Re: [PATCH 1/8] dt-bindings: Add linux,kunit binding

[Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>]

Hi David,

On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 8:16 AM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 09:38, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > Document the linux,kunit board compatible string. This board is loaded
> > into the Linux kernel when KUnit is testing devicetree dependent code.
>
> As with the series as a whole, this might need to change a little bit
> if we want to either use devicetree overlays and/or other
> architectures.
>
> That being said, I'm okay with having this until then: the only real
> topic for bikeshedding is the name.
> - Is KUnit best as a board name, or part of the vendor name?
> - Do we want to include the architecture in the name?
> Should it be "linux,kunit", "linux-kunit,uml", "linux,kunit-uml", etc?

I would not include an architecture (or virtualization method), as
this is independent of the architecture or virtualization method.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds