All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.jf.intel.com>,
	"djbw @ fb . com" <djbw@fb.com>,
	"linux-kernel @ vger . kernel . org"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel @ lists . infradead . org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"viresh.kumar@linaro.org" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmatest: abort transfers immediately when asked for
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:51:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf58kq0t7+et9i54fxjEdQfBrTWxji4xk_MS-fZgWGOdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130523100932.GA30200@intel.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:24:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:33:17PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >> When thread is going to be stopped we have to unconditionally terminate all
>> >> ongoing transfers. Otherwise it would be possible that callback function will
>> >> be called on the next interrupt and will try to access to already freed
>> >> structures.
>> >>
>> >> The patch introduces specific error message for this, though it doesn't
>> >> increase the counter of the failed tests.
>> >>
>> > Thanks for persevering with this! Although this patch definitely fixes the
>> > panic I was seeing, I now observe buffer verification failures in subsequent
>> > test runs after an aborted run:
>>
>> I think the description to the commit adfa543e "dmatest: don't use
>> set_freezable_with_signal()" may shed light on this.
>>
>> The background (if  I got it correctly) is in race with done flag. So,
>> we got a callback call from the DMA engine, but we don't know which
>> transfer triggers it.
>> I might be wrong. This is just an assumption.
>>
>> Have you ever see such behaviour on pre v3.10-rc1 kernels? (I mean
>> with old dmatest module)
> Terminate shouldnt cause the issue with buffer verfication, can you try this on
> dw_dmac, do you see similar failures on verfication?

I saw the similar errors on dw_dmac on Intel Medfield device.
Anyway, I checked another approach with Will.
For now I will send a quick fix that prevents tester to abort an
ongoing transfer.
In future we could implement a robust logic when transfers can be
interrupted at any time.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: andy.shevchenko@gmail.com (Andy Shevchenko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmatest: abort transfers immediately when asked for
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 13:51:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vf58kq0t7+et9i54fxjEdQfBrTWxji4xk_MS-fZgWGOdQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130523100932.GA30200@intel.com>

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 08:24:15PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 01:33:17PM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >> When thread is going to be stopped we have to unconditionally terminate all
>> >> ongoing transfers. Otherwise it would be possible that callback function will
>> >> be called on the next interrupt and will try to access to already freed
>> >> structures.
>> >>
>> >> The patch introduces specific error message for this, though it doesn't
>> >> increase the counter of the failed tests.
>> >>
>> > Thanks for persevering with this! Although this patch definitely fixes the
>> > panic I was seeing, I now observe buffer verification failures in subsequent
>> > test runs after an aborted run:
>>
>> I think the description to the commit adfa543e "dmatest: don't use
>> set_freezable_with_signal()" may shed light on this.
>>
>> The background (if  I got it correctly) is in race with done flag. So,
>> we got a callback call from the DMA engine, but we don't know which
>> transfer triggers it.
>> I might be wrong. This is just an assumption.
>>
>> Have you ever see such behaviour on pre v3.10-rc1 kernels? (I mean
>> with old dmatest module)
> Terminate shouldnt cause the issue with buffer verfication, can you try this on
> dw_dmac, do you see similar failures on verfication?

I saw the similar errors on dw_dmac on Intel Medfield device.
Anyway, I checked another approach with Will.
For now I will send a quick fix that prevents tester to abort an
ongoing transfer.
In future we could implement a robust logic when transfers can be
interrupted at any time.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-23 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-15 15:28 dmatest regression in 3.10-rc1 Will Deacon
2013-05-15 15:28 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-16 15:35 ` Will Deacon
2013-05-16 15:35   ` Will Deacon
2013-05-17 12:34   ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-17 12:34     ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-17 14:18     ` Will Deacon
2013-05-17 14:18       ` Will Deacon
2013-05-20  7:52       ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-20  7:52         ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-20  9:58         ` Will Deacon
2013-05-20  9:58           ` Will Deacon
2013-05-21 12:31           ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-21 12:31             ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-21 12:33   ` [PATCH] dmatest: abort transfers immediately when asked for Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-21 12:33     ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-21 15:11     ` Will Deacon
2013-05-21 15:11       ` Will Deacon
2013-05-21 17:24       ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-21 17:24         ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-22 12:41         ` Will Deacon
2013-05-22 12:41           ` Will Deacon
2013-05-22 13:26           ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-22 13:26             ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-23 10:09         ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-23 10:09           ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-23 10:51           ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2013-05-23 10:51             ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-05-23 10:22             ` Vinod Koul
2013-05-23 10:22               ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAHp75Vf58kq0t7+et9i54fxjEdQfBrTWxji4xk_MS-fZgWGOdQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.jf.intel.com \
    --cc=djbw@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.