maskable property.
v7:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v4:
- Define ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 only if FEAT_GICv3_NMI is implemented.
- Check sctrl_elx.SCTLR_NMI to return 1022 for icc_iar1_read().
- Add gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read() trace event.
- Do not check icc_hppi_can_preempt() for icc_nmiar1_read().
- Add icv_nmiar1_read() and call it when EL2Enabled() and HCR_EL2.IMO == '1'
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h  |   5 ++
 hw/intc/trace-events      |   1 +
 3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
index e1a60d8c15..76e2286e70 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
@@ -795,6 +795,13 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
     return intid;
 }
 
+static uint64_t icv_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
+{
+    /* todo */
+    uint64_t intid = INTID_SPURIOUS;
+    return intid;
+}
+
 static uint32_t icc_fullprio_mask(GICv3CPUState *cs)
 {
     /*
@@ -825,11 +832,15 @@ static inline int icc_num_aprs(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     return aprmax;
 }
 
-static int icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
+static uint64_t icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
 {
     /* Calculate the current running priority based on the set bits
      * in the Active Priority Registers.
      */
+    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs->cpu);
+    CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
+
+    uint64_t prio;
     int i;
 
     for (i = 0; i < icc_num_aprs(cs); i++) {
@@ -839,7 +850,32 @@ static int icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
         if (!apr) {
             continue;
         }
-        return (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icc_min_bpr(cs) + 1);
+        prio = (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icc_min_bpr(cs) + 1);
+
+        if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
+            if (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) {
+                if ((cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) ||
+                    (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) ||
+                    (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI)) {
+                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
+                }
+            } else if (!arm_is_secure(env)) {
+                if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
+                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
+                }
+            } else {
+                if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
+                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
+                }
+            }
+
+            if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) &&
+                cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
+                prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI;
+            }
+        }
+
+        return prio;
     }
     /* No current active interrupts: return idle priority */
     return 0xff;
@@ -896,7 +932,7 @@ static bool icc_hppi_can_preempt(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     /* Return true if we have a pending interrupt of sufficient
      * priority to preempt.
      */
-    int rprio;
+    uint64_t rprio;
     uint32_t mask;
 
     if (icc_no_enabled_hppi(cs)) {
@@ -1034,7 +1070,7 @@ static void icc_pmr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
     gicv3_cpuif_update(cs);
 }
 
-static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq)
+static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, bool nmi)
 {
     /* Move the interrupt from the Pending state to Active, and update
      * the Active Priority Registers
@@ -1047,6 +1083,10 @@ static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq)
 
     cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit);
 
+    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
+        cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (nmi ? ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI : 0);
+    }
+
     if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL) {
         cs->gicr_iactiver0 = deposit32(cs->gicr_iactiver0, irq, 1, 1);
         cs->gicr_ipendr0 = deposit32(cs->gicr_ipendr0, irq, 1, 0);
@@ -1097,7 +1137,8 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir0_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
     return cs->hppi.irq;
 }
 
-static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
+static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env, bool hppi,
+                                 bool nmi)
 {
     /* Return the highest priority pending interrupt register value
      * for group 1.
@@ -1108,6 +1149,18 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
         return INTID_SPURIOUS;
     }
 
+    if (!hppi) {
+        int el = arm_current_el(env);
+
+        if (nmi && (!cs->hppi.nmi)) {
+            return INTID_SPURIOUS;
+        }
+
+        if (!nmi && cs->hppi.nmi && env->cp15.sctlr_el[el] & SCTLR_NMI) {
+            return INTID_NMI;
+        }
+    }
+
     /* Check whether we can return the interrupt or if we should return
      * a special identifier, as per the CheckGroup1ForSpecialIdentifiers
      * pseudocode. (We can simplify a little because for us ICC_SRE_EL1.RM
@@ -1149,7 +1202,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar0_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
     }
 
     if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
-        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid);
+        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, false);
     }
 
     trace_gicv3_icc_iar0_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
@@ -1168,17 +1221,36 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
     if (!icc_hppi_can_preempt(cs)) {
         intid = INTID_SPURIOUS;
     } else {
-        intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env);
+        intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, false);
     }
 
     if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
-        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid);
+        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, false);
     }
 
     trace_gicv3_icc_iar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
     return intid;
 }
 
+static uint64_t icc_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
+{
+    GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
+    uint64_t intid;
+
+    if (icv_access(env, HCR_IMO)) {
+        return icv_nmiar1_read(env, ri);
+    }
+
+    intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, true);
+
+    if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
+        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, true);
+    }
+
+    trace_gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
+    return intid;
+}
+
 static void icc_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs, int grp)
 {
     /* Drop the priority of the currently active interrupt in
@@ -1207,6 +1279,10 @@ static void icc_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs, int grp)
         }
         /* Clear the lowest set bit */
         *papr &= *papr - 1;
+
+        if (cs->gic->nmi_support && (*papr & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI)) {
+            *papr &= (~ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
+        }
         break;
     }
 
@@ -1555,7 +1631,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
         return icv_hppir_read(env, ri);
     }
 
-    value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env);
+    value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, true, false);
     trace_gicv3_icc_hppir1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), value);
     return value;
 }
@@ -1693,7 +1769,11 @@ static void icc_ap_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
         return;
     }
 
-    cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
+    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
+        cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & (0xFFFFFFFFU | ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
+    } else {
+        cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
+    }
     gicv3_cpuif_update(cs);
 }
 
@@ -1783,7 +1863,7 @@ static void icc_dir_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
 static uint64_t icc_rpr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
 {
     GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
-    int prio;
+    uint64_t prio;
 
     if (icv_access(env, HCR_FMO | HCR_IMO)) {
         return icv_rpr_read(env, ri);
@@ -2482,6 +2562,15 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_icc_apxr23_reginfo[] = {
     },
 };
 
+static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo[] = {
+    { .name = "ICC_NMIAR1_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
+      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 12, .crm = 9, .opc2 = 5,
+      .type = ARM_CP_IO | ARM_CP_NO_RAW,
+      .access = PL1_R, .accessfn = gicv3_irq_access,
+      .readfn = icc_nmiar1_read,
+    },
+};
+
 static uint64_t ich_ap_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
 {
     GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
@@ -2838,6 +2927,10 @@ void gicv3_init_cpuif(GICv3State *s)
          */
         define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_reginfo);
 
+        if (s->nmi_support) {
+            define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo);
+        }
+
         /*
          * The CPU implementation specifies the number of supported
          * bits of physical priority. For backwards compatibility
diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
index 8d793243f4..81200eb90e 100644
--- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
+++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
@@ -194,6 +194,10 @@ FIELD(GICR_VPENDBASER, VALID, 63, 1)
 #define ICC_CTLR_EL3_A3V (1U << 15)
 #define ICC_CTLR_EL3_NDS (1U << 17)
 
+#define ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI (1ULL << 63)
+#define ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI (1ULL << 62)
+#define ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI (1ULL << 63)
+
 #define ICH_VMCR_EL2_VENG0_SHIFT 0
 #define ICH_VMCR_EL2_VENG0 (1U << ICH_VMCR_EL2_VENG0_SHIFT)
 #define ICH_VMCR_EL2_VENG1_SHIFT 1
@@ -511,6 +515,7 @@ FIELD(VTE, RDBASE, 42, RDBASE_PROCNUM_LENGTH)
 /* Special interrupt IDs */
 #define INTID_SECURE 1020
 #define INTID_NONSECURE 1021
+#define INTID_NMI 1022
 #define INTID_SPURIOUS 1023
 
 /* Functions internal to the emulated GICv3 */
diff --git a/hw/intc/trace-events b/hw/intc/trace-events
index 1ef29d0256..94030550d5 100644
--- a/hw/intc/trace-events
+++ b/hw/intc/trace-events
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ gicv3_cpuif_set_irqs(uint32_t cpuid, int fiqlevel, int irqlevel) "GICv3 CPU i/f
 gicv3_icc_generate_sgi(uint32_t cpuid, int irq, int irm, uint32_t aff, uint32_t targetlist) "GICv3 CPU i/f 0x%x generating SGI %d IRM %d target affinity 0x%xxx targetlist 0x%x"
 gicv3_icc_iar0_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_IAR0 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_icc_iar1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_IAR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
+gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_NMIAR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_icc_eoir_write(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_EOIR%d write cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_icc_hppir0_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_HPPIR0 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_icc_hppir1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICC_HPPIR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 18/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read()
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-28 19:27   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 19/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Implement icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read(), so add definition for
ICH_LR_EL2.NMI and ICH_AP1R_EL2.NMI bit.

If FEAT_GICv3_NMI is supported, ich_ap_write() should consider ICV_AP1R_EL1.NMI
bit. In icv_activate_irq() and icv_eoir_write(), the ICV_AP1R_EL1.NMI bit
should be set or clear according to the Non-maskable property. And the RPR
priority should also update the NMI bit according to the APR priority NMI bit.

By the way, add gicv3_icv_nmiar1_read trace event.

If the hpp irq is a NMI, the icv iar read should return 1022 and trap for
NMI again

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- Rename ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI to ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI.
- Add ICV_RPR_EL1_NMI definition.
- Set ICV_RPR_EL1.NMI according to the ICV_AP1R<n>_EL1.NMI in
  ich_highest_active_virt_prio().
v9:
- Correct the INTID_NMI logic.
v8:
- Fix an unexpected interrupt bug when sending VNMI by running qemu VM.
v7:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v6:
- Implement icv_nmiar1_read().
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h  |  4 ++
 hw/intc/trace-events      |  1 +
 3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
index 76e2286e70..e0dc76df2f 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
@@ -149,12 +149,13 @@ static uint32_t icv_fullprio_mask(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     return (~0U << (8 - cs->vpribits)) & 0xff;
 }
 
-static int ich_highest_active_virt_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
+static uint64_t ich_highest_active_virt_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
 {
     /* Calculate the current running priority based on the set bits
      * in the ICH Active Priority Registers.
      */
     int i;
+    uint64_t prio;
     int aprmax = ich_num_aprs(cs);
 
     for (i = 0; i < aprmax; i++) {
@@ -164,7 +165,15 @@ static int ich_highest_active_virt_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
         if (!apr) {
             continue;
         }
-        return (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icv_min_vbpr(cs) + 1);
+        prio = (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icv_min_vbpr(cs) + 1);
+
+        if (cs->gic->nmi_support &&
+            cs->ich_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
+            prio |= ICV_RPR_EL1_NMI;
+        }
+
+        return prio;
+
     }
     /* No current active interrupts: return idle priority */
     return 0xff;
@@ -289,7 +298,8 @@ static bool icv_hppi_can_preempt(GICv3CPUState *cs, uint64_t lr)
      * equivalent of these checks.
      */
     int grp;
-    uint32_t mask, prio, rprio, vpmr;
+    uint32_t mask, prio, vpmr;
+    uint64_t rprio;
 
     if (!(cs->ich_hcr_el2 & ICH_HCR_EL2_EN)) {
         /* Virtual interface disabled */
@@ -336,7 +346,8 @@ static bool icv_hppvlpi_can_preempt(GICv3CPUState *cs)
      * We can assume we're Non-secure because hppvi_index() already
      * tested for that.
      */
-    uint32_t mask, rprio, vpmr;
+    uint32_t mask, vpmr;
+    uint64_t rprio;
 
     if (!(cs->ich_hcr_el2 & ICH_HCR_EL2_EN)) {
         /* Virtual interface disabled */
@@ -550,7 +561,11 @@ static void icv_ap_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
 
     trace_gicv3_icv_ap_write(ri->crm & 1, regno, gicv3_redist_affid(cs), value);
 
-    cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
+    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
+        cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & (0xFFFFFFFFU | ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
+    } else {
+        cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
+    }
 
     gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(cs);
     return;
@@ -697,7 +712,7 @@ static void icv_ctlr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
 static uint64_t icv_rpr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
 {
     GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
-    int prio = ich_highest_active_virt_prio(cs);
+    uint64_t prio = ich_highest_active_virt_prio(cs);
 
     trace_gicv3_icv_rpr_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), prio);
     return prio;
@@ -728,7 +743,7 @@ static uint64_t icv_hppir_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
     return value;
 }
 
-static void icv_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int idx, int grp)
+static void icv_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int idx, int grp, bool nmi)
 {
     /* Activate the interrupt in the specified list register
      * by moving it from Pending to Active state, and update the
@@ -742,7 +757,12 @@ static void icv_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int idx, int grp)
 
     cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] &= ~ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_PENDING_BIT;
     cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] |= ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_ACTIVE_BIT;
-    cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit);
+
+    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
+        cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit) | (nmi ? ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI : 0);
+    } else {
+        cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit);
+    }
 }
 
 static void icv_activate_vlpi(GICv3CPUState *cs)
@@ -776,7 +796,11 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
         if (thisgrp == grp && icv_hppi_can_preempt(cs, lr)) {
             intid = ich_lr_vintid(lr);
             if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
-                icv_activate_irq(cs, idx, grp);
+                if (!(lr & ICH_LR_EL2_NMI)) {
+                    icv_activate_irq(cs, idx, grp, false);
+                } else {
+                    intid = INTID_NMI;
+                }
             } else {
                 /* Interrupt goes from Pending to Invalid */
                 cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] &= ~ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_PENDING_BIT;
@@ -797,8 +821,32 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
 
 static uint64_t icv_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
 {
-    /* todo */
+    GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
+    int idx = hppvi_index(cs);
     uint64_t intid = INTID_SPURIOUS;
+
+    if (idx >= 0 && idx != HPPVI_INDEX_VLPI) {
+        uint64_t lr = cs->ich_lr_el2[idx];
+        int thisgrp = (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_GROUP) ? GICV3_G1NS : GICV3_G0;
+
+        if ((thisgrp == GICV3_G1NS) && (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_NMI)) {
+            intid = ich_lr_vintid(lr);
+            if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
+                icv_activate_irq(cs, idx, GICV3_G1NS, true);
+            } else {
+                /* Interrupt goes from Pending to Invalid */
+                cs->ich_lr_el2[idx] &= ~ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_PENDING_BIT;
+                /* We will now return the (bogus) ID from the list register,
+                 * as per the pseudocode.
+                 */
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    trace_gicv3_icv_nmiar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
+
+    gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(cs);
+
     return intid;
 }
 
@@ -1439,6 +1487,11 @@ static int icv_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
             return (apr0count + i * 32) << (icv_min_vbpr(cs) + 1);
         } else {
             *papr1 &= *papr1 - 1;
+
+            if (cs->gic->nmi_support && (*papr1 & ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI)) {
+                *papr1 &= (~ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
+            }
+
             return (apr1count + i * 32) << (icv_min_vbpr(cs) + 1);
         }
     }
@@ -2592,7 +2645,11 @@ static void ich_ap_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
 
     trace_gicv3_ich_ap_write(ri->crm & 1, regno, gicv3_redist_affid(cs), value);
 
-    cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
+    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
+        cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & (0xFFFFFFFFU | ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
+    } else {
+        cs->ich_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
+    }
     gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(cs);
 }
 
diff --git a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
index 81200eb90e..bc9f518fe8 100644
--- a/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
+++ b/hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h
@@ -246,6 +246,7 @@ FIELD(GICR_VPENDBASER, VALID, 63, 1)
 #define ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_SHIFT 48
 #define ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_LENGTH 8
 #define ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_MASK (0xffULL << ICH_LR_EL2_PRIORITY_SHIFT)
+#define ICH_LR_EL2_NMI (1ULL << 59)
 #define ICH_LR_EL2_GROUP (1ULL << 60)
 #define ICH_LR_EL2_HW (1ULL << 61)
 #define ICH_LR_EL2_STATE_SHIFT 62
@@ -277,6 +278,9 @@ FIELD(GICR_VPENDBASER, VALID, 63, 1)
 #define ICH_VTR_EL2_PREBITS_SHIFT 26
 #define ICH_VTR_EL2_PRIBITS_SHIFT 29
 
+#define ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI (1ULL << 63)
+#define ICV_RPR_EL1_NMI (1ULL << 63)
+
 /* ITS Registers */
 
 FIELD(GITS_BASER, SIZE, 0, 8)
diff --git a/hw/intc/trace-events b/hw/intc/trace-events
index 94030550d5..47340b5bc1 100644
--- a/hw/intc/trace-events
+++ b/hw/intc/trace-events
@@ -152,6 +152,7 @@ gicv3_icv_rpr_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_RPR read cpu 0x%x valu
 gicv3_icv_hppir_read(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_HPPIR%d read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_icv_dir_write(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_DIR write cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_icv_iar_read(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_IAR%d read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
+gicv3_icv_nmiar1_read(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_NMIAR1 read cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_icv_eoir_write(int grp, uint32_t cpu, uint64_t val) "GICv3 ICV_EOIR%d write cpu 0x%x value 0x%" PRIx64
 gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(uint32_t cpuid, int idx, int hppvlpi, int grp, int prio) "GICv3 CPU i/f 0x%x virt HPPI update LR index %d HPPVLPI %d grp %d prio %d"
 gicv3_cpuif_virt_set_irqs(uint32_t cpuid, int fiqlevel, int irqlevel) "GICv3 CPU i/f 0x%x virt HPPI update: setting FIQ %d IRQ %d"
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 19/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 18/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read() Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 20/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update() Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

If GICD_CTLR_DS bit is zero and the NMI is non-secure, the NMI prioirty
is higher than 0x80, otherwise it is higher than 0x0. And save NMI
super prioirty information in hppi.superprio to deliver NMI exception.
Since both GICR and GICD can deliver NMI, it is both necessary to check
whether the pending irq is NMI in gicv3_redist_update_noirqset and
gicv3_update_noirqset. And In irqbetter(), only a non-NMI with the same
priority and a smaller interrupt number can be preempted but not NMI.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- has_superprio -> nmi.
- superpriority -> non-maskable property.
- gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0.
- superprio -> nmi.
v8:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v7:
- Reorder the irqbetter() code for clarity.
- Eliminate the has_superprio local variable for gicv3_get_priority().
- false -> cs->hpplpi.superprio in gicv3_redist_update_noirqset().
- 0x0 -> false in arm_gicv3_common_reset_hold().
- Clear superprio in several places for hppi, hpplpi and hppvlpi.
v6:
- Put the "extract superprio info" logic into gicv3_get_priority().
- Update the comment in irqbetter().
- Reset the cs->hppi.superprio to 0x0.
- Set hppi.superprio to false for LPI.
v4:
- Replace is_nmi with has_superprio to not a mix NMI and superpriority.
- Update the comment in irqbetter().
- Extract gicv3_get_priority() to avoid code repeat.
---
v3:
- Add missing brace
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c        | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c |  3 ++
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c |  3 ++
 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c
index 0b8f79a122..6704190d9d 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 #include "hw/intc/arm_gicv3.h"
 #include "gicv3_internal.h"
 
-static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio)
+static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio, bool nmi)
 {
     /* Return true if this IRQ at this priority should take
      * precedence over the current recorded highest priority
@@ -30,14 +30,23 @@ static bool irqbetter(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, uint8_t prio)
      * is the same as this one (a property which the calling code
      * relies on).
      */
-    if (prio < cs->hppi.prio) {
-        return true;
+    if (prio != cs->hppi.prio) {
+        return prio < cs->hppi.prio;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * The same priority IRQ with non-maskable property should signal to
+     * the CPU as it have the priority higher than the labelled 0x80 or 0x00.
+     */
+    if (nmi != cs->hppi.nmi) {
+        return nmi;
     }
+
     /* If multiple pending interrupts have the same priority then it is an
      * IMPDEF choice which of them to signal to the CPU. We choose to
      * signal the one with the lowest interrupt number.
      */
-    if (prio == cs->hppi.prio && irq <= cs->hppi.irq) {
+    if (irq <= cs->hppi.irq) {
         return true;
     }
     return false;
@@ -129,6 +138,40 @@ static uint32_t gicr_int_pending(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     return pend;
 }
 
+static bool gicv3_get_priority(GICv3CPUState *cs, bool is_redist,
+                               uint8_t *prio, int irq)
+{
+    uint32_t nmi = 0x0;
+
+    if (is_redist) {
+        nmi = extract32(cs->gicr_inmir0, irq, 1);
+    } else {
+        nmi = *gic_bmp_ptr32(cs->gic->nmi, irq);
+        nmi = nmi & (1 << (irq & 0x1f));
+    }
+
+    if (nmi) {
+        /* DS = 0 & Non-secure NMI */
+        if (!(cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) &&
+            ((is_redist && extract32(cs->gicr_igroupr0, irq, 1)) ||
+             (!is_redist && gicv3_gicd_group_test(cs->gic, irq)))) {
+            *prio = 0x80;
+        } else {
+            *prio = 0x0;
+        }
+
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    if (is_redist) {
+        *prio = cs->gicr_ipriorityr[irq];
+    } else {
+        *prio = cs->gic->gicd_ipriority[irq];
+    }
+
+    return false;
+}
+
 /* Update the interrupt status after state in a redistributor
  * or CPU interface has changed, but don't tell the CPU i/f.
  */
@@ -141,6 +184,7 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     uint8_t prio;
     int i;
     uint32_t pend;
+    bool nmi = false;
 
     /* Find out which redistributor interrupts are eligible to be
      * signaled to the CPU interface.
@@ -152,10 +196,11 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs)
             if (!(pend & (1 << i))) {
                 continue;
             }
-            prio = cs->gicr_ipriorityr[i];
-            if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio)) {
+            nmi = gicv3_get_priority(cs, true, &prio, i);
+            if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio, nmi)) {
                 cs->hppi.irq = i;
                 cs->hppi.prio = prio;
+                cs->hppi.nmi = nmi;
                 seenbetter = true;
             }
         }
@@ -168,9 +213,10 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_noirqset(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     if ((cs->gicr_ctlr & GICR_CTLR_ENABLE_LPIS) && cs->gic->lpi_enable &&
         (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_EN_GRP1NS) &&
         (cs->hpplpi.prio != 0xff)) {
-        if (irqbetter(cs, cs->hpplpi.irq, cs->hpplpi.prio)) {
+        if (irqbetter(cs, cs->hpplpi.irq, cs->hpplpi.prio, cs->hpplpi.nmi)) {
             cs->hppi.irq = cs->hpplpi.irq;
             cs->hppi.prio = cs->hpplpi.prio;
+            cs->hppi.nmi = cs->hpplpi.nmi;
             cs->hppi.grp = cs->hpplpi.grp;
             seenbetter = true;
         }
@@ -213,6 +259,7 @@ static void gicv3_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s, int start, int len)
     int i;
     uint8_t prio;
     uint32_t pend = 0;
+    bool nmi = false;
 
     assert(start >= GIC_INTERNAL);
     assert(len > 0);
@@ -240,10 +287,11 @@ static void gicv3_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s, int start, int len)
              */
             continue;
         }
-        prio = s->gicd_ipriority[i];
-        if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio)) {
+        nmi = gicv3_get_priority(cs, false, &prio, i);
+        if (irqbetter(cs, i, prio, nmi)) {
             cs->hppi.irq = i;
             cs->hppi.prio = prio;
+            cs->hppi.nmi = nmi;
             cs->seenbetter = true;
         }
     }
@@ -293,6 +341,7 @@ void gicv3_full_update_noirqset(GICv3State *s)
 
     for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
         s->cpu[i].hppi.prio = 0xff;
+        s->cpu[i].hppi.nmi = false;
     }
 
     /* Note that we can guarantee that these functions will not
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
index be76ae0be6..91e17035a3 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
@@ -542,8 +542,11 @@ static void arm_gicv3_common_reset_hold(Object *obj)
         memset(cs->gicr_ipriorityr, 0, sizeof(cs->gicr_ipriorityr));
 
         cs->hppi.prio = 0xff;
+        cs->hppi.nmi = false;
         cs->hpplpi.prio = 0xff;
+        cs->hpplpi.nmi = false;
         cs->hppvlpi.prio = 0xff;
+        cs->hppvlpi.nmi = false;
 
         /* State in the CPU interface must *not* be reset here, because it
          * is part of the CPU's reset domain, not the GIC device's.
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c
index ed1f9d1e44..90b238fac0 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist.c
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ static void update_for_one_lpi(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq,
         ((prio == hpp->prio) && (irq <= hpp->irq))) {
         hpp->irq = irq;
         hpp->prio = prio;
+        hpp->nmi = false;
         /* LPIs and vLPIs are always non-secure Grp1 interrupts */
         hpp->grp = GICV3_G1NS;
     }
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ static void update_for_all_lpis(GICv3CPUState *cs, uint64_t ptbase,
     int i, bit;
 
     hpp->prio = 0xff;
+    hpp->nmi = false;
 
     for (i = GICV3_LPI_INTID_START / 8; i < pendt_size / 8; i++) {
         address_space_read(as, ptbase + i, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, &pend, 1);
@@ -241,6 +243,7 @@ static void gicv3_redist_update_vlpi_only(GICv3CPUState *cs)
 
     if (!FIELD_EX64(cs->gicr_vpendbaser, GICR_VPENDBASER, VALID)) {
         cs->hppvlpi.prio = 0xff;
+        cs->hppvlpi.nmi = false;
         return;
     }
 
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 20/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update()
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 19/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 21/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the VINMI interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

In CPU Interface, if the IRQ has the non-maskable property, report NMI to
the corresponding PE.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- superprio -> nmi.
- Update the commit message, superpriority -> non-maskable.
v6:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v4:
- Swap the ordering of the IFs.
v3:
- Remove handling nmi_is_irq flag.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
index e0dc76df2f..4cd84b142e 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
@@ -1015,6 +1015,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     /* Tell the CPU about its highest priority pending interrupt */
     int irqlevel = 0;
     int fiqlevel = 0;
+    int nmilevel = 0;
     ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs->cpu);
     CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
 
@@ -1053,6 +1054,8 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
 
         if (isfiq) {
             fiqlevel = 1;
+        } else if (cs->hppi.nmi) {
+            nmilevel = 1;
         } else {
             irqlevel = 1;
         }
@@ -1062,6 +1065,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
 
     qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_fiq, fiqlevel);
     qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_irq, irqlevel);
+    qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_nmi, nmilevel);
 }
 
 static uint64_t icc_pmr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 21/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the VINMI interrupt
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 20/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update() Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 22/23] target/arm: Add FEAT_NMI to max Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 23/23] hw/arm/virt: Add FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature support in virt GIC Jinjie Ruan via
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

In vCPU Interface, if the vIRQ has the non-maskable property, report
vINMI to the corresponding vPE.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v10:
- Update the commit message, superpriority -> non-maskable.
v9:
- Update the commit subject and message, vNMI -> vINMI.
v6:
- Add Reviewed-by.
---
 hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
index 4cd84b142e..cc5ff124d6 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
@@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     int idx;
     int irqlevel = 0;
     int fiqlevel = 0;
+    int nmilevel = 0;
 
     idx = hppvi_index(cs);
     trace_gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), idx,
@@ -493,9 +494,17 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
         uint64_t lr = cs->ich_lr_el2[idx];
 
         if (icv_hppi_can_preempt(cs, lr)) {
-            /* Virtual interrupts are simple: G0 are always FIQ, and G1 IRQ */
+            /*
+             * Virtual interrupts are simple: G0 are always FIQ, and G1 are
+             * IRQ or NMI which depends on the ICH_LR<n>_EL2.NMI to have
+             * non-maskable property.
+             */
             if (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_GROUP) {
-                irqlevel = 1;
+                if (cs->gic->nmi_support && (lr & ICH_LR_EL2_NMI)) {
+                    nmilevel = 1;
+                } else {
+                    irqlevel = 1;
+                }
             } else {
                 fiqlevel = 1;
             }
@@ -505,6 +514,7 @@ void gicv3_cpuif_virt_irq_fiq_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
     trace_gicv3_cpuif_virt_set_irqs(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), fiqlevel, irqlevel);
     qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_vfiq, fiqlevel);
     qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_virq, irqlevel);
+    qemu_set_irq(cs->parent_vnmi, nmilevel);
 }
 
 static void gicv3_cpuif_virt_update(GICv3CPUState *cs)
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 22/23] target/arm: Add FEAT_NMI to max
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 21/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the VINMI interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 23/23] hw/arm/virt: Add FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature support in virt GIC Jinjie Ruan via
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

Enable FEAT_NMI on the 'max' CPU.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v3:
- Add Reviewed-by.
- Sorted to last.
---
 docs/system/arm/emulation.rst | 1 +
 target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c        | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst b/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst
index 2a7bbb82dc..a9ae7ede9f 100644
--- a/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst
+++ b/docs/system/arm/emulation.rst
@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ the following architecture extensions:
 - FEAT_MTE (Memory Tagging Extension)
 - FEAT_MTE2 (Memory Tagging Extension)
 - FEAT_MTE3 (MTE Asymmetric Fault Handling)
+- FEAT_NMI (Non-maskable Interrupt)
 - FEAT_NV (Nested Virtualization)
 - FEAT_NV2 (Enhanced nested virtualization support)
 - FEAT_PACIMP (Pointer authentication - IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED algorithm)
diff --git a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
index 9f7a9f3d2c..62c4663512 100644
--- a/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
+++ b/target/arm/tcg/cpu64.c
@@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ void aarch64_max_tcg_initfn(Object *obj)
     t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, RAS_FRAC, 0);  /* FEAT_RASv1p1 + FEAT_DoubleFault */
     t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, SME, 1);       /* FEAT_SME */
     t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, CSV2_FRAC, 0); /* FEAT_CSV2_2 */
+    t = FIELD_DP64(t, ID_AA64PFR1, NMI, 1);       /* FEAT_NMI */
     cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 = t;
 
     t = cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0;
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v10 23/23] hw/arm/virt: Add FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature support in virt GIC
  2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 22/23] target/arm: Add FEAT_NMI to max Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-25  8:48 ` Jinjie Ruan via
  22 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-25  8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peter.maydell, eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm
  Cc: ruanjinjie

A PE that implements FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 also implements
FEAT_GICv3_NMI. A PE that does not implement FEAT_NMI, does not implement
FEAT_GICv3_NMI

So included support FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature as part of virt platform
GIC initialization if FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 supported.

Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
v4:
- Add Reviewed-by.
v3:
- Adjust to be the last after add FEAT_NMI to max.
- Check whether support FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 for FEAT_GICv3_NMI.
---
 hw/arm/virt.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/virt.c
index ef2e6c2c4d..63d9f5b553 100644
--- a/hw/arm/virt.c
+++ b/hw/arm/virt.c
@@ -729,6 +729,19 @@ static void create_v2m(VirtMachineState *vms)
     vms->msi_controller = VIRT_MSI_CTRL_GICV2M;
 }
 
+/*
+ * A PE that implements FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3 also implements
+ * FEAT_GICv3_NMI. A PE that does not implement FEAT_NMI, does not implement
+ * FEAT_GICv3_NMI.
+ */
+static bool gicv3_nmi_present(VirtMachineState *vms)
+{
+    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(qemu_get_cpu(0));
+
+    return cpu_isar_feature(aa64_nmi, cpu) &&
+           (vms->gic_version != VIRT_GIC_VERSION_2);
+}
+
 static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem)
 {
     MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms);
@@ -802,6 +815,11 @@ static void create_gic(VirtMachineState *vms, MemoryRegion *mem)
                               vms->virt);
         }
     }
+
+    if (gicv3_nmi_present(vms)) {
+        qdev_prop_set_bit(vms->gic, "has-nmi", true);
+    }
+
     gicbusdev = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(vms->gic);
     sysbus_realize_and_unref(gicbusdev, &error_fatal);
     sysbus_mmio_map(gicbusdev, 0, vms->memmap[VIRT_GIC_DIST].base);
-- 
2.34.1



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-28 14:50   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-30  2:44     ` Jinjie Ruan via
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-28 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:53, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Add the NMIAR CPU interface registers which deal with acknowledging NMI.
>
> When introduce NMI interrupt, there are some updates to the semantics for the
> register ICC_IAR1_EL1 and ICC_HPPIR1_EL1. For ICC_IAR1_EL1 register, it
> should return 1022 if the intid has non-maskable property. And for
> ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 register, it should return 1023 if the intid do not have
> non-maskable property. Howerever, these are not necessary for ICC_HPPIR1_EL1
> register.
>
> And the APR and RPR has NMI bits which should be handled correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> v10:
> - is_nmi -> nmi.
> - is_hppi -> hppi.
> - Exchange the order of nmi and hppi parameters.
> - superprio -> nmi.
> - Handle APR and RPR NMI bits.
> - Update the commit message, super priority -> non-maskable property.
> v7:
> - Add Reviewed-by.
> v4:
> - Define ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 only if FEAT_GICv3_NMI is implemented.
> - Check sctrl_elx.SCTLR_NMI to return 1022 for icc_iar1_read().
> - Add gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read() trace event.
> - Do not check icc_hppi_can_preempt() for icc_nmiar1_read().
> - Add icv_nmiar1_read() and call it when EL2Enabled() and HCR_EL2.IMO == '1'
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h  |   5 ++
>  hw/intc/trace-events      |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
> index e1a60d8c15..76e2286e70 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
> @@ -795,6 +795,13 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>      return intid;
>  }
>
> +static uint64_t icv_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
> +{
> +    /* todo */
> +    uint64_t intid = INTID_SPURIOUS;
> +    return intid;
> +}
> +
>  static uint32_t icc_fullprio_mask(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>  {
>      /*
> @@ -825,11 +832,15 @@ static inline int icc_num_aprs(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>      return aprmax;
>  }
>
> -static int icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
> +static uint64_t icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>  {
>      /* Calculate the current running priority based on the set bits
>       * in the Active Priority Registers.
>       */
> +    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs->cpu);
> +    CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
> +
> +    uint64_t prio;
>      int i;
>
>      for (i = 0; i < icc_num_aprs(cs); i++) {
> @@ -839,7 +850,32 @@ static int icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>          if (!apr) {
>              continue;
>          }
> -        return (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icc_min_bpr(cs) + 1);
> +        prio = (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icc_min_bpr(cs) + 1);
> +
> +        if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
> +            if (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) {
> +                if ((cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) ||
> +                    (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) ||
> +                    (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI)) {
> +                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
> +                }
> +            } else if (!arm_is_secure(env)) {
> +                if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> +                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
> +                }
> +            } else {
> +                if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> +                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
> +                }
> +            }
> +
> +            if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) &&
> +                cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> +                prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI;
> +            }
> +        }
> +
> +        return prio;

This function is used both for getting the ICC_RPR value,
and also in icc_hppi_can_preempt(). So we can't put the
special RPR NMI bits in here. Also doing that will not work well
with the way the code in icc_rpr_read() adjusts the priority
for non-secure accesses. I think we should follow the structure
of the pseudocode here, and do the setting of the RPR bits 62 and 63
in icc_rpr_read(). (In the pseudocode this is ICC_RPR_EL1 calling
GetHighestActivePriority() and then doing the NMI bits locally.)

The NMI bit also exists only in the AP1R0 bit, not in every AP
register. So you can check it before the for() loop, something like this:

    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
        /*
         * If an NMI is active this takes precedence over anything else
         * for priority purposes; the NMI bit is only in the AP1R0 bit.
         * We return here the effective priority of the NMI, which is
         * either 0x0 or 0x80. Callers will need to check NMI again for
         * purposes of either setting the RPR register bits or for
         * prioritization of NMI vs non-NMI.
         */
        prio = 0;
        if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
            return 0;
        }
        if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
            return (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) ? 0 : 0x80;
        }
    }

Then in icc_rpr_read() we can pretty much directly write the same
logic that the pseudocode uses to determine whether to set the RPR
NMI bits, after the point where we do the shifting of the prio for
the NS view:

    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
        /* NMI info is reported in the high bits of RPR */
        if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) && !arm_is_secure(env)) {
            if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
                prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
            }
        } else {
            if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
                prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI;
            }
            if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
                prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
            }
        }
    }

>      }
>      /* No current active interrupts: return idle priority */
>      return 0xff;
> @@ -896,7 +932,7 @@ static bool icc_hppi_can_preempt(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>      /* Return true if we have a pending interrupt of sufficient
>       * priority to preempt.
>       */
> -    int rprio;
> +    uint64_t rprio;

You won't need to change the type of this variable with the change above.

>      uint32_t mask;
>
>      if (icc_no_enabled_hppi(cs)) {

icc_hppi_can_preempt() needs more changes than this (check the
pseudocode in CanSignalInterrupt(), and the text in 4.8, particularly
4.8.6):

 * the (cs->hppi.prio >= cs->icc_pmr_el1) check only applies
   if !cs->hppi.nmi
 * if this is an NMI and GICD_CTLR.DS is 0 and it's a G1NS
   interrupt, then we mask if the PMR is < 0x80, or if
   we're in Secure state and the PMR == 0x80
 * if this is an NMI and the (masked) hppi.prio is equal to the
   (masked) running priority, then we preempt if there's not
   already an active NMI, ie if the APR NMI bit is clear

> @@ -1034,7 +1070,7 @@ static void icc_pmr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>      gicv3_cpuif_update(cs);
>  }
>
> -static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq)
> +static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, bool nmi)
>  {

When activating an interrupt, we set the NMI bit in the
priority register based only on the interrupt's config,
not on what register was used to activate it. So we don't
want a 'bool nmi' argument, we want a local:
   bool nmi = cs->hppi.nmi;

(Compare the pseudocode in the spec: ICC_IAR0_EL1, ICC_IAR1_EL1,
and ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 all call AcknowledgeInterrupt(pendID)
to activate it.)

>      /* Move the interrupt from the Pending state to Active, and update
>       * the Active Priority Registers
> @@ -1047,6 +1083,10 @@ static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq)
>
>      cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit);
>
> +    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
> +        cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (nmi ? ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI : 0);
> +    }

In the APRs, we set only the NMI bit for an NMI and the ordinary priority
bit for a non-NMI; so this should be

     if (cs->gic->nmi_support && nmi) {
         cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI;
     } else {
         cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit);
     }

(Otherwise if we had a non-NMI that was interrupted by an NMI
at the same priority we wouldn't be able to distinguish this
from the NMI interrupting when nothing else was active.)

> +
>      if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL) {
>          cs->gicr_iactiver0 = deposit32(cs->gicr_iactiver0, irq, 1, 1);
>          cs->gicr_ipendr0 = deposit32(cs->gicr_ipendr0, irq, 1, 0);
> @@ -1097,7 +1137,8 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir0_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
>      return cs->hppi.irq;
>  }
>
> -static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
> +static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env, bool hppi,
> +                                 bool nmi)
>  {
>      /* Return the highest priority pending interrupt register value
>       * for group 1.
> @@ -1108,6 +1149,18 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
>          return INTID_SPURIOUS;
>      }
>
> +    if (!hppi) {
> +        int el = arm_current_el(env);
> +
> +        if (nmi && (!cs->hppi.nmi)) {
> +            return INTID_SPURIOUS;
> +        }
> +
> +        if (!nmi && cs->hppi.nmi && env->cp15.sctlr_el[el] & SCTLR_NMI) {
> +            return INTID_NMI;
> +        }
> +    }
> +

Rather than passing two extra boolean arguments into this
function, I think it's better to follow the pseudocode's
structure, and have the "should we instead return a
special INTID_*" checks be done in the callers of this function.
They all end up different so they don't really share code
by pushing the checks into this function.

>      /* Check whether we can return the interrupt or if we should return
>       * a special identifier, as per the CheckGroup1ForSpecialIdentifiers
>       * pseudocode. (We can simplify a little because for us ICC_SRE_EL1.RM
> @@ -1149,7 +1202,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar0_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>      }
>
>      if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
> -        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid);
> +        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, false);
>      }
>
>      trace_gicv3_icc_iar0_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
> @@ -1168,17 +1221,36 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>      if (!icc_hppi_can_preempt(cs)) {
>          intid = INTID_SPURIOUS;
>      } else {
> -        intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env);
> +        intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, false);
>      }
>
>      if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
> -        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid);
> +        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, false);
>      }
>
>      trace_gicv3_icc_iar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
>      return intid;
>  }
>
> +static uint64_t icc_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
> +{
> +    GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
> +    uint64_t intid;
> +
> +    if (icv_access(env, HCR_IMO)) {
> +        return icv_nmiar1_read(env, ri);
> +    }
> +
> +    intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, true);
> +
> +    if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
> +        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, true);
> +    }
> +
> +    trace_gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
> +    return intid;
> +}
> +
>  static void icc_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs, int grp)
>  {
>      /* Drop the priority of the currently active interrupt in
> @@ -1207,6 +1279,10 @@ static void icc_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs, int grp)
>          }
>          /* Clear the lowest set bit */
>          *papr &= *papr - 1;
> +
> +        if (cs->gic->nmi_support && (*papr & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI)) {
> +            *papr &= (~ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
> +        }

The NMI bit is only in the AP1R0 register, and if it is set then
we should clear only it and not any other AP bits. At the moment
this code clears the lowest set bit and also the NMI bit.

>          break;
>      }
>
> @@ -1555,7 +1631,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>          return icv_hppir_read(env, ri);
>      }
>
> -    value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env);
> +    value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, true, false);
>      trace_gicv3_icc_hppir1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), value);
>      return value;
>  }
> @@ -1693,7 +1769,11 @@ static void icc_ap_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>          return;
>      }
>
> -    cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
> +    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
> +        cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & (0xFFFFFFFFU | ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
> +    } else {
> +        cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
> +    }
>      gicv3_cpuif_update(cs);
>  }
>
> @@ -1783,7 +1863,7 @@ static void icc_dir_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>  static uint64_t icc_rpr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>  {
>      GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
> -    int prio;
> +    uint64_t prio;
>
>      if (icv_access(env, HCR_FMO | HCR_IMO)) {
>          return icv_rpr_read(env, ri);
> @@ -2482,6 +2562,15 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_icc_apxr23_reginfo[] = {
>      },
>  };
>
> +static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo[] = {
> +    { .name = "ICC_NMIAR1_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 12, .crm = 9, .opc2 = 5,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_IO | ARM_CP_NO_RAW,
> +      .access = PL1_R, .accessfn = gicv3_irq_access,
> +      .readfn = icc_nmiar1_read,
> +    },
> +};
> +
>  static uint64_t ich_ap_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>  {
>      GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
> @@ -2838,6 +2927,10 @@ void gicv3_init_cpuif(GICv3State *s)
>           */
>          define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_reginfo);
>
> +        if (s->nmi_support) {
> +            define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo);
> +        }
> +
>          /*
>           * The CPU implementation specifies the number of supported
>           * bits of physical priority. For backwards compatibility

icc_highest_active_group() also needs to be changed, because
if the NMI bit is set in an AP register that is what defines
the group of the highest priority active interrupt. Something
like this at the top of icc_highest_active_group() should do:

+    if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
+        return GICV3_G1;
+    }
+    if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
+        return GICV3_G1NS;
+    }

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-28 14:54   ` Peter Maydell
  2024-03-30  1:42     ` Jinjie Ruan via
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-28 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:52, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> A SPI, PPI or SGI interrupt can have non-maskable property. So maintain
> non-maskable property in PendingIrq and GICR/GICD. Since add new device
> state, it also needs to be migrated, so also save NMI info in
> vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> v10:
> - superprio -> nmi, gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0.
> - Save NMI state in vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
> - Update the commit message.
> v3:
> - Place this ahead of implement GICR_INMIR.
> - Add Acked-by.
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h |  4 +++
>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> index 2d2cea6858..be76ae0be6 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> @@ -164,6 +164,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicv4 = {
>      }
>  };
>
> +static bool nmi_needed(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    GICv3CPUState *cs = opaque;
> +
> +    return cs->gic->nmi_support != 0;

nmi_support is already a bool, so you can
       return cs->gic_nmi_support;


> +}
> +
> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu_nmi = {
> +    .name = "arm_gicv3_cpu/nmi",
> +    .version_id = 1,
> +    .minimum_version_id = 1,
> +    .needed = nmi_needed,
> +    .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
> +        VMSTATE_UINT32(gicr_inmir0, GICv3CPUState),
> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> +    }
> +};
> +
>  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
>      .name = "arm_gicv3_cpu",
>      .version_id = 1,
> @@ -197,6 +215,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
>          &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_sre_el1,
>          &vmstate_gicv3_gicv4,
>          NULL
> +    },
> +    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
> +        &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_nmi,
> +        NULL

You add your subsection to the existing .subsections[] list.
Otherwise this field initializer overwrites the previous one.

>      }
>  };
>
> @@ -238,6 +260,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_migration_shift_bug = {
>      }
>  };
>
> +static bool needed_nmi(void *opaque)
> +{
> +    GICv3State *cs = opaque;
> +
> +    return cs->nmi_support != 0;
> +}

You already have nmi_needed() above, so you can use it
as the .needed function for both vmstate struct definitions.

> +
> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_nmi = {
> +    .name = "arm_gicv3/gicd_nmi",
> +    .version_id = 1,
> +    .minimum_version_id = 1,
> +    .needed = needed_nmi,
> +    .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
> +        VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(nmi, GICv3State, GICV3_BMP_SIZE),
> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> +    }
> +};
> +
>  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
>      .name = "arm_gicv3",
>      .version_id = 1,
> @@ -267,6 +307,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
>      .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
>          &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_migration_shift_bug,
>          NULL
> +    },
> +    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
> +        &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_nmi,
> +        NULL

Similarly here this must be added to the existing list.

>      }
>  };
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
> index 4358c5319c..88533749eb 100644
> --- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
> +++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ typedef struct {
>      int irq;
>      uint8_t prio;
>      int grp;
> +    bool nmi;
>  } PendingIrq;
>
>  struct GICv3CPUState {
> @@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ struct GICv3CPUState {
>      uint32_t gicr_ienabler0;
>      uint32_t gicr_ipendr0;
>      uint32_t gicr_iactiver0;
> +    uint32_t gicr_inmir0;
>      uint32_t edge_trigger; /* ICFGR0 and ICFGR1 even bits */
>      uint32_t gicr_igrpmodr0;
>      uint32_t gicr_nsacr;
> @@ -275,6 +277,7 @@ struct GICv3State {
>      GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(active);       /* GICD_ISACTIVER */
>      GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(level);        /* Current level */
>      GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(edge_trigger); /* GICD_ICFGR even bits */
> +    GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(nmi);          /* GICD_INMIR */
>      uint8_t gicd_ipriority[GICV3_MAXIRQ];
>      uint64_t gicd_irouter[GICV3_MAXIRQ];
>      /* Cached information: pointer to the cpu i/f for the CPUs specified
> @@ -314,6 +317,7 @@ GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(pending)
>  GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(active)
>  GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(level)
>  GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(edge_trigger)
> +GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(nmi)
>
>  #define TYPE_ARM_GICV3_COMMON "arm-gicv3-common"
>  typedef struct ARMGICv3CommonClass ARMGICv3CommonClass;
> --
> 2.34.1

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 11/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 11/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-28 14:55   ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-28 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:52, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Augment the GICv3's QOM device interface by adding one
> new set of sysbus IRQ line, to signal NMI to each CPU.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 15/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 15/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0 Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-28 14:56   ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-28 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:52, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Add GICR_INMIR0 register and support access GICR_INMIR0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> v10:
> - gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0.
> v6:
> - Add Reviewed-by.
> v4:
> - Make the GICR_INMIR0 implementation more clearer.
> ---

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 16/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 16/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-28 14:57   ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-28 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:52, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Add GICD_INMIR, GICD_INMIRnE register and support access GICD_INMIR0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 18/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read()
  2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 18/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read() Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-28 19:27   ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-28 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:52, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Implement icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read(), so add definition for
> ICH_LR_EL2.NMI and ICH_AP1R_EL2.NMI bit.
>
> If FEAT_GICv3_NMI is supported, ich_ap_write() should consider ICV_AP1R_EL1.NMI
> bit. In icv_activate_irq() and icv_eoir_write(), the ICV_AP1R_EL1.NMI bit
> should be set or clear according to the Non-maskable property. And the RPR
> priority should also update the NMI bit according to the APR priority NMI bit.
>
> By the way, add gicv3_icv_nmiar1_read trace event.
>
> If the hpp irq is a NMI, the icv iar read should return 1022 and trap for
> NMI again
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
> v10:
> - Rename ICH_AP1R_EL2_NMI to ICV_AP1R_EL1_NMI.
> - Add ICV_RPR_EL1_NMI definition.
> - Set ICV_RPR_EL1.NMI according to the ICV_AP1R<n>_EL1.NMI in
>   ich_highest_active_virt_prio().
> v9:
> - Correct the INTID_NMI logic.
> v8:
> - Fix an unexpected interrupt bug when sending VNMI by running qemu VM.
> v7:
> - Add Reviewed-by.
> v6:
> - Implement icv_nmiar1_read().
> ---
>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h  |  4 ++
>  hw/intc/trace-events      |  1 +
>  3 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

I haven't done a full review of this yet, but it looks like some of
the parts that applied to physical interrupts apply here too, eg
 * don't do the RPR NMI bit handling in ich_highest_active_virt_prio(),
   deal with NMI in the callers
 * in the AP registers, set either NMI or a group-priority bit, not both
 * AP NMI bits are only in the 0 reg, so checking doesn't need to be
   inside the for loop

You'll also need to update hppvi_index() so it accounts for NMIs
when it's finding the highest priority interrupt in the list registers:
compare the HighestPriorityVirtualInterrupt() pseudocode function.

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property
  2024-03-28 14:54   ` Peter Maydell
@ 2024-03-30  1:42     ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-30 14:45       ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-30  1:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Maydell
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm



On 2024/3/28 22:54, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:52, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> A SPI, PPI or SGI interrupt can have non-maskable property. So maintain
>> non-maskable property in PendingIrq and GICR/GICD. Since add new device
>> state, it also needs to be migrated, so also save NMI info in
>> vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> v10:
>> - superprio -> nmi, gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0.
>> - Save NMI state in vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
>> - Update the commit message.
>> v3:
>> - Place this ahead of implement GICR_INMIR.
>> - Add Acked-by.
>> ---
>>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h |  4 +++
>>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
>> index 2d2cea6858..be76ae0be6 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
>> @@ -164,6 +164,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicv4 = {
>>      }
>>  };
>>
>> +static bool nmi_needed(void *opaque)
>> +{
>> +    GICv3CPUState *cs = opaque;
>> +
>> +    return cs->gic->nmi_support != 0;
> 
> nmi_support is already a bool, so you can
>        return cs->gic_nmi_support;
> 
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu_nmi = {
>> +    .name = "arm_gicv3_cpu/nmi",
>> +    .version_id = 1,
>> +    .minimum_version_id = 1,
>> +    .needed = nmi_needed,
>> +    .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
>> +        VMSTATE_UINT32(gicr_inmir0, GICv3CPUState),
>> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>> +    }
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
>>      .name = "arm_gicv3_cpu",
>>      .version_id = 1,
>> @@ -197,6 +215,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_cpu = {
>>          &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_sre_el1,
>>          &vmstate_gicv3_gicv4,
>>          NULL
>> +    },
>> +    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
>> +        &vmstate_gicv3_cpu_nmi,
>> +        NULL
> 
> You add your subsection to the existing .subsections[] list.
> Otherwise this field initializer overwrites the previous one.
> 
>>      }
>>  };
>>
>> @@ -238,6 +260,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_migration_shift_bug = {
>>      }
>>  };
>>
>> +static bool needed_nmi(void *opaque)
>> +{
>> +    GICv3State *cs = opaque;
>> +
>> +    return cs->nmi_support != 0;
>> +}
> 
> You already have nmi_needed() above, so you can use it
> as the .needed function for both vmstate struct definitions.

The input opaque pointer seems not same, one is "GICv3CPUState *", but
another is "GICv3State *"

> 
>> +
>> +const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_nmi = {
>> +    .name = "arm_gicv3/gicd_nmi",
>> +    .version_id = 1,
>> +    .minimum_version_id = 1,
>> +    .needed = needed_nmi,
>> +    .fields = (const VMStateField[]) {
>> +        VMSTATE_UINT32_ARRAY(nmi, GICv3State, GICV3_BMP_SIZE),
>> +        VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
>> +    }
>> +};
>> +
>>  static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
>>      .name = "arm_gicv3",
>>      .version_id = 1,
>> @@ -267,6 +307,10 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3 = {
>>      .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
>>          &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_migration_shift_bug,
>>          NULL
>> +    },
>> +    .subsections = (const VMStateDescription * const []) {
>> +        &vmstate_gicv3_gicd_nmi,
>> +        NULL
> 
> Similarly here this must be added to the existing list.
> 
>>      }
>>  };
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
>> index 4358c5319c..88533749eb 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h
>> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ typedef struct {
>>      int irq;
>>      uint8_t prio;
>>      int grp;
>> +    bool nmi;
>>  } PendingIrq;
>>
>>  struct GICv3CPUState {
>> @@ -172,6 +173,7 @@ struct GICv3CPUState {
>>      uint32_t gicr_ienabler0;
>>      uint32_t gicr_ipendr0;
>>      uint32_t gicr_iactiver0;
>> +    uint32_t gicr_inmir0;
>>      uint32_t edge_trigger; /* ICFGR0 and ICFGR1 even bits */
>>      uint32_t gicr_igrpmodr0;
>>      uint32_t gicr_nsacr;
>> @@ -275,6 +277,7 @@ struct GICv3State {
>>      GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(active);       /* GICD_ISACTIVER */
>>      GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(level);        /* Current level */
>>      GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(edge_trigger); /* GICD_ICFGR even bits */
>> +    GIC_DECLARE_BITMAP(nmi);          /* GICD_INMIR */
>>      uint8_t gicd_ipriority[GICV3_MAXIRQ];
>>      uint64_t gicd_irouter[GICV3_MAXIRQ];
>>      /* Cached information: pointer to the cpu i/f for the CPUs specified
>> @@ -314,6 +317,7 @@ GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(pending)
>>  GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(active)
>>  GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(level)
>>  GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(edge_trigger)
>> +GICV3_BITMAP_ACCESSORS(nmi)
>>
>>  #define TYPE_ARM_GICV3_COMMON "arm-gicv3-common"
>>  typedef struct ARMGICv3CommonClass ARMGICv3CommonClass;
>> --
>> 2.34.1
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers
  2024-03-28 14:50   ` Peter Maydell
@ 2024-03-30  2:44     ` Jinjie Ruan via
  2024-03-30 14:48       ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 34+ messages in thread
From: Jinjie Ruan via @ 2024-03-30  2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Maydell
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm



On 2024/3/28 22:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:53, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Add the NMIAR CPU interface registers which deal with acknowledging NMI.
>>
>> When introduce NMI interrupt, there are some updates to the semantics for the
>> register ICC_IAR1_EL1 and ICC_HPPIR1_EL1. For ICC_IAR1_EL1 register, it
>> should return 1022 if the intid has non-maskable property. And for
>> ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 register, it should return 1023 if the intid do not have
>> non-maskable property. Howerever, these are not necessary for ICC_HPPIR1_EL1
>> register.
>>
>> And the APR and RPR has NMI bits which should be handled correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> v10:
>> - is_nmi -> nmi.
>> - is_hppi -> hppi.
>> - Exchange the order of nmi and hppi parameters.
>> - superprio -> nmi.
>> - Handle APR and RPR NMI bits.
>> - Update the commit message, super priority -> non-maskable property.
>> v7:
>> - Add Reviewed-by.
>> v4:
>> - Define ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 only if FEAT_GICv3_NMI is implemented.
>> - Check sctrl_elx.SCTLR_NMI to return 1022 for icc_iar1_read().
>> - Add gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read() trace event.
>> - Do not check icc_hppi_can_preempt() for icc_nmiar1_read().
>> - Add icv_nmiar1_read() and call it when EL2Enabled() and HCR_EL2.IMO == '1'
>> ---
>>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>  hw/intc/gicv3_internal.h  |   5 ++
>>  hw/intc/trace-events      |   1 +
>>  3 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
>> index e1a60d8c15..76e2286e70 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_cpuif.c
>> @@ -795,6 +795,13 @@ static uint64_t icv_iar_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>>      return intid;
>>  }
>>
>> +static uint64_t icv_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>> +{
>> +    /* todo */
>> +    uint64_t intid = INTID_SPURIOUS;
>> +    return intid;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static uint32_t icc_fullprio_mask(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>>  {
>>      /*
>> @@ -825,11 +832,15 @@ static inline int icc_num_aprs(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>>      return aprmax;
>>  }
>>
>> -static int icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>> +static uint64_t icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>>  {
>>      /* Calculate the current running priority based on the set bits
>>       * in the Active Priority Registers.
>>       */
>> +    ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(cs->cpu);
>> +    CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
>> +
>> +    uint64_t prio;
>>      int i;
>>
>>      for (i = 0; i < icc_num_aprs(cs); i++) {
>> @@ -839,7 +850,32 @@ static int icc_highest_active_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>>          if (!apr) {
>>              continue;
>>          }
>> -        return (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icc_min_bpr(cs) + 1);
>> +        prio = (i * 32 + ctz32(apr)) << (icc_min_bpr(cs) + 1);
>> +
>> +        if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
>> +            if (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) {
>> +                if ((cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G0][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) ||
>> +                    (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) ||
>> +                    (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI)) {
>> +                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
>> +                }
>> +            } else if (!arm_is_secure(env)) {
>> +                if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>> +                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
>> +                }
>> +            } else {
>> +                if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>> +                    prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
>> +                }
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) &&
>> +                cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][i] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>> +                prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI;
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        return prio;
> 
> This function is used both for getting the ICC_RPR value,
> and also in icc_hppi_can_preempt(). So we can't put the
> special RPR NMI bits in here. Also doing that will not work well
> with the way the code in icc_rpr_read() adjusts the priority
> for non-secure accesses. I think we should follow the structure
> of the pseudocode here, and do the setting of the RPR bits 62 and 63
> in icc_rpr_read(). (In the pseudocode this is ICC_RPR_EL1 calling
> GetHighestActivePriority() and then doing the NMI bits locally.)
> 
> The NMI bit also exists only in the AP1R0 bit, not in every AP
> register. So you can check it before the for() loop, something like this:
> 
>     if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
>         /*
>          * If an NMI is active this takes precedence over anything else
>          * for priority purposes; the NMI bit is only in the AP1R0 bit.
>          * We return here the effective priority of the NMI, which is
>          * either 0x0 or 0x80. Callers will need to check NMI again for
>          * purposes of either setting the RPR register bits or for
>          * prioritization of NMI vs non-NMI.
>          */
>         prio = 0;
>         if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>             return 0;
>         }
>         if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>             return (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) ? 0 : 0x80;
>         }
>     }
> 
> Then in icc_rpr_read() we can pretty much directly write the same
> logic that the pseudocode uses to determine whether to set the RPR
> NMI bits, after the point where we do the shifting of the prio for
> the NS view:
> 
>     if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
>         /* NMI info is reported in the high bits of RPR */
>         if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) && !arm_is_secure(env)) {
>             if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>                 prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;

It seems ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI in pseudocode:

// GICv3.3
if HaveNMIExt() then
    if HaveEL(EL3) && (IsNonSecure() || IsRealm()) then
        pPriority<63> = ICC_AP1R_EL1NS<63>;
        ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
else
    pPriority<63> = ICC_AP1R_EL1S<63>;
    pPriority<62> = ICC_AP1R_EL1NS<63>;

>             }
>         } else {
>             if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>                 prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI;
>             }
>             if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
>                 prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
>             }
>         }
>     }
> 
>>      }
>>      /* No current active interrupts: return idle priority */
>>      return 0xff;
>> @@ -896,7 +932,7 @@ static bool icc_hppi_can_preempt(GICv3CPUState *cs)
>>      /* Return true if we have a pending interrupt of sufficient
>>       * priority to preempt.
>>       */
>> -    int rprio;
>> +    uint64_t rprio;
> 
> You won't need to change the type of this variable with the change above.
> 
>>      uint32_t mask;
>>
>>      if (icc_no_enabled_hppi(cs)) {
> 
> icc_hppi_can_preempt() needs more changes than this (check the
> pseudocode in CanSignalInterrupt(), and the text in 4.8, particularly
> 4.8.6):
> 
>  * the (cs->hppi.prio >= cs->icc_pmr_el1) check only applies
>    if !cs->hppi.nmi
>  * if this is an NMI and GICD_CTLR.DS is 0 and it's a G1NS
>    interrupt, then we mask if the PMR is < 0x80, or if
>    we're in Secure state and the PMR == 0x80
>  * if this is an NMI and the (masked) hppi.prio is equal to the
>    (masked) running priority, then we preempt if there's not
>    already an active NMI, ie if the APR NMI bit is clear
> 
>> @@ -1034,7 +1070,7 @@ static void icc_pmr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>>      gicv3_cpuif_update(cs);
>>  }
>>
>> -static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq)
>> +static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq, bool nmi)
>>  {
> 
> When activating an interrupt, we set the NMI bit in the
> priority register based only on the interrupt's config,
> not on what register was used to activate it. So we don't
> want a 'bool nmi' argument, we want a local:
>    bool nmi = cs->hppi.nmi;
> 
> (Compare the pseudocode in the spec: ICC_IAR0_EL1, ICC_IAR1_EL1,
> and ICC_NMIAR1_EL1 all call AcknowledgeInterrupt(pendID)
> to activate it.)
> 
>>      /* Move the interrupt from the Pending state to Active, and update
>>       * the Active Priority Registers
>> @@ -1047,6 +1083,10 @@ static void icc_activate_irq(GICv3CPUState *cs, int irq)
>>
>>      cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit);
>>
>> +    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
>> +        cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (nmi ? ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI : 0);
>> +    }
> 
> In the APRs, we set only the NMI bit for an NMI and the ordinary priority
> bit for a non-NMI; so this should be
> 
>      if (cs->gic->nmi_support && nmi) {
>          cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI;
>      } else {
>          cs->icc_apr[cs->hppi.grp][regno] |= (1 << regbit);
>      }
> 
> (Otherwise if we had a non-NMI that was interrupted by an NMI
> at the same priority we wouldn't be able to distinguish this
> from the NMI interrupting when nothing else was active.)
> 
>> +
>>      if (irq < GIC_INTERNAL) {
>>          cs->gicr_iactiver0 = deposit32(cs->gicr_iactiver0, irq, 1, 1);
>>          cs->gicr_ipendr0 = deposit32(cs->gicr_ipendr0, irq, 1, 0);
>> @@ -1097,7 +1137,8 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir0_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
>>      return cs->hppi.irq;
>>  }
>>
>> -static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
>> +static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env, bool hppi,
>> +                                 bool nmi)
>>  {
>>      /* Return the highest priority pending interrupt register value
>>       * for group 1.
>> @@ -1108,6 +1149,18 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_value(GICv3CPUState *cs, CPUARMState *env)
>>          return INTID_SPURIOUS;
>>      }
>>
>> +    if (!hppi) {
>> +        int el = arm_current_el(env);
>> +
>> +        if (nmi && (!cs->hppi.nmi)) {
>> +            return INTID_SPURIOUS;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        if (!nmi && cs->hppi.nmi && env->cp15.sctlr_el[el] & SCTLR_NMI) {
>> +            return INTID_NMI;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
> 
> Rather than passing two extra boolean arguments into this
> function, I think it's better to follow the pseudocode's
> structure, and have the "should we instead return a
> special INTID_*" checks be done in the callers of this function.
> They all end up different so they don't really share code
> by pushing the checks into this function.
> 
>>      /* Check whether we can return the interrupt or if we should return
>>       * a special identifier, as per the CheckGroup1ForSpecialIdentifiers
>>       * pseudocode. (We can simplify a little because for us ICC_SRE_EL1.RM
>> @@ -1149,7 +1202,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar0_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>>      }
>>
>>      if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
>> -        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid);
>> +        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, false);
>>      }
>>
>>      trace_gicv3_icc_iar0_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
>> @@ -1168,17 +1221,36 @@ static uint64_t icc_iar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>>      if (!icc_hppi_can_preempt(cs)) {
>>          intid = INTID_SPURIOUS;
>>      } else {
>> -        intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env);
>> +        intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, false);
>>      }
>>
>>      if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
>> -        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid);
>> +        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, false);
>>      }
>>
>>      trace_gicv3_icc_iar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
>>      return intid;
>>  }
>>
>> +static uint64_t icc_nmiar1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>> +{
>> +    GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
>> +    uint64_t intid;
>> +
>> +    if (icv_access(env, HCR_IMO)) {
>> +        return icv_nmiar1_read(env, ri);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    intid = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, false, true);
>> +
>> +    if (!gicv3_intid_is_special(intid)) {
>> +        icc_activate_irq(cs, intid, true);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    trace_gicv3_icc_nmiar1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), intid);
>> +    return intid;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void icc_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs, int grp)
>>  {
>>      /* Drop the priority of the currently active interrupt in
>> @@ -1207,6 +1279,10 @@ static void icc_drop_prio(GICv3CPUState *cs, int grp)
>>          }
>>          /* Clear the lowest set bit */
>>          *papr &= *papr - 1;
>> +
>> +        if (cs->gic->nmi_support && (*papr & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI)) {
>> +            *papr &= (~ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
>> +        }
> 
> The NMI bit is only in the AP1R0 register, and if it is set then
> we should clear only it and not any other AP bits. At the moment
> this code clears the lowest set bit and also the NMI bit.
> 
>>          break;
>>      }
>>
>> @@ -1555,7 +1631,7 @@ static uint64_t icc_hppir1_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>>          return icv_hppir_read(env, ri);
>>      }
>>
>> -    value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env);
>> +    value = icc_hppir1_value(cs, env, true, false);
>>      trace_gicv3_icc_hppir1_read(gicv3_redist_affid(cs), value);
>>      return value;
>>  }
>> @@ -1693,7 +1769,11 @@ static void icc_ap_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>>          return;
>>      }
>>
>> -    cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
>> +    if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
>> +        cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & (0xFFFFFFFFU | ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI);
>> +    } else {
>> +        cs->icc_apr[grp][regno] = value & 0xFFFFFFFFU;
>> +    }
>>      gicv3_cpuif_update(cs);
>>  }
>>
>> @@ -1783,7 +1863,7 @@ static void icc_dir_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>>  static uint64_t icc_rpr_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>>  {
>>      GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
>> -    int prio;
>> +    uint64_t prio;
>>
>>      if (icv_access(env, HCR_FMO | HCR_IMO)) {
>>          return icv_rpr_read(env, ri);
>> @@ -2482,6 +2562,15 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_icc_apxr23_reginfo[] = {
>>      },
>>  };
>>
>> +static const ARMCPRegInfo gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo[] = {
>> +    { .name = "ICC_NMIAR1_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>> +      .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 12, .crm = 9, .opc2 = 5,
>> +      .type = ARM_CP_IO | ARM_CP_NO_RAW,
>> +      .access = PL1_R, .accessfn = gicv3_irq_access,
>> +      .readfn = icc_nmiar1_read,
>> +    },
>> +};
>> +
>>  static uint64_t ich_ap_read(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri)
>>  {
>>      GICv3CPUState *cs = icc_cs_from_env(env);
>> @@ -2838,6 +2927,10 @@ void gicv3_init_cpuif(GICv3State *s)
>>           */
>>          define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_reginfo);
>>
>> +        if (s->nmi_support) {
>> +            define_arm_cp_regs(cpu, gicv3_cpuif_gicv3_nmi_reginfo);
>> +        }
>> +
>>          /*
>>           * The CPU implementation specifies the number of supported
>>           * bits of physical priority. For backwards compatibility
> 
> icc_highest_active_group() also needs to be changed, because
> if the NMI bit is set in an AP register that is what defines
> the group of the highest priority active interrupt. Something
> like this at the top of icc_highest_active_group() should do:
> 
> +    if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> +        return GICV3_G1;
> +    }
> +    if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> +        return GICV3_G1NS;
> +    }
> 
> thanks
> -- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property
  2024-03-30  1:42     ` Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-30 14:45       ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-30 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 01:42, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024/3/28 22:54, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Mar 2024 at 08:52, Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> A SPI, PPI or SGI interrupt can have non-maskable property. So maintain
> >> non-maskable property in PendingIrq and GICR/GICD. Since add new device
> >> state, it also needs to be migrated, so also save NMI info in
> >> vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
> >> Acked-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> >> ---
> >> v10:
> >> - superprio -> nmi, gicr_isuperprio -> gicr_inmir0.
> >> - Save NMI state in vmstate_gicv3_cpu and vmstate_gicv3.
> >> - Update the commit message.
> >> v3:
> >> - Place this ahead of implement GICR_INMIR.
> >> - Add Acked-by.
> >> ---
> >>  hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c         | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  include/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.h |  4 +++
> >>  2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> >> index 2d2cea6858..be76ae0be6 100644
> >> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> >> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gicv3_common.c
> >> @@ -164,6 +164,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicv4 = {
> >>      }
> >>  };
> >>
> >> +static bool nmi_needed(void *opaque)
> >> +{
> >> +    GICv3CPUState *cs = opaque;
> >> +
> >> +    return cs->gic->nmi_support != 0;
> >
> > nmi_support is already a bool, so you can
> >        return cs->gic_nmi_support;
> >
> >
> >> +}

> >> @@ -238,6 +260,24 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_gicv3_gicd_no_migration_shift_bug = {
> >>      }
> >>  };
> >>
> >> +static bool needed_nmi(void *opaque)
> >> +{
> >> +    GICv3State *cs = opaque;
> >> +
> >> +    return cs->nmi_support != 0;
> >> +}
> >
> > You already have nmi_needed() above, so you can use it
> > as the .needed function for both vmstate struct definitions.
>
> The input opaque pointer seems not same, one is "GICv3CPUState *", but
> another is "GICv3State *"

Oops, you're right. In that case let's give these two
functions names that hopefully guide the reader towards
the difference, like gic_cpu_state_nmi_needed() and
gic_state_nmi_needed().

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers
  2024-03-30  2:44     ` Jinjie Ruan via
@ 2024-03-30 14:48       ` Peter Maydell
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 34+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2024-03-30 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jinjie Ruan
  Cc: eduardo, marcel.apfelbaum, philmd, wangyanan55,
	richard.henderson, qemu-devel, qemu-arm

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 at 02:44, Jinjie Ruan via <qemu-arm@nongnu.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024/3/28 22:50, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > The NMI bit also exists only in the AP1R0 bit, not in every AP
> > register. So you can check it before the for() loop, something like this:
> >
> >     if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
> >         /*
> >          * If an NMI is active this takes precedence over anything else
> >          * for priority purposes; the NMI bit is only in the AP1R0 bit.
> >          * We return here the effective priority of the NMI, which is
> >          * either 0x0 or 0x80. Callers will need to check NMI again for
> >          * purposes of either setting the RPR register bits or for
> >          * prioritization of NMI vs non-NMI.
> >          */
> >         prio = 0;
> >         if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> >             return 0;
> >         }
> >         if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> >             return (cs->gic->gicd_ctlr & GICD_CTLR_DS) ? 0 : 0x80;
> >         }
> >     }
> >
> > Then in icc_rpr_read() we can pretty much directly write the same
> > logic that the pseudocode uses to determine whether to set the RPR
> > NMI bits, after the point where we do the shifting of the prio for
> > the NS view:
> >
> >     if (cs->gic->nmi_support) {
> >         /* NMI info is reported in the high bits of RPR */
> >         if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3) && !arm_is_secure(env)) {
> >             if (cs->icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] & ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI) {
> >                 prio |= ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI;
>
> It seems ICC_RPR_EL1_NSNMI in pseudocode:
>
> // GICv3.3
> if HaveNMIExt() then
>     if HaveEL(EL3) && (IsNonSecure() || IsRealm()) then
>         pPriority<63> = ICC_AP1R_EL1NS<63>;
>         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> else
>     pPriority<63> = ICC_AP1R_EL1S<63>;
>     pPriority<62> = ICC_AP1R_EL1NS<63>;

I'm not sure what you have in mind here? For QEMU,
ICC_AP1R_EL1NS<63> is the ICC_AP1R_EL1_NMI bit in the
icc_apr[GICV3_G1NS][0] value, and ICC_RPR_EL1_NMI is bit 63,
so the C code seems to me to match up with the pseudocode line
that you highlight.

thanks
-- PMM


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 34+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-03-30 14:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-03-25  8:48 [PATCH v10 00/23] target/arm: Implement FEAT_NMI and FEAT_GICv3_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 01/23] target/arm: Handle HCR_EL2 accesses for bits introduced with FEAT_NMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 02/23] target/arm: Add PSTATE.ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 03/23] target/arm: Add support for FEAT_NMI, Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 04/23] target/arm: Implement ALLINT MSR (immediate) Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 05/23] target/arm: Support MSR access to ALLINT Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 06/23] target/arm: Add support for Non-maskable Interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 07/23] target/arm: Add support for NMI in arm_phys_excp_target_el() Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 08/23] target/arm: Handle IS/FS in ISR_EL1 for NMI, VINMI and VFNMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 09/23] target/arm: Handle PSTATE.ALLINT on taking an exception Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 10/23] hw/arm/virt: Wire NMI and VINMI irq lines from GIC to CPU Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 11/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add external IRQ lines for NMI Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-28 14:55   ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 12/23] target/arm: Handle NMI in arm_cpu_do_interrupt_aarch64() Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 13/23] hw/intc: Enable FEAT_GICv3_NMI Feature Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 14/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add irq non-maskable property Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-28 14:54   ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-30  1:42     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-30 14:45       ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 15/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3_redist: Implement GICR_INMIR0 Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-28 14:56   ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 16/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement GICD_INMIR Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-28 14:57   ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 17/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Add NMI handling CPU interface registers Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-28 14:50   ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-30  2:44     ` Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-30 14:48       ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 18/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Handle icv_nmiar1_read() for icc_nmiar1_read() Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-28 19:27   ` Peter Maydell
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 19/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Implement NMI interrupt prioirty Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 20/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the NMI interrupt in gicv3_cpuif_update() Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 21/23] hw/intc/arm_gicv3: Report the VINMI interrupt Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 22/23] target/arm: Add FEAT_NMI to max Jinjie Ruan via
2024-03-25  8:48 ` [PATCH v10 23/23] hw/arm/virt: Add FEAT_GICv3_NMI feature support in virt GIC Jinjie Ruan via

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.