All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:52:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNW=hEEcsJy1gUEwrnERRgH3kRBkEuDtcPwPdfXr91eTGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSebRQ=2VfT0KnM6ChjMg0j3NWJDPwn9S=aQk8tbNrUt6w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:32 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:00 AM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> >
> > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface
> > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the
> > virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance.
>
> I had focused on the code previously.
>
> The s/w checksum verification cost is significant in a VM with traffic
> to local destinations. A bridge does not verify transport layer
> checksums OTOH?
Hi Willem.
No, think about GRO(In the GRO we don't know packets will be forwarded
to other ports or to local). The call tree as below:
   + 5.41% secondary_startup_64
   - 1.22% ret_from_fork
....
        net_rx_action
        napi_poll
        virtnet_poll
        virtnet_receive
        napi_gro_receive
        dev_gro_receive
        inet_gro_receive
        tcp4_gro_receive
        __skb_gro_checksum_complete
        skb_checksum
        __skb_checksum
        csum_partial
        do_csum
   - 1.13% do_csum

$ brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.001122330001 no eth1
eth2


> > Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO")
> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * change the fix-tag
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 7145c83c6c8c..21b71148c532 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = {
> >         VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM
> >  };
> >
> > +#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \
> > +                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) | \
> > +                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN)  | \
> > +                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO))
> > +
> >  struct virtnet_stat_desc {
> >         char desc[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
> >         size_t offset;
> > @@ -2531,7 +2536,8 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
> >                 if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
> >                         offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable;
> >                 else
> > -                       offloads = 0;
> > +                       offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable &
> > +                                  ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK;
> >
> >                 err = virtnet_set_guest_offloads(vi, offloads);
> >                 if (err)
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >



-- 
Best regards, Tonghao

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 15:52:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMDZJNW=hEEcsJy1gUEwrnERRgH3kRBkEuDtcPwPdfXr91eTGg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+FuTSebRQ=2VfT0KnM6ChjMg0j3NWJDPwn9S=aQk8tbNrUt6w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:32 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:00 AM <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> >
> > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface
> > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the
> > virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance.
>
> I had focused on the code previously.
>
> The s/w checksum verification cost is significant in a VM with traffic
> to local destinations. A bridge does not verify transport layer
> checksums OTOH?
Hi Willem.
No, think about GRO(In the GRO we don't know packets will be forwarded
to other ports or to local). The call tree as below:
   + 5.41% secondary_startup_64
   - 1.22% ret_from_fork
....
        net_rx_action
        napi_poll
        virtnet_poll
        virtnet_receive
        napi_gro_receive
        dev_gro_receive
        inet_gro_receive
        tcp4_gro_receive
        __skb_gro_checksum_complete
        skb_checksum
        __skb_checksum
        csum_partial
        do_csum
   - 1.13% do_csum

$ brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br0 8000.001122330001 no eth1
eth2


> > Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO")
> > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * change the fix-tag
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +++++++-
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 7145c83c6c8c..21b71148c532 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = {
> >         VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM
> >  };
> >
> > +#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \
> > +                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) | \
> > +                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN)  | \
> > +                               (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO))
> > +
> >  struct virtnet_stat_desc {
> >         char desc[ETH_GSTRING_LEN];
> >         size_t offset;
> > @@ -2531,7 +2536,8 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
> >                 if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
> >                         offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable;
> >                 else
> > -                       offloads = 0;
> > +                       offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable &
> > +                                  ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK;
> >
> >                 err = virtnet_set_guest_offloads(vi, offloads);
> >                 if (err)
> > --
> > 2.23.0
> >



-- 
Best regards, Tonghao
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-29  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29  1:58 [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO xiangxia.m.yue
2020-09-29  1:58 ` xiangxia.m.yue
2020-09-29  6:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-29  6:23   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-29  6:59   ` Tonghao Zhang
2020-09-29  6:59     ` Tonghao Zhang
2020-09-29  7:21     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-29  7:21       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-09-29  7:29       ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29  7:29         ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29  8:04         ` Tonghao Zhang
2020-09-29  8:04           ` Tonghao Zhang
2020-09-29  7:31 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29  7:31   ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29  7:52   ` Tonghao Zhang [this message]
2020-09-29  7:52     ` Tonghao Zhang
2020-09-29  8:38     ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29  8:38       ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29  8:39 ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29  8:39   ` Willem de Bruijn
2020-09-29 19:54 ` David Miller
2020-09-29 19:54   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMDZJNW=hEEcsJy1gUEwrnERRgH3kRBkEuDtcPwPdfXr91eTGg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.