All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	Scott Branden <sbranden@broadcom.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@broadcom.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: bcm2835aux: ensure interrupts are enabled for shared handler
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 17:06:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+pf0y7+mV8o3t=Uvgo9ZbmVNB9PyS2E3BktR8BZ_ecQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87efiso2yz.fsf@anholt.net>

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
> Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> The BCM2835 AUX SPI has a shared interrupt line (with AUX UART).
>> Downstream fixes this with an AUX irqchip to demux the IRQ sources and a
>> DT change which breaks compatibility with older kernels. The AUX irqchip
>> was already rejected for upstream[1] and the DT change would break
>> working systems if the DTB is updated to a newer one. The latter issue
>> was brought to my attention by Alex Graf.
>>
>> The root cause however is a bug in the shared handler. Shared handlers
>> must check that interrupts are actually enabled before servicing the
>> interrupt. Add a check that the TXEMPTY or IDLE interrupts are enabled.
>
> It looks to me like we'd only return IRQ_HANDLED if we did work that
> needed doing.  Is this check effectively doing some interlock to make
> sure that we've already started bcm2835aux_spi_transfer_one_irq() and
> aren't just racing against transaction setup?

What if you are in polled mode for the SPI and the 8250 irq (or other
SPI instance) causes the SPI irq handler to run?

The way I look at it is, this change in the irq handler was also said
to fix the problem[1]:

    u32 irq_flags = readl(bcm2835_aux_irq_reg);

    if(!(irq_flags & (1<<master->bus_num)))
    {
        return IRQ_NONE;
    }

Is checking whether the interrupt is pending in the aux reg any
different than checking for interrupt being enabled in the device? I
could have checked the status bits too, but as you say that is handled
farther down.

Rob

[1] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/1573

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robh@kernel.org (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] spi: bcm2835aux: ensure interrupts are enabled for shared handler
Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 17:06:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+pf0y7+mV8o3t=Uvgo9ZbmVNB9PyS2E3BktR8BZ_ecQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87efiso2yz.fsf@anholt.net>

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
> Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> writes:
>
>> The BCM2835 AUX SPI has a shared interrupt line (with AUX UART).
>> Downstream fixes this with an AUX irqchip to demux the IRQ sources and a
>> DT change which breaks compatibility with older kernels. The AUX irqchip
>> was already rejected for upstream[1] and the DT change would break
>> working systems if the DTB is updated to a newer one. The latter issue
>> was brought to my attention by Alex Graf.
>>
>> The root cause however is a bug in the shared handler. Shared handlers
>> must check that interrupts are actually enabled before servicing the
>> interrupt. Add a check that the TXEMPTY or IDLE interrupts are enabled.
>
> It looks to me like we'd only return IRQ_HANDLED if we did work that
> needed doing.  Is this check effectively doing some interlock to make
> sure that we've already started bcm2835aux_spi_transfer_one_irq() and
> aren't just racing against transaction setup?

What if you are in polled mode for the SPI and the 8250 irq (or other
SPI instance) causes the SPI irq handler to run?

The way I look at it is, this change in the irq handler was also said
to fix the problem[1]:

    u32 irq_flags = readl(bcm2835_aux_irq_reg);

    if(!(irq_flags & (1<<master->bus_num)))
    {
        return IRQ_NONE;
    }

Is checking whether the interrupt is pending in the aux reg any
different than checking for interrupt being enabled in the device? I
could have checked the status bits too, but as you say that is handled
farther down.

Rob

[1] https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/1573

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-03 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-03 18:09 [PATCH] spi: bcm2835aux: ensure interrupts are enabled for shared handler Rob Herring
2018-05-03 18:09 ` Rob Herring
2018-05-03 18:31 ` Stefan Wahren
2018-05-03 18:31   ` Stefan Wahren
2018-05-03 21:15 ` Eric Anholt
2018-05-03 21:15   ` Eric Anholt
2018-05-03 22:06   ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-05-03 22:06     ` Rob Herring
2018-05-03 22:36     ` Eric Anholt
2018-05-03 22:36       ` Eric Anholt
2018-05-03 23:06 ` Mark Brown
2018-05-03 23:06   ` Mark Brown
2018-05-03 23:19 ` Applied "spi: bcm2835aux: ensure interrupts are enabled for shared handler" to the spi tree Mark Brown
2018-05-03 23:19   ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAL_Jsq+pf0y7+mV8o3t=Uvgo9ZbmVNB9PyS2E3BktR8BZ_ecQQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=eric@anholt.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=rjui@broadcom.com \
    --cc=sbranden@broadcom.com \
    --cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.