äÌÑÇÌÁ×ÎÏÇÏÂÕÈÇÁÌÔÅÒÁ

äÌÑÇÌÁ×ÎÏÇÏÂÕÈÇÁÌÔÅÒÁ

[au_ru]

Для главного бухгалтера.

Приказ о налоговой и учетной политике на 2002 год (в редакции от 1 февраля 2002 года), 
Постатейный комментарий к 25 главе Налогового кодекса РФ Налог на прибыль организаций (в редакции от 28 января 2002 года), 
Новый типовой устав акционерного общества.

Вы имеете возможность получить данные документы бесплатно на электронных носителях, в срок до 15 февраля 2002 года. Комментарий разработан группой методологов крупной аудиторской фирмы.

Заявку направлять E-mail: nal10ru@yahoo.com 


Форма заявки: наименование организации, почтовый адрес, фамилия имя отчество и телефон главного бухгалтера полностью, E-mail, перечень необходимых мне документов.

Заявки с вложенными (прикрепленными) файлами не рассматриваются!!!

Направление документов произойдет в срок с 10 до 15 февраля 2002 года.

(ВНИМАНИЕ: Если Вас не заинтересовало наше предложение приносим свои извинения за предоставленные неудобства.)

Re: ?????????????????????

[Brian]

Can we get something like 
	/[\200-\377]{6}/   (6 upper ACSII characters in a row)
added to the taboo list?

	-- Brian

On Tuesday 05 February 2002 06:48 pm, au_ru@yahoo.com wrote:
> Для главного бухгалтера.
>
> Приказ о налоговой и учетной политике на 2002 год (в редакции от 1
>

Re: ?????????????????????

[Alex Bligh - linux-kernel]

like

Subject: [ANNOUNCE] blah blah?



--On Wednesday, 06 February, 2002 4:21 PM -0500 Brian 
<hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:

> Can we get something like
> 	/[\200-\377]{6}/   (6 upper ACSII characters in a row)
> added to the taboo list?
>
> 	-- Brian
>
> On Tuesday 05 February 2002 06:48 pm, au_ru@yahoo.com wrote:
>> äÌÑ ÇÌÁ×ÎÏÇÏ ÂÕÈÇÁÌÔÅÒÁ.
>>
>> ðÒÉËÁÚ Ï ÎÁÌÏÇÏ×ÏÊ É ÕÞÅÔÎÏÊ ÐÏÌÉÔÉËÅ ÎÁ 2002 ÇÏÄ (× ÒÅÄÁËÃÉÉ ÏÔ 1
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>



--
Alex Bligh

Re: ?????????????????????

[Roland Dreier]

>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Bligh <- linux-kernel <linux-kernel@alex.org.uk>> writes:

    Alex> like Subject: [ANNOUNCE] blah blah?

    Brian> Can we get something like /[\200-\377]{6}/ (6 upper ACSII
    Brian> characters in a row) added to the taboo list?

Brian's pattern doesn't match upper case letters.  It matches
characters with the most significant bit set.  'A' is 0101 octal,
'N' is 0116 octal, etc. so your example would not trigger the rule.
The idea of the rule is to filter out messages posted in non-Roman
character sets.

Roland

Re: ?????????????????????

[Bruce Harada]

On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:42:17 -0500
Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:

> To my knowledge, there is no English word that would match that regex (or, 
> for that matter, any Romantic or Germanic language word).  It's the most 
> effective tool I've seen against Asian spam (like the one I replied to).


Just to set the record straight, that was RUSSIAN spam, not Asian spam...
(The regex should still be effective, of course.)

Re: ?????????????????????

[Pavel Machek]

Hi!

> like
> 
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] blah blah?

He talked about characters >128.
							Pavel

> --On Wednesday, 06 February, 2002 4:21 PM -0500 Brian 
> <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:
> 
> >Can we get something like
> >	/[\200-\377]{6}/   (6 upper ACSII characters in a row)
> >added to the taboo list?
> >
> >	-- Brian
> >
> >On Tuesday 05 February 2002 06:48 pm, au_ru@yahoo.com wrote:
> >>ä?? Ç?Á×Î?Ç? Â??ÇÁ?Ô??Á.
> >>
> >>??ÉËÁÚ ? ÎÁ??Ç?×?? É ???ÔÎ?? ???ÉÔÉË? ÎÁ 2002 Ç?Ä (× ??ÄÁË?ÉÉ ?Ô 1

-- 
(about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly.  However, I really think that the U.S.
no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa

Re: ?????????????????????

[Brian]

On Wednesday 06 February 2002 05:31 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote:
> like
>
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] blah blah?
>

That would be upperCASE ACSII.
I mean 6 bytes, each higher than 127, in a row.

To my knowledge, there is no English word that would match that regex (or, 
for that matter, any Romantic or Germanic language word).  It's the most 
effective tool I've seen against Asian spam (like the one I replied to).

> --On Wednesday, 06 February, 2002 4:21 PM -0500 Brian
>
> <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:
> > Can we get something like
> > 	/[\200-\377]{6}/   (6 upper ACSII characters in a row)
> > added to the taboo list?
> >
> > 	-- Brian
>

Re: ?????????????????????

[David S. Miller]

   From: Bruce Harada <bruce@ask.ne.jp>
   Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:12:43 +0900

   On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:42:17 -0500
   Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:
   
   > To my knowledge, there is no English word that would match that regex (or, 
   > for that matter, any Romantic or Germanic language word).  It's the most 
   > effective tool I've seen against Asian spam (like the one I replied to).
   
   Just to set the record straight, that was RUSSIAN spam, not Asian spam...
   (The regex should still be effective, of course.)

Except that it would block out uuencoded patches in postings perhaps?
Or is it just supposed to be matched in the Subject field or other
parts of the headers?

Re: ?????????????????????

[Jesse Pollard]

---------  Received message begins Here  ---------

> 
>    From: Bruce Harada <bruce@ask.ne.jp>
>    Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:12:43 +0900
> 
>    On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:42:17 -0500
>    Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:
>    
>    > To my knowledge, there is no English word that would match that regex (or, 
>    > for that matter, any Romantic or Germanic language word).  It's the most 
>    > effective tool I've seen against Asian spam (like the one I replied to).
>    
>    Just to set the record straight, that was RUSSIAN spam, not Asian spam...
>    (The regex should still be effective, of course.)
> 
> Except that it would block out uuencoded patches in postings perhaps?
> Or is it just supposed to be matched in the Subject field or other
> parts of the headers?

I thought uuencode format required 7bit print ascii output, which would
never match that pattern.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jesse I Pollard, II
Email: pollard@navo.hpc.mil

Any opinions expressed are solely my own.

Re: ?????????????????????

[Horst von Brand]

"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> said:

[...]

> Except that it would block out uuencoded patches in postings perhaps?

Since when does uuencoding generate high chars? It is supposed to give only
"safe" chars (i.e., in ASCII and EBCDIC).
-- 
Horst von Brand			     http://counter.li.org # 22616

Re: ?????????????????????

[Pete Cervasio]

At 03:44 AM 2/7/2002 -0800, David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com> wrote:
>   From: Bruce Harada <bruce@ask.ne.jp>
>   Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:12:43 +0900
>
>   On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 18:42:17 -0500
>   Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote:
>   
>   > To my knowledge, there is no English word that would match that regex
(or, 
>   > for that matter, any Romantic or Germanic language word).  It's the
most 
>   > effective tool I've seen against Asian spam (like the one I replied to).
>   
>   Just to set the record straight, that was RUSSIAN spam, not Asian spam...
>   (The regex should still be effective, of course.)
>
>Except that it would block out uuencoded patches in postings perhaps?
>Or is it just supposed to be matched in the Subject field or other
>parts of the headers?

Um... no, it's just supposed to look at several characters in a row that
have the high bit set.  Have another cup of coffee and think about what
happens to attachments after they're uuencoded.  :)

Best regards,
Pete C.


=====================================================================
         $5                          $75
"this is your brain... this is your brain on ebay."
                                     (Pat McNeil on comp.sys.tandy)

Re: ?????????????????????

[Martin Dalecki]

Brian wrote:

>On Wednesday 06 February 2002 05:31 pm, Alex Bligh - linux-kernel wrote:
>
>>like
>>
>>Subject: [ANNOUNCE] blah blah?
>>
>
>That would be upperCASE ACSII.
>I mean 6 bytes, each higher than 127, in a row.
>
>To my knowledge, there is no English word that would match that regex (or, 
>for that matter, any Romantic or Germanic language word).  It's the most 
>effective tool I've seen against Asian spam (like the one I replied to).
>
Just for the record... the spam you replayed to was in russian.

Re: ?????????????????????

[Oliver M . Bolzer]

On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 04:21:50PM -0500, Brian <hiryuu@envisiongames.net> wrote...
> Can we get something like 
> 	/[\200-\377]{6}/   (6 upper ACSII characters in a row)
> added to the taboo list?

If you mean to match a header like Subject: , don't forget to
decode them first. Usually, headers containing these are MIME-encoded.

-- 
	Oliver M. Bolzer
	oliver@gol.com

GPG (PGP) Fingerprint = 621B 52F6 2AC1 36DB 8761  018F 8786 87AD EF50 D1FF