All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:18:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMcdM2MSL5J6ewChovxZbe-rKncU4LekQiXwKoVY0xDnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez1VNQo2HZSDDxUqtM4w63MmQsDc4SH0xLw92E6vXaPWrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 08:48, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:38 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> > Add architecture specific implementation details for KFENCE and enable
> > KFENCE for the arm64 architecture. In particular, this implements the
> > required interface in <asm/kfence.h>. Currently, the arm64 version does
> > not yet use a statically allocated memory pool, at the cost of a pointer
> > load for each is_kfence_address().
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h
> [...]
> > +static inline bool arch_kfence_initialize_pool(void)
> > +{
> > +       const unsigned int num_pages = ilog2(roundup_pow_of_two(KFENCE_POOL_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE));
> > +       struct page *pages = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, num_pages);
> > +
> > +       if (!pages)
> > +               return false;
> > +
> > +       __kfence_pool = page_address(pages);
> > +       return true;
> > +}
>
> If you're going to do "virt_to_page(meta->addr)->slab_cache = cache;"
> on these pages in kfence_guarded_alloc(), and pass them into kfree(),
> you'd better mark these pages as non-compound - something like
> alloc_pages_exact() or split_page() may help. Otherwise, I think when
> SLUB's kfree() does virt_to_head_page() right at the start, that will
> return a pointer to the first page of the entire __kfence_pool, and
> then when it loads page->slab_cache, it gets some random cache and
> stuff blows up. Kinda surprising that you haven't run into that during
> your testing, maybe I'm missing something...

I added a WARN_ON() check in kfence_initialize_pool() to check if our
pages are compound or not; they are not.

In slub.c, __GFP_COMP is passed to alloc_pages(), which causes them to
have a compound head I believe.

> Also, this kinda feels like it should be the "generic" version of
> arch_kfence_initialize_pool() and live in mm/kfence/core.c ?

Done for v5.

Thanks,
-- Marco

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/11] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:18:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNMcdM2MSL5J6ewChovxZbe-rKncU4LekQiXwKoVY0xDnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez1VNQo2HZSDDxUqtM4w63MmQsDc4SH0xLw92E6vXaPWrg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2 Oct 2020 at 08:48, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 3:38 PM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> > Add architecture specific implementation details for KFENCE and enable
> > KFENCE for the arm64 architecture. In particular, this implements the
> > required interface in <asm/kfence.h>. Currently, the arm64 version does
> > not yet use a statically allocated memory pool, at the cost of a pointer
> > load for each is_kfence_address().
> [...]
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kfence.h
> [...]
> > +static inline bool arch_kfence_initialize_pool(void)
> > +{
> > +       const unsigned int num_pages = ilog2(roundup_pow_of_two(KFENCE_POOL_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE));
> > +       struct page *pages = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, num_pages);
> > +
> > +       if (!pages)
> > +               return false;
> > +
> > +       __kfence_pool = page_address(pages);
> > +       return true;
> > +}
>
> If you're going to do "virt_to_page(meta->addr)->slab_cache = cache;"
> on these pages in kfence_guarded_alloc(), and pass them into kfree(),
> you'd better mark these pages as non-compound - something like
> alloc_pages_exact() or split_page() may help. Otherwise, I think when
> SLUB's kfree() does virt_to_head_page() right at the start, that will
> return a pointer to the first page of the entire __kfence_pool, and
> then when it loads page->slab_cache, it gets some random cache and
> stuff blows up. Kinda surprising that you haven't run into that during
> your testing, maybe I'm missing something...

I added a WARN_ON() check in kfence_initialize_pool() to check if our
pages are compound or not; they are not.

In slub.c, __GFP_COMP is passed to alloc_pages(), which causes them to
have a compound head I believe.

> Also, this kinda feels like it should be the "generic" version of
> arch_kfence_initialize_pool() and live in mm/kfence/core.c ?

Done for v5.

Thanks,
-- Marco

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-02 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-29 13:38 [PATCH v4 00/11] KFENCE: A low-overhead sampling-based memory safety error detector Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 01/11] mm: add Kernel Electric-Fence infrastructure Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02  6:33   ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  6:33     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  6:33     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  7:53     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  7:53       ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  7:53       ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 14:22       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-10-02 14:22         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-10-02 14:22         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2020-10-02 15:06         ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-02 15:06           ` Mark Rutland
2020-10-02 18:27         ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 18:27           ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 18:27           ` Jann Horn
2020-10-05 18:59           ` Marco Elver
2020-10-05 18:59             ` Marco Elver
2020-10-05 18:59             ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 17:19     ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 17:19       ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 19:31       ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 19:31         ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 19:31         ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 21:12         ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 21:12           ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 21:28         ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 21:28           ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 21:28           ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 22:27           ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 22:27             ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 22:27             ` Jann Horn
2020-10-12 14:20             ` Marco Elver
2020-10-12 14:20               ` Marco Elver
2020-10-12 14:20               ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 02/11] x86, kfence: enable KFENCE for x86 Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02  5:45   ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  5:45     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  5:45     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-07 13:08     ` Marco Elver
2020-10-07 13:08       ` Marco Elver
2020-10-07 13:08       ` Marco Elver
2020-10-07 14:14       ` Jann Horn
2020-10-07 14:14         ` Jann Horn
2020-10-07 14:14         ` Jann Horn
2020-10-07 14:41         ` Marco Elver
2020-10-07 14:41           ` Marco Elver
2020-10-07 14:41           ` Marco Elver
2020-10-09 17:40           ` Marco Elver
2020-10-09 17:40             ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02  6:08   ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  6:08     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  6:08     ` Jann Horn
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 03/11] arm64, kfence: enable KFENCE for ARM64 Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02  6:47   ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  6:47     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  6:47     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 14:18     ` Marco Elver [this message]
2020-10-02 14:18       ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 14:18       ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02 16:10       ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 16:10         ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02 16:10         ` Jann Horn
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 04/11] mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLAB Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 05/11] mm, kfence: insert KFENCE hooks for SLUB Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-10-02  7:07   ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  7:07     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-02  7:07     ` Jann Horn
2020-10-05  9:29     ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-10-05  9:29       ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-10-05  9:29       ` Alexander Potapenko
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 06/11] kfence, kasan: make KFENCE compatible with KASAN Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 07/11] kfence, kmemleak: make KFENCE compatible with KMEMLEAK Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 08/11] kfence, lockdep: make KFENCE compatible with lockdep Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 09/11] kfence, Documentation: add KFENCE documentation Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 10/11] kfence: add test suite Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38 ` [PATCH v4 11/11] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for KFENCE Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 13:38   ` Marco Elver
2020-09-29 14:21   ` SeongJae Park
2020-09-29 14:21     ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANpmjNMcdM2MSL5J6ewChovxZbe-rKncU4LekQiXwKoVY0xDnQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sjpark@amazon.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.