[PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: use proper target btf when exporting attach_btf_obj_id

[PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: use proper target btf when exporting attach_btf_obj_id

[Stanislav Fomichev]

When attaching to program, the program itself might not be attached
to anything (and, hence, might not have attach_btf), so we can't
unconditionally use 'prog->aux->dst_prog->aux->attach_btf'.
Instead, use bpf_prog_get_target_btf to pick proper target btf:

* when attached to dst_prog, use dst_prog->aux->btf
* when attached to kernel btf, use prog->aux->attach_btf

Fixes: b79c9fc9551b ("bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP")
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 83c7136c5788..7dc3f8003631 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3886,6 +3886,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
 				   union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog_info __user *uinfo = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->info.info);
+	struct btf *attach_btf = bpf_prog_get_target_btf(prog);
 	struct bpf_prog_info info;
 	u32 info_len = attr->info.info_len;
 	struct bpf_prog_kstats stats;
@@ -4088,10 +4089,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
 	if (prog->aux->btf)
 		info.btf_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->btf);
 	info.attach_btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
-	if (prog->aux->attach_btf)
-		info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->attach_btf);
-	else if (prog->aux->dst_prog)
-		info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->dst_prog->aux->attach_btf);
+	if (attach_btf)
+		info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(attach_btf);
 
 	ulen = info.nr_func_info;
 	info.nr_func_info = prog->aux->func_info_cnt;
-- 
2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog

[PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Stanislav Fomichev]

Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.

v2:
- use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
- remove verifier log (Hao)
- drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..eb06f522c0b3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <network_helpers.h>
+#include "attach_to_bpf.skel.h"
+
+static int find_prog_btf_id(const char *name, __u32 attach_prog_fd)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	struct btf *btf;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(attach_prog_fd, &info, &info_len);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!info.btf_id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	btf = btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(info.btf_id);
+	ret = libbpf_get_error(btf);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
+	btf__free(btf);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
+		    .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
+		    .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
+		    .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
+	);
+	struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	};
+
+	return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
+			     "bind4_fentry",
+			     "GPL",
+			     insns,
+			     ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
+			     &opts);
+}
+
+void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
+{
+	struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	int cgroup_fd = -1;
+	int fentry_fd = -1;
+	int btf_id;
+
+	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
+	 * to another BPF program.
+	 */
+
+	ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
+		  "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
+
+cleanup:
+	close(cgroup_fd);
+	close(fentry_fd);
+	attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+
+SEC("cgroup/bind4")
+int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Hao Luo]

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:39 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>
> Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
> we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
> Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
> should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.
>
> v2:
> - use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
> - remove verifier log (Hao)
> - drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

I see Martin has comments based on v1, but v2 looks good to me.

Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>

> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
>  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..eb06f522c0b3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#define _GNU_SOURCE
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <bpf/btf.h>
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <network_helpers.h>
> +#include "attach_to_bpf.skel.h"
> +
> +static int find_prog_btf_id(const char *name, __u32 attach_prog_fd)
> +{
> +       struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> +       __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> +       struct btf *btf;
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(attach_prog_fd, &info, &info_len);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       if (!info.btf_id)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       btf = btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(info.btf_id);
> +       ret = libbpf_get_error(btf);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
> +       btf__free(btf);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
> +{
> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
> +                   .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
> +                   .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
> +                   .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
> +       );
> +       struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
> +               BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> +               BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> +       };
> +
> +       return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> +                            "bind4_fentry",
> +                            "GPL",
> +                            insns,
> +                            ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> +                            &opts);
> +}
> +
> +void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
> +{
> +       struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
> +       struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> +       __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> +       int cgroup_fd = -1;
> +       int fentry_fd = -1;
> +       int btf_id;
> +
> +       cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> +               return;
> +
> +       skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> +        * to another BPF program.
> +        */
> +
> +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> +                 "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> +
> +       ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> +
> +cleanup:
> +       close(cgroup_fd);
> +       close(fentry_fd);
> +       attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +SEC("cgroup/bind4")
> +int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> +{
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 12:34 PM Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:39 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
> > we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
> > Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
> > should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.
> >
> > v2:
> > - use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
> > - remove verifier log (Hao)
> > - drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
>
> I see Martin has comments based on v1, but v2 looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>

Thank you for the review! I'll move some stuff around for v3, so I'll
have to ask you to have one more :-(

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:39 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>
> Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
> we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
> Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
> should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.
>
> v2:
> - use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
> - remove verifier log (Hao)
> - drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
>  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
>

[...]

> +
> +       ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
> +       btf__free(btf);
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)

static?

> +{
> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
> +                   .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
> +                   .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
> +                   .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
> +       );
> +       struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
> +               BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> +               BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> +       };
> +
> +       return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> +                            "bind4_fentry",
> +                            "GPL",
> +                            insns,
> +                            ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> +                            &opts);
> +}
> +
> +void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
> +{
> +       struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
> +       struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> +       __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> +       int cgroup_fd = -1;
> +       int fentry_fd = -1;
> +       int btf_id;
> +
> +       cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> +               return;
> +
> +       skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))

you probably meant to check skel->links.bind4 instead of just skel
(which you already checked)

> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
> +       if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> +        * to another BPF program.
> +        */
> +
> +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> +                 "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> +
> +       ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> +
> +cleanup:

if (cgroup_fd >= 0)

> +       close(cgroup_fd);

if (fentry_fd >= 0)

> +       close(fentry_fd);
> +       attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +
> +SEC("cgroup/bind4")
> +int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> +{
> +       return 1;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 2:44 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:39 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
> > we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
> > Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
> > should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.
> >
> > v2:
> > - use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
> > - remove verifier log (Hao)
> > - drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
> >  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > +
> > +       ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
> > +       btf__free(btf);
> > +       return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
>
> static?
>
> > +{
> > +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
> > +                   .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
> > +                   .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
> > +                   .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
> > +       );
> > +       struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
> > +               BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> > +               BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> > +       };
> > +
> > +       return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> > +                            "bind4_fentry",
> > +                            "GPL",
> > +                            insns,
> > +                            ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> > +                            &opts);
> > +}
> > +
> > +void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
> > +{
> > +       struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
> > +       struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> > +       __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > +       int cgroup_fd = -1;
> > +       int fentry_fd = -1;
> > +       int btf_id;
> > +
> > +       cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
> > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
> > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +       skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
> > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
>
> you probably meant to check skel->links.bind4 instead of just skel
> (which you already checked)

Oh, good catch, thanks!

> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +       btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
> > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +       fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
> > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> > +               goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +       /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> > +        * to another BPF program.
> > +        */
> > +
> > +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> > +                 "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> > +
> > +       ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> > +
> > +cleanup:
>
> if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
>
> > +       close(cgroup_fd);
>
> if (fentry_fd >= 0)

Should be safe to do unconditional close(-1), right? Why bother with
the checks here? Seems like a common pattern we do elsewhere?

> > +       close(fentry_fd);
> > +       attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +
> > +SEC("cgroup/bind4")
> > +int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> > +{
> > +       return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > --
> > 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
> >

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 9:21 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 2:44 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:39 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
> > > we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
> > > Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
> > > should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
> > > - remove verifier log (Hao)
> > > - drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
> > >  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > >
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > +
> > > +       ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
> > > +       btf__free(btf);
> > > +       return ret;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
> >
> > static?
> >
> > > +{
> > > +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
> > > +                   .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
> > > +                   .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
> > > +                   .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
> > > +       );
> > > +       struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
> > > +               BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> > > +               BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> > > +       };
> > > +
> > > +       return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> > > +                            "bind4_fentry",
> > > +                            "GPL",
> > > +                            insns,
> > > +                            ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> > > +                            &opts);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
> > > +       struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> > > +       __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > > +       int cgroup_fd = -1;
> > > +       int fentry_fd = -1;
> > > +       int btf_id;
> > > +
> > > +       cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
> > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> > > +               return;
> > > +
> > > +       skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
> > > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +       skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
> > > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> >
> > you probably meant to check skel->links.bind4 instead of just skel
> > (which you already checked)
>
> Oh, good catch, thanks!
>
> > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +       btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
> > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +       fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
> > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +       /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> > > +        * to another BPF program.
> > > +        */
> > > +
> > > +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> > > +                 "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> > > +
> > > +       ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> > > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> > > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> > > +
> > > +cleanup:
> >
> > if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
> >
> > > +       close(cgroup_fd);
> >
> > if (fentry_fd >= 0)
>
> Should be safe to do unconditional close(-1), right? Why bother with
> the checks here? Seems like a common pattern we do elsewhere?
>

I don't think we consciously do close(-1), libbpf definitely tries
hard to not attempt to close invalid fd, and so do (most?) of
selftests. Where do you see use doing close(-1)?

> > > +       close(fentry_fd);
> > > +       attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > > +
> > > +SEC("cgroup/bind4")
> > > +int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> > > +{
> > > +       return 1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > > --
> > > 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
> > >

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 11:42 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 9:21 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 2:44 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:39 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
> > > > we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
> > > > Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
> > > > should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.
> > > >
> > > > v2:
> > > > - use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
> > > > - remove verifier log (Hao)
> > > > - drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
> > > >  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> > > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > >
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +       ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
> > > > +       btf__free(btf);
> > > > +       return ret;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
> > >
> > > static?
> > >
> > > > +{
> > > > +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
> > > > +                   .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
> > > > +                   .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
> > > > +                   .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
> > > > +       );
> > > > +       struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
> > > > +               BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> > > > +               BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> > > > +       };
> > > > +
> > > > +       return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> > > > +                            "bind4_fentry",
> > > > +                            "GPL",
> > > > +                            insns,
> > > > +                            ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> > > > +                            &opts);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
> > > > +       struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> > > > +       __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > > > +       int cgroup_fd = -1;
> > > > +       int fentry_fd = -1;
> > > > +       int btf_id;
> > > > +
> > > > +       cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
> > > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> > > > +               return;
> > > > +
> > > > +       skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
> > > > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +       skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
> > > > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> > >
> > > you probably meant to check skel->links.bind4 instead of just skel
> > > (which you already checked)
> >
> > Oh, good catch, thanks!
> >
> > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +       btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
> > > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +       fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
> > > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +       /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> > > > +        * to another BPF program.
> > > > +        */
> > > > +
> > > > +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> > > > +                 "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> > > > +
> > > > +       ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> > > > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> > > > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> > > > +
> > > > +cleanup:
> > >
> > > if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
> > >
> > > > +       close(cgroup_fd);
> > >
> > > if (fentry_fd >= 0)
> >
> > Should be safe to do unconditional close(-1), right? Why bother with
> > the checks here? Seems like a common pattern we do elsewhere?
> >
>
> I don't think we consciously do close(-1), libbpf definitely tries
> hard to not attempt to close invalid fd, and so do (most?) of
> selftests. Where do you see use doing close(-1)?

I might have contributed to this :-/ Everything is from prog_tests:
sockopt_multi.c (test_sockopt_multi)
lsm_cgroup.c (test_lsm_cgroup_functional)

But there is more that haven't been added by me:
d_path.c (trigger_fstat_events)
cgroup_attach_override.c (serial_test_cgroup_attach_override)
cg_storage_multi.c (connect_send)
test_local_storage.c (test_test_local_storage)
bpf_cookie.c (kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest)
fexit_bpf2bpf.c (test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf)
(I stopped here, maybe there is more?)

I'm not sure how much we should care about these 'if (fd >= 0)' checks.
It might be it's easier to always do close(-1), otherwise we get bugs
like the one in test_unpriv_bpf_disabled_positive from
unpriv_bpf_disabled.c:
if (link_fd)
  close(link_fd);

(but I'm also happy to add those 'ifs' if you prefer, lmk)


?



> > > > +       close(fentry_fd);
> > > > +       attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
> > > > +}
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +
> > > > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > > > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > > > +
> > > > +SEC("cgroup/bind4")
> > > > +int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> > > > +{
> > > > +       return 1;
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > > > --
> > > > 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
> > > >

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 1:53 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 11:42 AM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 9:21 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 2:44 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > > <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:39 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
> > > > > we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
> > > > > Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
> > > > > should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.
> > > > >
> > > > > v2:
> > > > > - use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
> > > > > - remove verifier log (Hao)
> > > > > - drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c  | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c       | 12 +++
> > > > >  2 files changed, 109 insertions(+)
> > > > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
> > > > > +       btf__free(btf);
> > > > > +       return ret;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
> > > >
> > > > static?
> > > >
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
> > > > > +                   .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
> > > > > +                   .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
> > > > > +                   .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
> > > > > +       );
> > > > > +       struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
> > > > > +               BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
> > > > > +               BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
> > > > > +       };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
> > > > > +                            "bind4_fentry",
> > > > > +                            "GPL",
> > > > > +                            insns,
> > > > > +                            ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
> > > > > +                            &opts);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +void test_attach_to_bpf(void)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       struct attach_to_bpf *skel = NULL;
> > > > > +       struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> > > > > +       __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > > > > +       int cgroup_fd = -1;
> > > > > +       int fentry_fd = -1;
> > > > > +       int btf_id;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/attach_to_bpf");
> > > > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> > > > > +               return;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       skel = attach_to_bpf__open_and_load();
> > > > > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> > > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       skel->links.bind4 = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind4, cgroup_fd);
> > > > > +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> > > >
> > > > you probably meant to check skel->links.bind4 instead of just skel
> > > > (which you already checked)
> > >
> > > Oh, good catch, thanks!
> > >
> > > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind4", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4));
> > > > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> > > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind4), btf_id);
> > > > > +       if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> > > > > +               goto cleanup;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> > > > > +        * to another BPF program.
> > > > > +        */
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> > > > > +                 "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> > > > > +
> > > > > +       ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> > > > > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> > > > > +       ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> > > > > +
> > > > > +cleanup:
> > > >
> > > > if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
> > > >
> > > > > +       close(cgroup_fd);
> > > >
> > > > if (fentry_fd >= 0)
> > >
> > > Should be safe to do unconditional close(-1), right? Why bother with
> > > the checks here? Seems like a common pattern we do elsewhere?
> > >
> >
> > I don't think we consciously do close(-1), libbpf definitely tries
> > hard to not attempt to close invalid fd, and so do (most?) of
> > selftests. Where do you see use doing close(-1)?
>
> I might have contributed to this :-/ Everything is from prog_tests:
> sockopt_multi.c (test_sockopt_multi)
> lsm_cgroup.c (test_lsm_cgroup_functional)
>
> But there is more that haven't been added by me:
> d_path.c (trigger_fstat_events)
> cgroup_attach_override.c (serial_test_cgroup_attach_override)
> cg_storage_multi.c (connect_send)
> test_local_storage.c (test_test_local_storage)
> bpf_cookie.c (kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest)
> fexit_bpf2bpf.c (test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf)
> (I stopped here, maybe there is more?)
>
> I'm not sure how much we should care about these 'if (fd >= 0)' checks.
> It might be it's easier to always do close(-1), otherwise we get bugs
> like the one in test_unpriv_bpf_disabled_positive from
> unpriv_bpf_disabled.c:
> if (link_fd)
>   close(link_fd);
>
> (but I'm also happy to add those 'ifs' if you prefer, lmk)
>
>
> ?

I'd rather have non-sloppy clean up sections.

>
>
>
> > > > > +       close(fentry_fd);
> > > > > +       attach_to_bpf__destroy(skel);
> > > > > +}
> > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > index 000000000000..3f111fe96f8f
> > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/attach_to_bpf.c
> > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> > > > > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > > > > +
> > > > > +SEC("cgroup/bind4")
> > > > > +int bind4(struct bpf_sock_addr *ctx)
> > > > > +{
> > > > > +       return 1;
> > > > > +}
> > > > > +
> > > > > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog
> > > > >

[PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: use proper target btf when exporting attach_btf_obj_id

[Stanislav Fomichev]

When attaching to program, the program itself might not be attached
to anything (and, hence, might not have attach_btf), so we can't
unconditionally use 'prog->aux->dst_prog->aux->attach_btf'.
Instead, use bpf_prog_get_target_btf to pick proper target btf:

* when attached to dst_prog, use dst_prog->aux->btf
* when attached to kernel btf, use prog->aux->attach_btf

Fixes: b79c9fc9551b ("bpf: implement BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF_LSM_CGROUP")
Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 83c7136c5788..7dc3f8003631 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3886,6 +3886,7 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
 				   union bpf_attr __user *uattr)
 {
 	struct bpf_prog_info __user *uinfo = u64_to_user_ptr(attr->info.info);
+	struct btf *attach_btf = bpf_prog_get_target_btf(prog);
 	struct bpf_prog_info info;
 	u32 info_len = attr->info.info_len;
 	struct bpf_prog_kstats stats;
@@ -4088,10 +4089,8 @@ static int bpf_prog_get_info_by_fd(struct file *file,
 	if (prog->aux->btf)
 		info.btf_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->btf);
 	info.attach_btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
-	if (prog->aux->attach_btf)
-		info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->attach_btf);
-	else if (prog->aux->dst_prog)
-		info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(prog->aux->dst_prog->aux->attach_btf);
+	if (attach_btf)
+		info.attach_btf_obj_id = btf_obj_id(attach_btf);
 
 	ulen = info.nr_func_info;
 	info.nr_func_info = prog->aux->func_info_cnt;
-- 
2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog

[PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Stanislav Fomichev]

Apparently, no existing selftest covers it. Add a new one where
we load cgroup/bind4 program and attach fentry to it.
Calling bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd on the fentry program
should return non-zero btf_id/btf_obj_id instead of crashing the kernel.

v3:
- move into fexit_bpf2bpf.c (Martin)
- assert on skel->links.bind_v4_prog (Andrii)
- do no close(-1) unconditionally (Andrii)

v2:
- use ret instead of err in find_prog_btf_id (Hao)
- remove verifier log (Hao)
- drop if conditional from ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(...)) (Hao)

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c  | 95 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
index 02bb8cbf9194..fb62cef35e42 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fexit_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 #include <test_progs.h>
 #include <network_helpers.h>
 #include <bpf/btf.h>
+#include "bind4_prog.skel.h"
 
 typedef int (*test_cb)(struct bpf_object *obj);
 
@@ -407,6 +408,98 @@ static void test_func_replace_global_func(void)
 				  prog_name, false, NULL);
 }
 
+static int find_prog_btf_id(const char *name, __u32 attach_prog_fd)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	struct btf *btf;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(attach_prog_fd, &info, &info_len);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!info.btf_id)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	btf = btf__load_from_kernel_by_id(info.btf_id);
+	ret = libbpf_get_error(btf);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
+	btf__free(btf);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int load_fentry(int attach_prog_fd, int attach_btf_id)
+{
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_prog_load_opts, opts,
+		    .expected_attach_type = BPF_TRACE_FENTRY,
+		    .attach_prog_fd = attach_prog_fd,
+		    .attach_btf_id = attach_btf_id,
+	);
+	struct bpf_insn insns[] = {
+		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+	};
+
+	return bpf_prog_load(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,
+			     "bind4_fentry",
+			     "GPL",
+			     insns,
+			     ARRAY_SIZE(insns),
+			     &opts);
+}
+
+static void test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf(void)
+{
+	struct bind4_prog *skel = NULL;
+	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
+	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
+	int cgroup_fd = -1;
+	int fentry_fd = -1;
+	int btf_id;
+
+	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/fentry_to_cgroup_bpf");
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
+		return;
+
+	skel = bind4_prog__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	skel->links.bind_v4_prog = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog, cgroup_fd);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.bind_v4_prog, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind_v4_prog", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog));
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog), btf_id);
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
+	 * to another BPF program.
+	 */
+
+	ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
+		  "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
+	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
+
+cleanup:
+	if (cgroup_fd >= 0)
+		close(cgroup_fd);
+	if (fentry_fd >= 0)
+		close(fentry_fd);
+	bind4_prog__destroy(skel);
+}
+
 /* NOTE: affect other tests, must run in serial mode */
 void serial_test_fexit_bpf2bpf(void)
 {
@@ -430,4 +523,6 @@ void serial_test_fexit_bpf2bpf(void)
 		test_fmod_ret_freplace();
 	if (test__start_subtest("func_replace_global_func"))
 		test_func_replace_global_func();
+	if (test__start_subtest("fentry_to_cgroup_bpf"))
+		test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf();
 }
-- 
2.37.1.455.g008518b4e5-goog

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Martin KaFai Lau]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:32:23AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> +static void test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf(void)
> +{
> +	struct bind4_prog *skel = NULL;
> +	struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> +	__u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> +	int cgroup_fd = -1;
> +	int fentry_fd = -1;
> +	int btf_id;
> +
> +	cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/fentry_to_cgroup_bpf");
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	skel = bind4_prog__open_and_load();
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	skel->links.bind_v4_prog = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog, cgroup_fd);
> +	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.bind_v4_prog, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind_v4_prog", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog));
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog), btf_id);
> +	if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> +		goto cleanup;
> +
> +	/* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> +	 * to another BPF program.
> +	 */
> +
> +	ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> +		  "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> +
> +	ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> +	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> +	ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
nit. This can check against btf_id.

Overall lgtm. Thanks.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:51 AM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:32:23AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > +static void test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf(void)
> > +{
> > +     struct bind4_prog *skel = NULL;
> > +     struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> > +     __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > +     int cgroup_fd = -1;
> > +     int fentry_fd = -1;
> > +     int btf_id;
> > +
> > +     cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/fentry_to_cgroup_bpf");
> > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> > +             return;
> > +
> > +     skel = bind4_prog__open_and_load();
> > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> > +             goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +     skel->links.bind_v4_prog = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog, cgroup_fd);
> > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.bind_v4_prog, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> > +             goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +     btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind_v4_prog", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog));
> > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> > +             goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +     fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog), btf_id);
> > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> > +             goto cleanup;
> > +
> > +     /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> > +      * to another BPF program.
> > +      */
> > +
> > +     ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> > +               "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> > +
> > +     ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> > +     ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> > +     ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> nit. This can check against btf_id.

As in ASSERT_NEQ(info.attach_btf_obj_id, info.btf_id,
"info.attach_btf_obj_id") ?

> Overall lgtm. Thanks.
>
> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>

Thank you for the review!

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Martin KaFai Lau]

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:10:33AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:51 AM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:32:23AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > +static void test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf(void)
> > > +{
> > > +     struct bind4_prog *skel = NULL;
> > > +     struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> > > +     __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > > +     int cgroup_fd = -1;
> > > +     int fentry_fd = -1;
> > > +     int btf_id;
> > > +
> > > +     cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/fentry_to_cgroup_bpf");
> > > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> > > +             return;
> > > +
> > > +     skel = bind4_prog__open_and_load();
> > > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +     skel->links.bind_v4_prog = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog, cgroup_fd);
> > > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.bind_v4_prog, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +     btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind_v4_prog", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog));
> > > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +     fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog), btf_id);
> > > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > +
> > > +     /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> > > +      * to another BPF program.
> > > +      */
> > > +
> > > +     ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> > > +               "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> > > +
> > > +     ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> > > +     ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> > > +     ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> > nit. This can check against btf_id.
> 
> As in ASSERT_NEQ(info.attach_btf_obj_id, info.btf_id,
> "info.attach_btf_obj_id") ?
Ah, my bad on one line off.  I meant the previous line.

ASSERT_NEQ(info.attach_btf_id, btf_id, "info.attach_btf_id");

The bind_v4_prog's btf_obj_id is lost.  Otherwise, it could also do
ASSERT_NEQ(info.attach_btf_obj_id, bind_v4_prog_btf_id, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/bpf: Excercise bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd for bpf2bpf

[Stanislav Fomichev]

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 10:19 AM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:10:33AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:51 AM Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 09:32:23AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > > +static void test_fentry_to_cgroup_bpf(void)
> > > > +{
> > > > +     struct bind4_prog *skel = NULL;
> > > > +     struct bpf_prog_info info = {};
> > > > +     __u32 info_len = sizeof(info);
> > > > +     int cgroup_fd = -1;
> > > > +     int fentry_fd = -1;
> > > > +     int btf_id;
> > > > +
> > > > +     cgroup_fd = test__join_cgroup("/fentry_to_cgroup_bpf");
> > > > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(cgroup_fd, 0, "cgroup_fd"))
> > > > +             return;
> > > > +
> > > > +     skel = bind4_prog__open_and_load();
> > > > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel"))
> > > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +     skel->links.bind_v4_prog = bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog, cgroup_fd);
> > > > +     if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.bind_v4_prog, "bpf_program__attach_cgroup"))
> > > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +     btf_id = find_prog_btf_id("bind_v4_prog", bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog));
> > > > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(btf_id, 0, "find_prog_btf_id"))
> > > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +     fentry_fd = load_fentry(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.bind_v4_prog), btf_id);
> > > > +     if (!ASSERT_GE(fentry_fd, 0, "load_fentry"))
> > > > +             goto cleanup;
> > > > +
> > > > +     /* Make sure bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd works correctly when attaching
> > > > +      * to another BPF program.
> > > > +      */
> > > > +
> > > > +     ASSERT_OK(bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(fentry_fd, &info, &info_len),
> > > > +               "bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd");
> > > > +
> > > > +     ASSERT_EQ(info.btf_id, 0, "info.btf_id");
> > > > +     ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_id");
> > > > +     ASSERT_GT(info.attach_btf_obj_id, 0, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");
> > > nit. This can check against btf_id.
> >
> > As in ASSERT_NEQ(info.attach_btf_obj_id, info.btf_id,
> > "info.attach_btf_obj_id") ?
> Ah, my bad on one line off.  I meant the previous line.
>
> ASSERT_NEQ(info.attach_btf_id, btf_id, "info.attach_btf_id");

Thanks! I'm assuming that I also confused you with that ASSERT_NEQ and
you really meant:
ASSERT_EQ(info.attach_btf_id, btf_id, "info.attach_btf_id");

Will wait for more potential feedback from Hao/Andrii and will try to
respin tomorrow with your suggestion applied.

> The bind_v4_prog's btf_obj_id is lost.  Otherwise, it could also do
> ASSERT_NEQ(info.attach_btf_obj_id, bind_v4_prog_btf_id, "info.attach_btf_obj_id");