Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts

[Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>]

On 31 March 2012 03:36, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 15:19:49 +0530, Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts. The reverse mapping method
>> used is linear mapping since the sub-drivers of max8997 such as regulator
>> and charger drivers can use the max8997 irq_domain to get the linux irq
>> number for max8997 interrupts. All uses of irq_base in platform data and
>> max8997 driver private data are removed.
>>
>> Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c    |    4 --
>>  arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c  |    1 -
>>  drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c           |   61 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>  drivers/mfd/max8997.c               |    1 -
>>  include/linux/mfd/max8997-private.h |    4 ++-
>>  include/linux/mfd/max8997.h         |    1 -
>>  6 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
>> index 7ac81ce..b21d85d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-nuri.c
>> @@ -1077,12 +1077,8 @@ static struct platform_device nuri_max8903_device = {
>>  static void __init nuri_power_init(void)
>>  {
>>       int gpio;
>> -     int irq_base = IRQ_GPIO_END + 1;
>>       int ta_en = 0;
>>
>> -     nuri_max8997_pdata.irq_base = irq_base;
>> -     irq_base += MAX8997_IRQ_NR;
>> -
>>       gpio = EXYNOS4_GPX0(7);
>>       gpio_request(gpio, "AP_PMIC_IRQ");
>>       s3c_gpio_cfgpin(gpio, S3C_GPIO_SFN(0xf));
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c
>> index 827cb99..d3b2e9d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-origen.c
>> @@ -424,7 +424,6 @@ static struct max8997_platform_data __initdata origen_max8997_pdata = {
>>       .buck1_gpiodvs  = false,
>>       .buck2_gpiodvs  = false,
>>       .buck5_gpiodvs  = false,
>> -     .irq_base       = IRQ_GPIO_END + 1,
>>
>>       .ignore_gpiodvs_side_effect = true,
>>       .buck125_default_idx = 0x0,
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c b/drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c
>> index 09274cf..00390a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/max8997-irq.c
>> @@ -142,7 +142,8 @@ static void max8997_irq_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *data)
>>  static const inline struct max8997_irq_data *
>>  irq_to_max8997_irq(struct max8997_dev *max8997, int irq)
>>  {
>> -     return &max8997_irqs[irq - max8997->irq_base];
>> +     struct irq_data *data = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
>> +     return &max8997_irqs[data->hwirq];
>>  }
>
> Haha, this is kind of bogus now.  There are only two users of this
> function, and *both* of them already have the irq_data pointer.
> Instead of this, delete this function entirely and make each caller
> derefernce max8997_irqs directly:
>
>        const struct max8997_irq_data *irq_data = &max8997_irqs[data->hwirq];
>
> Otherwise, looks good.  After fixing you can add my:
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>

Hi Grant,

Thanks for the suggestion. I have modified the code accordingly and
included your ack.

Regards,
Thomas.