From: Pavel Starosek <starosekpd@gmail.com>
To: seth.forshee@canonical.com
Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Kazakhstan (KZ)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 03:19:01 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPgWZqx-bHc5iEn-fWbzarrUNB5kbMnay_Pr5BKROznOAO0nWQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPgWZqzskMUOnmdBwh6TEh5yfrbdzg+4bZOUMQPkJffWizZweg@mail.gmail.com>
Updates, based on [1] (search for word "RLAN" to jump to the desired
part on the page):
* Extended range 2400-2483.5
* 5150–5250 MHz range may be up to 200 mW
* The same is about 5250 - 5350 MHz according to our local
regulations, but looks like this is incorrect because of TPC?
Therefore, I didn't change this value
* Add 5725-5850 MHz range for indoor usage
* Add 57-66 GHz range. It must be outdoors only, so we don't specify
NO-OUTDOOR at all, right?
* In 5470-5725 changed the bandwidth from 80 to 160 (typo?)
As I understand it, there is no DFS requirement for the 5725-5850
range anywhere in the [2] document.
I can suggest this change. Please check if everything is correct?
---
# [1] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010730
# [2] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010375
country KZ: DFS-ETSI
(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20)
(5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
(5470 - 5725 @ 160), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
(5725 - 5850 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR
(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
---
Thanks,
Pavel
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:16 AM Pavel Starosek <starosekpd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Updates, based on [1] (search for word "RLAN" to jump to the desired part on the page):
>
> * Extended range 2400-2483.5
> * 5150–5250 MHz range may be up to 200 mW
> * The same is about 5250 - 5350 MHz according to our local regulations, but looks like this is incorrect because of TPC? Therefore, I didn't change this value
> * Add 5725-5850 MHz range for indoor usage
> * Add 57-66 GHz range. It must be outdoors only, so we don't specify NO-OUTDOOR at all, right?
> * In 5470-5725 changed the bandwidth from 80 to 160 (typo?)
> As I understand it, there is no DFS requirement for the 5725-5850 range anywhere in the [2] document.
>
> I can suggest this change. Please check if everything is correct?
> ---
> # [1] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010730
> # [2] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010375
> country KZ: DFS-ETSI
> (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20)
> (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
> (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
> (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
> (5725 - 5850 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR
> (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
>
> ---
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pavel Starosek <starosekpd@gmail.com>
To: seth.forshee@canonical.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Kazakhstan (KZ)
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 03:19:01 +0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPgWZqx-bHc5iEn-fWbzarrUNB5kbMnay_Pr5BKROznOAO0nWQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPgWZqzskMUOnmdBwh6TEh5yfrbdzg+4bZOUMQPkJffWizZweg@mail.gmail.com>
Updates, based on [1] (search for word "RLAN" to jump to the desired
part on the page):
* Extended range 2400-2483.5
* 5150–5250 MHz range may be up to 200 mW
* The same is about 5250 - 5350 MHz according to our local
regulations, but looks like this is incorrect because of TPC?
Therefore, I didn't change this value
* Add 5725-5850 MHz range for indoor usage
* Add 57-66 GHz range. It must be outdoors only, so we don't specify
NO-OUTDOOR at all, right?
* In 5470-5725 changed the bandwidth from 80 to 160 (typo?)
As I understand it, there is no DFS requirement for the 5725-5850
range anywhere in the [2] document.
I can suggest this change. Please check if everything is correct?
---
# [1] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010730
# [2] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010375
country KZ: DFS-ETSI
(2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20)
(5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
(5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
(5470 - 5725 @ 160), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
(5725 - 5850 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR
(57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
---
Thanks,
Pavel
On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:16 AM Pavel Starosek <starosekpd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Updates, based on [1] (search for word "RLAN" to jump to the desired part on the page):
>
> * Extended range 2400-2483.5
> * 5150–5250 MHz range may be up to 200 mW
> * The same is about 5250 - 5350 MHz according to our local regulations, but looks like this is incorrect because of TPC? Therefore, I didn't change this value
> * Add 5725-5850 MHz range for indoor usage
> * Add 57-66 GHz range. It must be outdoors only, so we don't specify NO-OUTDOOR at all, right?
> * In 5470-5725 changed the bandwidth from 80 to 160 (typo?)
> As I understand it, there is no DFS requirement for the 5725-5850 range anywhere in the [2] document.
>
> I can suggest this change. Please check if everything is correct?
> ---
> # [1] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010730
> # [2] http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V1500010375
> country KZ: DFS-ETSI
> (2400 - 2483.5 @ 40), (20)
> (5150 - 5250 @ 80), (23), NO-OUTDOOR, AUTO-BW
> (5250 - 5350 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS, AUTO-BW
> (5470 - 5725 @ 160), (20), NO-OUTDOOR, DFS
> (5725 - 5850 @ 80), (20), NO-OUTDOOR
> (57000 - 66000 @ 2160), (40)
>
> ---
> Thanks,
> Pavel
>
_______________________________________________
wireless-regdb mailing list
wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless-regdb
next parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-08 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAPgWZqzskMUOnmdBwh6TEh5yfrbdzg+4bZOUMQPkJffWizZweg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-11-08 21:19 ` Pavel Starosek [this message]
2020-11-08 21:19 ` [wireless-regdb] wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Kazakhstan (KZ) Pavel Starosek
2020-11-10 21:40 ` Seth Forshee
2020-11-10 21:40 ` [wireless-regdb] " Seth Forshee
2020-11-11 18:36 ` Pavel Starosek
2020-11-11 18:36 ` [wireless-regdb] " Pavel Starosek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPgWZqx-bHc5iEn-fWbzarrUNB5kbMnay_Pr5BKROznOAO0nWQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=starosekpd@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.