* [PATCH 0/1] Fix for YB6073 @ 2014-03-31 9:51 Cristian Iorga 2014-03-31 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature Cristian Iorga 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Cristian Iorga @ 2014-03-31 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core The following changes since commit 8210928e847fda7dbc145a94372b0beaf653a4f9: yocto-bsps: remove linux-yocto 3.8 bbappend (2014-03-30 23:53:00 +0100) are available in the git repository at: git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib ciorga/lsb-pam-enforcing http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=ciorga/lsb-pam-enforcing Cristian Iorga (1): core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 1.8.3.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 9:51 [PATCH 0/1] Fix for YB6073 Cristian Iorga @ 2014-03-31 9:51 ` Cristian Iorga 2014-03-31 9:58 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Cristian Iorga @ 2014-03-31 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core core-image-lsb only gave a warning: "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, PAM won't work correctly" when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", but not necessarily, depending on each custom distro. This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam as a distro feature for core-image-lsb by giving an error instead of just a warning. Fixes [YOCTO #6073] Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> --- meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb index ed316a6..ab61c6e 100644 --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ packagegroup-core-lsb \ " -inherit core-image +inherit core-image distro_features_check + +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" -- 1.8.3.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature Cristian Iorga @ 2014-03-31 9:58 ` Richard Purdie 2014-03-31 10:09 ` Iorga, Cristian 2014-03-31 11:58 ` Stanacar, StefanX 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2014-03-31 9:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Cristian Iorga; +Cc: openembedded-core On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > core-image-lsb only gave a warning: > "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, > PAM won't work correctly" > when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. > default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", > but not necessarily, depending on each custom distro. > > This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam > as a distro feature for core-image-lsb by giving > an error instead of just a warning. > > Fixes [YOCTO #6073] > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> > --- > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > index ed316a6..ab61c6e 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > packagegroup-core-lsb \ > " > > -inherit core-image > +inherit core-image distro_features_check > + > +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked? Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 9:58 ` Richard Purdie @ 2014-03-31 10:09 ` Iorga, Cristian 2014-03-31 10:40 ` Iorga, Cristian 2014-03-31 11:58 ` Stanacar, StefanX 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Iorga, Cristian @ 2014-03-31 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: openembedded-core No, but I will. But is this a negative point of the patch, or the autobuilder should be changed? I acted upon some personal observations, a discussion with Paul (he suggested the change) and also on this guide: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/LSB_Result (in which distro is set to poky-lsb). Regards, Cristian -----Original Message----- From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:58 PM To: Iorga, Cristian Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > core-image-lsb only gave a warning: > "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, PAM > won't work correctly" > when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. > default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", but not necessarily, > depending on each custom distro. > > This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam as a distro feature for > core-image-lsb by giving an error instead of just a warning. > > Fixes [YOCTO #6073] > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> > --- > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > index ed316a6..ab61c6e 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > packagegroup-core-lsb \ > " > > -inherit core-image > +inherit core-image distro_features_check > + > +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked? Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 10:09 ` Iorga, Cristian @ 2014-03-31 10:40 ` Iorga, Cristian 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Iorga, Cristian @ 2014-03-31 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Iorga, Cristian, Richard Purdie; +Cc: openembedded-core Hello, I have checked, on the autobuilder the right association between LSB-enabled images and proper distro (in our case, poky-lsb) is in place. As such, my patch should not cause any trouble. Regards, Cristian -----Original Message----- From: openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-core-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Iorga, Cristian Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 1:10 PM To: Richard Purdie Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature No, but I will. But is this a negative point of the patch, or the autobuilder should be changed? I acted upon some personal observations, a discussion with Paul (he suggested the change) and also on this guide: https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/LSB_Result (in which distro is set to poky-lsb). Regards, Cristian -----Original Message----- From: Richard Purdie [mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 12:58 PM To: Iorga, Cristian Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > core-image-lsb only gave a warning: > "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, PAM > won't work correctly" > when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. > default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", but not necessarily, > depending on each custom distro. > > This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam as a distro feature for > core-image-lsb by giving an error instead of just a warning. > > Fixes [YOCTO #6073] > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> > --- > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > index ed316a6..ab61c6e 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > packagegroup-core-lsb \ > " > > -inherit core-image > +inherit core-image distro_features_check > + > +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked? Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 9:58 ` Richard Purdie 2014-03-31 10:09 ` Iorga, Cristian @ 2014-03-31 11:58 ` Stanacar, StefanX 2014-03-31 12:18 ` Paul Eggleton 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Stanacar, StefanX @ 2014-03-31 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: richard.purdie; +Cc: openembedded-core On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 10:58 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > > core-image-lsb only gave a warning: > > "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, > > PAM won't work correctly" > > when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. > > default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", > > but not necessarily, depending on each custom distro. > > > > This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam > > as a distro feature for core-image-lsb by giving > > an error instead of just a warning. > > > > Fixes [YOCTO #6073] > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> > > --- > > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > index ed316a6..ab61c6e 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > > packagegroup-core-lsb \ > > " > > > > -inherit core-image > > +inherit core-image distro_features_check > > + > > +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" > > > I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations > where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked? > FWIW, all the -lsb buildsets are done with DISTRO=poky-lsb on the AB. Unfortuntely we do have one problematic build. So the answer to your question is: we don't have core-image-lsb builds with DISTRO=poky but we do have a lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk image built with DISTRO=poky and no pam in DISTRO_FEATURES, see the last build on nightly-multilib... :( Cheers, Stefan > Cheers, > > Richard > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 11:58 ` Stanacar, StefanX @ 2014-03-31 12:18 ` Paul Eggleton 2014-03-31 17:03 ` Richard Purdie 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Paul Eggleton @ 2014-03-31 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stanacar, StefanX; +Cc: openembedded-core On Monday 31 March 2014 11:58:49 Stanacar, StefanX wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 10:58 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > > > core-image-lsb only gave a warning: > > > "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, > > > PAM won't work correctly" > > > when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. > > > default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", > > > but not necessarily, depending on each custom distro. > > > > > > This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam > > > as a distro feature for core-image-lsb by giving > > > an error instead of just a warning. > > > > > > Fixes [YOCTO #6073] > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> > > > --- > > > > > > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb index ed316a6..ab61c6e > > > 100644 > > > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > > > > > > packagegroup-core-lsb \ > > > " > > > > > > -inherit core-image > > > +inherit core-image distro_features_check > > > + > > > +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" > > > > I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations > > where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked? > > FWIW, all the -lsb buildsets are done with DISTRO=poky-lsb on the AB. > Unfortuntely we do have one problematic build. > So the answer to your question is: we don't have core-image-lsb builds > with DISTRO=poky but we do have a lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk image built > with DISTRO=poky and no pam in DISTRO_FEATURES, see the last build on > nightly-multilib... :( If we're doing this then we should be changing the autobuilder so it doesn't. LSB images should not be built in non-LSB configuration. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 12:18 ` Paul Eggleton @ 2014-03-31 17:03 ` Richard Purdie 2014-03-31 17:23 ` Paul Eggleton 2014-03-31 17:31 ` Burton, Ross 0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Richard Purdie @ 2014-03-31 17:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Eggleton; +Cc: openembedded-core On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 13:18 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Monday 31 March 2014 11:58:49 Stanacar, StefanX wrote: > > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 10:58 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > > > > core-image-lsb only gave a warning: > > > > "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, > > > > PAM won't work correctly" > > > > when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. > > > > default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", > > > > but not necessarily, depending on each custom distro. > > > > > > > > This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam > > > > as a distro feature for core-image-lsb by giving > > > > an error instead of just a warning. > > > > > > > > Fixes [YOCTO #6073] > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> > > > > --- > > > > > > > > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > > b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb index ed316a6..ab61c6e > > > > 100644 > > > > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > > > > > > > > packagegroup-core-lsb \ > > > > " > > > > > > > > -inherit core-image > > > > +inherit core-image distro_features_check > > > > + > > > > +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" > > > > > > I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations > > > where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked? > > > > FWIW, all the -lsb buildsets are done with DISTRO=poky-lsb on the AB. > > Unfortuntely we do have one problematic build. > > So the answer to your question is: we don't have core-image-lsb builds > > with DISTRO=poky but we do have a lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk image built > > with DISTRO=poky and no pam in DISTRO_FEATURES, see the last build on > > nightly-multilib... :( > > If we're doing this then we should be changing the autobuilder so it doesn't. > LSB images should not be built in non-LSB configuration. I kind of disagree with that, the LSB image can take into account configuration in other parts of the system. If pam isn't configured, I'm not sure that should automatically make it completely unbuildable... Cheers, Richard ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 17:03 ` Richard Purdie @ 2014-03-31 17:23 ` Paul Eggleton 2014-03-31 17:31 ` Burton, Ross 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Paul Eggleton @ 2014-03-31 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: openembedded-core On Monday 31 March 2014 18:03:32 Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 13:18 +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote: > > On Monday 31 March 2014 11:58:49 Stanacar, StefanX wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 10:58 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 12:51 +0300, Cristian Iorga wrote: > > > > > core-image-lsb only gave a warning: > > > > > "WARNING: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, > > > > > PAM won't work correctly" > > > > > when the proper DISTRO was not set for it. > > > > > default choice would be DISTRO = "poky-lsb", > > > > > but not necessarily, depending on each custom distro. > > > > > > > > > > This fix will enforce the proper usage of pam > > > > > as a distro feature for core-image-lsb by giving > > > > > an error instead of just a warning. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes [YOCTO #6073] > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Iorga <cristian.iorga@intel.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb | 4 +++- > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > > > b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb index > > > > > ed316a6..ab61c6e > > > > > 100644 > > > > > --- a/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > > > +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/images/core-image-lsb.bb > > > > > @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ IMAGE_INSTALL = "\ > > > > > > > > > > packagegroup-core-lsb \ > > > > > " > > > > > > > > > > -inherit core-image > > > > > +inherit core-image distro_features_check > > > > > + > > > > > +REQUIRED_DISTRO_FEATURES = "pam" > > > > > > > > I have a feeling the autobuilder builds core-image-lsb in situations > > > > where DISTRO=poky, although I could be wrong. Have you checked? > > > > > > FWIW, all the -lsb buildsets are done with DISTRO=poky-lsb on the AB. > > > Unfortuntely we do have one problematic build. > > > So the answer to your question is: we don't have core-image-lsb builds > > > with DISTRO=poky but we do have a lib64-core-image-lsb-sdk image built > > > with DISTRO=poky and no pam in DISTRO_FEATURES, see the last build on > > > nightly-multilib... :( > > > > If we're doing this then we should be changing the autobuilder so it > > doesn't. LSB images should not be built in non-LSB configuration. > > I kind of disagree with that, the LSB image can take into account > configuration in other parts of the system. If pam isn't configured, I'm > not sure that should automatically make it completely unbuildable... For other situations I would agree, but the fact that the image has "lsb" in its name will naturally lead users to assume that that the output will be something LSB-compliant, but if poky-lsb or some other similar distro configuration is not used to build it then it will not be. Building something that's almost-LSB but not quite but is still labelled LSB just dilutes the meaning of LSB, and therefore doesn't seem to me to be particularly desirable. Since we can't just check if DISTRO is "poky-lsb", an alternative check would be to look for "linuxstdbase" in OVERRIDES since we ought to be able to rely upon that given usage within other recipes. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 17:03 ` Richard Purdie 2014-03-31 17:23 ` Paul Eggleton @ 2014-03-31 17:31 ` Burton, Ross 2014-03-31 17:57 ` Mark Hatle 1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Burton, Ross @ 2014-03-31 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: Paul Eggleton, OE-core On 31 March 2014 18:03, Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I kind of disagree with that, the LSB image can take into account > configuration in other parts of the system. If pam isn't configured, I'm > not sure that should automatically make it completely unbuildable... An image that claims to be LSB compliant but due to not-immediately-obvious DISTRO_FEATURES isn't actually doesn't seem like a good idea to me, fwiw. If the LSB image requires PAM, X11 and so on then it should require the features. Ross ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature 2014-03-31 17:31 ` Burton, Ross @ 2014-03-31 17:57 ` Mark Hatle 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Mark Hatle @ 2014-03-31 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: openembedded-core On 3/31/14, 12:31 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > On 31 March 2014 18:03, Richard Purdie > <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> I kind of disagree with that, the LSB image can take into account >> configuration in other parts of the system. If pam isn't configured, I'm >> not sure that should automatically make it completely unbuildable... > > An image that claims to be LSB compliant but due to > not-immediately-obvious DISTRO_FEATURES isn't actually doesn't seem > like a good idea to me, fwiw. If the LSB image requires PAM, X11 and > so on then it should require the features. I agree the image with the name LSB should enforce the items it knows the LSB depends on. If the user patches that away then it becomes their issue. --Mark > Ross > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-31 17:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-03-31 9:51 [PATCH 0/1] Fix for YB6073 Cristian Iorga 2014-03-31 9:51 ` [PATCH 1/1] core-image-lsb: enforce pam as a needed distro feature Cristian Iorga 2014-03-31 9:58 ` Richard Purdie 2014-03-31 10:09 ` Iorga, Cristian 2014-03-31 10:40 ` Iorga, Cristian 2014-03-31 11:58 ` Stanacar, StefanX 2014-03-31 12:18 ` Paul Eggleton 2014-03-31 17:03 ` Richard Purdie 2014-03-31 17:23 ` Paul Eggleton 2014-03-31 17:31 ` Burton, Ross 2014-03-31 17:57 ` Mark Hatle
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.