All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/22] x86/cpu: Add conistent CPU match macros
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:39:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdKavBD=yTR6Mz4iaGKQVP__xCsf-fWdy1MMJJywhDd-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320131508.826011988@linutronix.de>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Finding all places which build x86_cpu_id match tables is tedious and the
> logic is hidden in lots of differently named macro wrappers.
>
> Most of these initializer macros use plain C89 initializers which rely on
> the ordering of the struct members. So new members could only be added at
> the end of the struct, but that's ugly as hell and C99 initializers are
> really the right thing to use.
>
> Provide a set of macros which:
>
>   - Have a proper naming scheme, starting with X86_MATCH_
>
>   - Use C99 initializers
>
> The set of provided macros are all subsets of the base macro
>
>     X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE()
>
> which allows to supply all possible selection criteria:
>
>       vendor, family, model, feature
>
> The other macros shorten this to avoid typing all arguments when they are
> not needed and would require one of the _ANY constants. They have been
> created due to the requirements of the existing usage sites.
>

> Also a add a few model constants for Centaur CPUs and QUARK.

I would perhaps made this as a separate change(s).

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(_vendor, _family, _model,   \
> +                                          _feature, _data) {           \

I would leave it on one line despite the length, but it's up to you.

> +       .vendor         = X86_VENDOR_##_vendor,                         \
> +       .family         = _family,                                      \
> +       .model          = _model,                                       \
> +       .feature        = _feature,                                     \

> +       .driver_data    = (unsigned long) _data                         \

For sake of consistency shouldn't be this kernel_ulong_t ?
Or we are going to get rid of that type?

>  }

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_FEATURE(vendor, family, feature, data)    \

> +       X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family,              \
> +                                          X86_MODEL_ANY, feature, data)

I would leave it on one line despite the length, but it's up to you.

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(vendor, family, model, data)                \
> +       X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model,       \
> +                                          X86_FEATURE_ANY, data)

Ditto.

...

> + * X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL,
> + *                                   X86_FEATURE_ANY, NULL);

Perhaps one line?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>linux
Subject: Re: [patch 02/22] x86/cpu: Add conistent CPU match macros
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:39:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdKavBD=yTR6Mz4iaGKQVP__xCsf-fWdy1MMJJywhDd-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320131508.826011988@linutronix.de>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Finding all places which build x86_cpu_id match tables is tedious and the
> logic is hidden in lots of differently named macro wrappers.
>
> Most of these initializer macros use plain C89 initializers which rely on
> the ordering of the struct members. So new members could only be added at
> the end of the struct, but that's ugly as hell and C99 initializers are
> really the right thing to use.
>
> Provide a set of macros which:
>
>   - Have a proper naming scheme, starting with X86_MATCH_
>
>   - Use C99 initializers
>
> The set of provided macros are all subsets of the base macro
>
>     X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE()
>
> which allows to supply all possible selection criteria:
>
>       vendor, family, model, feature
>
> The other macros shorten this to avoid typing all arguments when they are
> not needed and would require one of the _ANY constants. They have been
> created due to the requirements of the existing usage sites.
>

> Also a add a few model constants for Centaur CPUs and QUARK.

I would perhaps made this as a separate change(s).

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(_vendor, _family, _model,   \
> +                                          _feature, _data) {           \

I would leave it on one line despite the length, but it's up to you.

> +       .vendor         = X86_VENDOR_##_vendor,                         \
> +       .family         = _family,                                      \
> +       .model          = _model,                                       \
> +       .feature        = _feature,                                     \

> +       .driver_data    = (unsigned long) _data                         \

For sake of consistency shouldn't be this kernel_ulong_t ?
Or we are going to get rid of that type?

>  }

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_FEATURE(vendor, family, feature, data)    \

> +       X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family,              \
> +                                          X86_MODEL_ANY, feature, data)

I would leave it on one line despite the length, but it's up to you.

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(vendor, family, model, data)                \
> +       X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model,       \
> +                                          X86_FEATURE_ANY, data)

Ditto.

...

> + * X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL,
> + *                                   X86_FEATURE_ANY, NULL);

Perhaps one line?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)"
	<x86@kernel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
	Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@verdurent.com>,
	Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 02/22] x86/cpu: Add conistent CPU match macros
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 16:39:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdKavBD=yTR6Mz4iaGKQVP__xCsf-fWdy1MMJJywhDd-Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200320131508.826011988@linutronix.de>

On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 3:18 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Finding all places which build x86_cpu_id match tables is tedious and the
> logic is hidden in lots of differently named macro wrappers.
>
> Most of these initializer macros use plain C89 initializers which rely on
> the ordering of the struct members. So new members could only be added at
> the end of the struct, but that's ugly as hell and C99 initializers are
> really the right thing to use.
>
> Provide a set of macros which:
>
>   - Have a proper naming scheme, starting with X86_MATCH_
>
>   - Use C99 initializers
>
> The set of provided macros are all subsets of the base macro
>
>     X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE()
>
> which allows to supply all possible selection criteria:
>
>       vendor, family, model, feature
>
> The other macros shorten this to avoid typing all arguments when they are
> not needed and would require one of the _ANY constants. They have been
> created due to the requirements of the existing usage sites.
>

> Also a add a few model constants for Centaur CPUs and QUARK.

I would perhaps made this as a separate change(s).

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(_vendor, _family, _model,   \
> +                                          _feature, _data) {           \

I would leave it on one line despite the length, but it's up to you.

> +       .vendor         = X86_VENDOR_##_vendor,                         \
> +       .family         = _family,                                      \
> +       .model          = _model,                                       \
> +       .feature        = _feature,                                     \

> +       .driver_data    = (unsigned long) _data                         \

For sake of consistency shouldn't be this kernel_ulong_t ?
Or we are going to get rid of that type?

>  }

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_FEATURE(vendor, family, feature, data)    \

> +       X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family,              \
> +                                          X86_MODEL_ANY, feature, data)

I would leave it on one line despite the length, but it's up to you.

...

> +#define X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(vendor, family, model, data)                \
> +       X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(vendor, family, model,       \
> +                                          X86_FEATURE_ANY, data)

Ditto.

...

> + * X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL_FEATURE(INTEL, 6, INTEL_FAM6_BROADWELL,
> + *                                   X86_FEATURE_ANY, NULL);

Perhaps one line?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20 13:13 [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 01/22] x86/devicetable: Move x86 specific macro out of generic code Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:33     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:33     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:24       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 02/22] x86/cpu: Add conistent CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:29   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:29     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:39   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-03-20 14:39     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:39     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:27     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:27       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:27       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu: Add consistent " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 03/22] x86/cpu/bugs: Convert to new matching macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 04/22] x86/perf/events: Convert to new CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 05/22] x86/kvm: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 06/22] x86/kernel: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 07/22] x86/platform: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 08/22] ACPI: Convert to new X86 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:47   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:47     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:47     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:32     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:32       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:32       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-23 16:38       ` mark gross
2020-03-23 16:38         ` mark gross
2020-03-23 16:38         ` mark gross
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 09/22] cpufreq: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:50   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:50     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:50     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 20:30     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:30       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 20:30       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 21:52       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 21:52         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 21:52         ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 22:18         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 22:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 22:18           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24  6:01   ` [cpufreq] 06c4d00466: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -53.4% regression kernel test robot
2020-03-24  6:01     ` kernel test robot
2020-03-24  6:01     ` kernel test robot
2020-03-24  6:01     ` kernel test robot
2020-03-24 10:24     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 10:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 10:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 10:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 15:38       ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-24 15:38         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-24 15:38         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-24 15:38         ` Srinivas Pandruvada
2020-03-25  7:51         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:51           ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:51           ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:51           ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:50       ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:50         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:50         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25  7:50         ` Rong Chen
2020-03-25 10:32         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 10:32           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 10:32           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25 10:32           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26  8:33           ` kernel test robot
2020-03-26  8:33             ` kernel test robot
2020-03-26  8:33             ` kernel test robot
2020-03-26  8:33             ` kernel test robot
2020-03-25 12:41     ` [tip: x86/cpu] cpufreq/intel_pstate: Fix wrong macro conversion tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 13:51   ` [patch V2 09/22] cpufreq: Convert to new X86 CPU match macros Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 13:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 13:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 15:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24 15:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24 15:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-03-24 22:32     ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 10/22] EDAC: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 19:31   ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-24 19:31     ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-24 19:31     ` Luck, Tony
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 11/22] platform/x86: Convert to new " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:52   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:52     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 12/22] hwmon: Convert to new X86 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 13/22] thermal: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13 ` [patch 14/22] extcon: axp288: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:13   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 15/22] intel_idle: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 16/22] mmc: sdhci-acpi: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 17/22] PCI: intel-mid: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:30   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-20 14:30     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 18/22] powercap/intel_rapl: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 19/22] ASoC: Intel: " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:58   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:58     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:58     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 20/22] crypto: Convert to new " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 21/22] hwrng: via_rng - Convert to new X86 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] hwrng: via_rng: " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14 ` [patch 22/22] x86/cpu: Cleanup the now unused " Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 13:14   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 22:32   ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-20 14:31 ` [patch 00/22] x86/treewide: Consolidate CPU match macro maze and get rid of C89 (sic!) initializers Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-20 14:59 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-20 14:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-20 14:59   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-24 18:58 ` [PATCH 23/22] x86/smpboot: Remove the last ICPU() macro Borislav Petkov
2020-03-24 18:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-24 18:58   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-04-13  8:40   ` [tip: x86/cleanups] " tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHp75VdKavBD=yTR6Mz4iaGKQVP__xCsf-fWdy1MMJJywhDd-Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@verdurent.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.