All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, LKP <lkp@01.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@inria.fr>,
	Jade Alglave <j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: rcu_read_lock lost its compiler barrier
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 10:19:43 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1906061017200.1641-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190606081657.GA4249@andrea>

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019, Andrea Parri wrote:

> This seems a sensible change to me: looking forward to seeing a patch,
> on top of -rcu/dev, for further review and testing!
> 
> We could also add (to LKMM) the barrier() for rcu_read_{lock,unlock}()
> discussed in this thread (maybe once the RCU code and the informal doc
> will have settled in such direction).

Yes.  Also for SRCU.  That point had not escaped me.

Alan


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: rcu_read_lock lost its compiler barrier
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2019 10:19:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1906061017200.1641-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190606081657.GA4249@andrea>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 431 bytes --]

On Thu, 6 Jun 2019, Andrea Parri wrote:

> This seems a sensible change to me: looking forward to seeing a patch,
> on top of -rcu/dev, for further review and testing!
> 
> We could also add (to LKMM) the barrier() for rcu_read_{lock,unlock}()
> discussed in this thread (maybe once the RCU code and the informal doc
> will have settled in such direction).

Yes.  Also for SRCU.  That point had not escaped me.

Alan


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-06 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-10  0:57 [rcu] kernel BUG at include/linux/pagemap.h:149! Fengguang Wu
2015-09-10  0:57 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-09-10 10:25 ` Boqun Feng
2015-09-10 17:16   ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-10 17:16     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-11  2:19     ` Boqun Feng
     [not found]       ` <CAJzB8QG=1iZW3dQEie6ZSTLv8GZ3YSut0aL1VU7LLmiHQ1B1DQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-09-11 21:59         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-11 21:59           ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-12  5:46           ` Boqun Feng
2015-09-21 19:30       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-21 19:30         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-21 20:43         ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-09-21 20:43           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-02  5:56           ` rcu_read_lock lost its compiler barrier Herbert Xu
2019-06-02  5:56             ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-02 20:54             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-02 20:54               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03  2:46               ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  2:46                 ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  3:47                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03  4:01                   ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  4:01                     ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  4:17                     ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  4:17                       ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  7:23                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03  8:42                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03 15:26                         ` David Laight
2019-06-03 15:40                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03 15:40                             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03  5:26                   ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  5:26                     ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  6:42                     ` Boqun Feng
2019-06-03  6:42                       ` Boqun Feng
2019-06-03 20:03                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-04 14:44                         ` Alan Stern
2019-06-04 14:44                           ` Alan Stern
2019-06-04 16:04                           ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-04 16:04                             ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-04 17:00                             ` Alan Stern
2019-06-04 17:00                               ` Alan Stern
2019-06-04 17:29                               ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-04 17:29                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-07 14:09                             ` inet: frags: Turn fqdir->dead into an int for old Alphas Herbert Xu
2019-06-07 14:09                               ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-07 15:26                               ` Eric Dumazet
2019-06-07 15:26                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-06-07 15:32                                 ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-07 15:32                                   ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-07 16:13                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-06-07 16:13                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2019-06-07 16:19                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-07 16:19                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-08 15:27                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-08 17:42                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-08 17:42                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-08 17:50                                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-08 17:50                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-08 18:50                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-08 18:14                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  4:51                           ` rcu_read_lock lost its compiler barrier Herbert Xu
2019-06-06  4:51                             ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06  6:05                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  6:14                               ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06  6:14                                 ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06  9:06                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  9:28                                   ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06  9:28                                     ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06 10:58                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06 13:38                                       ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06 13:38                                         ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06 13:48                                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  8:16                           ` Andrea Parri
2019-06-06 14:19                             ` Alan Stern [this message]
2019-06-06 14:19                               ` Alan Stern
2019-06-08 15:19                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-08 15:56                                 ` Alan Stern
2019-06-08 15:56                                   ` Alan Stern
2019-06-08 16:31                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03  9:35                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  8:38                 ` Andrea Parri
2019-06-06  9:32                   ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06  9:32                     ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  0:06             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03  3:03               ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  3:03                 ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-03  9:27                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03 15:55                 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03 15:55                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03 16:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03 16:07                     ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03 19:53                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-03 20:24                       ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-03 20:24                         ` Linus Torvalds
2019-06-04 21:14                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-05  2:21                           ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-05  2:21                             ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-05  3:30                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-06-06  4:37                               ` Herbert Xu
2019-06-06  4:37                                 ` Herbert Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1906061017200.1641-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.