* Deleting layers in Hob
@ 2012-03-27 6:48 Xu, Dongxiao
2012-03-27 7:19 ` Lu, Lianhao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Xu, Dongxiao @ 2012-03-27 6:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting layers. I
think I ever raised this problem before.
Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
changes a layer, it will following the below steps
1) init the cooker.
2) set new layers to cooker.
3) parse configuration files.
4) get available machines, distros, SDKs, etc.
As we know, if we source oe-init-build-env in Yocto project environment,
we will have DISTRO="poky" set in local.conf by default, where the
"poky" DISTRO comes from the meta-yocto layer. If user deletes
meta-yocto in Hob, and then error will happen when bitbake parsing the
local.conf, since it could not find where the "poky" DISTRO is defined.
Even if we are able to successfully removed the meta-yocto layer by
removing the DISTRO definition in local.conf, system will report another
issue that:
Your configuration is using stamp files including the sstate hash but
your build directory was built with stamp files that do not include
this.
To continue, either rebuild or switch back to the OEBasic signature
handler with BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = 'OEBasic'.
This is because BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEBasic" is also defined in
meta-yocto layer (poky.conf).
So it seems that in certain environment (e.x, Yocto Project), certain
layer (e.x, meta-yocto) should not be removed?
Or any idea on how to solve this problem?
Thanks,
Dongxiao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-27 6:48 Deleting layers in Hob Xu, Dongxiao
@ 2012-03-27 7:19 ` Lu, Lianhao
2012-03-27 16:56 ` Joshua Lock
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Lu, Lianhao @ 2012-03-27 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xu, Dongxiao, yocto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Dongxiao
> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:49 PM
> To: yocto
> Subject: [yocto] Deleting layers in Hob
>
> When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting layers. I
> think I ever raised this problem before.
>
> Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
> changes a layer, it will following the below steps
> 1) init the cooker.
> 2) set new layers to cooker.
> 3) parse configuration files.
> 4) get available machines, distros, SDKs, etc.
>
> As we know, if we source oe-init-build-env in Yocto project environment,
> we will have DISTRO="poky" set in local.conf by default, where the
> "poky" DISTRO comes from the meta-yocto layer. If user deletes
> meta-yocto in Hob, and then error will happen when bitbake parsing the
> local.conf, since it could not find where the "poky" DISTRO is defined.
>
> Even if we are able to successfully removed the meta-yocto layer by
> removing the DISTRO definition in local.conf, system will report another
> issue that:
>
> Your configuration is using stamp files including the sstate hash but
> your build directory was built with stamp files that do not include
> this.
> To continue, either rebuild or switch back to the OEBasic signature
> handler with BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = 'OEBasic'.
>
> This is because BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEBasic" is also defined in
> meta-yocto layer (poky.conf).
Meta-yocto is using OEBasicHash as default signature handler(ABI_VERSION=8, see ${TMPDIR}/abi_version), while oe-core is still using the OEBasic(ABI_VERSION=7). This means the oe-core can not reuse the stamp files generated by meta-yocto.
>
> So it seems that in certain environment (e.x, Yocto Project), certain
> layer (e.x, meta-yocto) should not be removed?
>
> Or any idea on how to solve this problem?
>
> Thanks,
> Dongxiao
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> yocto mailing list
> yocto@yoctoproject.org
> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-27 7:19 ` Lu, Lianhao
@ 2012-03-27 16:56 ` Joshua Lock
2012-03-29 11:05 ` Barros Pena, Belen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2012-03-27 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
On 27/03/12 00:19, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Dongxiao
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:49 PM
>> To: yocto
>> Subject: [yocto] Deleting layers in Hob
>>
>> When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting layers. I
>> think I ever raised this problem before.
>>
>> Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
>> changes a layer, it will following the below steps
>> 1) init the cooker.
>> 2) set new layers to cooker.
>> 3) parse configuration files.
>> 4) get available machines, distros, SDKs, etc.
>>
>> As we know, if we source oe-init-build-env in Yocto project environment,
>> we will have DISTRO="poky" set in local.conf by default, where the
>> "poky" DISTRO comes from the meta-yocto layer. If user deletes
>> meta-yocto in Hob, and then error will happen when bitbake parsing the
>> local.conf, since it could not find where the "poky" DISTRO is defined.
>>
>> Even if we are able to successfully removed the meta-yocto layer by
>> removing the DISTRO definition in local.conf, system will report another
>> issue that:
>>
>> Your configuration is using stamp files including the sstate hash but
>> your build directory was built with stamp files that do not include
>> this.
>> To continue, either rebuild or switch back to the OEBasic signature
>> handler with BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = 'OEBasic'.
>>
>> This is because BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEBasic" is also defined in
>> meta-yocto layer (poky.conf).
>
> Meta-yocto is using OEBasicHash as default signature handler(ABI_VERSION=8, see ${TMPDIR}/abi_version), while oe-core is still using the OEBasic(ABI_VERSION=7). This means the oe-core can not reuse the stamp files generated by meta-yocto.
Could we workaround the incompatibility by setting BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER
= "OEBasic" somewhere in meta-hob?
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua '贾詡' Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-27 16:56 ` Joshua Lock
@ 2012-03-29 11:05 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-03-29 12:00 ` Xu, Dongxiao
2012-03-30 6:32 ` Khem Raj
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-03-29 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joshua Lock, yocto; +Cc: Giulia Piu
Hi all,
Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined to
make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this layer
in Hob).
What do you think?
Belen
On 27/03/2012 17:56, "Joshua Lock" <josh@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>On 27/03/12 00:19, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org
>>>[mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Dongxiao
>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:49 PM
>>> To: yocto
>>> Subject: [yocto] Deleting layers in Hob
>>>
>>> When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting layers.
>>>I
>>> think I ever raised this problem before.
>>>
>>> Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
>>> changes a layer, it will following the below steps
>>> 1) init the cooker.
>>> 2) set new layers to cooker.
>>> 3) parse configuration files.
>>> 4) get available machines, distros, SDKs, etc.
>>>
>>> As we know, if we source oe-init-build-env in Yocto project
>>>environment,
>>> we will have DISTRO="poky" set in local.conf by default, where the
>>> "poky" DISTRO comes from the meta-yocto layer. If user deletes
>>> meta-yocto in Hob, and then error will happen when bitbake parsing the
>>> local.conf, since it could not find where the "poky" DISTRO is defined.
>>>
>>> Even if we are able to successfully removed the meta-yocto layer by
>>> removing the DISTRO definition in local.conf, system will report
>>>another
>>> issue that:
>>>
>>> Your configuration is using stamp files including the sstate hash but
>>> your build directory was built with stamp files that do not include
>>> this.
>>> To continue, either rebuild or switch back to the OEBasic signature
>>> handler with BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = 'OEBasic'.
>>>
>>> This is because BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEBasic" is also defined in
>>> meta-yocto layer (poky.conf).
>>
>> Meta-yocto is using OEBasicHash as default signature
>>handler(ABI_VERSION=8, see ${TMPDIR}/abi_version), while oe-core is
>>still using the OEBasic(ABI_VERSION=7). This means the oe-core can not
>>reuse the stamp files generated by meta-yocto.
>
>Could we workaround the incompatibility by setting BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER
>= "OEBasic" somewhere in meta-hob?
>
>Cheers,
>Joshua
>--
>Joshua '贾詡' Lock
> Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>_______________________________________________
>yocto mailing list
>yocto@yoctoproject.org
>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-29 11:05 ` Barros Pena, Belen
@ 2012-03-29 12:00 ` Xu, Dongxiao
2012-03-29 15:47 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-03-30 6:32 ` Khem Raj
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Xu, Dongxiao @ 2012-03-29 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barros Pena, Belen; +Cc: yocto, Giulia Piu
On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 19:05 +0800, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
> layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined to
> make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this layer
> in Hob).
The layer is removable in Hob, since many people are just using oe-core
without meta-yocto layer.
I have patches to solve the deletion of meta-yocto layer, and will send
it out soon.
Thanks,
Dongxiao
>
> What do you think?
>
> Belen
>
> On 27/03/2012 17:56, "Joshua Lock" <josh@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> >On 27/03/12 00:19, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org
> >>>[mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Dongxiao
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:49 PM
> >>> To: yocto
> >>> Subject: [yocto] Deleting layers in Hob
> >>>
> >>> When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting layers.
> >>>I
> >>> think I ever raised this problem before.
> >>>
> >>> Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
> >>> changes a layer, it will following the below steps
> >>> 1) init the cooker.
> >>> 2) set new layers to cooker.
> >>> 3) parse configuration files.
> >>> 4) get available machines, distros, SDKs, etc.
> >>>
> >>> As we know, if we source oe-init-build-env in Yocto project
> >>>environment,
> >>> we will have DISTRO="poky" set in local.conf by default, where the
> >>> "poky" DISTRO comes from the meta-yocto layer. If user deletes
> >>> meta-yocto in Hob, and then error will happen when bitbake parsing the
> >>> local.conf, since it could not find where the "poky" DISTRO is defined.
> >>>
> >>> Even if we are able to successfully removed the meta-yocto layer by
> >>> removing the DISTRO definition in local.conf, system will report
> >>>another
> >>> issue that:
> >>>
> >>> Your configuration is using stamp files including the sstate hash but
> >>> your build directory was built with stamp files that do not include
> >>> this.
> >>> To continue, either rebuild or switch back to the OEBasic signature
> >>> handler with BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = 'OEBasic'.
> >>>
> >>> This is because BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEBasic" is also defined in
> >>> meta-yocto layer (poky.conf).
> >>
> >> Meta-yocto is using OEBasicHash as default signature
> >>handler(ABI_VERSION=8, see ${TMPDIR}/abi_version), while oe-core is
> >>still using the OEBasic(ABI_VERSION=7). This means the oe-core can not
> >>reuse the stamp files generated by meta-yocto.
> >
> >Could we workaround the incompatibility by setting BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER
> >= "OEBasic" somewhere in meta-hob?
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Joshua
> >--
> >Joshua '贾詡' Lock
> > Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
> > Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> >_______________________________________________
> >yocto mailing list
> >yocto@yoctoproject.org
> >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-29 12:00 ` Xu, Dongxiao
@ 2012-03-29 15:47 ` Barros Pena, Belen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-03-29 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xu, Dongxiao; +Cc: yocto, Giulia Piu
Great! Care to tell us a bit about it, or will we have to hold our breath
until you submit the patches? ;)
Belen
On 29/03/2012 13:00, "Xu, Dongxiao" <dongxiao.xu@intel.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 2012-03-29 at 19:05 +0800, Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
>> layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined
>>to
>> make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this
>>layer
>> in Hob).
>
>The layer is removable in Hob, since many people are just using oe-core
>without meta-yocto layer.
>
>I have patches to solve the deletion of meta-yocto layer, and will send
>it out soon.
>
>Thanks,
>Dongxiao
>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Belen
>>
>> On 27/03/2012 17:56, "Joshua Lock" <josh@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 27/03/12 00:19, Lu, Lianhao wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org
>> >>>[mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Xu, Dongxiao
>> >>> Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 2:49 PM
>> >>> To: yocto
>> >>> Subject: [yocto] Deleting layers in Hob
>> >>>
>> >>> When using Hob in Yocto Project, I found a issue when deleting
>>layers.
>> >>>I
>> >>> think I ever raised this problem before.
>> >>>
>> >>> Let me briefly introduce how layer removal works in Hob. When user
>> >>> changes a layer, it will following the below steps
>> >>> 1) init the cooker.
>> >>> 2) set new layers to cooker.
>> >>> 3) parse configuration files.
>> >>> 4) get available machines, distros, SDKs, etc.
>> >>>
>> >>> As we know, if we source oe-init-build-env in Yocto project
>> >>>environment,
>> >>> we will have DISTRO="poky" set in local.conf by default, where the
>> >>> "poky" DISTRO comes from the meta-yocto layer. If user deletes
>> >>> meta-yocto in Hob, and then error will happen when bitbake parsing
>>the
>> >>> local.conf, since it could not find where the "poky" DISTRO is
>>defined.
>> >>>
>> >>> Even if we are able to successfully removed the meta-yocto layer by
>> >>> removing the DISTRO definition in local.conf, system will report
>> >>>another
>> >>> issue that:
>> >>>
>> >>> Your configuration is using stamp files including the sstate hash
>>but
>> >>> your build directory was built with stamp files that do not include
>> >>> this.
>> >>> To continue, either rebuild or switch back to the OEBasic signature
>> >>> handler with BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = 'OEBasic'.
>> >>>
>> >>> This is because BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER = "OEBasic" is also defined in
>> >>> meta-yocto layer (poky.conf).
>> >>
>> >> Meta-yocto is using OEBasicHash as default signature
>> >>handler(ABI_VERSION=8, see ${TMPDIR}/abi_version), while oe-core is
>> >>still using the OEBasic(ABI_VERSION=7). This means the oe-core can not
>> >>reuse the stamp files generated by meta-yocto.
>> >
>> >Could we workaround the incompatibility by setting BB_SIGNATURE_HANDLER
>> >= "OEBasic" somewhere in meta-hob?
>> >
>> >Cheers,
>> >Joshua
>> >--
>> >Joshua '贾詡' Lock
>> > Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
>> > Intel Open Source Technology Centre
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >yocto mailing list
>> >yocto@yoctoproject.org
>> >https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-29 11:05 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-03-29 12:00 ` Xu, Dongxiao
@ 2012-03-30 6:32 ` Khem Raj
2012-03-30 11:26 ` Barros Pena, Belen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Khem Raj @ 2012-03-30 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barros Pena, Belen; +Cc: yocto, Giulia Piu
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
<belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote:
> Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
> layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined to
> make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this layer
> in Hob).
>
> What do you think?
bad idea. Unless you intend to shackle hob to yocto. Is that the intention ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-30 6:32 ` Khem Raj
@ 2012-03-30 11:26 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-03-30 12:19 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-03-30 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Khem Raj; +Cc: yocto, Giulia Piu
Well: I don't know. Does anybody have an answer?
Belen
On 30/03/2012 07:32, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
><belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote:
>> Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
>> layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined
>>to
>> make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this
>>layer
>> in Hob).
>>
>> What do you think?
>
>bad idea. Unless you intend to shackle hob to yocto. Is that the
>intention ?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-30 11:26 ` Barros Pena, Belen
@ 2012-03-30 12:19 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-04-02 10:48 ` Barros Pena, Belen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-03-30 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto; +Cc: Giulia Piu
On Friday 30 March 2012 11:26:15 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> On 30/03/2012 07:32, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
> ><belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote:
> >> Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
> >> layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am inclined
> >> to make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete this
> >> layer in Hob).
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >
> >bad idea. Unless you intend to shackle hob to yocto. Is that the
> >intention ?
>
> Well: I don't know. Does anybody have an answer?
We don't want to tie hob to meta-yocto, no. The solution to this problem is to
have Hob understand when removing a layer is removing the DISTRO selection
that a user currently has made and warning them about it; if they respond in
affirmative then DISTRO can be set to empty (or we can allow them to select an
alternative, perhaps - something for the designers to consider). Fortunately
since DISTRO points directly to a file in conf/distro/ the detection part is
pretty easy to implement.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-03-30 12:19 ` Paul Eggleton
@ 2012-04-02 10:48 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-04-02 10:55 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Barros Pena, Belen @ 2012-04-02 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Eggleton, yocto; +Cc: Giulia Piu
Thanks, Paul. What happens if the DISTRO is set to empty? Will the image
build?
Belen
On 30/03/2012 13:19, "Paul Eggleton" <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>On Friday 30 March 2012 11:26:15 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
>> On 30/03/2012 07:32, "Khem Raj" <raj.khem@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
>> ><belen.barros.pena@intel.com> wrote:
>> >> Do we have enough information to make a decision about the meta-yocto
>> >> layer? I don't understand all the technical details, but I am
>>inclined
>> >> to make it non-deletable in Hob (i.e. it is not possible to delete
>>this
>> >> layer in Hob).
>> >>
>> >> What do you think?
>> >
>> >bad idea. Unless you intend to shackle hob to yocto. Is that the
>> >intention ?
>>
>> Well: I don't know. Does anybody have an answer?
>
>We don't want to tie hob to meta-yocto, no. The solution to this problem
>is to
>have Hob understand when removing a layer is removing the DISTRO
>selection
>that a user currently has made and warning them about it; if they respond
>in
>affirmative then DISTRO can be set to empty (or we can allow them to
>select an
>alternative, perhaps - something for the designers to consider).
>Fortunately
>since DISTRO points directly to a file in conf/distro/ the detection part
>is
>pretty easy to implement.
>
>Cheers,
>Paul
>
>--
>
>Paul Eggleton
>Intel Open Source Technology Centre
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Corporation (UK) Limited
Registered No. 1134945 (England)
Registered Office: Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ
VAT No: 860 2173 47
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Deleting layers in Hob
2012-04-02 10:48 ` Barros Pena, Belen
@ 2012-04-02 10:55 ` Paul Eggleton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Paul Eggleton @ 2012-04-02 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Barros Pena, Belen; +Cc: yocto, Giulia Piu
On Monday 02 April 2012 10:48:23 Barros Pena, Belen wrote:
> Thanks, Paul. What happens if the DISTRO is set to empty? Will the image
> build?
Yes it will still build, but it will use a default distro policy defined within
OE-Core; this may imply some minor differences in build output.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-02 10:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-27 6:48 Deleting layers in Hob Xu, Dongxiao
2012-03-27 7:19 ` Lu, Lianhao
2012-03-27 16:56 ` Joshua Lock
2012-03-29 11:05 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-03-29 12:00 ` Xu, Dongxiao
2012-03-29 15:47 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-03-30 6:32 ` Khem Raj
2012-03-30 11:26 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-03-30 12:19 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-04-02 10:48 ` Barros Pena, Belen
2012-04-02 10:55 ` Paul Eggleton
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.