All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 10:28:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANiq72mTmYCJ4_7KVRMMKCDTMrnE9wCXBKViCMzkW1ErpdZKHg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7dw75gh.fsf@meer.lwn.net>

On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 1:57 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>
> In this case I think we're as close as to consensus as things get.  In
> the absence of a strong reason to the contrary, I'll apply this before
> too long.

No strong reason, but there was the question about the `__malloc` in a
separate line in the second example which seems to contradict the
declaration and it is not explained otherwise (+ clang-format does it
differently).

Cheers,
Miguel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-05  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-30 23:57 [PATCH v4] docs: Explain the desired position of function attributes Kees Cook
2021-10-01 19:05 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-10-01 20:23   ` Joe Perches
2021-10-02  0:00   ` Kees Cook
2021-10-02  6:31   ` Greg KH
2021-10-02 10:42     ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-10-02 15:22       ` Joe Perches
2021-10-02 16:29         ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-10-02 15:21     ` Joe Perches
2021-10-02 16:27       ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-10-02 21:42         ` Kees Cook
2021-10-02 10:46 ` Miguel Ojeda
2021-10-04 23:09 ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-10-05  8:28   ` Miguel Ojeda [this message]
2021-10-05 14:58     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANiq72mTmYCJ4_7KVRMMKCDTMrnE9wCXBKViCMzkW1ErpdZKHg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.