From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] of/unittest: Add reference count tests Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:08:37 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXUbD=4cOa-2Dwzhpz9vYVzjpewx4Z2tcMhccVyrJbVHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+7rDCvNQoGVpnjAWwB6Yma6fkiY3YXOso+92iiLU7rEg@mail.gmail.com> Hi Rob, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert+renesas@glider.be> wrote: >> This patch series adds tests to detect reference count imbalances. >> The tests use a fixed list of paths to devices nodes (required device >> nodes in a minimal DTS, and device nodes present in unittest-data). >> I considered scanning for all present device node instead, but these >> are more likely to change while running the test. >> >> These tests are executed only if CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC=y. >> >> Patches are against devicetree/next, with "[PATCH] of: Add missing >> of_node_put() in of_find_node_by_path()" (or the alternative proposed >> by Grant) applied. >> >> Note that it shows 44 failures, which I haven't investigated yet: > > Do you plan to? Maybe. It doesn't have such a high priority in my task list... > While this could find problems in the unittests or the core OF code, > the vast majority of the problems are likely in the users and this > doesn't help with those. This whole issue of ref counts has been > discussed some and probably needs to be redesigned or instrumented in > a way that users can validate. But then it is pretty low priority > given that ref counts only matter on pseries. I agree most issues are in the users. However, I did find one issue in the core code. Note that the reference counts may become more important in the future, as OF_OVERLAY selects OF_DYNAMIC. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org> To: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>, Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] of/unittest: Add reference count tests Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:08:37 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXUbD=4cOa-2Dwzhpz9vYVzjpewx4Z2tcMhccVyrJbVHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+7rDCvNQoGVpnjAWwB6Yma6fkiY3YXOso+92iiLU7rEg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> Hi Rob, On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven > <geert+renesas-gXvu3+zWzMSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> This patch series adds tests to detect reference count imbalances. >> The tests use a fixed list of paths to devices nodes (required device >> nodes in a minimal DTS, and device nodes present in unittest-data). >> I considered scanning for all present device node instead, but these >> are more likely to change while running the test. >> >> These tests are executed only if CONFIG_OF_DYNAMIC=y. >> >> Patches are against devicetree/next, with "[PATCH] of: Add missing >> of_node_put() in of_find_node_by_path()" (or the alternative proposed >> by Grant) applied. >> >> Note that it shows 44 failures, which I haven't investigated yet: > > Do you plan to? Maybe. It doesn't have such a high priority in my task list... > While this could find problems in the unittests or the core OF code, > the vast majority of the problems are likely in the users and this > doesn't help with those. This whole issue of ref counts has been > discussed some and probably needs to be redesigned or instrumented in > a way that users can validate. But then it is pretty low priority > given that ref counts only matter on pseries. I agree most issues are in the users. However, I did find one issue in the core code. Note that the reference counts may become more important in the future, as OF_OVERLAY selects OF_DYNAMIC. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert-Td1EMuHUCqxL1ZNQvxDV9g@public.gmane.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-04 17:08 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-01-23 16:10 [PATCH RFC 0/2] of/unittest: Add reference count tests Geert Uytterhoeven 2015-01-23 16:10 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2015-01-23 16:10 ` [PATCH 1/2] of: Allow selection of OF_DYNAMIC and OF_OVERLAY if OF_UNITTEST Geert Uytterhoeven 2015-03-20 12:25 ` Grant Likely 2015-03-20 12:25 ` Grant Likely 2015-03-20 13:32 ` Rob Herring 2015-03-20 13:32 ` Rob Herring 2015-03-24 22:54 ` Grant Likely 2015-03-25 14:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven 2015-01-23 16:10 ` [PATCH RFC 2/2] of/unittest: Add reference count tests Geert Uytterhoeven 2015-02-04 16:14 ` [PATCH RFC 0/2] " Rob Herring 2015-02-04 16:14 ` Rob Herring 2015-02-04 17:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message] 2015-02-04 17:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdXUbD=4cOa-2Dwzhpz9vYVzjpewx4Z2tcMhccVyrJbVHg@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \ --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.