All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
To: "Ken.Lin" <ken.lin@advantech.com>
Cc: "shawnguo@kernel.org" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"kernel@pengutronix.de" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"sboyd@codeaurora.org" <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	"mturquette@baylibre.com" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Peter.Stretz" <peter.stretz@advantech.com>,
	"Peter.Chiang" <peter.chiang@advantech.com>,
	Akshay Bhat <akshay.bhat@timesys.com>,
	Jason Moss <jason.moss@nxp.com>,
	"emil@limesaudio.com" <emil@limesaudio.com>
Subject: Re: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:00:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CVggufx2U0pZUXd1o=i36Jo-c1B=hgFcSaWeM+=oagaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <WM!8ae38b052eee9a42a4712d13aee34e2d793055d4125e98cc2c03451811f33168b3556d3bf52ee5ba8dda879cea808cdc!@dg.advantech.com>

Hi Ken,

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken.lin@advantech.com> wrote:

> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080@60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected.
> I think the patches should fix the issue.

That's good news. Thanks for testing.

Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series.

Emil,

Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: festevam@gmail.com (Fabio Estevam)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:00:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CVggufx2U0pZUXd1o=i36Jo-c1B=hgFcSaWeM+=oagaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <WM!8ae38b052eee9a42a4712d13aee34e2d793055d4125e98cc2c03451811f33168b3556d3bf52ee5ba8dda879cea808cdc!@dg.advantech.com>

Hi Ken,

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ken.Lin <ken.lin@advantech.com> wrote:

> With the patches applied, the pixel clock (148500000 required for 1920x1080 at 60) is correct as we checked in kernel 4.7 and the actual measurement result looked good as we expected.
> I think the patches should fix the issue.

That's good news. Thanks for testing.

Emil is working on a v3 version of the patch series.

Emil,

Please add Ken Lin on Cc when you submit v3.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-11 18:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A390AE@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP>
2016-10-06 23:26 ` The possible regression in kernel 4.8 - clk: imx: correct AV PLL rate formula Ken.Lin
2016-10-06 23:26   ` Ken.Lin
2016-10-06 23:37   ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-06 23:37     ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-06 23:37     ` Fabio Estevam
     [not found]     ` <WM!8b5ef465717800ac4466674b98bb32450dc231d955cd4979ca96fd54828a7c3af7de5f376015ebf046c75f20677161c6!@dgg.advantech.com>
     [not found]       ` <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A39613@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP>
2016-10-11 17:49         ` Ken.Lin
2016-10-11 17:49           ` Ken.Lin
2016-10-11 17:49           ` Ken.Lin
2016-10-11 18:00           ` Fabio Estevam [this message]
2016-10-11 18:00             ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-11 18:00             ` Fabio Estevam
2016-10-11 18:34             ` Otavio Salvador
2016-10-11 18:34               ` Otavio Salvador
2016-10-11 18:34               ` Otavio Salvador
     [not found] <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A390AF@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP>
2016-10-06 23:26 ` Ken.Lin
2016-10-06 23:26   ` Ken.Lin
2016-10-06 23:26   ` Ken.Lin
     [not found] <03B5A3CA1724CE4EAC32B27E39292A677FC5A390A9@AUSMAIL1.AUS.ADVANTECH.CORP>
2016-10-06 23:21 ` Ken.Lin
2016-10-06 23:21   ` Ken.Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOMZO5CVggufx2U0pZUXd1o=i36Jo-c1B=hgFcSaWeM+=oagaQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=akshay.bhat@timesys.com \
    --cc=emil@limesaudio.com \
    --cc=jason.moss@nxp.com \
    --cc=ken.lin@advantech.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=peter.chiang@advantech.com \
    --cc=peter.stretz@advantech.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.