From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] lazytime fix and cleanups
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:49:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/9AxL5Mrt+CiKHx@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113162957.GA26686@quack2.suse.cz>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:29:58PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue 12-01-21 11:02:42, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Patch 1 fixes a bug in how __writeback_single_inode() handles lazytime
> > expirations. I originally reported this last year
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306004555.GB225345@gmail.com) because it
> > causes the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl to not work properly, as
> > the bug causes inodes to remain dirty after a sync.
> >
> > It also turns out that lazytime on XFS is partially broken because it
> > doesn't actually write timestamps to disk after a sync() or after
> > dirtytime_expire_interval. This is fixed by the same fix.
> >
> > This supersedes previously proposed fixes, including
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200307020043.60118-1-tytso@mit.edu and
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200325122825.1086872-3-hch@lst.de from last
> > year (which had some issues and didn't fix the XFS bug), and v1 of this
> > patchset which took a different approach
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105005452.92521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org).
> >
> > Patches 2-11 then clean up various things related to lazytime and
> > writeback, such as clarifying the semantics of ->dirty_inode() and the
> > inode dirty flags, and improving comments.
> >
> > This patchset applies to v5.11-rc2.
>
> Thanks for the patches. I've picked the patches to my tree. I plan to push
> patch 1/11 to Linus later this week, the rest of the cleanups will go to
> him during the next merge window.
>
> Honza
Sounds good, thanks!
- Eric
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3 00/11] lazytime fix and cleanups
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:49:40 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <X/9AxL5Mrt+CiKHx@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113162957.GA26686@quack2.suse.cz>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 05:29:58PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Tue 12-01-21 11:02:42, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > Patch 1 fixes a bug in how __writeback_single_inode() handles lazytime
> > expirations. I originally reported this last year
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306004555.GB225345@gmail.com) because it
> > causes the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY ioctl to not work properly, as
> > the bug causes inodes to remain dirty after a sync.
> >
> > It also turns out that lazytime on XFS is partially broken because it
> > doesn't actually write timestamps to disk after a sync() or after
> > dirtytime_expire_interval. This is fixed by the same fix.
> >
> > This supersedes previously proposed fixes, including
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200307020043.60118-1-tytso@mit.edu and
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200325122825.1086872-3-hch@lst.de from last
> > year (which had some issues and didn't fix the XFS bug), and v1 of this
> > patchset which took a different approach
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105005452.92521-1-ebiggers@kernel.org).
> >
> > Patches 2-11 then clean up various things related to lazytime and
> > writeback, such as clarifying the semantics of ->dirty_inode() and the
> > inode dirty flags, and improving comments.
> >
> > This patchset applies to v5.11-rc2.
>
> Thanks for the patches. I've picked the patches to my tree. I plan to push
> patch 1/11 to Linus later this week, the rest of the cleanups will go to
> him during the next merge window.
>
> Honza
Sounds good, thanks!
- Eric
_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 19:02 [PATCH v3 00/11] lazytime fix and cleanups Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] fs: fix lazytime expiration handling in __writeback_single_inode() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] fs: correctly document the inode dirty flags Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] fs: only specify I_DIRTY_TIME when needed in generic_update_time() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] fat: only specify I_DIRTY_TIME when needed in fat_update_time() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] fs: don't call ->dirty_inode for lazytime timestamp updates Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] fs: pass only I_DIRTY_INODE flags to ->dirty_inode Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] fs: clean up __mark_inode_dirty() a bit Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] fs: drop redundant check from __writeback_single_inode() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] fs: improve comments for writeback_single_inode() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] gfs2: don't worry about I_DIRTY_TIME in gfs2_fsync() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] ext4: simplify i_state checks in __ext4_update_other_inode_time() Eric Biggers
2021-01-12 19:02 ` [f2fs-dev] " Eric Biggers
2021-01-13 7:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-13 7:07 ` [f2fs-dev] " Christoph Hellwig
2021-01-13 16:29 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] lazytime fix and cleanups Jan Kara
2021-01-13 16:29 ` [f2fs-dev] " Jan Kara
2021-01-13 18:49 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2021-01-13 18:49 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=X/9AxL5Mrt+CiKHx@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.