All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
To: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>,
	Kevin.Hilman.khilman@ti.com,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: host: enable OMAP DMA engine support for omap hosts by default
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:06:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMQu2gy-U1WmgGOGZ+VyXjZmLem9TEWbq5kR8jzC0qXvqF-=BA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANfBPZ97onLov1TwXYaT5A6D5XzXxwpvk+=y09W_9FmcOne4Mw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, S, Venkatraman <svenkatr@ti.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>> * Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120718 00:09]:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>> > * Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> [120716 23:56]:
>>> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh
>>> >> <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Hi,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>> >> > <javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
>>> >> >> The OMAP MMC and OMAP High Speed MMC hosts now use entirely the DMA
>>> >> >> engine API instead of the previous private DMA API implementation.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> So, if the kernel is built with support for any of these hosts but it
>>> >> >> doesn't support DMA devices nor OMAP DMA support, it fails when trying
>>> >> >> to obtain a DMA channel which leads to the following error on an OMAP3
>>> >> >> IGEPv2 Rev.C board (and probably on most OMAP boards with MMC support):
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> [    2.199981] omap_hsmmc omap_hsmmc.1: unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel 48
>>> >> >> [    2.215087] omap_hsmmc omap_hsmmc.0: unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel 62
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> selecting automatically CONFIG_DMADEVICES and CONFIG_DMA_OMAP solves it.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
>>> >> >> ---
>>> >> > Considering, we are updating drivers to select the DMA engine, can you
>>> >> > also include
>>> >> > "drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c" which is also updated for DMA engine.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Regards
>>> >> > Santosh
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Santosh,
>>> >>
>>> >> Ok, I'll send a v2 now which includes spi-omap2-mcspi then.
>>> >
>>> > I don't think we should do this, the drivers should work with and without
>>> > dma. This just needs to be added to the omap2plus_defconfig.
>>> >
>>> Well this was not decided based on any DMA CONFIG option before for
>>> the subject drivers. It is already by default enabled if the DMA is supported
>>> by the driver IP. There is a possibility to disable it from driver platform/dt
>>> data so that still remains.
>>
>> I think it should rather be that if the driver is broken and does not work
>> without DMA, it should have depends on CONFIG_DMA_OMAP.
>>
> I can confirm that omap MMC can't work without DMA; polled mode is not
> supported / implemented.

Same case for SPI driver as well. It uses DMA for everything except the cases
where DMA doesn't make sense like 1 byte/2 byte etc. And its not configurable,

At least considering this, it is better we do this per driver than enabling
it at SOC config.

Regards
Santosh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Shilimkar, Santosh)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: host: enable OMAP DMA engine support for omap hosts by default
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:06:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMQu2gy-U1WmgGOGZ+VyXjZmLem9TEWbq5kR8jzC0qXvqF-=BA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANfBPZ97onLov1TwXYaT5A6D5XzXxwpvk+=y09W_9FmcOne4Mw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, S, Venkatraman <svenkatr@ti.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>> * Shilimkar, Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120718 00:09]:
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>> > * Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> [120716 23:56]:
>>> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Shilimkar, Santosh
>>> >> <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Hi,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
>>> >> > <javier@dowhile0.org> wrote:
>>> >> >> The OMAP MMC and OMAP High Speed MMC hosts now use entirely the DMA
>>> >> >> engine API instead of the previous private DMA API implementation.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> So, if the kernel is built with support for any of these hosts but it
>>> >> >> doesn't support DMA devices nor OMAP DMA support, it fails when trying
>>> >> >> to obtain a DMA channel which leads to the following error on an OMAP3
>>> >> >> IGEPv2 Rev.C board (and probably on most OMAP boards with MMC support):
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> [    2.199981] omap_hsmmc omap_hsmmc.1: unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel 48
>>> >> >> [    2.215087] omap_hsmmc omap_hsmmc.0: unable to obtain RX DMA engine channel 62
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> selecting automatically CONFIG_DMADEVICES and CONFIG_DMA_OMAP solves it.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
>>> >> >> ---
>>> >> > Considering, we are updating drivers to select the DMA engine, can you
>>> >> > also include
>>> >> > "drivers/spi/spi-omap2-mcspi.c" which is also updated for DMA engine.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Regards
>>> >> > Santosh
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Santosh,
>>> >>
>>> >> Ok, I'll send a v2 now which includes spi-omap2-mcspi then.
>>> >
>>> > I don't think we should do this, the drivers should work with and without
>>> > dma. This just needs to be added to the omap2plus_defconfig.
>>> >
>>> Well this was not decided based on any DMA CONFIG option before for
>>> the subject drivers. It is already by default enabled if the DMA is supported
>>> by the driver IP. There is a possibility to disable it from driver platform/dt
>>> data so that still remains.
>>
>> I think it should rather be that if the driver is broken and does not work
>> without DMA, it should have depends on CONFIG_DMA_OMAP.
>>
> I can confirm that omap MMC can't work without DMA; polled mode is not
> supported / implemented.

Same case for SPI driver as well. It uses DMA for everything except the cases
where DMA doesn't make sense like 1 byte/2 byte etc. And its not configurable,

At least considering this, it is better we do this per driver than enabling
it at SOC config.

Regards
Santosh

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-18  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1342485005-5178-1-git-send-email-javier@dowhile0.org>
2012-07-17  6:45 ` [PATCH 1/1] mmc: host: enable OMAP DMA engine support for omap hosts by default Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-17  6:45   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-17  6:51   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-17  6:51     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-18  6:59     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-18  6:59       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-18  7:04       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-18  7:04         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-18  7:10         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-18  7:10           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-18  7:44           ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-18  7:44             ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-18  8:36             ` Shilimkar, Santosh [this message]
2012-07-18  8:36               ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-18  8:49               ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-18  8:49                 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-18  9:11                 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-18  9:11                   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-18  9:16                   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-18  9:16                     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-18  9:38                     ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-18  9:38                       ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-18  9:44                       ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-18  9:44                         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-19 11:32                         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-19 11:32                           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-20  9:28                           ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-20  9:28                             ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-20 10:01                             ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-20 10:01                               ` S, Venkatraman
2012-08-23 21:00                 ` Peter Meerwald
2012-08-23 21:00                   ` Peter Meerwald
2012-08-24  7:10                   ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-24  7:10                     ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-24  7:51                     ` Peter Meerwald
2012-08-24  7:51                       ` Peter Meerwald
2012-08-24  9:42                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-24  9:42                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-24 10:21                         ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-24 10:21                           ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-24 10:39                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-24 10:39                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-24 10:45                             ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-24 10:45                               ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-24 12:10                               ` Peter Meerwald
2012-08-24 12:10                                 ` Peter Meerwald
2012-08-25  7:57                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-08-25  7:57                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-18  8:25       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-18  8:25         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-19 11:31         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-19 11:31           ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMQu2gy-U1WmgGOGZ+VyXjZmLem9TEWbq5kR8jzC0qXvqF-=BA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
    --cc=Kevin.Hilman.khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=cjb@laptop.org \
    --cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.