All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@samsung.com>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	kishon <kishon@ti.com>, Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Add support to get PHYs
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:40:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iHUX0jn0xW6ijXmRpgXodp43_mBtVxnCcOb2H6duHvigQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAODwPW-2tbDht8P=KsTyTyeBivFtFMiyCpxd0QFa-cUSRTpJjQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> index 9ffecd5..453d89e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> @@ -1582,6 +1582,9 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
>>         u32                     port_status_u0;
>>  /* Compliance Mode Timer Triggered every 2 seconds */
>>  #define COMP_MODE_RCVRY_MSECS 2000
>> +       /* phys for the controller */
>> +       struct phy              *phy2_gen;
>> +       struct phy              *phy3_gen;
>>  };
>
> I don't think adding new variables here and restricting most of this
> logic to xhci-plat.c (in the next patch) is the best way to do it.
> There's no conceptual reason why other host controllers (e.g. xhci-pci
> or even EHCI) could not have a similar need to tune their PHY after
> reset. PHYs are universal to all host controllers.
>
> There is already a 'phy' member in struct usb_hcd which I think is
> mostly unused right now. I think it would be much less
> confusing/redundant to reuse that member for this purpose (you could
> still set it up from xhci_plat_probe(), and then call it from
> hcd_bus_resume() or something like that). Since XHCI host controllers
> already conveniently have two struct usb_hcd (one for 2.0 and one for
> 3.0), you can cleanly store references to your two PHYs in there.

Ok, i will look into the suggested approach, and raise flag in case i
have doubts.



-- 
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gautam.vivek@samsung.com (Vivek Gautam)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Add support to get PHYs
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 11:40:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFp+6iHUX0jn0xW6ijXmRpgXodp43_mBtVxnCcOb2H6duHvigQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAODwPW-2tbDht8P=KsTyTyeBivFtFMiyCpxd0QFa-cUSRTpJjQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,


On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> index 9ffecd5..453d89e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
>> @@ -1582,6 +1582,9 @@ struct xhci_hcd {
>>         u32                     port_status_u0;
>>  /* Compliance Mode Timer Triggered every 2 seconds */
>>  #define COMP_MODE_RCVRY_MSECS 2000
>> +       /* phys for the controller */
>> +       struct phy              *phy2_gen;
>> +       struct phy              *phy3_gen;
>>  };
>
> I don't think adding new variables here and restricting most of this
> logic to xhci-plat.c (in the next patch) is the best way to do it.
> There's no conceptual reason why other host controllers (e.g. xhci-pci
> or even EHCI) could not have a similar need to tune their PHY after
> reset. PHYs are universal to all host controllers.
>
> There is already a 'phy' member in struct usb_hcd which I think is
> mostly unused right now. I think it would be much less
> confusing/redundant to reuse that member for this purpose (you could
> still set it up from xhci_plat_probe(), and then call it from
> hcd_bus_resume() or something like that). Since XHCI host controllers
> already conveniently have two struct usb_hcd (one for 2.0 and one for
> 3.0), you can cleanly store references to your two PHYs in there.

Ok, i will look into the suggested approach, and raise flag in case i
have doubts.



-- 
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-24  6:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-06 12:12 [PATCH v1 0/4] Fine tune USB 3.0 PHY on exynos5420 Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12 ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12 ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12 ` [PATCH 1/4] phy: Add provision for calibrating phy Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12   ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-09  3:49   ` Pratyush Anand
2014-06-09  3:49     ` Pratyush Anand
2014-06-09  3:49     ` Pratyush Anand
2014-07-09  9:02     ` Vivek Gautam
2014-07-09  9:02       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-07-09  9:02       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12 ` [PATCH 2/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Add support to get PHYs Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12   ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-09 20:22   ` Julius Werner
2014-06-09 20:22     ` Julius Werner
2014-06-09 20:22     ` Julius Werner
2014-06-24  6:10     ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2014-06-24  6:10       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-24  6:10       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-24 22:34     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-24 22:34       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-24 22:34       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-25  5:49       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-25  5:49         ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-25  5:49         ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-25  8:44       ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-25  8:44         ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-25  8:44         ` Vivek Gautam
2014-07-03 22:39         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-07-03 22:39           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-07-03 22:39           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-06-06 12:12 ` [PATCH 3/4] usb: host: xhci-plat: Caibrate PHY post host reset Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12   ` Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12 ` [PATCH 4/4] phy: exynos5-usbdrd: Calibrate LOS levels for exynos5420/5800 Vivek Gautam
2014-06-06 12:12   ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAFp+6iHUX0jn0xW6ijXmRpgXodp43_mBtVxnCcOb2H6duHvigQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=gautam.vivek@samsung.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.