From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com>
Cc: Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Prabhakar Mahadev Lad <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Subject: Re: E1000 s2idle crash (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 0/4] treewide: add regulator condition on _mmc_suspend())
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 11:15:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdV_gPbcYQZ38S-g4td-fTd0a=ticVvdGPO+SESt84UMOg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY2PR01MB36920F6F4CF5B9EC4925F335D85F0@TY2PR01MB3692.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Shimoda-san,
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 2:00 PM Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com> wrote:
> > From: Geert Uytterhoeven, Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 10:50 PM
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:14 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > I moved the E1000E card to an R-Car Gen2 board (r8a7791/koelsch), and
> > s2idle crashes in a similar way:
> >
> > Unhandled fault: asynchronous external abort (0x1211) at 0x00000000
> > pgd = ceadf1f8
> > [00000000] *pgd=80000040004003, *pmd=00000000
> > Internal error: : 1211 [#1] SMP ARM
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 0 PID: 124 Comm: kworker/u4:6 Not tainted
> > 5.8.0-koelsch-00539-gce07c9ba6e9f601c #867
> > Hardware name: Generic R-Car Gen2 (Flattened Device Tree)
> > Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
> > PC is at rcar_pcie_config_access+0x10c/0x13c
> > LR is at rcar_pcie_config_access+0x10c/0x13c
> > pc : [<c04a4ab4>] lr : [<c04a4ab4>] psr: 60000093
> > sp : e67b3e00 ip : 00000000 fp : 00000000
> > r10: 00000000 r9 : 00000000 r8 : e7369800
> > r7 : 00000000 r6 : e67b3e40 r5 : e7369640 r4 : 000000cc
> > r3 : f0900000 r2 : f0900018 r1 : f0900020 r0 : 00000000
> > Flags: nZCv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment user
> > Control: 30c5387d Table: 648fe480 DAC: fffffffd
> > Process kworker/u4:6 (pid: 124, stack limit = 0x0dcce627)
> > Stack: (0xe67b3e00 to 0xe67b4000)
> > ...
> > [<c04a4ab4>] (rcar_pcie_config_access) from [<c04a4be0>]
> > (rcar_pcie_read_conf+0x28/0x80)
> > [<c04a4be0>] (rcar_pcie_read_conf) from [<c048a4e0>]
> > (pci_bus_read_config_word+0x68/0xa8)
> > [<c048a4e0>] (pci_bus_read_config_word) from [<c0490030>]
> > (pci_raw_set_power_state+0x18c/0x270)
> > [<c0490030>] (pci_raw_set_power_state) from [<c0492e20>]
> > (pci_set_power_state+0x98/0xcc)
> > [<c0492e20>] (pci_set_power_state) from [<c0492ea0>]
> > (pci_prepare_to_sleep+0x4c/0x6c)
> > [<c0492ea0>] (pci_prepare_to_sleep) from [<c0496c84>]
> > (pci_pm_suspend_noirq+0x228/0x244)
> > [<c0496c84>] (pci_pm_suspend_noirq) from [<c0509d88>]
> > (dpm_run_callback.part.5+0x44/0xac)
> > [<c0509d88>] (dpm_run_callback.part.5) from [<c050b38c>]
> > (__device_suspend_noirq+0x74/0x1a4)
> >
> > > Why haven't we seen this before?
> > > I can reproduce the issue on v5.5 (first version that supported M3-W+,
> > > but needs backported DTS for PCIe support) and later.
> >
> > On Koelsch, I could easily reproduce this on v4.10 and later[1].
> >
> > As this time no firmware is involved, I guess Linux itself needs to
> > become aware of this issue, and handle it in a similar way like ATF
> > on arm64[2]?
>
> I agree. But, I'm not sure how to implement a similar way on arm32 though...
> Maybe, we should unbind a PCI device before R-Car Gen2 is suspended?
Unbinding PCI devices before suspending the system means that e.g.
Wake-on-LAN will no longer work. Unless WoL-enabled devices are
not unbound.
However, it seems Wake-on-LAN is enabled by default on E1000E.
Hence even if WoL is enabled, the PCIe device will send an L1_Enter_PM DLLP
request, triggering the issue.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-27 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-26 9:32 [PATCH/RFC v4 0/4] treewide: add regulator condition on _mmc_suspend() Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 9:32 ` [PATCH/RFC v4 1/4] regulator: core: add prepare and resume_early Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 13:51 ` kernel test robot
2020-06-26 14:30 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 2:12 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 9:32 ` [PATCH/RFC v4 2/4] regulator: fixed: add regulator_ops members for suspend/resume Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 14:39 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 2:42 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-29 12:57 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 13:40 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-29 14:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-29 15:07 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-29 16:14 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 16:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-29 17:26 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 17:42 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-06-30 8:29 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 9:32 ` [PATCH/RFC v4 3/4] mmc: core: Call mmc_poweroff_nofity() if regulators are disabled Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 15:13 ` Mark Brown
2020-06-29 2:49 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 15:53 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2020-06-29 5:16 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 9:32 ` [PATCH/RFC v4 4/4] arm64: dts: renesas: add regulator-off-in-suspend property for eMMC Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-26 10:13 ` [PATCH/RFC v4 0/4] treewide: add regulator condition on _mmc_suspend() Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-29 10:04 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-06-29 11:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-06-30 13:19 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-07-03 11:10 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-07-06 11:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-11 13:50 ` E1000 s2idle crash (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC v4 0/4] treewide: add regulator condition on _mmc_suspend()) Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-08-17 12:00 ` Yoshihiro Shimoda
2020-08-27 9:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2020-08-27 9:16 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdV_gPbcYQZ38S-g4td-fTd0a=ticVvdGPO+SESt84UMOg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.