All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexander Shiyan" <shc_work@mail.ru>
To: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Russell King" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re[2]: clps711x patchset
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:04:02 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1SLZ2o-0002iH-SH.shc_work-mail-ru@f105.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204211140.21564.arnd@arndb.de>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8, Size: 2016 bytes --]

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:40:21 +0000 от Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> On Saturday 21 April 2012, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Hello.
> > This is patchset contains some cleanups and tricks for CLPS711X ARM target.
> > Please review and apply it to kernel tree. Comments are welcome :)
...
> This looks very nice overall, it's certainly good that you can manage to add
> support for a new soc with a net removal of lines.
> 
> Note that with the current work split, it will be Olof and me who apply
> these patches in the end, not Russell, although he will probably have
> to something to say about the patches, too, since he has done almost all the
> changes to this platform in its more active times.
> 
> From my reading of the git history, very little has happened in clps711x
> since about 2005, and we've never had a subarch maintainer for it. Are you
> interested in becoming the maintainer for it, or is this more a one-time
> effort on your side? I don't expect this to be much work for you, but it
> would be nice to have some person that can review the occasional patch
> touching multiple platforms.
> 
> Do you have any plans to add more stuff to the platform, like additional
> SoCs or more board files? Do you see value in having it included in
> a single kernel image that runs on various different ARMv4/ARMv5 based
> Socs? I assume that the answer to all of these is 'no', but you plan
> to do them, we should talk about how to make that happen.

The new processors in this series as far as I know there is not and no more will be.
Existing processors are still produced and used. We use this processor is 4-5 years
old and still expect to use in the future.

I can look at the new code is correct, but check it can only work on our custom board.

Of the new things I would like to add the ability to use gpiolib with this type of processor.ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shc_work@mail.ru (Alexander Shiyan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re[2]: clps711x patchset
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 16:04:02 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1SLZ2o-0002iH-SH.shc_work-mail-ru@f105.mail.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204211140.21564.arnd@arndb.de>

Sat, 21 Apr 2012 11:40:21 +0000 ?? Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> On Saturday 21 April 2012, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Hello.
> > This is patchset contains some cleanups and tricks for CLPS711X ARM target.
> > Please review and apply it to kernel tree. Comments are welcome :)
...
> This looks very nice overall, it's certainly good that you can manage to add
> support for a new soc with a net removal of lines.
> 
> Note that with the current work split, it will be Olof and me who apply
> these patches in the end, not Russell, although he will probably have
> to something to say about the patches, too, since he has done almost all the
> changes to this platform in its more active times.
> 
> From my reading of the git history, very little has happened in clps711x
> since about 2005, and we've never had a subarch maintainer for it. Are you
> interested in becoming the maintainer for it, or is this more a one-time
> effort on your side? I don't expect this to be much work for you, but it
> would be nice to have some person that can review the occasional patch
> touching multiple platforms.
> 
> Do you have any plans to add more stuff to the platform, like additional
> SoCs or more board files? Do you see value in having it included in
> a single kernel image that runs on various different ARMv4/ARMv5 based
> Socs? I assume that the answer to all of these is 'no', but you plan
> to do them, we should talk about how to make that happen.

The new processors in this series as far as I know there is not and no more will be.
Existing processors are still produced and used. We use this processor is 4-5 years
old and still expect to use in the future.

I can look at the new code is correct, but check it can only work on our custom board.

Of the new things I would like to add the ability to use gpiolib with this type of processor.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-21 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-21  9:11 clps711x patchset Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 01/17] ARM clps711x: Cleanup: Rename ARCH_EP7211 and ARCH_EP7212 to SOC_xxx Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 02/17] ARM clps711x: Added Cirrus Logic EP7312 CPU variant Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 11:21   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 11:21     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 11:30     ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 11:30       ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 11:48     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-21 11:48       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-21 12:11       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 12:11         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 12:20         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-21 12:20           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-22 13:58           ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-22 13:58             ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-22 14:13             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-22 14:13               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-22 14:24             ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-22 14:24               ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 03/17] ARM clps711x: Selecting CPU-variant automatically for clps711x targets Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 04/17] ARM clps711x: Using a single definition for virtual address register Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 05/17] ARM clps711x: Added missing definitions for PORT C Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 06/17] ARM clps711x: Remove now unused cs89712 board header Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 07/17] ARM clps711x: Remove unused includes Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 08/17] ARM clps711x: Cleanup: remove unused definitions for ep_readl/ep_writel Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 09/17] ARM clps711x: Using a single definition for physical address register Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 10/17] ARM clps711x: Address register renaming to reflect the fact that the name is the same for all arch Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 11/17] ARM clps711x: Move definitions of register address in one unit Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 12/17] ARM clps711x: Simple optimise debug_macro by removing one NOP Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 10:46   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-21 10:46     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-21 10:50     ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 10:50       ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 11:18   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 11:18     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 11:49     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 11:49       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 13/17] ARM clps711x: Removed unused header mach/time.h Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 14/17] ARM clps711x: Do not mask interrupts in ack procedure Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 15/17] ARM clps711x: Removed unused definitions from mach/irqs.h Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 16/17] ARM clps711x: Replaced frequency settings to definition Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11 ` [PATCH 17/17] ARM clps711x: Make select CPU spees as KConfig option Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21  9:11   ` Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 11:40 ` clps711x patchset Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 11:40   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 12:04   ` Alexander Shiyan [this message]
2012-04-21 12:04     ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2012-04-21 12:14     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-21 12:14       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E1SLZ2o-0002iH-SH.shc_work-mail-ru@f105.mail.ru \
    --to=shc_work@mail.ru \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.