[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Radhakrishna Sripada]

Bit12 of the Forcewake request register should not be cleared post
gen12. Do not touch this bit while clearing during fw domain reset.

Bspec: 52542

Signed-off-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index a852c471d1b3..c85e2b686c95 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -113,7 +113,10 @@ fw_domain_reset(const struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
 	 * off in ICL+), so no waiting for acks
 	 */
 	/* WaRsClearFWBitsAtReset:bdw,skl */
-	fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
+	if (GRAPHICS_VER(d->uncore->i915) >= 12)
+		fw_clear(d, 0xefff);
+	else
+		fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
 }
 
 static inline void
-- 
2.25.1

[Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3540 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/107426/
State : success

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11995 -> Patchwork_107426v1
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **SUCCESS**

  No regressions found.

  External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/index.html

Participating hosts (33 -> 31)
------------------------------

  Missing    (2): fi-bdw-5557u bat-adls-5 

Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_107426v1 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gem:
    - fi-pnv-d510:        NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][1] ([i915#4528])
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@gem.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
    - bat-dg1-6:          NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][2] ([i915#4494] / [i915#4957])
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915:
    - bat-dg1-6:          NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][3] ([i915#6011])
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor@atomic-transitions:
    - fi-bsw-kefka:       [PASS][4] -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#6298])
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor@atomic-transitions.html
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor@atomic-transitions.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_engines:
    - bat-dg1-6:          [INCOMPLETE][6] ([i915#4418]) -> [PASS][7]
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_engines.html
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/bat-dg1-6/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_engines.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
    - fi-pnv-d510:        [DMESG-FAIL][8] ([i915#4528]) -> [PASS][9]
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html

  
  [i915#4418]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4418
  [i915#4494]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4494
  [i915#4528]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4528
  [i915#4957]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4957
  [i915#6011]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6011
  [i915#6298]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6298


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_11995 -> Patchwork_107426v1

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_11995: 3f79495b5f708c18bc5aac01a9b6d3b954d887a6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6630: b5e2222c9a988015bdf237e6ebb9f5b6d87ac7e1 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_107426v1: 3f79495b5f708c18bc5aac01a9b6d3b954d887a6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux


### Linux commits

fd180b1136d7 drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4357 bytes --]

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Matt Roper]

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> Bit12 of the Forcewake request register should not be cleared post
> gen12. Do not touch this bit while clearing during fw domain reset.
> 
> Bspec: 52542
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> index a852c471d1b3..c85e2b686c95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,10 @@ fw_domain_reset(const struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
>  	 * off in ICL+), so no waiting for acks
>  	 */
>  	/* WaRsClearFWBitsAtReset:bdw,skl */

While we're at it, let's remove the "bdw,skl" from this comment since
it's misleading and doesn't match the code.  We do still apply this
workaround on other pre-gen12 platforms than just those two.

Aside from the comment tweak,

Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>

> -	fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
> +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(d->uncore->i915) >= 12)
> +		fw_clear(d, 0xefff);
> +	else
> +		fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
>  }
>  
>  static inline void
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Gwan-gyeong Mun]

On 8/18/22 3:00 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
>> Bit12 of the Forcewake request register should not be cleared post
>> gen12. Do not touch this bit while clearing during fw domain reset.
>>
>> Bspec: 52542
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 5 ++++-
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> index a852c471d1b3..c85e2b686c95 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> @@ -113,7 +113,10 @@ fw_domain_reset(const struct intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
>>   	 * off in ICL+), so no waiting for acks
>>   	 */
>>   	/* WaRsClearFWBitsAtReset:bdw,skl */
> 
> While we're at it, let's remove the "bdw,skl" from this comment since
> it's misleading and doesn't match the code.  We do still apply this
> workaround on other pre-gen12 platforms than just those two.
> 
> Aside from the comment tweak,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> 
>> -	fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
>> +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(d->uncore->i915) >= 12)
Hi Radhakrishna Sripada,

In bspec 52542, there is an explanation that BIT12 should not be set for 
address 0xA188 corresponding to FORCEWAKE_MT/FORCEWAKE_GT_GEN9, but in 
bspec 52466, there is no explanation that BIT12 should not be set for 
address 0xA278, address of FORCEWAKE_RENDER_GEN9.

I ask if fw_domain_reset() should perform fw_clear() by comparing not 
only GRAPHICS_VER() >= 12 but also checking of FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER and 
FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT values.

Br,
G.G.
>> +		fw_clear(d, 0xefff);
>> +	else
>> +		fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
>>   }
>>   
>>   static inline void
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>
> 

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Sripada, Radhakrishna]

Hi G.G,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mun, Gwan-gyeong <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 11:14 PM
> To: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; Sripada, Radhakrishna
> <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/18/22 3:00 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> >> Bit12 of the Forcewake request register should not be cleared post
> >> gen12. Do not touch this bit while clearing during fw domain reset.
> >>
> >> Bspec: 52542
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy
> <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 5 ++++-
> >>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> >> index a852c471d1b3..c85e2b686c95 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> >> @@ -113,7 +113,10 @@ fw_domain_reset(const struct
> intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
> >>   	 * off in ICL+), so no waiting for acks
> >>   	 */
> >>   	/* WaRsClearFWBitsAtReset:bdw,skl */
> >
> > While we're at it, let's remove the "bdw,skl" from this comment since
> > it's misleading and doesn't match the code.  We do still apply this
> > workaround on other pre-gen12 platforms than just those two.
> >
> > Aside from the comment tweak,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> >
> >> -	fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
> >> +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(d->uncore->i915) >= 12)
> Hi Radhakrishna Sripada,
> 
> In bspec 52542, there is an explanation that BIT12 should not be set for
> address 0xA188 corresponding to FORCEWAKE_MT/FORCEWAKE_GT_GEN9, but
> in
> bspec 52466, there is no explanation that BIT12 should not be set for
> address 0xA278, address of FORCEWAKE_RENDER_GEN9.
> 
> I ask if fw_domain_reset() should perform fw_clear() by comparing not
> only GRAPHICS_VER() >= 12 but also checking of FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER and
> FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT values.
Based on the note in 52542, all other WA notes are overridden by the comment. So unless stated
otherwise, it should apply to this register as well.

Created a bspec issue to request for additional clarification just to be safe. Will send an additional
patch if the comment contradicts our understanding. 

Thanks,
RK
> 
> Br,
> G.G.
> >> +		fw_clear(d, 0xefff);
> >> +	else
> >> +		fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   static inline void
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Tvrtko Ursulin]

On 25/08/2022 18:49, Sripada, Radhakrishna wrote:
> Hi G.G,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mun, Gwan-gyeong <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 11:14 PM
>> To: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; Sripada, Radhakrishna
>> <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
>> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
>> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/18/22 3:00 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
>>>> Bit12 of the Forcewake request register should not be cleared post
>>>> gen12. Do not touch this bit while clearing during fw domain reset.
>>>>
>>>> Bspec: 52542
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy
>> <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 5 ++++-
>>>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>>>> index a852c471d1b3..c85e2b686c95 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
>>>> @@ -113,7 +113,10 @@ fw_domain_reset(const struct
>> intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
>>>>    	 * off in ICL+), so no waiting for acks
>>>>    	 */
>>>>    	/* WaRsClearFWBitsAtReset:bdw,skl */
>>>
>>> While we're at it, let's remove the "bdw,skl" from this comment since
>>> it's misleading and doesn't match the code.  We do still apply this
>>> workaround on other pre-gen12 platforms than just those two.
>>>
>>> Aside from the comment tweak,
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
>>>
>>>> -	fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
>>>> +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(d->uncore->i915) >= 12)
>> Hi Radhakrishna Sripada,
>>
>> In bspec 52542, there is an explanation that BIT12 should not be set for
>> address 0xA188 corresponding to FORCEWAKE_MT/FORCEWAKE_GT_GEN9, but
>> in
>> bspec 52466, there is no explanation that BIT12 should not be set for
>> address 0xA278, address of FORCEWAKE_RENDER_GEN9.
>>
>> I ask if fw_domain_reset() should perform fw_clear() by comparing not
>> only GRAPHICS_VER() >= 12 but also checking of FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER and
>> FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT values.
> Based on the note in 52542, all other WA notes are overridden by the comment. So unless stated
> otherwise, it should apply to this register as well.
> 
> Created a bspec issue to request for additional clarification just to be safe. Will send an additional
> patch if the comment contradicts our understanding.

How important was this patch - should it be sent to stable?

Regards,

Tvrtko

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Matt Roper]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:38:22PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 25/08/2022 18:49, Sripada, Radhakrishna wrote:
> > Hi G.G,
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mun, Gwan-gyeong <gwan-gyeong.mun@intel.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2022 11:14 PM
> > > To: Roper, Matthew D <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>; Sripada, Radhakrishna
> > > <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> > > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 8/18/22 3:00 PM, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 03:43:04PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> > > > > Bit12 of the Forcewake request register should not be cleared post
> > > > > gen12. Do not touch this bit while clearing during fw domain reset.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bspec: 52542
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sushma Venkatesh Reddy
> > > <sushma.venkatesh.reddy@intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >    drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 5 ++++-
> > > > >    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > > > > index a852c471d1b3..c85e2b686c95 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
> > > > > @@ -113,7 +113,10 @@ fw_domain_reset(const struct
> > > intel_uncore_forcewake_domain *d)
> > > > >    	 * off in ICL+), so no waiting for acks
> > > > >    	 */
> > > > >    	/* WaRsClearFWBitsAtReset:bdw,skl */
> > > > 
> > > > While we're at it, let's remove the "bdw,skl" from this comment since
> > > > it's misleading and doesn't match the code.  We do still apply this
> > > > workaround on other pre-gen12 platforms than just those two.
> > > > 
> > > > Aside from the comment tweak,
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
> > > > 
> > > > > -	fw_clear(d, 0xffff);
> > > > > +	if (GRAPHICS_VER(d->uncore->i915) >= 12)
> > > Hi Radhakrishna Sripada,
> > > 
> > > In bspec 52542, there is an explanation that BIT12 should not be set for
> > > address 0xA188 corresponding to FORCEWAKE_MT/FORCEWAKE_GT_GEN9, but
> > > in
> > > bspec 52466, there is no explanation that BIT12 should not be set for
> > > address 0xA278, address of FORCEWAKE_RENDER_GEN9.
> > > 
> > > I ask if fw_domain_reset() should perform fw_clear() by comparing not
> > > only GRAPHICS_VER() >= 12 but also checking of FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER and
> > > FW_DOMAIN_ID_GT values.
> > Based on the note in 52542, all other WA notes are overridden by the comment. So unless stated
> > otherwise, it should apply to this register as well.
> > 
> > Created a bspec issue to request for additional clarification just to be safe. Will send an additional
> > patch if the comment contradicts our understanding.
> 
> How important was this patch - should it be sent to stable?

It shouldn't be needed for stable; clearing the bit isn't necessary from
gen12 onward, but as far as we know it doesn't cause any problems either
(except maybe on MTL, which is still under force_probe and not supported
on stable kernels).  So according to stable-kernel-rules.rst, this patch
would not qualify.


Matt

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Tvrtko

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
VTT-OSGC Platform Enablement
Intel Corporation

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+

[Patchwork]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 15414 bytes --]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm/i915: Skip Bit12 fw domain reset for gen12+
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/107426/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11995_full -> Patchwork_107426v1_full
====================================================

Summary
-------

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_107426v1_full absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_107426v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  

Participating hosts (12 -> 11)
------------------------------

  Additional (1): shard-rkl 
  Missing    (2): pig-skl-6260u pig-glk-j5005 

Possible new issues
-------------------

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in Patchwork_107426v1_full:

### IGT changes ###

#### Possible regressions ####

  * igt@i915_pm_rps@engine-order:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][1] -> [FAIL][2]
   [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_pm_rps@engine-order.html
   [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-tglb7/igt@i915_pm_rps@engine-order.html

  
Known issues
------------

  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_107426v1_full that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

#### Issues hit ####

  * igt@gem_eio@kms:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] ([i915#5784]) +1 similar issue
   [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_eio@kms.html
   [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_eio@kms.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
    - shard-tglb:         [PASS][5] -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
   [5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
   [6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-tglb7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs1:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
   [7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs1.html
   [8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vcs1.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2842])
   [9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-apl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0.html
   [10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-apl8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@verify:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +2 similar issues
   [11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_lmem_swapping@verify.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#6559])
   [12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-untiled:
    - shard-kbl:          [PASS][13] -> [DMESG-WARN][14] ([i915#180]) +3 similar issues
   [13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-kbl4/igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-untiled.html
   [14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl7/igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-untiled.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][15] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#3886]) +3 similar issues
   [15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-a-ccs-on-another-bo-y_tiled_gen12_rc_ccs_cc.html

  * igt@kms_ccs@pipe-d-crc-primary-rotation-180-4_tiled_dg2_rc_ccs_cc:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][16] ([fdo#109271]) +78 similar issues
   [16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_ccs@pipe-d-crc-primary-rotation-180-4_tiled_dg2_rc_ccs_cc.html

  * igt@kms_chamelium@vga-edid-read:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [SKIP][17] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +4 similar issues
   [17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_chamelium@vga-edid-read.html

  * igt@kms_content_protection@lic:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][18] ([i915#1319]) +1 similar issue
   [18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_content_protection@lic.html

  * igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend@pipe-a-dp-1:
    - shard-apl:          [PASS][19] -> [DMESG-WARN][20] ([i915#180])
   [19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-apl3/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend@pipe-a-dp-1.html
   [20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-apl1/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch-suspend@pipe-a-dp-1.html

  * igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-transparent-fb:
    - shard-kbl:          NOTRUN -> [FAIL][21] ([i915#265])
   [21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-transparent-fb.html

  
#### Possible fixes ####

  * igt@gem_ctx_persistence@engines-hang@vcs0:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [FAIL][22] ([i915#4883]) -> [PASS][23] +1 similar issue
   [22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-dg1-17/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@engines-hang@vcs0.html
   [23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-dg1-17/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@engines-hang@vcs0.html

  * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0:
    - shard-kbl:          [FAIL][24] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][25] +1 similar issue
   [24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html
   [25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vecs0.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
    - {shard-dg1}:        [DMESG-FAIL][26] ([i915#4494] / [i915#4957]) -> [PASS][27]
   [26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-dg1-18/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
   [27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-dg1-16/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html

  * igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-suspend@pipe-b-dp-1:
    - shard-kbl:          [DMESG-WARN][28] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][29] +3 similar issues
   [28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-suspend@pipe-b-dp-1.html
   [29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_cursor_crc@cursor-suspend@pipe-b-dp-1.html

  * igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@a-dp1:
    - shard-kbl:          [FAIL][30] ([i915#79]) -> [PASS][31]
   [30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@a-dp1.html
   [31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@a-dp1.html

  
#### Warnings ####

  * igt@i915_suspend@forcewake:
    - shard-snb:          [INCOMPLETE][32] ([i915#4817]) -> [INCOMPLETE][33] ([i915#4817] / [i915#6598])
   [32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-snb5/igt@i915_suspend@forcewake.html
   [33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-snb4/igt@i915_suspend@forcewake.html

  * igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend:
    - shard-kbl:          [INCOMPLETE][34] ([i915#180] / [i915#4939]) -> [FAIL][35] ([i915#4767])
   [34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-kbl7/igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend.html
   [35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_fbcon_fbt@fbc-suspend.html

  * igt@runner@aborted:
    - shard-apl:          [FAIL][36] ([i915#4312] / [i915#6599]) -> ([FAIL][37], [FAIL][38]) ([i915#4312] / [i915#5257] / [i915#6599])
   [36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11995/shard-apl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-apl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
   [38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/shard-apl1/igt@runner@aborted.html

  
  {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
          the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

  [fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
  [fdo#109289]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109289
  [fdo#109291]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109291
  [fdo#109303]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109303
  [fdo#109314]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109314
  [fdo#111068]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111068
  [fdo#111615]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111615
  [fdo#111825]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111825
  [fdo#111827]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111827
  [i915#1063]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1063
  [i915#1072]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1072
  [i915#1319]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1319
  [i915#1397]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1397
  [i915#1755]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1755
  [i915#1769]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1769
  [i915#180]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/180
  [i915#1839]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1839
  [i915#1902]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1902
  [i915#2527]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2527
  [i915#2530]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2530
  [i915#265]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/265
  [i915#2672]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2672
  [i915#2705]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2705
  [i915#284]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/284
  [i915#2842]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2842
  [i915#2994]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2994
  [i915#3281]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3281
  [i915#3282]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3282
  [i915#3297]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3297
  [i915#3458]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3458
  [i915#3469]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3469
  [i915#3539]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3539
  [i915#3555]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3555
  [i915#3638]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3638
  [i915#3689]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3689
  [i915#3708]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3708
  [i915#3742]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3742
  [i915#3828]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3828
  [i915#3886]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3886
  [i915#3938]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3938
  [i915#3952]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3952
  [i915#4036]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4036
  [i915#4077]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4077
  [i915#4079]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4079
  [i915#4083]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4083
  [i915#4103]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4103
  [i915#4270]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4270
  [i915#4312]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4312
  [i915#4387]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4387
  [i915#4494]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4494
  [i915#4521]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4521
  [i915#4538]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4538
  [i915#4565]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4565
  [i915#4613]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4613
  [i915#4767]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4767
  [i915#4771]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4771
  [i915#4812]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4812
  [i915#4817]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4817
  [i915#4833]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4833
  [i915#4852]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4852
  [i915#4853]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4853
  [i915#4855]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4855
  [i915#4860]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4860
  [i915#4880]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4880
  [i915#4883]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4883
  [i915#4885]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4885
  [i915#4939]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4939
  [i915#4957]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4957
  [i915#4958]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/4958
  [i915#5176]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5176
  [i915#5235]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5235
  [i915#5257]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5257
  [i915#5286]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5286
  [i915#5287]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5287
  [i915#5325]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5325
  [i915#5439]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5439
  [i915#5563]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5563
  [i915#5784]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/5784
  [i915#6095]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6095
  [i915#6301]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6301
  [i915#6331]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6331
  [i915#6433]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6433
  [i915#6458]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6458
  [i915#6524]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6524
  [i915#6559]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6559
  [i915#658]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/658
  [i915#6590]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6590
  [i915#6598]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6598
  [i915#6599]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/6599
  [i915#79]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/79


Build changes
-------------

  * Linux: CI_DRM_11995 -> Patchwork_107426v1

  CI-20190529: 20190529
  CI_DRM_11995: 3f79495b5f708c18bc5aac01a9b6d3b954d887a6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  IGT_6630: b5e2222c9a988015bdf237e6ebb9f5b6d87ac7e1 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
  Patchwork_107426v1: 3f79495b5f708c18bc5aac01a9b6d3b954d887a6 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
  piglit_4509: fdc5a4ca11124ab8413c7988896eec4c97336694 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/piglit

== Logs ==

For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_107426v1/index.html

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 12680 bytes --]