From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Przemyslaw Sroka <psroka@cadence.com>, Arkadiusz Golec <agolec@cadence.com>, Alan Douglas <adouglas@cadence.com>, Bartosz Folta <bfolta@cadence.com>, Damian Kos <dkos@cadence.com>, Alicja Jurasik-Urbaniak <alicja@cadence.com>, Jan Kotas <jank@cadence.com>, Cyprian Wronka <cwronka@cadence.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:16:42 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAK8P3a06GoMdKdn=3Cq0FUwYnjGX0oG+FQLjxfiasVDpbonWRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1501518290-5723-3-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Add core infrastructure to support I3C in Linux and document it. > - I2C backward compatibility has been designed to be transparent to I2C > drivers and the I2C subsystem. The I3C master just registers an I2C > adapter which creates a new I2C bus. I'd say that, from a > representation PoV it's not ideal because what should appear as a > single I3C bus exposing I3C and I2C devices here appears as 2 > different busses connected to each other through the parenting (the > I3C master is the parent of the I2C and I3C busses). > On the other hand, I don't see a better solution if we want something > that is not invasive. Can you describe the reasons for making i3c a separate subsystem then, rather than extending the i2c subsystem to handle both i2c devices as before and also i3c devices and hosts? Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Przemyslaw Sroka <psroka@cadence.com>, Arkadiusz Golec <agolec@cadence.com>, Alan Douglas <adouglas@cadence.com>, Bartosz Folta <bfolta@cadence.com>, Damian Kos <dkos@cadence.com>, Alicja Jurasik-Urbaniak <alicja@cadence.com>, Jan Kotas <jank@cadence.com>, Cyprian Wronka <cwronka@cadence.com>, Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, Ku Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:16:42 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAK8P3a06GoMdKdn=3Cq0FUwYnjGX0oG+FQLjxfiasVDpbonWRw@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1501518290-5723-3-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote: > Add core infrastructure to support I3C in Linux and document it. > - I2C backward compatibility has been designed to be transparent to I2C > drivers and the I2C subsystem. The I3C master just registers an I2C > adapter which creates a new I2C bus. I'd say that, from a > representation PoV it's not ideal because what should appear as a > single I3C bus exposing I3C and I2C devices here appears as 2 > different busses connected to each other through the parenting (the > I3C master is the parent of the I2C and I3C busses). > On the other hand, I don't see a better solution if we want something > that is not invasive. Can you describe the reasons for making i3c a separate subsystem then, rather than extending the i2c subsystem to handle both i2c devices as before and also i3c devices and hosts? Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-31 20:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-07-31 16:24 [RFC 0/5] Add I3C subsystem Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 16:24 ` [RFC 1/5] i2c: Export of_i2c_get_board_info() Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 16:24 ` [RFC 2/5] i3c: Add core I3C infrastructure Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 19:17 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-07-31 19:17 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-07-31 20:46 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 20:46 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 20:16 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message] 2017-07-31 20:16 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-07-31 21:15 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 21:15 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 21:32 ` Peter Rosin 2017-07-31 21:32 ` Peter Rosin 2017-07-31 21:42 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-07-31 21:42 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 16:47 ` Andrew F. Davis 2017-08-01 16:47 ` Andrew F. Davis 2017-08-01 17:27 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 17:27 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 21:47 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 21:47 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-02 10:21 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-02 10:21 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 12:00 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 12:00 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 12:29 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 12:29 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 13:11 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 13:11 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 13:34 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 13:34 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 13:58 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 13:58 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 14:22 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 14:22 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 15:14 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 15:14 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 20:16 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 20:16 ` Arnd Bergmann 2017-08-01 14:12 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 14:12 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 14:48 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 14:48 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 15:01 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 15:01 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-08-01 15:20 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 15:20 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-03 8:03 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-03 8:03 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-16 21:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2017-08-16 21:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2017-08-17 7:48 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-17 7:48 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 1:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-01 1:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-01 10:48 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 10:48 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 17:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-01 17:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-01 21:30 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-01 21:30 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-02 0:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-02 0:54 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-02 2:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-02 2:13 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-12-13 16:20 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-12-13 16:20 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-12-13 16:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-12-13 16:51 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2017-08-17 9:03 ` Linus Walleij 2017-08-17 9:03 ` Linus Walleij 2017-08-17 9:28 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-17 9:28 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 16:24 ` [RFC 3/5] dt-bindings: i3c: Document core bindings Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 16:24 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-09 23:43 ` Rob Herring 2017-08-09 23:43 ` Rob Herring 2017-08-10 8:49 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-08-10 8:49 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 16:24 ` [RFC 4/5] i3c: master: Add driver for Cadence IP Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 16:24 ` [RFC 5/5] dt-bindings: i3c: Document Cadence I3C master bindings Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 19:17 ` [RFC 0/5] Add I3C subsystem Wolfram Sang 2017-07-31 19:17 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-07-31 20:40 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 20:40 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-07-31 20:47 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-07-31 20:47 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-12-12 19:58 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-12-12 19:58 ` Boris Brezillon 2017-12-12 22:01 ` Wolfram Sang 2017-12-12 22:01 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAK8P3a06GoMdKdn=3Cq0FUwYnjGX0oG+FQLjxfiasVDpbonWRw@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=adouglas@cadence.com \ --cc=agolec@cadence.com \ --cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \ --cc=alicja@cadence.com \ --cc=bfolta@cadence.com \ --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \ --cc=corbet@lwn.net \ --cc=cwronka@cadence.com \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=dkos@cadence.com \ --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \ --cc=jank@cadence.com \ --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \ --cc=nm@ti.com \ --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \ --cc=psroka@cadence.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \ --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.