All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: syscon regmap for disabled node?
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:51:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a25wQiCreFB3qBuyE86GvwmjpZmqyTszF-ZBJRDPwHotQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9863f03-f1b5-9158-76f3-37158a0b4cd4@ti.com>

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 2:40 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Pankaj, Arnd, Lee,
>
> I am testing some code to use a syscon/regmap interface and I find that
> the syscon/regmap is initialized even on a disabled device node using a
> "syscon" compatible property when I have expected it to fail. Prior to
> commit bdb0066df96e ("mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from
> platform devices"), the driver would have never probed, and the
> of_syscon_register() only checks for the compatible, but not if the
> device node is available. Is this intentional or a bug?

My guess would be that nothing relies on the current behavior and that
it could be changed if it causes problems, but it's hard to tell for the general
case.

Can you describe why you have a disabled syscon node? Most uses of the
status property are for on-chip devices that we disable because nothing is
connected to them, but that seems unlikely for a syscon.

        Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: syscon regmap for disabled node?
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 20:51:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a25wQiCreFB3qBuyE86GvwmjpZmqyTszF-ZBJRDPwHotQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9863f03-f1b5-9158-76f3-37158a0b4cd4@ti.com>

On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 2:40 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Pankaj, Arnd, Lee,
>
> I am testing some code to use a syscon/regmap interface and I find that
> the syscon/regmap is initialized even on a disabled device node using a
> "syscon" compatible property when I have expected it to fail. Prior to
> commit bdb0066df96e ("mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from
> platform devices"), the driver would have never probed, and the
> of_syscon_register() only checks for the compatible, but not if the
> device node is available. Is this intentional or a bug?

My guess would be that nothing relies on the current behavior and that
it could be changed if it causes problems, but it's hard to tell for the general
case.

Can you describe why you have a disabled syscon node? Most uses of the
status property are for on-chip devices that we disable because nothing is
connected to them, but that seems unlikely for a syscon.

        Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-17 19:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-17  1:40 syscon regmap for disabled node? Suman Anna
2018-02-17  1:40 ` Suman Anna
2018-02-17 19:51 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2018-02-17 19:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-02-20  0:06   ` Suman Anna
2018-02-20  0:06     ` Suman Anna

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a25wQiCreFB3qBuyE86GvwmjpZmqyTszF-ZBJRDPwHotQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
    --cc=s-anna@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.