All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] kasan, mm: don't save alloc stacks twice
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:40:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNOkBQdvgB-4QNXQMoNFppzVCsCz+ZcuviDL0HX5zJ4kbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+wnufE=jOAOsG6LTA5Objcj=OyakEDr4zPKVW+Qq+y28g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 19:01, 'Andrey Konovalov' via kasan-dev
<kasan-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
[...]
> > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static inline void kasan_disable_current(void) {}
> > >  struct kasan_cache {
> > >       int alloc_meta_offset;
> > >       int free_meta_offset;
> > > +     bool is_kmalloc;
[...]
> > >       if (kasan_stack_collection_enabled())
> > > -             set_alloc_info(cache, (void *)object, flags);
> > > +             set_alloc_info(cache, (void *)object, flags, kmalloc);
> >
> > It doesn't bother me too much, but: 'bool kmalloc' shadows function
> > 'kmalloc' so this is technically fine, but using 'kmalloc' as the
> > variable name here might be confusing and there is a small chance it
> > might cause problems in a future refactor.
>
> Good point. Does "is_kmalloc" sound good?

Sure, that's also consistent with the new struct field.

Thanks,
-- Marco

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] kasan, mm: don't save alloc stacks twice
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:40:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNOkBQdvgB-4QNXQMoNFppzVCsCz+ZcuviDL0HX5zJ4kbg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+wnufE=jOAOsG6LTA5Objcj=OyakEDr4zPKVW+Qq+y28g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 at 19:01, 'Andrey Konovalov' via kasan-dev
<kasan-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
[...]
> > > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ static inline void kasan_disable_current(void) {}
> > >  struct kasan_cache {
> > >       int alloc_meta_offset;
> > >       int free_meta_offset;
> > > +     bool is_kmalloc;
[...]
> > >       if (kasan_stack_collection_enabled())
> > > -             set_alloc_info(cache, (void *)object, flags);
> > > +             set_alloc_info(cache, (void *)object, flags, kmalloc);
> >
> > It doesn't bother me too much, but: 'bool kmalloc' shadows function
> > 'kmalloc' so this is technically fine, but using 'kmalloc' as the
> > variable name here might be confusing and there is a small chance it
> > might cause problems in a future refactor.
>
> Good point. Does "is_kmalloc" sound good?

Sure, that's also consistent with the new struct field.

Thanks,
-- Marco

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-02 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 19:43 [PATCH 00/12] kasan: optimizations and fixes for HW_TAGS Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43 ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 01/12] kasan, mm: don't save alloc stacks twice Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 16:06   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 16:06     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 18:01     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 18:01       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 18:01       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 18:40       ` Marco Elver [this message]
2021-02-02 18:40         ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 18:40         ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 02/12] kasan, mm: optimize kmalloc poisoning Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 16:25   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 16:25     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 17:15     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 17:15       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 17:15       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 17:39       ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 17:39         ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 17:39         ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 03/12] kasan: optimize large " Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 16:57   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 16:57     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 04/12] kasan: clean up setting free info in kasan_slab_free Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 17:03   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-02 17:03     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 05/12] kasan: unify large kfree checks Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-03 12:13   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-03 12:13     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 06/12] kasan: rework krealloc tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-03 14:48   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-03 14:48     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 07/12] kasan, mm: remove krealloc side-effect Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-03 15:10   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-03 15:10     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 08/12] kasan, mm: optimize krealloc poisoning Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-03 14:34   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-03 14:34     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 09/12] kasan: ensure poisoning size alignment Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-03 15:31   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-03 15:31     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm64: kasan: simplify and inline MTE functions Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 22:44   ` Andrew Morton
2021-02-01 22:44     ` Andrew Morton
2021-02-04 12:39     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-04 12:39       ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-02 15:42   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-02 15:42     ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-02 18:04     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 18:04       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 18:04       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-04 12:37   ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-04 12:37     ` Vincenzo Frascino
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 11/12] kasan: always inline HW_TAGS helper functions Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-03 15:51   ` Marco Elver
2021-02-03 15:51     ` Marco Elver
2021-02-01 19:43 ` [PATCH 12/12] arm64: kasan: export MTE symbols for KASAN tests Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-01 19:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 10:46   ` Will Deacon
2021-02-02 10:46     ` Will Deacon
2021-02-02 13:42     ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 13:42       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 13:42       ` Andrey Konovalov
2021-02-02 15:43   ` Catalin Marinas
2021-02-02 15:43     ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANpmjNOkBQdvgB-4QNXQMoNFppzVCsCz+ZcuviDL0HX5zJ4kbg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=Branislav.Rankov@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=eugenis@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.