[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/4] dm: spi: soft_spi bug fix

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/4] dm: spi: soft_spi bug fix

[Peng Fan]

When doing xfer, should use device->parent, but not device
When doing bit xfer, should use "!!(tmpdout & 0x80)", but not
"(tmpdout & 0x80)"

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
---

V4:
 None

V3:
 None

V2:
 Follow Simon's comments, split bug fix into seperate patch.

 drivers/spi/soft_spi.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
index aa4abcc..8cdb520 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
@@ -34,7 +34,8 @@ struct soft_spi_priv {
 
 static int soft_spi_scl(struct udevice *dev, int bit)
 {
-	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev->platdata;
+	struct udevice *bus = dev_get_parent(dev);
+	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(bus);
 
 	dm_gpio_set_value(&plat->sclk, bit);
 
@@ -43,7 +44,8 @@ static int soft_spi_scl(struct udevice *dev, int bit)
 
 static int soft_spi_sda(struct udevice *dev, int bit)
 {
-	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev->platdata;
+	struct udevice *bus = dev_get_parent(dev);
+	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(bus);
 
 	dm_gpio_set_value(&plat->mosi, bit);
 
@@ -52,7 +54,8 @@ static int soft_spi_sda(struct udevice *dev, int bit)
 
 static int soft_spi_cs_activate(struct udevice *dev)
 {
-	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev->platdata;
+	struct udevice *bus = dev_get_parent(dev);
+	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(bus);
 
 	dm_gpio_set_value(&plat->cs, 0);
 	dm_gpio_set_value(&plat->sclk, 0);
@@ -63,7 +66,8 @@ static int soft_spi_cs_activate(struct udevice *dev)
 
 static int soft_spi_cs_deactivate(struct udevice *dev)
 {
-	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev->platdata;
+	struct udevice *bus = dev_get_parent(dev);
+	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(bus);
 
 	dm_gpio_set_value(&plat->cs, 0);
 
@@ -100,8 +104,9 @@ static int soft_spi_release_bus(struct udevice *dev)
 static int soft_spi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
 			 const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags)
 {
-	struct soft_spi_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
-	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev->platdata;
+	struct udevice *bus = dev_get_parent(dev);
+	struct soft_spi_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(bus);
+	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(bus);
 	uchar		tmpdin  = 0;
 	uchar		tmpdout = 0;
 	const u8	*txd = dout;
@@ -134,7 +139,7 @@ static int soft_spi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
 
 		if (!cpha)
 			soft_spi_scl(dev, 0);
-		soft_spi_sda(dev, tmpdout & 0x80);
+		soft_spi_sda(dev, !!(tmpdout & 0x80));
 		udelay(plat->spi_delay_us);
 		if (cpha)
 			soft_spi_scl(dev, 0);
-- 
2.6.2

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/4] dm: spi: soft_spi: switch to use linux compatible string

[Peng Fan]

1. Support compatible string "spi-gpio" which is used by Linux
   Linux use different bindings, so use UBOOT_COMPAT and
   LINUX_COMPAT to differentiate them.
2. Introduce SPI_MASTER_NO_RX and SPI_MASTER_NO_TX to handle
   no rx or no tx case.
3. Tested on i.MX6 UltraLite board with 74LV595 spi-gpio chip.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
---

V4:
 None
V3:
 None
V2:
 Follow Simon's comments, drop uboot compatible string, convert to use
 Linux compatile string, and convert the universal board.

 arch/arm/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 10 ++++----
 drivers/spi/soft_spi.c                     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
index 16948c9..ad3527e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
@@ -42,11 +42,11 @@
 	};
 
 	soft-spi {
-		compatible = "u-boot,soft-spi";
-		cs-gpio = <&gpy4 3 0>;
-		sclk-gpio = <&gpy3 1 0>;
-		mosi-gpio = <&gpy3 3 0>;
-		miso-gpio = <&gpy3 0 0>;
+		compatible = "spi-gpio";
+		cs-gpios = <&gpy4 3 0>;
+		gpio-sck = <&gpy3 1 0>;
+		gpio-mosi = <&gpy3 3 0>;
+		gpio-miso = <&gpy3 0 0>;
 		spi-delay-us = <1>;
 		#address-cells = <1>;
 		#size-cells = <0>;
diff --git a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
index 8cdb520..d23dc81 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/soft_spi.c
@@ -26,8 +26,12 @@ struct soft_spi_platdata {
 	struct gpio_desc mosi;
 	struct gpio_desc miso;
 	int spi_delay_us;
+	int flags;
 };
 
+#define SPI_MASTER_NO_RX        BIT(0)
+#define SPI_MASTER_NO_TX        BIT(1)
+
 struct soft_spi_priv {
 	unsigned int mode;
 };
@@ -139,14 +143,16 @@ static int soft_spi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
 
 		if (!cpha)
 			soft_spi_scl(dev, 0);
-		soft_spi_sda(dev, !!(tmpdout & 0x80));
+		if ((plat->flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_TX) == 0)
+			soft_spi_sda(dev, !!(tmpdout & 0x80));
 		udelay(plat->spi_delay_us);
 		if (cpha)
 			soft_spi_scl(dev, 0);
 		else
 			soft_spi_scl(dev, 1);
 		tmpdin	<<= 1;
-		tmpdin	|= dm_gpio_get_value(&plat->miso);
+		if ((plat->flags & SPI_MASTER_NO_RX) == 0)
+			tmpdin	|= dm_gpio_get_value(&plat->miso);
 		tmpdout	<<= 1;
 		udelay(plat->spi_delay_us);
 		if (cpha)
@@ -208,24 +214,36 @@ static int soft_spi_probe(struct udevice *dev)
 	struct spi_slave *slave = dev_get_parent_priv(dev);
 	struct soft_spi_platdata *plat = dev->platdata;
 	int cs_flags, clk_flags;
+	int ret;
 
 	cs_flags = (slave->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH) ? 0 : GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW;
 	clk_flags = (slave->mode & SPI_CPOL) ? GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW : 0;
-	if (gpio_request_by_name(dev, "cs-gpio", 0, &plat->cs,
+
+	if (gpio_request_by_name(dev, "cs-gpios", 0, &plat->cs,
 				 GPIOD_IS_OUT | cs_flags) ||
-	    gpio_request_by_name(dev, "sclk-gpio", 0, &plat->sclk,
-				 GPIOD_IS_OUT | clk_flags) ||
-	    gpio_request_by_name(dev, "mosi-gpio", 0, &plat->mosi,
-				 GPIOD_IS_OUT | GPIOD_IS_OUT_ACTIVE) ||
-	    gpio_request_by_name(dev, "miso-gpio", 0, &plat->miso,
-				 GPIOD_IS_IN))
+	    gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-sck", 0, &plat->sclk,
+				 GPIOD_IS_OUT | clk_flags))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-mosi", 0, &plat->mosi,
+				   GPIOD_IS_OUT | GPIOD_IS_OUT_ACTIVE);
+	if (ret)
+		plat->flags |= SPI_MASTER_NO_TX;
+
+	ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "gpio-miso", 0, &plat->miso,
+				   GPIOD_IS_IN);
+	if (ret)
+		plat->flags |= SPI_MASTER_NO_RX;
+
+	if ((plat->flags & (SPI_MASTER_NO_RX | SPI_MASTER_NO_TX)) ==
+	    (SPI_MASTER_NO_RX | SPI_MASTER_NO_TX))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static const struct udevice_id soft_spi_ids[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "u-boot,soft-spi" },
+	{ .compatible = "spi-gpio" },
 	{ }
 };
 
-- 
2.6.2

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 3/4] dm: spi: introduce dm api

[Peng Fan]

Introduce dm_spi_claim_bus, dm_spi_release_bus and dm_spi_xfer
Convert spi_claim_bus, spi_release_bus and spi_xfer to use
the new API.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
---


V4:
 Convert spi_claim_bus, spi_release_bus and spi_xfer to call the use APIs.
V3:
 As Simon suggested, introduce new API. New patch.

 drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-------
 include/spi.h            | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
index 5561f36..84b6786 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c
@@ -45,12 +45,12 @@ static int spi_set_speed_mode(struct udevice *bus, int speed, int mode)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
+int dm_spi_claim_bus(struct udevice *dev)
 {
-	struct udevice *dev = slave->dev;
 	struct udevice *bus = dev->parent;
 	struct dm_spi_ops *ops = spi_get_ops(bus);
 	struct dm_spi_bus *spi = dev_get_uclass_priv(bus);
+	struct spi_slave *slave = dev_get_parent_priv(dev);
 	int speed;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -73,9 +73,8 @@ int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
 	return ops->claim_bus ? ops->claim_bus(dev) : 0;
 }
 
-void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
+void dm_spi_release_bus(struct udevice *dev)
 {
-	struct udevice *dev = slave->dev;
 	struct udevice *bus = dev->parent;
 	struct dm_spi_ops *ops = spi_get_ops(bus);
 
@@ -83,10 +82,9 @@ void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
 		ops->release_bus(dev);
 }
 
-int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen,
-	     const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags)
+int dm_spi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
+		const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags)
 {
-	struct udevice *dev = slave->dev;
 	struct udevice *bus = dev->parent;
 
 	if (bus->uclass->uc_drv->id != UCLASS_SPI)
@@ -95,6 +93,22 @@ int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen,
 	return spi_get_ops(bus)->xfer(dev, bitlen, dout, din, flags);
 }
 
+int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
+{
+	return dm_spi_claim_bus(slave->dev);
+}
+
+void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave)
+{
+	dm_spi_release_bus(slave->dev);
+}
+
+int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen,
+	     const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	return dm_spi_xfer(slave->dev, bitlen, dout, din, flags);
+}
+
 static int spi_post_bind(struct udevice *dev)
 {
 	/* Scan the bus for devices */
diff --git a/include/spi.h b/include/spi.h
index 4b88d39..ca96fa4 100644
--- a/include/spi.h
+++ b/include/spi.h
@@ -612,6 +612,58 @@ int sandbox_spi_get_emul(struct sandbox_state *state,
 			 struct udevice *bus, struct udevice *slave,
 			 struct udevice **emulp);
 
+/**
+ * Claim the bus and prepare it for communication with a given slave.
+ *
+ * This must be called before doing any transfers with a SPI slave. It
+ * will enable and initialize any SPI hardware as necessary, and make
+ * sure that the SCK line is in the correct idle state. It is not
+ * allowed to claim the same bus for several slaves without releasing
+ * the bus in between.
+ *
+ * @dev:	The SPI slave device
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 if the bus was claimed successfully, or a negative value
+ * if it wasn't.
+ */
+int dm_spi_claim_bus(struct udevice *dev);
+
+/**
+ * Release the SPI bus
+ *
+ * This must be called once for every call to dm_spi_claim_bus() after
+ * all transfers have finished. It may disable any SPI hardware as
+ * appropriate.
+ *
+ * @slave:	The SPI slave device
+ */
+void dm_spi_release_bus(struct udevice *dev);
+
+/**
+ * SPI transfer
+ *
+ * This writes "bitlen" bits out the SPI MOSI port and simultaneously clocks
+ * "bitlen" bits in the SPI MISO port.  That's just the way SPI works.
+ *
+ * The source of the outgoing bits is the "dout" parameter and the
+ * destination of the input bits is the "din" parameter.  Note that "dout"
+ * and "din" can point to the same memory location, in which case the
+ * input data overwrites the output data (since both are buffered by
+ * temporary variables, this is OK).
+ *
+ * dm_spi_xfer() interface:
+ * @dev:	The SPI slave device which will be sending/receiving the data.
+ * @bitlen:	How many bits to write and read.
+ * @dout:	Pointer to a string of bits to send out.  The bits are
+ *		held in a byte array and are sent MSB first.
+ * @din:	Pointer to a string of bits that will be filled in.
+ * @flags:	A bitwise combination of SPI_XFER_* flags.
+ *
+ * Returns: 0 on success, not 0 on failure
+ */
+int dm_spi_xfer(struct udevice *dev, unsigned int bitlen,
+		const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags);
+
 /* Access the operations for a SPI device */
 #define spi_get_ops(dev)	((struct dm_spi_ops *)(dev)->driver->ops)
 #define spi_emul_get_ops(dev)	((struct dm_spi_emul_ops *)(dev)->driver->ops)
-- 
2.6.2

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 4/4] dm: gpio: introduce 74x164 driver

[Peng Fan]

Introduce driver to support "fairchild,74hc595" devices.
1. Take linux drivers/drivers/gpio/gpio-74x164.c as reference.
2. Following the naming used in Linux driver with gen_7x164 as the prefix.
3. Enable CONFIG_DM_74X164 to use this driver.
4. Follow Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-74x164.txt to add device
   nodes
5. Tested on i.MX6 UltraLite with 74LV595 using gpio command and oscillograph.

Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
Cc: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
---

V4:
 Add Simon's review tag.

V3:
 Use dm_spi_claim_bus and dm_spi_xfer and dm_spi_release_bus
 Drop spi_slave from struct gen_74x164_priv.

V2:
 Address Simon's comments:
 Drop unused dev entry of gen_74x164_priv
 Rename gen_74x164_info to gen_74x164_priv
 Change u8 to uint
 Change EINVAL to ENOSYS
 Drop dm_gpio_set_value when probe, since GPIOD_IS_OUT_ACTIVE already
 active the gpio.
 Drop complicated spi_get_bus_and_cs, use dev_get_parent_priv.
 To Kconfig help msg, I add 74lv165 and 75hc595, actually, the linux
 one does not contain manufacture info.

 drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/gpio/Kconfig       |   8 ++
 drivers/gpio/Makefile      |   1 +
 3 files changed, 202 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.c

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9ac10a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.c
@@ -0,0 +1,193 @@
+/*
+ * Take drivers/gpio/gpio-74x164.c as reference.
+ *
+ * 74Hx164 - Generic serial-in/parallel-out 8-bits shift register GPIO driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2016 Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
+ *
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:	GPL-2.0+
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <common.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <dm.h>
+#include <fdtdec.h>
+#include <malloc.h>
+#include <asm/gpio.h>
+#include <asm/io.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
+#include <spi.h>
+
+DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
+
+/*
+ * struct gen_74x164_chip - Data for 74Hx164
+ *
+ * @oe: OE pin
+ * @nregs: number of registers
+ * @buffer: buffer for chained chips
+ */
+#define GEN_74X164_NUMBER_GPIOS 8
+
+struct gen_74x164_priv {
+	struct gpio_desc oe;
+	u32 nregs;
+	/*
+	 * Since the nregs are chained, every byte sent will make
+	 * the previous byte shift to the next register in the
+	 * chain. Thus, the first byte sent will end up in the last
+	 * register at the end of the transfer. So, to have a logical
+	 * numbering, store the bytes in reverse order.
+	 */
+	u8 *buffer;
+};
+
+static int gen_74x164_write_conf(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+	struct gen_74x164_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = dm_spi_claim_bus(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ret = dm_spi_xfer(dev, priv->nregs * 8, priv->buffer, NULL,
+			  SPI_XFER_BEGIN | SPI_XFER_END);
+
+	dm_spi_release_bus(dev);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int gen_74x164_get_value(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset)
+{
+	struct gen_74x164_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+	uint bank = priv->nregs - 1 - offset / 8;
+	uint pin = offset % 8;
+
+	return (priv->buffer[bank] >> pin) & 0x1;
+}
+
+static int gen_74x164_set_value(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset,
+				int value)
+{
+	struct gen_74x164_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+	uint bank = priv->nregs - 1 - offset / 8;
+	uint pin = offset % 8;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (value)
+		priv->buffer[bank] |= 1 << pin;
+	else
+		priv->buffer[bank] &= ~(1 << pin);
+
+	ret = gen_74x164_write_conf(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int gen_74x164_direction_input(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset)
+{
+	return -ENOSYS;
+}
+
+static int gen_74x164_direction_output(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset,
+				      int value)
+{
+	return gen_74x164_set_value(dev, offset, value);
+}
+
+static int gen_74x164_get_function(struct udevice *dev, unsigned offset)
+{
+	return GPIOF_OUTPUT;
+}
+
+static int gen_74x164_xlate(struct udevice *dev, struct gpio_desc *desc,
+			    struct fdtdec_phandle_args *args)
+{
+	desc->offset = args->args[0];
+	desc->flags = args->args[1] & GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW ? GPIOD_ACTIVE_LOW : 0;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct dm_gpio_ops gen_74x164_ops = {
+	.direction_input	= gen_74x164_direction_input,
+	.direction_output	= gen_74x164_direction_output,
+	.get_value		= gen_74x164_get_value,
+	.set_value		= gen_74x164_set_value,
+	.get_function		= gen_74x164_get_function,
+	.xlate			= gen_74x164_xlate,
+};
+
+static int gen_74x164_probe(struct udevice *dev)
+{
+	struct gen_74x164_priv *priv = dev_get_priv(dev);
+	struct gpio_dev_priv *uc_priv = dev_get_uclass_priv(dev);
+	char *str, name[32];
+	int ret;
+	const void *fdt = gd->fdt_blob;
+	int node = dev->of_offset;
+
+	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s_", dev->name);
+	str = strdup(name);
+	if (!str)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	/*
+	 * See Linux kernel:
+	 * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-74x164.txt
+	 */
+	priv->nregs = fdtdec_get_int(fdt, node, "registers-number", 1);
+	priv->buffer = calloc(priv->nregs, sizeof(u8));
+	if (!priv->buffer) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_str;
+	}
+
+	ret = fdtdec_get_byte_array(fdt, node, "registers-default",
+				    priv->buffer, priv->nregs);
+	if (ret)
+		dev_dbg(dev, "No registers-default property\n");
+
+	ret = gpio_request_by_name(dev, "oe-gpios", 0, &priv->oe,
+				   GPIOD_IS_OUT | GPIOD_IS_OUT_ACTIVE);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(dev, "No oe-pins property\n");
+		goto free_buf;
+	}
+
+	uc_priv->bank_name = str;
+	uc_priv->gpio_count = priv->nregs * 8;
+
+	ret = gen_74x164_write_conf(dev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto free_buf;
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "%s is ready\n", dev->name);
+
+	return 0;
+
+free_buf:
+	free(priv->buffer);
+free_str:
+	free(str);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static const struct udevice_id gen_74x164_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "fairchild,74hc595" },
+	{ }
+};
+
+U_BOOT_DRIVER(74x164) = {
+	.name		= "74x164",
+	.id		= UCLASS_GPIO,
+	.ops		= &gen_74x164_ops,
+	.probe		= gen_74x164_probe,
+	.priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct gen_74x164_priv),
+	.of_match	= gen_74x164_ids,
+};
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
index e72ac23..e61a15f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
@@ -143,6 +143,14 @@ config ZYNQ_GPIO
 	help
 	  Supports GPIO access on Zynq SoC.
 
+config DM_74X164
+	bool "74x164 serial-in/parallel-out 8-bits shift register"
+	depends on DM_GPIO
+	help
+	  Driver for 74x164 compatible serial-in/parallel-out 8-outputs
+	  shift registers, such as 74lv165, 74hc595.
+	  This driver can be used to provide access to more gpio outputs.
+
 config DM_PCA953X
 	bool "PCA95[357]x, PCA9698, TCA64xx, and MAX7310 I/O ports"
 	depends on DM_GPIO
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Makefile b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
index 4b1f6b9..ddec1ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/gpio/Makefile
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ endif
 obj-$(CONFIG_DM_GPIO)		+= gpio-uclass.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_DM_PCA953X)	+= pca953x_gpio.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_DM_74X164)		+= 74x164_gpio.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_AT91_GPIO)	+= at91_gpio.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ATMEL_PIO4)	+= atmel_pio4.o
-- 
2.6.2

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 3/4] dm: spi: introduce dm api

[Simon Glass]

On 2 May 2016 at 20:02, Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com> wrote:
> Introduce dm_spi_claim_bus, dm_spi_release_bus and dm_spi_xfer
> Convert spi_claim_bus, spi_release_bus and spi_xfer to use
> the new API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Cc: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
> ---
>
>
> V4:
>  Convert spi_claim_bus, spi_release_bus and spi_xfer to call the use APIs.
> V3:
>  As Simon suggested, introduce new API. New patch.
>
>  drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>  include/spi.h            | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/4] dm: spi: soft_spi: switch to use linux compatible string

[Simon Glass]

On 2 May 2016 at 20:02, Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. Support compatible string "spi-gpio" which is used by Linux
>    Linux use different bindings, so use UBOOT_COMPAT and
>    LINUX_COMPAT to differentiate them.
> 2. Introduce SPI_MASTER_NO_RX and SPI_MASTER_NO_TX to handle
>    no rx or no tx case.
> 3. Tested on i.MX6 UltraLite board with 74LV595 spi-gpio chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Cc: Przemyslaw Marczak <p.marczak@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> V4:
>  None
> V3:
>  None
> V2:
>  Follow Simon's comments, drop uboot compatible string, convert to use
>  Linux compatile string, and convert the universal board.
>
>  arch/arm/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 10 ++++----
>  drivers/spi/soft_spi.c                     | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 3/4] dm: spi: introduce dm api

[Simon Glass]

Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!

On 7 May 2016 at 09:11, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> wrote:
> On 2 May 2016 at 20:02, Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Introduce dm_spi_claim_bus, dm_spi_release_bus and dm_spi_xfer
>> Convert spi_claim_bus, spi_release_bus and spi_xfer to use
>> the new API.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
>> Cc: Jagan Teki <jteki@openedev.com>
>> ---
>>
>>
>> V4:
>>  Convert spi_claim_bus, spi_release_bus and spi_xfer to call the use APIs.
>> V3:
>>  As Simon suggested, introduce new API. New patch.
>>
>>  drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  include/spi.h            | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 4/4] dm: gpio: introduce 74x164 driver

[Simon Glass]

On 2 May 2016 at 20:02, Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com> wrote:
> Introduce driver to support "fairchild,74hc595" devices.
> 1. Take linux drivers/drivers/gpio/gpio-74x164.c as reference.
> 2. Following the naming used in Linux driver with gen_7x164 as the prefix.
> 3. Enable CONFIG_DM_74X164 to use this driver.
> 4. Follow Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-74x164.txt to add device
>    nodes
> 5. Tested on i.MX6 UltraLite with 74LV595 using gpio command and oscillograph.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Cc: Chin Liang See <clsee@altera.com>
> Cc: Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@toradex.com>
> Cc: Daniel Schwierzeck <daniel.schwierzeck@gmail.com>
> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>
> Cc: Stefano Babic <sbabic@denx.de>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> V4:
>  Add Simon's review tag.
>
> V3:
>  Use dm_spi_claim_bus and dm_spi_xfer and dm_spi_release_bus
>  Drop spi_slave from struct gen_74x164_priv.
>
> V2:
>  Address Simon's comments:
>  Drop unused dev entry of gen_74x164_priv
>  Rename gen_74x164_info to gen_74x164_priv
>  Change u8 to uint
>  Change EINVAL to ENOSYS
>  Drop dm_gpio_set_value when probe, since GPIOD_IS_OUT_ACTIVE already
>  active the gpio.
>  Drop complicated spi_get_bus_and_cs, use dev_get_parent_priv.
>  To Kconfig help msg, I add 74lv165 and 75hc595, actually, the linux
>  one does not contain manufacture info.
>
>  drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpio/Kconfig       |   8 ++
>  drivers/gpio/Makefile      |   1 +
>  3 files changed, 202 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpio/74x164_gpio.c

Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!